EPILOGUE: COURTS AND DEMOCRACY BETWEEN IDEALS AND REALITIES

REFERENCES

• CHANG, WEN-CHEN. 2010. Strategic judicial responses in politically charged cases: East Asian experiences. I-CON International Journal of Constitutional Law 8: 885–910. doi: 10.1093/icon/mor013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DA SILVA, VIRGILIO AFONSO and FERNANDA VARGS TERRAZAS. 2011. Claiming the right to health in Brazilian courts: the exclusion of the already excluded? Law & Social Inquiry 36: 825–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4469.2011.01252.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DAHL, ROBERT. 1989. Democracy and its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DRESSEL, BJORN. 2012. Thailand: judicialization of politics or politicization of the judiciary? In The Judicialization of Politics in Asia, edited by B. Dressel. New York: Routledge, pp. 79–97.
   Google Scholar
• DWORKIN, RONALD. 1990. A Bill of Rights for Britain. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• EPSTEIN, LEE and TONJA JACOBI. 2010. The strategic analysis of judicial decisions. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 6: 341–58. doi: 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102209-152921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EPSTEIN, LEE, JACK KNIGHT and OLGA SHVESTOVA. 2001. The role of constitutional courts in the establishment and maintenance of democratic systems of government. Law & Society Review 35: 117–64. doi: 10.2307/3185388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FEREJOHN, JOHN. 2002. Judicializing politics, politicizing law. Law and Contemporary Problems 61: 41–68. doi: 10.2307/1192402
   Google Scholar
• FRYMER, PAUL. 2003. Acting when elected officials won't: federal courts and civil rights enforcement in U.S. labor unions, 1935–85. American Political Science Review 97: 483–99. doi: 10.1017/S0003055403000820
   Google Scholar
• GALLIGAN, DENIS. 2014 (forthcoming). The people, the constitution, and the idea of representation. In Social and Political Foundations of Constitutions, edited by D. Galligan and M. Versteeg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• GILL, STEPHEN. 1995. Globalization, market civilization, and disciplinary neoliberalism. Millennium 24: 399–423. doi: 10.1177/03058298950240030801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GILL, STEPHEN. 2003. Power and Resistance in the New World Order. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• GRABER, MARK. 1993. The nonmajoritarian difficulty: legislative deference to the judiciary. Studies in American Political Development 7: 35–73. doi: 10.1017/S0898588X00000687
   Google Scholar
• HELMKE, GRETCHEN. 2002. The logic of strategic defection: court-executive relations in Argentina under dictatorship and democracy. American Political Science Review 96: 291–303. doi: 10.1017/S0003055402000175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HELMKE, GRETCHEN. 2005. Courts under Constraints: Judges, Generals, and Presidents in Argentina. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• HIRSCHL, RAN. 2004. Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• HIRSCHL, RAN. 2008. The judicialization of mega-politics and the rise of political courts. Annual Review of Political Science 11: 93–118. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053006.183906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HIRSCHL, RAN. 2010. Constitutional Theocracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• KAPISZEWSKI, DIANA. 2011. Tactical balancing: high court decision making on politically crucial cases. Law and Society Review 45: 471–506. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00437.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KARPIK, LUCIEN and TERRENCE HALLIDAY 2011. The legal complex. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 7: 217–36. doi: 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102510-105512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LAW, DAVID. 2005. Generic constitutional law. Minnesota Law Review 89: 652–742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCANN, MICHAEL. 1994. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• MOTTA FEBRAZ, OCTAVIO LUIS 2010. Harming the poor through social rights litigation: lessons from Brazil. Texas Law Review 89: 1643–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• POPOVA, MARIA. 2010. Political competition as an obstacle to judicial independence: evidence from Russia and Ukraine. Comparative Political Studies 43: 1220–29. doi: 10.1177/0010414010369075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RADMILOVIC, VUK. 2010. Strategic legitimacy cultivation at the Supreme Court of Canada: Quebec secession reference and beyond. Canadian Journal of Political Science 43: 843–69. doi: 10.1017/S0008423910000764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCHEINGOLD, STUART. 1974. The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Political Change. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• SCHNEIDERMAN, DAVID. 2008. Constitutionalizing Economic Globalization: Investment Rules and Democracy's Promise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• STATON, JEFFREY. 2010. Judicial Power and Strategic Communication in Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• STEPHENSON, MATTHEW. 2003. ‘When the devil turns…’: the political foundations of independent judicial review. Journal of Legal Studies 32: 59–89. doi: 10.1086/342038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• STONE SWEET, ALEC. 2000. Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• TREBILCOCK, MICHAEL, ANTHONY DUGGAN and LORNE SOSSIN. 2012. Middle Income Access to Justice. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• TRIPP, AILI MARI. 2010. The politics of constitution-making in Uganda. In Framing the State in Times of Transition: Case Studies in Constitution Making, edited by L. E. Miller. Washington, DC: United States Institute for Peace, pp. 158–75.
   Google Scholar
• TROCHEV, ALEXEI. 2008. Judging Russia: The Role of the Constitutional Court in Russian Politics 1990–2006. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• TROCHEV, ALEXEI. 2013. Fragmentation, defection, and disputed elections: why judges joined the post-communist color revolutions. In Consequential Courts: New Judicial Roles in Global Perspective, edited by D. Kapiszewski, G. Silverstein and R. Kagan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 67–92.
   Google Scholar
• VANBERG, GEORG. 2005. The Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• VERSTEEG, MILA. 2014 (forthcoming). Unpopular constitutionalism. Indiana Law Review 89 (forthcoming).
   Google Scholar
• VOIGT, STEPHAN and ELI SALZBERGER. 2002. Choosing not to choose: when politicians choose to delegate powers. Kyklos 55: 289–310. doi: 10.1111/1467-6435.00187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WEINRIB, LORRAINE. 2007. The postwar paradigm and American exceptionalism. In The Migration of Constitutional Ideas, edited by S. Choudhry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 83–113.
   Google Scholar
• WHITTINGTON, KEITH. 2005. ‘Interpose your friendly hand’: political supports for the exercise of judicial review by the United States Supreme Court. American Political Science Review 99: 583–96. doi: 10.1017/S0003055405051890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar