Constituting ‘The Poor’: A Critical Frame Analysis of Substantive Claims

REFERENCES

• Alonso, Sonia, John Keane and Wolfgang Merkel. 2011. The Future of Representative Democracy. New York: Cambridge Press University.
   Google Scholar
• Celis, Karen, Sarah Childs, Johanna Kantola and Mona L. Krook. 2008. Rethinking women’s substantive representation. Representation 44 (2): 99–110. doi: 10.1080/00344890802079573
   Google Scholar
• Childs, Sarah and Julie Withey. 2004. Women representatives acting for women: Sex and the signing of early day motions in the 1997 British parliament. Political Studies 52: 552–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2004.00495.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coene, Jill. 2012. Armoede en sociale uitsluiting in 2012. In Armoede en sociale uitsluiting. Jaarboek 2012, edited by Danielle Dierickx, Stijn Oosterlynck, Jill Coene and An Van Haarlem. Leuven: Uitgeverij Acco, pp. 49–70.
   Google Scholar
• Cornwall, Andrea and Mamoru Fujita. 2007. The politics of representing ‘the poor’. In The Power of Labelling: How People are Categorized and Why it Matters, edited by Joy Moncrieffe and Rosalind Eyben. London: Earthscan, pp. 48–63.
   Google Scholar
• De Wilde, Pieter. 2013. Representative claims analysis: Theory meets method. Journal of European Public Policy 20 (2): 278–94. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2013.746128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erzeel, Silvia. 2012. Women’s substantive representation in the Belgian chamber of representatives: Testing the added value of a ‘claims-making’ approach. World Political Science Review 8 (1): 28–47.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2015. At-risk-of-poverty rate by poverty threshold, age and sex. Available at http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=ilc_li02, accessed 5 March 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, David and Peter Townsend. ed. 2000. Breadline Europe. The Measurement of Poverty. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lombardo, Emanuela and Mieke Verloo. 2009. Institutionalizing intersectionality in the European Union?. International Feminist Journal of Politics 11 (4): 478–95. doi: 10.1080/14616740903237442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovenduski, Joni. 2008. State feminism and women’s movements. West European Politics 31 (1–2): 169–94. doi: 10.1080/01402380701834978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, Jane. 2003. Rethinking representation. American Political Science Review 97 (4): 515–28. doi: 10.1017/S0003055403000856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, Petra. 2000. The evidence of being present: Guarantees of representation and the example of the Belgian case. Acta Politica 35 (1): 64–85.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, Petra. 2008. Critical frame analysis of EU gender equality policy: New perspectives on the substantive representation of women. Representation 44 (2): 155–67. doi: 10.1080/00344890802079656
   Google Scholar
• Miler, Kristina C. 2007. The view from the Hill: Legislative perceptions of the district. Legislative Studies Quarterly 32 (4): 597–628. doi: 10.3162/036298007782398477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitkin, Hanna F. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• POD Maatschappelijke Integratie. 2012. Federaal Plan Armoedebestrijding. Brussel: Federale overheid.
   Google Scholar
• Saward, Michael. 2006. The representative claim. Contemporary Political Theory 5: 297–318. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300234
   Google Scholar
• Severs, Eline. 2012. Substantive representation through a claims-making lens: A strategy for the identification and analysis of substantive claims. Representation 48 (2): 169–82. doi: 10.1080/00344893.2012.683491
   Google Scholar
• Strolovitch, Dana. 2007. Affirmative Advocacy. Race, Class and Gender in Interest Group Politics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Studiedienst Van De Vlaamse Regering. 2014. Vlaamse Armoedemonitor 2014. Brussel: Vlaamse overheid.
   Google Scholar
• Weldon, Laurel S. 2002. Beyond Bodies: Institutional Sources of Representation of Women in Democratic Policymaking. The Journal of Politics 64 (4): 1153–74. doi: 10.1111/1468-2508.00167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar