Understanding green regional path development: a systematic study of the Nordic regions

REFERENCES

• Angelucci, S., Hurtado-Albir, F. J., & Volpe, A. (2018). Supporting global initiatives on climate change: The EPO’s “Y02-Y04S” tagging scheme. World Patent Information, 54, S85–S92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2017.04.006
   Google Scholar
• Balassa, B. (1965). Trade liberalisation and “revealed” comparative advantage. The Manchester School, 33(2), 99–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.1965.tb00050.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbieri, N., Marzucchi, A., & Rizzo, U. (2023). Green technologies, interdependencies, and policy. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 118, 102791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2023.102791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbieri, N., Perruchas, F., & Consoli, D. (2020). Specialization, diversification, and environmental technology life cycle. Economic Geography, 96(2), 161–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2020.1721279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartinger-Seiringer, S., Fuenfschilling, L., Miörner, J., & Trippl, M. (2022). Reconsidering regional structural conditions for industrial renewal. Regional Studies, 56(4), 579–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1984419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer, A., Barnes, T., & Horne, S. (2023). Place-based industrial strategy and economic trajectory: Advancing agency-based approaches. Regional Studies, 57(6), 984–997. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1947485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellandi, M., Plechero, M., & Santini, E. (2021). Forms of place leadership in local productive systems: From endogenous rerouting to deliberate resistance to change. Regional Studies, 55(7), 1327–1336. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1896696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. (2017). Relatedness as driver of regional diversification: A research agenda. Regional Studies, 51(3), 351–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1254767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., Balland, P. A., & Kogler, D. F. (2015). Relatedness and technological change in cities: The rise and fall of technological knowledge in US metropolitan areas from 1981 to 2010. Industrial and Corporate Change, 24(1), 223–250. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtu012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., Coenen, L., Frenken, K., & Truffer, B. (2017). Towards a theory of regional diversification: Combining insights from evolutionary economic geography and transition studies. Regional Studies, 51(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1258460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., & Malerba, F. (2003). Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification. Research Policy, 32(1), 69–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00004-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breschi, S., Malerba, F., & Orsenigo, L. (2000). Technological regimes and Schumpeterian patterns of innovation. The Economic Journal, 110(463), 388–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cainelli, G., De Marchi, V., & Grandinetti, R. (2015). Does the development of environmental innovation require different resources? Evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 94, 211–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castellani, D., Marin, G., Montresor, S., & Zanfei, A. (2022). Greenfield foreign direct investments and regional environmental technologies. Research Policy, 51(1), 104405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cecere, G., Corrocher, N., Gossart, C., & Ozman, M. (2014). Lock-in and path dependence: An evolutionary approach to eco-innovations. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 24(5), 1037–1065. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-014-0381-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, J. L., & Hain, D. S. (2017). Knowing where to go: The knowledge foundation for investments in renewable energy. Energy Research & Social Science, 25, 124–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.12.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, J. L., Hain, D. S., & Nogueira, L. A. (2019). Joining forces: Collaboration patterns and performance of renewable energy innovators. Small Business Economics, 52(4), 793–814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9932-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombelli, A., & Quatraro, F. (2019). Green start-ups and local knowledge spillovers from clean and dirty technologies. Small Business Economics, 52(4), 773–792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9934-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corradini, C. (2019). Location determinants of green technological entry: Evidence from European regions. Small Business Economics, 52(4), 845–858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9938-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Rassenfosse, G., Dernis, H., Guellec, D., Picci, L., & De La Potterie, B. V. P. (2013). The worldwide count of priority patents: A new indicator of inventive activity. Research Policy, 42(3), 720–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Rassenfosse, G., Kozak, J., & Seliger, F. (2019). Geocoding of worldwide patent data. Scientific Data, 6(1), 260. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0264-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. Research Policy, 11(3), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elekes, Z., Boschma, R., & Lengyel, B. (2019). Foreign-owned firms as agents of structural change in regions. Regional Studies, 53(11), 1603–1613. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1596254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EPO. (2020). ‘EEE-PPAT: ECOOM-EUROSTAT-EPO PATSTAT Person Augmented Table’.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. P., Kogler, D. F., & Rigby, D. L. (2015). rKnowledge: The spatial diffusion and adoption of rDNA methods. Regional Studies, 49(5), 798–817. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.980799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenken, K., & Boschma, R. (2007). A theoretical framework for evolutionary economic geography: Industrial dynamics and urban growth as a branching process. Journal of Economic Geography, 7(5), 635–649. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbm018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giudici, G., Guerini, M., & Rossi-Lamastra, C. (2019). The creation of cleantech startups at the local level: The role of knowledge availability and environmental awareness. Small Business Economics, 52(4), 815–830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9936-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldschlag, N., Lybbert, T. J., & Zolas, N. J. (2020). Tracking the technological composition of industries with algorithmic patent concordances. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 29(6), 582-602.
   Google Scholar
• Griliches, Z. (1998). Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. In Z. Griliches (Ed.), R&D and productivity: The econometric evidence (pp. 287–343). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., Asheim, B., & Trippl, M. (2018). Unrelated knowledge combinations: The unexplored potential for regional industrial path development. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(2), 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsy012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., & Hansen, T. (2019). Green industry development in different types of regions. European Planning Studies, 27(11), 2163–2183. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1648385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., & Sotarauta, M. (2020). Trinity of change agency, regional development paths and opportunity spaces. Progress in Human Geography, 44(4), 704–723. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519853870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassink, R., Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2019). Towards a comprehensive understanding of new regional industrial path development. Regional Studies, 53(11), 1636–1645. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1566704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedstrom, P., & Swedberg, R. (1998). Social mechanisms: An introductory essay. In P. Hedstrom, & R. Swedberg (Eds.), Social mechanisms: An analytical approach to social theory (pp. 1–30). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hidalgo, C. A., Klinger, B., Barabási, A. L., & Hausmann, R. (2007). The product space conditions the development of nations. Science, 317(5837), 482–487. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1144581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horbach, J. (2008). Determinants of environmental innovation—new evidence from German panel data sources. Research Policy, 37(1), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., Jakobsen, S. E., Njøs, R., & Normann, R. (2019). Regional industrial restructuring resulting from individual and system agency. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 32(1), 48–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2018.1496322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2014). Regional industrial path development in different regional innovation systems: A conceptual analysis, Papers in Innovation Studies from Lund University, CIRCLE.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2016). Path development in different regional innovation systems: A conceptual analysis. In M. Davide Parrilli, & A. R.-P. Rune Dahl Fitjar (Eds.), Innovation drivers and regional innovation strategies (pp. 66–84). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, S. E., Uyarra, E., Njøs, R., & Fløysand, A. (2021). Policy action for green restructuring in specialized industrial regions. European Urban and Regional Studies 29(3), 312–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/09697764211049116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolly, S., & Hansen, T. (2022). Industry legitimacy: Bright and dark phases in regional industry path development. Regional Studies, 56(4), 630–643. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1861236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klepper, S. (2010). The origin and growth of industry clusters: The making of Silicon Valley and Detroit. Journal of Urban Economics, 67(1), 15–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2009.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, K. (2015). Revealed comparative advantage and the alternatives as measures of international specialization. Eurasian Business Review, 5(1), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-015-0017-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leoncini, R., Marzucchi, A., Montresor, S., Rentocchini, F., & Rizzo, U. (2019). Better late than never: The interplay between green technology and age for firm growth. Small Business Economics, 52(4), 891–904. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9939-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lybbert, T. J., & Zolas, N. J. (2014). Getting patents and economic data to speak to each other: An ‘algorithmic links with probabilities’ approach for joint analyses of patenting and economic activity. Research Policy, 43(3), 530–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montresor, S., & Quatraro, F. (2020). Green technologies and smart specialisation strategies: A European patent-based analysis of the intertwining of technological relatedness and key enabling technologies. Regional Studies, 54(10), 1354–1365. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1648784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neffke, F., Hartog, M., Boschma, R., & Henning, M. (2018). Agents of structural change: The role of firms and entrepreneurs in regional diversification. Economic Geography, 94(1), 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2017.1391691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2020a). OECD HAN database.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2020b). OECD REGPAT database.
   Google Scholar
• Oltra, V., & Saint Jean, M. (2009). Sectoral systems of environmental innovation: An application to the French automotive industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(4), 567–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2008.03.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, Y., Yoon, B., & Lee, S. (2005). The idiosyncrasy and dynamism of technological innovation across industries: Patent citation analysis. Technology in Society, 27(4), 471–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.08.003
   Google Scholar
• Perruchas, F., Consoli, D., & Barbieri, N. (2020). Specialisation, diversification and the ladder of green technology development. Research Policy, 49(3), 103922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.103922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petralia, S., Balland, P. A., & Morrison, A. (2017). Climbing the ladder of technological development. Research Policy, 46(5), 956–969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Protogerou, A., Caloghirou, Y., & Vonortas, N. S. (2017). Determinants of young firms’ innovative performance: Empirical evidence from Europe. Research Policy, 46(7), 1312–1326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santoalha, A., & Boschma, R. (2020). Diversifying in green technologies in European regions: Does political support matter? Regional Studies, 55(2), 82–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santoalha, A., Consoli, D., & Castellacci, F. (2021). Digital skills, relatedness and green diversification: A study of European regions. Research Policy, 50(9), 104340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smulders, S., Toman, M., & Withagen, C. (2014). Growth theory and “green growth”’. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 30(3), 423–446. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/gru027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M., Suvinen, N., Jolly, S., & Hansen, T. (2021). The many roles of change agency in the game of green path development in the north. European Urban and Regional Studies, 28(2), 92–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776420944995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squicciarini, M., Dernis, H., & Criscuolo, C. (2013). Measuring patent quality: Indicators of technological and economic value, OECD science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, No. 2013/03, OECD Publishing, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Steen, M., & Hansen, G. H. (2014). Same sea, different ponds: Cross-sectorial knowledge spillovers in the north sea. European Planning Studies, 22(10), 2030–2049. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.814622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner, A. N. (2014). Regional branching reconsidered: Emergence of the fuel cell industry in European regions. Economic Geography, 90(4), 403–427. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecge.12055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner, A. N. (2016). The emergence of new technology-based industries: The case of fuel cells and its technological relatedness to regional knowledge bases. Journal of Economic Geography, 16(3), 611–635. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbv011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., Höglinger, C., Sinozic, T., & Auer, A. (2014). Factors for the emergence and growth of environmental technology industries in upper Austria. Mitteilungen der Österreichischen Geographischen Gesellschaft, 156, 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all? Research Policy, 34(8), 1203–1219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trajtenberg, M. (1990). A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of innovations. The Rand Journal of Economics, 21 (1), 172–187. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trippl, M., Baumgartinger-Seiringer, S., Frangenheim, A., Isaksen, A., & Rypestøl, J. O. (2020). Unravelling green regional industrial path development: Regional preconditions, asset modification and agency. Geoforum, 111, 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.02.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Berge, M., Weterings, A., & Alkemade, F. (2020). Do existing regional specialisations stimulate or hinder diversification into cleantech? Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 35, 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veefkind, V., Hurtado-Albir, J., Angelucci, S., Karachalios, K., & Thumm, N. (2012). A new EPO classification scheme for climate change mitigation technologies. World Patent Information, 34(2), 106–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2011.12.004
   Google Scholar