Styles of Representation and Voters’ Evaluations of Democratic Performance: Parties and Party Voters

REFERENCES

• ALDRICH, JOHN H. 2011. Why Parties?: A Second Look. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• ANDEWEG, RUDY B. 2012. The consequences of representatives’ role orientations: Attitudes behaviour perceptions. In Parliamentary Roles in Modern Legislatures, edited by Magnus Blomgren and Olivier Rozenberg. Oxon: Routledge, pp. 66–84.
   Google Scholar
• ANDEWEG, RUDY B. and JACQUES J.A. THOMASSEN. 2005. Modes of political representation: towards a new typology. Legislative Studies Quarterly 30 (4): 507–28. doi: 10.3162/036298005X201653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BAVISKAR, SIDDHARTHA and MARY FRAN T. MALONE. 2004. What democracy means to citizens – and why it matters. European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies 76: 3–23.
   Google Scholar
• BLOMGREN, MAGNUS and OLIVIER ROZENBERG. 2012. Introduction. In Parliamentary Roles in Modern Legislatures, edited by Magnus Blomgren and Olivier Rozenberg. Oxon: Routledge, pp. 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• VAN DER BRUG, WOUTER. 2003. How LPF fuelled discontent: empirical tests of explanations of LPF support. Acta Politica 38 (1): 89–106. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500005
   Google Scholar
• CASTIGLIONE, DARIO and MARK E. WARREN. 2006. Rethinking democratic representation: Eight theoretical issues. Prepared for ‘Rethinking Democratic Representation’ hosted by the Centre for the Study of Democratic Institutions, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, 18–19 May.
   Google Scholar
• CEKA, BESIR and PEDRO MAGALHÃES. 2016. How people understand democracy: A social dominance approach. In How European View and Evaluate Democracy, edited by Mónica Ferrín and Hanspeter Kriesi. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 90–110.
   Google Scholar
• CONVERSE PHILIP E. and ROY PIERCE. 1986. Political Representation in France. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• DAHLBERG, STEFAN. 2009. Political parties and perceptual agreement: the influence of party related factors on voters’ perceptions in proportional electoral systems. Electoral Studies 28 (2): 270–8. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2009.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DALTON, RUSSELL J. 1999. Political support in advanced industrial democracies. In Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance, edited by Pippa Norris. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 57–77.
   Google Scholar
• DALTON, RUSSELL J. 2006. Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. 4th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• EASTON, DAVID. 1973. An approach to the analysis of political systems. In Politiske Systemer. Oslo: Universitetforlaget, pp. 8–23.
   Google Scholar
• EASTON, DAVID. 1975. A re-assessment of the concept of political support. British Journal of Political Science 5 (4): 435–57. doi: 10.1017/S0007123400008309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EULAU, HEINZ and PAUL D. KARPS. 1977. The puzzle of representation: Specifying the components of responsiveness. Legislative Studies Quarterly 2 (3): 233–54. doi: 10.2307/439340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FOX, JUSTIN and KENNETH W. SHOTTS. 2009. Delegates or trustees? A theory of political accountability. The Journal of Politics 71 (4): 1225–37. doi: 10.1017/S0022381609990260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FUCHS, DIETER. 1999. The democratic culture of unified Germany. In Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance, edited by Pippa Norris. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 123–45.
   Google Scholar
• GÓMEZ, BRAULIO and IRENE PALACIOS. 2016. Citizens’ evaluations of democracy: A microscope with quality seal. In How European View and Evaluate Democracy, edited by Mónica Ferrín and Hanspeter Kriesi. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 155–77.
   Google Scholar
• HERNÁNDEZ, ENRIQUE. 2016. Europeans’ views of democracy: The core elements of democracy. In How European View and Evaluate Democracy, edited by Mónica Ferrín and Hanspeter Kriesi. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 43–63.
   Google Scholar
• HOOGHE, LIESBET, GARY MARKS and CAROLE J. WILSON. 2002. Does left/right structure party positions on European integration? Comparative Political Studies 35 (8): 965–89. doi: 10.1177/001041402236310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JAGERS, JAN and STEEFAN WALGRAVE. 2007. Populism as political communication style: an empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research 46 (3): 319–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00690.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KRIESI, HANSPETER, WILLEM SARIS and PAOLO MONCAGATTA. 2016. The structure of Europeans’ views of democracy: Citizens’ models of democracy. In How European View and Evaluate Democracy, edited by Mónica Ferrín and Hanspeter Kriesi. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 64–89.
   Google Scholar
• KUBBE, INA. 2013. Corruption and trust: A model design. In (Dys)-functionalities of Corruption: Comparative Perspectives and Methodological Pluralism, edited by Tobias Debiel and Andrea Gawrich. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, pp. 117–36.
   Google Scholar
• LAASKO, MAARKU and REIN TAAGEPERA. 1979. “Effective” number of parties: a measure with application to West Europe. Comparative Political Studies 12 (1): 3–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MAGALHÃES, PEDRO C. 2014a. Government effectiveness and support for democracy. European Journal of Political Research 53: 77–97. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MAGALHÃES, PEDRO C. 2014b. Introduction – financial crisis, austerity, and electoral politics. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 24 (2): 125–33. doi: 10.1080/17457289.2014.887090
   Google Scholar
• MAIR, PETER. 2006. Polity-scepticism, Party Failings and the Challenge to European Democracy. Wassenaar: NIAS, Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study in the Humanities and Social Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• NORRIS, PIPPA. 1999a. Conclusions: The growth of critical citizens and its consequences. In Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance, edited by Pippa Norris. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 257–72.
   Google Scholar
• NORRIS, PIPPA. 1999b. Introduction: The growth of critical citizens. In Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance, edited by Pippa Norris. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• NORRIS, PIPPA. 2011. Does democratic satisfaction reflect regime performance? In Political Representation and Policy Congruence in Modern Societies, edited by Martin Rosema, Bas Denters and Kees Aarts. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 115–35.
   Google Scholar
• ÖNNUDÓTTIR, EVA H. 2014. Policy congruence and style of representation: Party voters and political parties. West European Politics 37 (3): 538–63. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2013.841057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ÖNNUDÓTTIR, EVA H. 2016. Political parties and styles of representation. Party Politics 22 (6): 732–45.
   Google Scholar
• ROHRSCHNEIDER, ROBERT and STEPHEN WHITEFIELD. 2012. The Strain of Representation: How Parties Represent Diverse Voters in Western and Eastern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• RYDGREN, JENS. 2005. Is extreme right-wing populism contagious?: explaining the emergence of a new party family. European Journal of Political Research 44 (3–4): 413–37. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2005.00233.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCHMITT, HERMANN and JACQUES J.A. THOMASSEN. 2000. Dynamic representation: the case of European integration. European Union Politics 1 (3): 318–39. doi: 10.1177/1465116500001003003
   Google Scholar
• STOKEMER, DANIEL and AKSEL SUNDSTRØM. 2013. Corruption and citizens’ satisfaction with democracy in Europe: What is the empirical linkage? In (Dys)-functionalities of Corruption: Comparative Perspectives and Methodological Pluralism, edited by Tobia Debial and Andrea Gawrich. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, pp. 137–58.
   Google Scholar
• STRØM, KAARE. 2012. Roles as strategies: Towards a logic of legislative behavior. In Parliamentary Roles in Modern Legislatures, edited by Magnus Blomgren and Olivier Rozenberg. Oxon: Routledge, pp. 85–100.
   Google Scholar
• THOMASSEN, JACQUES. 1994. Empirical research into representation: Failing democracy or failing models. In Elections at Home and Abroad: Essays in Honor of Warren E. Miller, edited by M. Kent Jennings and Thomas E. Mann. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 237–64.
   Google Scholar
• THOMASSEN, JACQUES and CAROLIEN VAN HAM. 2014. Failing representation or a change in kind? Models of representation and empirical trends in Europe. West European Politics 37 (2): 400–19. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2014.887881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TORCAL, MARIANO and ALEXANDER H. TRECHSEL. 2016. Explaining citizens’ evaluations of democracy. In How European View and Evaluate Democracy, edited by Mónica Ferrín and Hanspeter Kriesi. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 206–34.
   Google Scholar
• VALEN, HENRY and HANNE MARTHE NARUD. 2007. The conditional party mandate: a model for the study of mass and elite opinion patterns. European Journal of Political Research 46 (3): 296–316. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2007.00702.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WESSELS, BERNHARD and HEIKO GIEBLER. 2011. Choosing a style of representation: The role of institutional and organizational incentives. Prepared for ‘6th General Conference of the European Consortium for Political Research’ in Reykjavik, Iceland, 25–27 August.
   Google Scholar
• WESSELS, BERNHARD and HERMANN SCHMITT. 2008. Meaningful choices, political supply and institutional effectiveness. Electoral Studies 27 (1): 19–30. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2007.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar