Communication Without Legislation? A Cross-National Field Experiment on Members of Parliament

REFERENCES

• Anderson, Christopher J. 1998. When in doubt, use proxies: attitudes toward domestic politics and support for European integration. Comparative Political Studies 31 (5): 569–601. doi: 10.1177/0010414098031005002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• André, Audrey, Jonathan Bradbury and Sam Depauw. 2014. Constituency service in multi-level democracies. Regional & Federal Studies 24 (2): 129–50. doi: 10.1080/13597566.2013.858708
   Google Scholar
• André, Audrey, Jonathan Bradbury and Sam Depauw. 2015. Explaining cooperation over casework between members of national and regional parliaments. Parliamentary Affairs 68 (4): 665–89. doi: 10.1093/pa/gsu018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auel, Katrin and Oliver Höing. 2015. National parliaments and the Eurozone crisis: taking ownership in difficult times? West European Politics 38 (2): 375–95. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2014.990694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auel, Katrin and Tapio Raunio. 2014. Debating the state of the union? Comparing parliamentary debates on EU issues in Finland, France, Germany and the United Kingdom. Journal of Legislative Studies 20 (1): 13–28. doi: 10.1080/13572334.2013.871482
   Google Scholar
• Bagehot, Walter. 2001 [1867]. The English Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, Ryan, et al. 2015. 2014 Chapel Hill expert survey. Available at https://www.chesdata.eu/our-surveys/, accessed 22 December 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Bergman, Torbjörn, Wolfgang C. Müller, Kaare Strøm and Magnus Blomgren. 2003. Democratic delegation and accountability: Cross-national patterns. In Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies, edited by Kaare Strøm, Wolfgang C. Müller and Torbjörn Bergman. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 109–220.
   Google Scholar
• Bovens, Mark. 2007. Analysing and assessing accountability: a conceptual framework. European Law Journal 13 (4): 447–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradbury, Jonathan (ed). 2007. Constituency representation, devolution and MMP electoral systems: comparative and UK perspectives [special issue]. Regional & Federal Studies 17 (1): ii–158. doi: 10.1080/13597560701189693
   Google Scholar
• Butler, Daniel M. 2014. Representing the Advantaged: How Politicians Reinforce Inequality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cain, Bruce E., John A. Ferejohn and Morris P. Fiorina 1987. The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, John M. and Matthew Søberg Shugart. 1995. Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: a rank ordering of electoral formulas. Electoral Studies 14 (4): 417–39. doi: 10.1016/0261-3794(94)00035-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Closa, Carlos and Aleksandra Maatsch. 2014. In a spirit of solidarity? Justifying the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF) in national parliamentary debates. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 52 (4): 826–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler, Fred. 2004. Government responsibility and electoral accountability in federations. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 34 (2): 19–38. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a005028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler, Fred. 2008. Whodunnit? Voters and responsibility in Canadian federalism. Canadian Journal of Political Science 41 (3): 627–54. doi: 10.1017/S0008423908080761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Rooij, Eline A., Donald P. Green and Alan S. Gerber. 2009. Field experiments on political behavior and collective action. Annual Review of Political Science 12 (1): 389–95. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.12.060107.154037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Disch, Lisa. 2011. Toward a mobilization conception of democratic representation. American Political Science Review 105 (1): 100–14. doi: 10.1017/S0003055410000602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, Leon D. 1967. Political Parties in Western Democracies. New York: Praeger Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Fenno, Richard F. 1978. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Franks, C. E. S. 2007. Members and constituency roles in the Canadian federal system. Regional & Federal Studies 17 (1): 23–45. doi: 10.1080/13597560701189602
   Google Scholar
• Gaines, Brian J. 1998. The impersonal vote? Constituency service and incumbency advantage in British elections, 1950–92. Legislative Studies Quarterly 23 (2): 167–95. doi: 10.2307/440279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García Lupato, Fabio. 2014. Talking Europe, using Europe: the EU and parliamentary competition in Italy and Spain (1986–2006). Journal of Legislative Studies 20 (1): 29–45. doi: 10.1080/13572334.2013.871483
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, Alan S. and Donald P. Green, 2012. Field Experiments: Design, Analysis, and Interpretation. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Grose, Christian R. 2014. Field experimental work on political institutions. Annual Review of Political Science 17 (1): 355–70. doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-072012-174350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grose, Christian R. 2016. Field experiments on elected and public officials: Ethical obligations and requirements. In Ethics and Experiments: Problems and Solutions for Social Scientists and Policy Professionals, edited by Scott Desposato. New York: Routledge, pp. 227–38.
   Google Scholar
• Heitshusen, Valerie, Garry Young and David M. Wood. 2005. Electoral context and MP constituency focus in Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom. American Journal of Political Science 49 (1): 32–45. doi: 10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00108.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, Lawrence R. and Robert Y. Shapiro. 2000. Politicians Don’t Pander: Political Manipulation and the Loss of Democratic Responsiveness. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Joel W. and Jessica S. Wallack. 2012. Electoral systems and the personal vote. Available at http://hdl.handle.net/1902.1/17901, accessed 12 August 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, John W. 1989 [1973]. Congressmen’s Voting Decisions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• León, Sandra. 2011. Who is responsible for what? Clarity of responsibilities in multilevel states: the case of Spain. European Journal of Political Research 50 (1): 80–109. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2010.01921.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, Jane. 2003. Rethinking representation. American Political Science Review 97 (4): 515–28. doi: 10.1017/S0003055403000856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, Jane. 2004. Representation revisited: introduction to the case against electoral accountability. Democracy and Society 2 (1): 12–13.
   Google Scholar
• Mattila, Mikko and Tapio Raunio. 2006. Cautious voters – supportive parties: opinion congruence between voters and parties on the EU dimension. European Union Politics 7 (4): 427–49. doi: 10.1177/1465116506069434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mcclendon, Gwyneth H. 2012. Ethics of using public officials as field experiment subjects. Newsletter of the APSA Experimental Section 3 (1): 13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, Philip and David M. Wood. 1993. Back from Westminster: British Members of Parliament and Their Constituents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patzelt, Werner J. 2007. The constituency roles of MPs at the federal and Länder levels in Germany. Regional & Federal Studies 17 (1): 47–70. doi: 10.1080/13597560701189610
   Google Scholar
• Pilet, Jean-Benoit, André Freire and Olivier Costa. 2012. Ballot structure, district magnitude and constituency-orientation of MPs in proportional representation and majority electoral systems. Representation 48 (4): 359–72. doi: 10.1080/00344893.2012.720880
   Google Scholar
• Pitkin, Hanna F. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Puntscher Riekmann, Sonja and Doris Wydra. 2013. Representation in the European state of emergency: parliaments against governments? Journal of European Integration 35 (5): 565–82. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2013.799943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rae, Douglas W. 1971. The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rauh, Christian. 2015. Communicating supranational governance? The salience of EU affairs in the German Bundestag, 1991–2013. European Union Politics 16 (1): 116–38. doi: 10.1177/1465116514551806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawls, John. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, Liz and Peter John. 2012. Who listens to the grass roots? A field experiment on informational lobbying in the UK. British Journal of Politics & International Relations 14 (4): 595–612. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-856X.2011.00481.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, Meg and Jonathan Bradbury. 2007. The constituency work of Scottish and Welsh MPs: adjusting to devolution. Regional & Federal Studies 17 (1): 97–116. doi: 10.1080/13597560701189644
   Google Scholar
• Saalfeld, Thomas. 2003. The Bundestag: Institutional incrementalism and behavioural reticence. In Germany, Europe and the Politics of Constraint, edited by K. Dyson and K. Goetz. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 73–96.
   Google Scholar
• Saward, M. 2010. The Representative Claim. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schönwälder, Karen. 2013. Immigrant representation in Germany’s regional states: the puzzle of uneven dynamics. West European Politics 36 (3): 634–51. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2013.773730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbinati, Nadia. 2006. Representative Democracy: Principles and Genealogy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, Garry, Valerie Heitshusen and David M. Wood. 2005. Home style from the demand side: a comparative look at Westminster systems. Paper presented at the APSA Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 1–4 September.
   Google Scholar