GROWING OLD WITHOUT GRACE: ELECTORAL AUTHORITARIANISM AND THE AGE COMPOSITION OF RUSSIA'S REGIONAL LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLIES

References

• Aivazova, Svetlana. 2008. Russian Elections: Gender Profile. Moscow: Consortium of Women's Non-Governmental Associations and the Institute of Social Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Bader, Max. 2011. Hegemonic political parties in post-Soviet Eurasia: towards party-based authoritarianism? Communist and Post-Communist Studies 44 (3): 189–197. doi: 10.1016/j.postcomstud.2011.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldez, Lisa. 2006. The pros and cons of gender quota laws: what happens when you kick men out and let women in? Politics and Gender 2 (1): 102–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banducci, SUSAN A., Todd Donovan and Jeffrey A. Karp. 2004. Minority representation, empowerment, and participation. Journal of Politics 66 (2): 534–556. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2004.00163.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besley, Timothy and Stephen Coate. 1997. An economic model of representative democracy. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (1): 85–114. doi: 10.1162/003355397555136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blakkisrud, Helge. 2011. Medvedev's new governors. Europe-Asia Studies 63 (3): 367–395. doi: 10.1080/09668136.2011.557531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaisty, Paul. 2012. Members and leaders in Russian party organizations. East European Politics 28 (3): 283–297. doi: 10.1080/21599165.2012.683114
   Google Scholar
• Colton, Timothy and Michael Mcfaul. 2003. Popular Choice and Managed Democracy: The Russian Elections of 1999 and 2000. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, Robert. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, Michael. 1992. Comparing proportional representation electoral systems: quotas, thresholds, paradoxes and majorities. British Journal of Political Science 22 (4): 469–496. doi: 10.1017/S0007123400006499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandhi, Jennifer and Ellen Lust-Okar. 2009. Elections under authoritarianism. Annual Review of Political Science 12: 403–422. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060106.095434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandhi, Jennifer and Adam Przeworski. 2006. Cooperation, cooptation, and rebellion under dictatorships. Economics and Politics 18 (1): 1–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0343.2006.00160.x
   Google Scholar
• Gandhi, Jennifer and Adam Przeworski. 2007. Authoritarian institutions and the survival of autocrats. Comparative Political Studies 40 (11): 1279–1301. doi: 10.1177/0010414007305817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geddes, Barbara. 2003. Paradigms and Sand Castles: Research Design in Comparative Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gel'man, Vladimir. 2012. Subversive institutions, informal governance, and contemporary Russian politics. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 45 (3–4): 295–303. doi: 10.1016/j.postcomstud.2012.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gel'man, Vladimir and Inessa Tarusina. 2000. Studies of political elites in Russia: issues and alternatives. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 33 (3): 311–329. doi: 10.1016/S0967-067X(00)00009-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, Graeme. 2012. The decline of a dominant party and the destabilization of electoral authoritarianism? Post-Soviet Affairs 28 (4): 449–471. doi: 10.2747/1060-586X.28.4.449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golosov, Grigorii V. 1997. Russian political parties and the ‘bosses’: evidence from the 1994 provincial elections in Western Siberia. Party Politics 3 (1): 5–21. doi: 10.1177/1354068897003001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golosov, Grigorii V. 2002. Party support or personal resources? Factors of success in the plurality portion of the 1999 national legislative elections in Russia. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 35 (1): 23–38. doi: 10.1016/S0967-067X(01)00022-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golosov, Grigorii V. 2003. Electoral systems and party formation in Russia: a cross-regional analysis. Comparative Political Studies 36 (8): 912–35. doi: 10.1177/0010414003256115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golosov, Grigorii V. 2004. Political Parties in the Regions of Russia: Democracy Unclaimed. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Golosov, Grigorii V. 2006. The structure of party alternatives and voter choice in Russia: evidence from the 2003–2004 regional legislative elections. Party Politics 12 (6): 707–725. doi: 10.1177/1354068806068597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golosov, Grigorii V. 2011a. Russia's regional legislative elections, 2003–2007: authoritarianism incorporated. Europe-Asia Studies 63 (3): 397–414. doi: 10.1080/09668136.2011.557533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golosov, Grigorii V. 2011b. The regional roots of electoral authoritarianism in Russia. Europe-Asia Studies 63 (4): 623–639. doi: 10.1080/09668136.2011.566427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golosov, Grigorii V. 2012. The 2012 political reform in Russia: the interplay of liberalizing concessions and authoritarian corrections. Problems of Post-Communism 59 (6): 3–14. doi: 10.2753/PPC1075-8216590601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golosov, Grigorii V. 2013a. Proportional representation and authoritarianism: evidence from Russia's regional election law reform. Representation 49 (1): 83–95. doi: 10.1080/00344893.2012.751050
   Google Scholar
• Golosov, Grigorii V. 2013b. Machine politics: the concept and its implications for post-Soviet studies. Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization 21 (4): 459–480.
   Google Scholar
• Golosov, Grigorii V. 2014. Co-optation in the process of dominant party system building: the case of Russia. East European Politics 30 (2): 271–285. doi: 10.1080/21599165.2014.899211
   Google Scholar
• Hanley, Eric, Natasha Yershova and Richard Anderson. 1995. Russia – old wine in a new bottle? The circulation and reproduction of Russian elites, 1983–1993. Theory and Society 24 (5): 639–668. doi: 10.1007/BF00993401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassner, Pierre, and hassner, P. 2008. Russia's transition to autocracy. Journal of Democracy 19 (2): 5–15. doi: 10.1353/jod.2008.0022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutcheson, Derek S. 2003. Political Parties in the Russian Regions. London: Routledge Curzon.
   Google Scholar
• Ishiyama, John T. 1998. ‘Red versus expert’: candidate recruitment and Communist Party adaptation in post-Soviet politics. Party Politics 4 (3): 297–318. doi: 10.1177/1354068898004003002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, Keith. 1994. Stability and renewal: incumbency and parliamentary composition. In The Victorious Incumbent: A Threat to Democracy? edited by Albert Somit et al. Dartmouth: Aldershot, pp. 251–277.
   Google Scholar
• Joshi, Devin K. 2013. The representation of younger age cohorts in Asian parliaments: do electoral systems make a difference? Representation 49 (1): 1–16. doi: 10.1080/00344893.2013.775960
   Google Scholar
• Katz, Richard S. 1997. Democracy and Elections. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kissau, Kathrin, Georg Lutz and Jan Rosset. 2012. Unequal representation of age groups in Switzerland. Representation 48 (1): 63–81. doi: 10.1080/00344893.2012.653241
   Google Scholar
• Konitzer, Andrew and Stephen K. Wegren. 2006. Federalism and political recentralization in the Russian Federation: United Russia as the party of power. Publius 36 (4): 503–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lankina, Tomila V. 2012. Unbroken links? From imperial human capital to post-communist modernisation. Europe-Asia Studies 64 (4): 623–643. doi: 10.1080/09668136.2012.675666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lijphart, Arend. 1994. Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-seven Democracies, 1945–1990. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Magaloni, Beatriz and Ruth Kricheli. 2010. Political order and one-party rule. Annual Review of Political Science 13: 123–143. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.031908.220529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, Luke. 2009. Managing opposition in a hybrid regime: just Russia and parastatal opposition. Slavic Review 68 (3): 504–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matland, Richard E. 1998. Women's representation in national legislatures: developed and developing countries. Legislative Studies Quarterly 23 (1): 109–125. doi: 10.2307/440217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matland, Richard E. and Donley T. Studlar. 2004. Determinants of legislative turnover: a cross-national analysis. British Journal of Political Science 34 (1): 87–108. doi: 10.1017/S000712340300036X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matland, Richard E. and Michelle Taylor. 1997. Electoral system effects on women's representation: theoretical arguments and evidence from Costa Rica. Comparative Political Studies 30 (2): 186–210. doi: 10.1177/0010414097030002003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcallister, Ian and Donley T. Studlar. 2002. Electoral systems and women's representation: a long-term perspective. Representation 39 (1): 3–14. doi: 10.1080/00344890208523209
   Google Scholar
• Mcfaul, Michael and Kathryn Stoner-Weiss. 2008. The myth of the authoritarian model: how Putin's crackdown holds Russia back. Foreign Affairs 87 (1): 68–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moraski, Bryon. 2006. Prospects for professional parliaments in Russia's regions. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 22 (2): 135–161. doi: 10.1080/13523270600660997
   Google Scholar
• Mosca, Gaetano. 1939. The Ruling Class. New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, Robert G. and Ethan Scheiner. 2012. Electoral Systems and Political Context: How the Effects of Rules Vary across New and Established Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Narud, Hanne M. 2011. Ascent of the young, the smart, and the professional: Norway's parliamentary elite in comparative perspective. Comparative Sociology 10 (6): 840–872. doi: 10.1163/156913311X607593
   Google Scholar
• Norris, Pippa. 1985. Women's legislative participation in Western Europe. West European Politics 8 (4): 90–101. doi: 10.1080/01402388508424556
   Google Scholar
• Norris, Pippa. 1987. Politics and Sexual Equality. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, Pippa. 1993. Conclusion: comparative legislative recruitment in western democracies. In Gender and Party Politics, edited by Joni Lovenduski and Pippa Norris. London: Sage, pp. 309–330.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, Pippa. 1997. Choosing electoral systems: proportional, majoritarian and mixed systems. International Political Science Review 18 (3): 297–312. doi: 10.1177/019251297018003005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, Pippa and Mona L. Krook. 2009. One of us: multilevel models examining the impact of descriptive representation on civic engagement. Harvard Kennedy School Faculty Research Working Paper Series, RWP09–030. Boston, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, Pippa and Joni Lovenduski. 1995. Political Recruitment: Gender, Race and Class in the British Parliament. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Obydenkova, Anastassia and Alexander Libman. 2013. National autocratization and the survival of sub-national democracy: evidence from Russia's parliamentary elections of 2011. Acta Politica 48 (4): 459–489. doi: 10.1057/ap.2013.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, Martin J. and Al Slivinski. 1996. A model of political competition with citizen-candidates. Quarterly Journal of Economics 111 (1): 65–96. doi: 10.2307/2946658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pareto, Vilfredo. 1966. Sociological Writings. New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Pepinsky, Thomas. 2014. The institutional turn in comparative authoritarianism. British Journal of Political Science 44 (3): 631-653.
   Google Scholar
• Petrov, Nikolay. 2013. Governance and the types of political regimes in the ethnic regions in Russia. In Managing Ethnic Diversity in Russia, edited by Oleh Protsyk and Benedikt Harzl. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 111–129.
   Google Scholar
• Petrov, Nikolay, Maria Lipman and Henry E. Hale. 2014. Three dilemmas of hybrid regime governance: Russia from Putin to Putin. Post-Soviet Affairs 30 (1): 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, Anne. 1995. The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pitkin, Hanna F. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, Robert D. 1976. The Comparative Study of Political Elites. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Reuter, Ora John and Thomas F. Remington. 2008. Dominant party regimes and the commitment problem: the case of United Russia. Comparative Political Studies 42 (4): 501–526. doi: 10.1177/0010414008327426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riggs, Jonathan W. and Peter J. Schraeder. 2005. Russia's political party system as a (continued) impediment to democratization: the 2003 Duma and 2004 presidential elections in perspective. Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization 13 (1): 141–152. doi: 10.3200/DEMO.13.1.141-152
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, Sean P. 2012. United Russia and the dominant-party framework: understanding the Russian party of power in comparative perspective. East European Politics 28 (3): 225–240. doi: 10.1080/21599165.2012.684754
   Google Scholar
• Rule, Wilma. 1987. Electoral systems, contextual factors and women's opportunity for election to parliament in twenty-three democracies. Western Political Quarterly 40 (3): 477–498. doi: 10.2307/448386
   Google Scholar
• Seawright, Jason and David Collier. 2014. Rival strategies of validation: tools for evaluating measures of democracy. Comparative Political Studies 47 (1): 111–138. doi: 10.1177/0010414013489098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCHEDLER, ANDREAS (ed). 2006. Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, Nancy and Brett Curry. 2010. Does descriptive race representation enhance institutional legitimacy? The case of the U.S. courts. Journal of Politics 72 (1): 90–104. doi: 10.1017/S0022381609990491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A. 2005. The incumbency advantage and women's election to legislative office. Electoral Studies 24 (2): 227–244. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2004.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semenova, Elena. 2011. Ministerial and parliamentary elites in an executive-dominated system: post-Soviet Russia 1991–2009. Comparative Sociology 10 (6): 908–927. doi: 10.1163/156913311X607629
   Google Scholar
• Sharafutdinova, Gulnaz. 2010. Subnational governance in Russia: how Putin changed the contract with his agents and the problems it created for Medvedev. Publius 40 (4): 672–696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyth, Regina, Anna Lowry and Brandon Wilkening. 2007. Engineering victory: institutional reform, informal institutions, and the formation of a hegemonic party regime in the Russian Federation. Post-Soviet Affairs 23 (2): 118–137. doi: 10.2747/1060-586X.23.2.118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperling, Valerie. 2012. Nashi devushki: gender and political youth activism in Putin's and Medvedev's Russia. Post-Soviet Affairs 28 (2): 232–261. doi: 10.2747/1060-586X.28.2.232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockemer, Daniel. 2011. Women's parliamentary representation in Africa: the impact of democracy and corruption on the number of female deputies in national parliaments. Political Studies 59 (3): 693–712. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00897.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroha, Alexander. 2010. Electoral rules of the authoritarian game: undemocratic effects of proportional representation in Rwanda. Journal of Eastern African Studies 4 (1): 1–19. doi: 10.1080/17531050903550066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szelényi, IVÁN and Szonja Szelényi. 1995. Circulation or reproduction of elites during the postcommunist transformation of Eastern Europe. Theory and Society 24 (5): 615–638. doi: 10.1007/BF00993400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wängnerud, Lena. 2009. Women in parliaments: descriptive and substantive representation. Annual Review of Political Science 12: 51–69. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053106.123839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver, Leon. 1984. Semi-proportional and proportional representation systems in the United States. In Choosing an Electoral System: Issues and Alternatives, edited by Arend Lijphart and Bernard Grofman. New York: Praeger, pp. 191–206.
   Google Scholar
• White, Stephen and Olga Kryshtanovskaya. 2011. Changing the Russian electoral system: inside the black box. Europe-Asia Studies 63 (4): 557–578. doi: 10.1080/09668136.2011.566424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, Stephen and Valentina Feklyunina. 2011. Russia's authoritarian elections: the view from below. Europe-Asia Studies 63 (4): 579–602. doi: 10.1080/09668136.2011.566425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar