Missions, conditions and the policy transfer of Smart Specialisation in the European Union

REFERENCES

• Aiginger, K., & Rodrik, D. (2020). Rebirth of industrial policy and an agenda for the twenty-first century. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 20(2), 189–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-019-00322-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aiginger, K., & Sieber, S. (2006). The matrix approach to industrial policy. International Review of Applied Economics, 20(5), 573–601. https://doi.org/10.1080/02692170601005507
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, K. (2016). The open method of coordination – Obstinate or obsolete? (University of Cambridge, Faculty of Law Research Papers No. 45/2016). University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Babb, S. (2013). The Washington consensus as transnational policy paradigm: Its origins, trajectory and likely successor. Review of International Political Economy, 20(2), 268–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2011.640435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babb, S., & Carruthers, B. G. (2008). Conditionality: Forms, function, and history. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 4(1), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.4.110707.172254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachtler, J., & Mendez, C. (2020). Cohesion and the EU budget: Is conditionality undermining solidarity? In Governance and politics in the post-crisis European Union (pp. 121–139). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bachtler, J., Mendez, C., & Oraže, H. (2014). From conditionality to Europeanization in Central and Eastern Europe: Administrative performance and capacity in cohesion policy. European Planning Studies, 22(4), 735–757. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.772744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balland, P.-A., Boschma, R., Crespo, J., & Rigby, D. L. (2019). Smart specialization policy in the European Union: Relatedness, knowledge complexity and regional diversification. Regional Studies, 53(9), 1252–1268. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1437900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barca, F., McCann, P., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2012). The case for regional development intervention: Place-based versus place-neutral approaches. Journal of Regional Science, 52(1), 134–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathelt, H., & Glückler, J. (2014). Institutional change in economic geography. Progress in Human Geography, 38(3), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132513507823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazbauers, A. R. (2018). Policy movement and technical assistance. In A. R. Bazbauers (Ed.), The World Bank and transferring development: Policy movement through technical assistance (pp. 29–56). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58160-6_2
   Google Scholar
• Becker, P. (2019). The reform of European cohesion policy or how to couple the streams successfully. Journal of European Integration, 41(2), 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2018.1553964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benner, M. (2019). Smart specialization and institutional context: The role of institutional discovery, change and leapfrogging. European Planning Studies, 27(9), 1791–1810. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1643826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benner, M. (2020). Six additional questions about smart specialization: Implications for regional innovation policy 4.0. European Planning Studies, 28(8), 1667–1684. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1764506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benner, M. (2022). An institutionalist perspective on smart specialization: Towards a political economy of regional innovation policy. Science and Public Policy, 49(6), 878–889. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scac035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson, D. (2009). Review article: Constraints on policy transfer (CSERGE Working Paper No. EDM 09-13). University of East Anglia, The Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE). http://hdl.handle.net/10419/48824
   Google Scholar
• Benson, D., & Jordan, A. (2011). What have we learned from policy transfer research? Dolowitz and Marsh revisited. Political Studies Review, 9(3), 366–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9302.2011.00240.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bini Smaghi, L. (2015). Governance and conditionality: Toward a sustainable framework? Journal of European Integration, 37(7), 755–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2015.1079372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrás, S., & Edler, J. (2020). The roles of the state in the governance of socio-technical systems’ transformation. Research Policy, 49(5), 103971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.103971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., & Capone, G. (2015). Institutions and diversification: Related versus unrelated diversification in a varieties of capitalism framework. Research Policy, 44(10), 1902–1914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2006). Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(3), 273–302. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbi022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., & Gianelle, C. (2013). Regional branching and smart specialization policy. JRC 06/2104.
   Google Scholar
• Bours, S. A. M. J. V., Wanzenböck, I., & Frenken, K. (2022). Small wins for grand challenges. A bottom-up governance approach to regional innovation policy. European Planning Studies, 30, 2245–2272. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.1980502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradford, A. (2020). The Brussels effect. How the European Union rules the world. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R., Mawson, S., & Rocha, A. (2023). Places are not like people: The perils of anthropomorphism within entrepreneurial ecosystems research. Regional Studies, 57(2), 384–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2022.2135698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulmer, S., Dolowitz, D., Humphreys, P., & Padgett, S. (2007). Policy transfer in European Union governance. Regulating the utilities. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Bulmer, S., & Padgett, S. (2005). Policy transfer in the European Union: An institutionalist perspective. British Journal of Political Science, 35(1), 103–126. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123405000050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charles, D., Gross, F., & Bachtler, J. (2012). ‘Smart specialisation’ and cohesion policy – A strategy for all regions? (IQ-Net Thematic Paper No. 30(2), 1–5). 32nd IQ-Net Conference (Phase V).
   Google Scholar
• Chien, S.-S. (2008). The isomorphism of local development policy: A case study of the formation and transformation of national development zones in post-Mao Jiangsu, China. Urban Studies, 45(2), 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098007085963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen, L., & Morgan, K. (2020). Evolving geographies of innovation: Existing paradigms, critiques and possible alternatives. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift - Norwegian Journal of Geography, 74(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2019.1692065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Felice, D. (2015). Diverging visions on political conditionality: The role of domestic politics and international socialization in French and British aid. Political Conditionality and EU Foreign Aid, 75, 26–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.01.010
   Google Scholar
• Deegan, J., Broekel, T., & Fitjar, R. D. (2021). Searching through the Haystack: The relatedness and complexity of priorities in smart specialization strategies. Economic Geography, 97, 497–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2021.1967739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Cataldo, M., Monastiriotis, V., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2022). How ‘smart’ Are smart specialization strategies? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 60(5), 1272–1298. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diercks, G., Larsen, H., & Steward, F. (2019). Transformative innovation policy: Addressing variety in an emerging policy paradigm. New Frontiers in Science, Technology and Innovation Research from SPRU’s 50th Anniversary Conference, 48(4), 880–894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.028
   Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, A. G. (2002). The effectiveness of policy conditionality: Eight country experiences. Development and Change, 33(2), 307–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (1996). Who learns what from whom: A review of the policy transfer literature. Political Studies, 44(2), 343–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00334.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (2000). Learning from abroad: The role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making. Governance, 13(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/0952-1895.00121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (2012). The future of policy transfer research. Political Studies Review, 10(3), 339–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9302.2012.00274.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dussauge-Laguna, M. I. (2012). On the past and future of policy transfer research: Benson and Jordan revisited. Political Studies Review, 10(3), 313–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9302.2012.00275.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esparza-Masana, R. (2022). Towards smart specialisation 2.0. Main challenges when updating strategies. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(1), 635–655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00766-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estensoro, M., & Larrea, M. (2023). Facilitation of entrepreneurial discovery processes by policymakers: An actionable definition of roles and challenges. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 14(2), 1321–1342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-00906-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2013). Regulation 1301/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32013R1301
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2021). Regulation 2021/1060 of the European Parliament and of the Council. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32021R1060
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Hollanders, H., & Es-Sadki, N. (2023). Regional innovation scoreboard 2023. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.277770412
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, & Mazzucato, M. (2018). Mission-oriented research & innovation in the European Union: A problem-solving approach to fuel innovation-led growth. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2777/360325
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Kelchtermans, S., Kardas, M., Pontikakis, D., González Vázquez, I., Bianchi, G., Ranga, M., Marques Santos, A., Reimeris, R., Mifsud, S., Morgan, K., Madrid, C., & Stierna, J. (2022). Partnerships for regional innovation: Playbook. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/775610
   Google Scholar
• Evans, M. (2006). At the interface between theory and practice – Policy transfer and lesson-drawing. Public Administration, 84(2), 479–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00013.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, M. (2009). Policy transfer in critical perspective. Policy Studies, 30(3), 243–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442870902863828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagerberg, J. (2018). Mobilizing innovation for sustainability transitions: A comment on transformative innovation policy. Research Policy, 47(9), 1568–1576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, J. (2015). ‘Does it work?’ – Work for whom? Britain and political conditionality since the cold war. World Development, 75, 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fligstein, N. (1997). Social skill and institutional theory. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(4), 397–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764297040004003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foray, D. (2014). From smart specialisation to smart specialisation policy. European Journal of Innovation Management, 17(4), 492–507. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-09-2014-0096
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D. (2018). Smart specialization strategies as a case of mission-oriented policy – A case study on the emergence of new policy practices. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(5), 817–832. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foray, D., David, P. A., & Hall, B. (2009). Smart specialisation – The concept. Knowledge Economists Policy Brief, 9(85), 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D., David, P. A., & Hall, B. (2011). Smart specialisation – From academic idea to political instrument, the surprising career of a concept and the difficulties involved in its implementation (MTEI Working Paper No. 2011–001). EPFL. https://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/170252
   Google Scholar
• Foray, D., Mowery, D. C., & Nelson, R. R. (2012). Public R&D and social challenges: What lessons from mission R&D programs? The Need for a New Generation of Policy Instruments to Respond to the Grand Challenges, 41(10), 1697–1702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.07.011
   Google Scholar
• Foreman-Peck, J. (2006). Industrial policy in Europe in the 20th century. EIB Papers, 11(1), 36–62.
   Google Scholar
• Gertler, M. S. (2010). Rules of the game: The place of institutions in regional economic change. Regional Studies, 44(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400903389979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gianelle, C., Guzzo, F., & Mieszkowski, K. (2020). Smart specialisation: What gets lost in translation from concept to practice? Regional Studies, 54(10), 1377–1388. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1607970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gianelle, C., Kyriakou, D., McCann, P., & Morgan, K. (2020). Smart specialisation on the move: Reflections on six years of implementation and prospects for the future. Regional Studies, 54(10), 1323–1327. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1817364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabbe, H. (2002). European Union conditionality and the acquis communautaire. International Political Science Review, 23(3), 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512102023003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, E. B. (1980). Why collaborate? Issue-linkage and international regimes. World Politics, 32(3), 357–405. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, P. M. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300001442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassink, R., & Gong, H. (2019). Six critical questions about smart specialization. European Planning Studies, 27, 2049–2065. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1650898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haupt, W. (2023). Policy diffusion, policy transfer, and policy mobilities revisited: A call for more interdisciplinary approaches in human geography. Geography Compass, 17(5), e12688. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy, A. (2016). Smart specialization in a centralized state: Strengthening the regional contribution in North East Romania. European Planning Studies, 24(8), 1527–1543. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1184233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hekkert, M. P., Janssen, M. J., Wesseling, J. H., & Negro, S. O. (2020). Mission-oriented innovation systems. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 34(November 2019), 76–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.11.011
   Google Scholar
• Hollanders, H., & Wintjes, R. (2003). Innovation pathways and policy challenges at the regional level: Smart specialisation (UNU-MERIT Working Papers No. 27). https://doi.org/10.20955/r.85.67
   Google Scholar
• Holzinger, K., & Knill, C. (2005). Causes and conditions of cross-national policy convergence. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(5), 775–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760500161357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hospers, G.-J. (2006). Silicon somewhere? Policy Studies, 27(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442870500499934
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. (2009). Governance modes, policy regimes and operational plans: A multi-level nested model of policy instrument choice and policy design. Policy Sciences, 42(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-009-9079-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, B. (2015). Institutional preconditions for policy success. Tulane Law Review, 89(3), 669–718.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, J., Sasse, G., & Gordon, C. (2004). Conditionality and compliance in the EU’s eastward enlargement: Regional policy and the reform of sub-national government. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 42(3), 523–551. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9886.2004.00517.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, O., & Lodge, M. (2003). The limitations of ‘policy transfer’ and ‘lesson drawing’ for public policy research. Political Studies Review, 1(2), 179–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/1478-9299.t01-1-00003
   Google Scholar
• Jokelainen, K., & Novo Guerrero, A. (2023). Implementation of the smart specialisation strategies into the practice with the support of the synergic funding (S3 Community of Practice). European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/policy/communities-and-networks/s3-community-of-practice/Synergy_paper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jorge Nuñez Ferrer, C., Alcidi, C., Busse, M., Musmeci, R., & Fujiwara, N. (2018). Ex-ante conditionality in ESI funds: State of play and their potential impact on the financial implementation of the funds. EPRS: European Parliamentary Research Service. https://policycommons.net/artifacts/1335504/ex-ante-conditionality-in-esi-funds/1942052/
   Google Scholar
• Kristensen, I. F., & Pugh, R. (2023). Opportunities and challenges in implementing smart specialisation in Nordic ‘strong innovator’ regions. Regional Studies, 57, 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2022.2054975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, S. (2015). A typology of political conditionality beyond aid: Conceptual horizons based on lessons from the European Union. World Development, 75, 97–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kölling, M. (2022). The role of (rule of law) conditionality in MFF 2021–2027 and next generation EU, or the stressed budget. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2022.2059654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laatsit, M., Grillitsch, M., & Fünfschilling, L. (2022). Great expectations: The promises and limits of innovation policy in addressing societal challenges. Centre for Innovation Research (CIRCLE), Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Laranja, M. (2022). Translating smart specialisation and entrepreneurial discovery into a process-oriented policy. Regional Studies, 56, 853–865. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1959028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larouche, P. (2004). Coordination of European and member state regulatory policy. Horizontal, vertical and transversal aspects. Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, 5(3–4), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/178359170400500303
   Google Scholar
• Larrue, P. (2021). The design and implementation of mission-oriented innovation policies: A new systemic policy approach to address societal challenges (OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers No. 100). Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). https://doi.org/10.1787/3f6c76a4-en
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2009). Introduction: Theorizing and studying institutional work. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 1–27). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann, T., Benner, M., & Kapo, A. (2022). Institutional asymmetries in a low-coordination economy: The smart specialization paradox in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2022.2092075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loomis, R. A. (1968). Why overseas technical assistance is ineffective. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 50(5), 1329–1341. https://doi.org/10.2307/1237323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, C. (2000). Lord Cockfield: A European Commissioner as a political entrepreneur. In K. Theakston (Ed.), Bureaucrats and leadership (pp. 151–170). MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B.-Å. (2023). Transformative innovation policy – Lessons from the innovation system literature. Innovation and Development, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2022.2158996
   Google Scholar
• Magro, E., & Wilson, J. R. (2019). Policy-mix evaluation: Governance challenges from new place-based innovation policies. Research Policy, 48(10), 103612–103612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, P., & Morgan, K. (2021). Getting to Denmark: The dialectic of governance & development in the European periphery. Applied Geography, 135, 102536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2021.102536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marrocu, E., Paci, R., Rigby, D., & Usai, S. (2023). Evaluating the implementation of smart specialisation policy. Regional Studies, 57(1), 112–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2022.2047915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattelaer, A. (2018). Exploring the boundaries of conditionality in the EU. (European Policy Brief No. 51). Egmont. http://aei.pitt.edu/94371/
   Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. (2021). Mission economy. A moonshot guide to changing capitalism. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M., & Rodrik, D. (2023). Industrial policy with conditionalities: A taxonomy and sample cases (Working Paper IIP WP 2023-07). UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/publicpurpose/wp2023-07
   Google Scholar
• McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2013). Modern regional innovation policy. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 6(2), 187–216. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rst007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2019). 2. Perspectives on smart specialisation policies in lagging regions. Regional Studies Policy Impact Books, 1(2), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/2578711X.2019.1621098
   Google Scholar
• Mendonça, H. L., van Aduard de Macedo-Soares, T. D. L., & de Fonseca, M. V. A. (2018). Working towards a framework based on mission-oriented practices for assessing renewable energy innovation policies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 193, 709–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molica, F. (2024a). Reassessing cohesion policy through the lens of the new EU industrial policy. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molica, F. (2024b). Regional innovation policies and directionality: Exploring the role of conditionality. European Planning Studies, 32, 1653–1670. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2024.2362710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monteverdi, A. (2017). From Washington consensus to Brussels consensus. In E. Sciso (Ed.), Accountability, transparency and democracy in the functioning of Bretton Woods institutions (pp. 73–90). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. (2019). 7. The future of place-based innovation policy (as if ‘lagging regions’ really mattered). Regional Studies Policy Impact Books, 1(2), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/2578711X.2019.1621103
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, K., & Marques, P. (2019). The public animateur: Mission-led innovation and the “smart state” in Europe. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 12(2), 179–193. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsz002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro, M., Gibaja, J. J., Franco, S., Murciego, A., Gianelle, C., Heygi, F.-B., & Kleibrink, A. (2014). Regional benchmarking in the smart specialisation process: Identification of reference regions based on structural similarity (S3 Working Paper Series No. 03/2014). Joint Research Centre (JRC).
   Google Scholar
• North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira Martins, J. (2021). Regional policy narratives and the ‘geographies of discontent’. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 14(3), 625–629. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsab024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oughton, C., Landabaso, M., & Morgan, K. (2002). The regional innovation paradox: Innovation policy and industrial policy. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013104805703
   Google Scholar
• Papamichail, G., Rosiello, A., & Wield, D. (2023). Addressing public policy implementation challenges in lagging regions through the analytical lens of smart specialisation. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 14(1), 356–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00874-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S.-C. (2018). The fourth industrial revolution and implications for innovative cluster policies. AI & Society, 33(3), 433–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-017-0777-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J. (2011). Geographies of policy: From transfer-diffusion to mobility-mutation. Progress in Human Geography, 35(6), 773–797. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510394010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2012). Follow the policy: A distended case approach. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 44(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1068/a44179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porto de Oliveira, O. (2021). A prelude to policy transfer research. In Handbook of policy transfer, diffusion and circulation (pp. 1–24). Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85119269760&partnerID=40&md5=7c9211f7cc3406c65e7a9ac83d7a1bbf
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J., & Lawton Smith, H. (2019). 4. Smart Specialisation in Eastern Europe: Insights from two lagging Polish regions. Regional Studies Policy Impact Books, 1(2), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/2578711X.2019.1621100
   Google Scholar
• Prange, H. (2008). Explaining varieties of regional innovation policies in Europe. European Urban and Regional Studies, 15(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776407081276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabadjieva, M., & Terstriep, J. (2021). Ambition meets reality: Mission-oriented innovation policy as a driver for participative governance. Sustainability, 13, 231. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radaelli, C. M. (2000). Policy transfer in the European Union: Institutional isomorphism as a source of legitimacy. Governance, 13(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/0952-1895.00122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, A., Steward, F., & Miedzinski, M. (2023). Aligning smart specialisation with transformative innovation policy (Issue JRC134466). Joint Research Centre (JRC). https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc134466
   Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. (2004). Industrial policy for the twenty-first century (Faculty Research Working Papers Series No. RWP04-047). John F. Kennedy School of Government. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=617544
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2013). Do institutions matter for regional development? Regional Studies, 47(7), 1034–1047. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.748978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roller, E. (2011). Can conditionality be introduced in cohesion policy? Regions Magazine, 282(1), 6–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/13673882.2011.9697687
   Google Scholar
• Rose, R., Corona, D., & Trechsel, A. H. (2013). Vertical and horizontal EU policymaking. University of Strathclyde Studies in Public Policy, 506.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, G., & Jenson, J. (2017). Reconsidering Jacques Delors’ leadership of the European Union. Journal of European Integration, 39(2), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2016.1277718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schot, J., & Steinmueller, W. E. (2018). Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy, 47(9), 1554–1567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedelmeier, U. (2016). Compliance after conditionality: Why are the European Union’s new member states so good? http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/89186/
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K. E. (1998). The use of political conditionality in the EU’s relations with third countries: How effective? European Foreign Affairs Review, 3(2), 253–274. https://doi.org/10.54648/EERR1998015
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. (2000). Non-governmental policy transfer: The strategies of independent policy institutes. Governance, 13(1), 45–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/0952-1895.00123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, D. (2008). Global public policy, transnational policy communities, and their networks. Policy Studies Journal, 36(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2007.00251.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suorsa, K. (2014). The concept of ‘region’ in research on regional innovation systems. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift – Norwegian Journal of Geography, 68(4), 207–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2014.924025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tholoniat, L. (2010). The career of the open method of coordination: Lessons from a ‘soft’ EU instrument. West European Politics, 33(1), 93–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380903354122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34(8), 1203–1219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., Trippl, M., & Desch, V. (2022). New directions for RIS studies and policies in the face of grand societal challenges. European Planning Studies, 30, 2139–2156. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.1951177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trippl, M., Zukauskaite, E., & Healy, A. (2020). Shaping smart specialization: The role of place-specific factors in advanced, intermediate and less-developed European regions. Regional Studies, 54(10), 1328–1340. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1582763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veldhuizen, C., & Coenen, L. (2022). Smart specialization in Australia: Between policy mobility and regional experimentalism? Economic Geography, 98(3), 228–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2022.2032637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viță, V. (2017). Revisiting the dominant discourse on conditionality in the EU: The case of EU spending conditionality. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 19, 116–143. https://doi.org/10.1017/cel.2017.4
   Google Scholar
• Vukov, V. (2020). More Catholic than the pope? Europeanisation, industrial policy and transnationalised capitalism in Eastern Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(10), 1546–1564. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1684976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanzenböck, I., & Frenken, K. (2020). The subsidiarity principle in innovation policy for societal challenges. Global Transitions, 2, 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glt.2020.02.002
   Google Scholar
• Wibisono, E. (2022). Smart specialisation in less-developed regions of the European Union. Region, 9(2), 161–181. https://doi.org/10.18335/region.v9i2.388
   Google Scholar