REFERENCES
- BELLAMY, RICHARD. 2008. The democratic constitution: why Europeans should avoid American style constitutional judicial review. European Political Science 7: 9–20. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210151
- BÖRZEL, TANJA. 2006. Participation through law enforcement: the case of the European Union. Comparative Political Studies 39 (1): 128–52. doi: 10.1177/0010414005283220
- BUGDAHN, SONJA. 2008. Travelling to Brussels via Aarhus: can transnational NGO networks impact on EU policy? Journal of European Public Policy 15 (4): 588–606. doi: 10.1080/13501760801996758
- CICHOWSKI, RACHEL. 2007. The European Court and Civil Society: Litigation, Mobilization and Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- CICHOWSKI, RACHEL and ALEC STONE SWEET. 2003. Participation, representative democracy, and the courts. In Democracy Transformed? Expanding Political Opportunities in Advanced Industrial Democracies, edited by Bruce E. Cain, Russell J. Dalton and Susan E. Scarrow. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 192–220.
- cole, luke w. and sheila r. foster. 2001. From the Ground Up: Environmental Racism and the Rise of the Environmental Justice Movement. New York: New York University Press.
- DEPARTMENT FOR ENVIRONMENT, FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS. 2008. Aarhus Convention Implementation Report. London: DEFRA. Available at http://archive.defra.gov.uk/environment/policy/international/aarhus/pdf/compliance-report.pdf, accessed 10 May 2012.
- eckstein, harry. 1975. Case studies and thoery in political science, in Handbook of political science, edited by F. I. Greenstein and N. W. Polsby. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
- EPP, CHARLES. 1998. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Friends of the Earth Scotland. 2011. Tipping the Scales: Complying with the Aarhus Convention on Access to Environmental Justice. Edinburgh: FoES.
- HIRSCHL, RAN. 2004. Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- HIRSCHL, RAN. 2008. The judicialization of politics. In The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics, edited by Keith E. Whittington, R. Daniel Kelemen and Gregory A. Caldeira. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 119–41.
- KELEMEN, R. DANIEL. 2011. Eurolegalism: The Transformation of Law and Regulation in the European Union. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- KELEMEN, R. DANIEL. 2012. Eurolegalism and democracy. Journal of Common Market Studies 50 (s1): 55–71.
- LEE, MARIA and CAROLYN ABBOTT. 2003. The usual suspects? Public participation under the Aarhus Convention. Modern Law Review 66: 80–108. doi: 10.1111/1468-2230.6601004
- MACRORY, RICHARD and NED WESTAWAY. 2011. Access to environmental justice: a United Kingdom perspective. In The Aarhus Convention at Ten: Interactions and Tensions between Conventional International Law and EU Environmental Law, edited by Marc Pallemaerts. Groningen: Europa Law Publishers, pp. 313–37.
- MCCARTNEY, FRANCES. 2011. The Aarhus Convention: can Scotland deliver environmental justice Edinburgh Law Review 15: 128–33.
- MCCORMICK, JOHN. 1999. The role of environmental NGOs in international regimes. In The Global Environment: Institutions, Law and Policy, edited by Noman J. Vig and Regina Axelrod. Washington, DC: CQ Press, pp. 52–71.
- o'neill, kate. 2009. The Environmental and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- PRINCEN, THOMAS and MATTHIAS FINGER. 1994. Environmental NGOs in World Politics. New York: Routledge.
- RAUSTIALA, KAL. 1997. The ‘participatory revolution’ in international environmental law. Harvard Environmental Law Review 21: 537–86.
- REID, COLIN. 2009. Nature Conservation Law (3rd edn). Edinburgh: W. Green.
- ROSS, ANDREA, COLIN REID and HAZEL NASH. 2009. The implementation of EU environmental law in Scotland. Edinburgh Law Review 13: 224–51. doi: 10.3366/E1364980909001371
- SCOTTISH LEGAL AID BOARD. 2011. Statement Re: Molly Forbes. Available at http://www.slab.org.uk/news/documents/statement11thJan2011reMollyForbespdf.pdf, accessed 10 May 2012.
- stone, chistopher. 1972. Should Trees Have Standing? Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects. New York: Oxford University Press.
- VANHALA, LISA. 2012. The paradox of legal mobilization by the environmental movement in the United Kingdom. Law and Society Review 46 (3): 523–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2012.00505.x
- WAPNER, PAUL. 1996. Environmental Activism and World Civic Politics. Albany: State University of New York Press.
- WAPNER, PAUL. 2000. The normative promise of non-state actors: a theoretical account of global civil society. In Principled World Politics: The Challenge of Normative International Relations, edited by Paul Wapner and Edwin J. Ruiz. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 261–74.
- WATES, JEREMY. 2005. NGOs and the Aarhus Convention. In Civil Society, International Courts and Compliance Bodies, edited by Tullio Treves, Marco Frigessi di Rattalma, Attila Tanzi, Alessandro Fodella, Cesare Pitea and Chiara Ragni. The Hague: TMC Asser Press, pp. 167–85.
- Wwf Scotland. 2011. Press release: destruction of nationally important wildlife site not open to challenge, 4 October. Available at http://scotland.wwf.org.uk/what_we_do/press_centre/?5309/Destruction-of-nationally-important-wildlife-site-not-open-to-challenge, accessed 10 May 2012.
CASES CITED
- AXA General Insurance Limited and others (Appellants) v. The Lord Advocate and others (Respondents) (Scotland) 2011 UKSC 46.
- Mary Buchan Forbes v. Aberdeenshire Council and Trump International Golf Links [2010] CSOH 1, 13.
- McGinty v. Scottish Ministers [2010] CSOH 5.
- William Walton v. Scottish Ministers [2012] CSIH 19 XA53/10.
- WWF-UK and RSPB v. Scottish Natural Heritage [1998] ScotCS 38 (27 October 1998).