When Does Partisanship Become Excessive?

REFERENCES

• Albright, Jeremy J. 2010. The multidimensional nature of party competition. Party Politics 16 (6): 699–719. doi: 10.1177/1354068809345856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansolabehere, Stephen and Shanto Iyengar. 1997. Going Negative: How Political Advertisements Shrink and Polarize the Electorate. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bader, Veit and Matteo Bonotti. 2014. Introduction: parties, partisanship and political theory. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 17 (3): 253–66. doi: 10.1080/13698230.2014.886382
   Google Scholar
• Beerbohm, Eric. 2016. The ethics of electioneering. The Journal of Political Philosophy 24 (4): 381–405. doi: 10.1111/jopp.12082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, André et al. 2010. Political judgments, perceptions of facts, and partisan effects. Electoral Studies 29: 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2009.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blidook, Kelly. 2012. Constituency Influence in Parliament: Countering the Centre. Vancouver: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blidook, Kelly. 2014. Democratic responsiveness in the House of Commons. In Canadian Democracy from the Ground Up: Perceptions and Performance, edited by Elisabeth Gidengil and Heather Bastedo. Vancouver: UBC Press, pp. 213–30.
   Google Scholar
• Blidook, Kelly and Matthew Byrne. 2013. Constant campaigning and partisan discourse in the House of Commons. In Parties, Elections, and the Future of Canadian Politics, edited by Amanda Bittner and Royce Koop. Vancouver: UBC Press, pp. 46–66.
   Google Scholar
• Bol, Damien. 2016. Electoral reform, values and party self-interest. Party Politics 22 (1): 93–104. doi: 10.1177/1354068813511590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonotti, Matteo. 2011. Conceptualising political parties: a normative framework. Politics 31 (1): 19–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9256.2010.01398.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonotti, Matteo. 2012. Partisanship and political obligation. Politics 32 (3): 153–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9256.2012.01440.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M. and Renée M. Smith.1996. The dynamics of aggregate partisanship. American Political Science Review 90 (3): 567–80. doi: 10.2307/2082609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, Mark D. 2005. The rise of partisanship and the expansion of partisan conflict within the American electorate. Political Research Quarterly 58 (2): 219–29. doi: 10.1177/106591290505800203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carty, Roland Kenneth. 2002. The politics of Tecumseh corners: Canadian political parties as franchise organizations. Canadian Journal of Political Science 35 (4): 723–45. doi: 10.1017/S0008423902778402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caruana, Nicholas J., R. Michael McGregor and Laura B. Stephenson. 2014. The power of the dark side: negative partisanship and political behavior in Canada. Canadian Journal of Political Science 48 (4): 771–89. doi: 10.1017/S0008423914000882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochrane, Christopher. 2010. Left/right ideology and Canadian politics. Canadian Journal of Political Science 43 (3): 583–605. doi: 10.1017/S0008423910000624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, Russell J. and Steven A. Weldon. 2005. Public images of political parties: a necessary evil? West European Politics 28 (5): 931–51. doi: 10.1080/01402380500310527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, Russell J. and Steven Weldon. 2007. Partisanship and party system institutionalization. Party Politics 13 (2): 179–96. doi: 10.1177/1354068807073856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Docherty, David C. 2005. Legislatures. Vancouver: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Docherty, David. 2010. Legislatures. In Auditing Canadian Democracy, edited by William Cross. Vancouver: UBC Press, pp. 65–92.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Elstub, Stephen. 2010. Linking micro deliberative democracy and decision-making: trade-offs between theory and practice in a partisan citizen forum. Representation 4 (3): 309–24. doi: 10.1080/00344893.2010.499699
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, David M. and Paul Webb. 2002. Parties as campaign organizations. In Parties Without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies, edited by Russell J. Dalton and Martin P. Wattenberg. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 102–28.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagan, Tom. 2014. Winning Power: Canadian Campaigning in the 21st Century. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flavelle, Lucinda and Philip Kaye. 1986. Party discipline and legislative voting. Canadian Parliamentary Review 9 (2): 6–9.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, Alan S., Gregory A. Huber and Ebonya Washington. 2010. Party affiliation, partisanship, and political beliefs: a field experiment. American Political Science Review 104 (4): 720–44. doi: 10.1017/S0003055410000407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gidengil, Elisabeth and Heather Bastedo. 2014. Perceptions and performance: how do MPs shape up? Canadian Parliamentary Review 37 (2): 25–30.
   Google Scholar
• Goodin, Robert E. 2005. Sequencing deliberative moments. Acta Politica 40 (2): 182–96. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodin, Robert E. 2008. Innovating Democracy: Democratic Theory and Practice After the Deliberative Turn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, Steven. 2002. The social-psychological measurement of partisanship. Political Behavior 24 (3): 171–97. doi: 10.1023/A:1021859907145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, Richard and Larry Diamond. 2003. Species of political parties: a new typology. Party Politics 9 (2): 167–99. doi: 10.1177/13540688030092003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutmann, Amy and Dennis Thompson. 2010. The mindsets of political compromise. Perspectives on Politics 8 (4): 1125–43. doi: 10.1017/S1537592710003270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, Carolyn M., John S. Dryzek and Christian Hunold. 2007. Turning up the heat: partisanship in deliberative innovation. Political Studies 55 (2): 362–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00667.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ignatieff, Michael. 2013. Fire and Ashes: Success and Failure in Politics. Toronto: Random House Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Invernizzi-Accetti, Carlo and Fabio Wolkenstein. 2017. The crisis of party democracy, cognitive mobilization, and the case for making parties more deliberative. American Political Science Review 111 (1): 97–109. doi: 10.1017/S0003055416000526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kam, Christopher. 2009. Party Discipline and Parliamentary Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kernecker, Theresa. 2017. Ambition as a micro-foundation of party loyalty. Party Politics 23 (5): 538–48. doi: 10.1177/1354068815610965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kölln, Ann-Kristin. 2015. The value of political parties to representative democracy. European Political Science Review 7 (4): 593–613. doi: 10.1017/S1755773914000344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krehbiel, Keith. 2000. Party discipline and measures of partisanship. American Journal of Political Science 44 (2): 212–27. doi: 10.2307/2669306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeDuc, Lawrence and Jon H. Pammett. 2014. Attitudes toward democratic norms and practices: Canada in comparative perspective. In Canadian Democracy from the Ground Up: Perceptions and Performance, edited by Elisabeth Gidengil and Heather Bastedo. Vancouver: UBC Press, pp. 22–40.
   Google Scholar
• Leydet, Dominique. 2015. Partisan legislatures and democratic deliberation. The Journal of Political Philosophy 23 (3): 235–60. doi: 10.1111/jopp.12043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsitz, Keena. 2004. Democratic theory and political campaigns. The Journal of Political Philosophy 12 (2): 163–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00196.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKuen, Michael, Jennifer Wolak, Luke Keele and George E. Marcus. 2010. Civic engagements: resolute partisanship or reflective deliberation. American Journal of Political Science 54 (2): 440–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00440.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malloy, Jonathan. 2006. High discipline, low cohesion? The uncertain patterns of Canadian parliamentary party groups. The Journal of Legislative Studies 9 (4): 116–29. doi: 10.1080/1357233042000306290
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, Jane. 2003. Rethinking representation. American Political Science Review 97 (4): 515–28. doi: 10.1017/S0003055403000856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, Jane et al. 2012. A systemic approach to deliberative democracy. In Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale, edited by John Parkinson and Jane Mansbridge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, J. Scott. 2013. When partisans are attacked: motivated reasoning and the new party system. In Parties, Elections, and the Future of Canadian Politics, edited by Amanda Bittner and Royce Koop. Vancouver: UBC Press, pp. 231–57.
   Google Scholar
• Muirhead, Russell. 2006. A defense of party spirit. Perspectives on Politics 4 (4): 713–27. doi: 10.1017/S1537592706060452
   Google Scholar
• Muirhead, Russell. 2010. Can deliberative democracy be partisan? Critical Review 22 (2–3): 129–57. doi: 10.1080/08913811.2010.508631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muirhead, Russell and Nancy L. Rosenblum. 2006. Political liberalism vs. “the great game of politics”: the politics of political liberalism. Perspectives on Politics 4 (1): 99–108. doi: 10.1017/S1537592706060105
   Google Scholar
• Müller, Wolfgang C. 2000. Political parties in parliamentary democracies: making delegation and accountability work. European Journal of Political Research 37 (3): 309–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Núñez, Linda, Caroline Close and Camille Bedock. 2016. Changing democracy? Why inertia is winning over innovation. Representation 52 (4): 341–57. doi: 10.1080/00344893.2017.1317656
   Google Scholar
• Nwokora, Zim. 2014. The distinctive politics of campaign finance reform. Party Politics 20 (6): 918–29. doi: 10.1177/1354068812462922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Önnudóttir, Eva H. 2016a. Political parties and styles of representation. Party Politics 22 (6): 732–45. doi: 10.1177/1354068814560934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Önnudóttir, Eva H. 2016b. Styles of representation and voters’ evaluations of democratic performance: parties and party voters. Representation 52 (2–3): 191–213. doi: 10.1080/00344893.2017.1288164
   Google Scholar
• Pétry, François and Matthew Mendelsohn. 2004. Public opinion and policy making in Canada 1994–2001. Canadian Journal of Political Science 37 (3): 505–29. doi: 10.1017/S0008423904030094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitkin, Hanna. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, John. 1999. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rehfeld, Andrew. 2009. Representation rethought: on trustees, delegates, and gyroscopes in the study of political representation and democracy. American Political Science Review 103 (2): 214–30. doi: 10.1017/S0003055409090261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renwick, Alan. 2010. The Politics of Electoral Reform: Changing the Rules of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rinne, Jenni M. 2016. How not to talk past each other: the convergence of political representation and deliberation. Representation 52 (1): 29–41. doi: 10.1080/00344893.2016.1241295
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblum, Nancy L. 2008. On the Side of the Angels: An Appreciation of Parties and Partisanship. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Savoie, Donald J. 2010. Power: Where Is It? Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press
   Google Scholar
• Smith, David E. 2007. The People’s House of Commons: Theories of Democracy in Contention. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soroka, Stuart, Erin Penner and Kelly Blidook. 2009. Constituency influence in parliament. Canadian Journal of Political Science 42 (3): 563–91. doi: 10.1017/S0008423909990059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soroka, Stuart N. and Christopher Wlezien. 2004. Opinion representation and policy feedback: Canada in comparative perspective. Canadian Journal of Political Science 37 (3): 531–59. doi: 10.1017/S0008423904030860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes, S.C. 1999. Political parties and democracy. Annual Review of Political Science 2: 243–67. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teorell, Jan. 1999. A deliberative defence of intra-party democracy. Party Politics 5 (3): 363–82. doi: 10.1177/1354068899005003006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbinati, Nadia and Mark E. Warren. 2008. The concept of representation in contemporary democratic theory. Annual Review of Political Science 11: 387–412. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053006.190533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Haute, Emilie and R. Kenneth Carty. 2011. Ideological misfits: a distinctive class of party members. Party Politics 18 (6): 885–95. doi: 10.1177/1354068810395058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, Jonathan. 2017. The party in time. British Journal of Political Science 47 (4): 851–68. doi: 10.1017/S0007123415000265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, Jonathan and Lea Ypi. 2010. Rethinking the modern prince: partisanship and the democratic ethos. Political Studies 58 (4): 809–28 doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00837.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, Jonathan and Lea Ypi. 2011. On partisan political justification. American Political Science Review 105 (2): 381–96. doi: 10.1017/S0003055411000074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, Jonathan and Lea Ypi. 2016. The Meaning of Partisanship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolkenstein, Fabio. 2016. Intra-party democracy beyond aggregation. Party Politics, doi:10.1177/1354068816655563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar