The Choice Is Yours: Caucus Typologies and Collaboration in U.S. State Legislatures

References

• Allen, P., & Childs, S. (2018). The grit in the oyster? Women’s parliamentary organizations and the substantive representation of women. Political studies, 0032321718793080. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321718793080
   Google Scholar
• Banda, K. K., & Kirkland, J. H. (2017). Legislative party polarization and trust in state legislatures. American Politics Research, September, 1532673X17727317. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X17727317
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, T. D. (2012). Gender and legislative preferences: Evidence from the Argentine provinces. Politics & Gender, 8(04), 483–507. doi: 10.1017/S1743923X12000505
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, T. D. (2014). Women’s Representation and Legislative Committee Appointments: The Case of the Argentine Provinces. Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política, 23, 135–163.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, T. D. (2016). Gendering legislative behavior: Institutional constraints and collaboration in Argentina. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, T. D., & Cassese, E. C. (2017). American party women: A look at the gender gap within parties. Political Research Quarterly, 70(1), 127–141. doi: 10.1177/1065912916675738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjarnegård, E. (2013). Gender, informal institutions and political recruitment: Explaining male dominance in parliamentary representation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, D., & Greene, Z. (2014). Should we measure professionalism with an Index? A note on theory and practice in state legislative professionalism research. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 14(3), 277–296. doi: 10.1177/1532440014536407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bratton, K. A., & Rouse, S. M. (2011). Networks in the legislative arena: How group dynamics affect cosponsorship. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 36(3), 423–460. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-9162.2011.00021.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celis, K., Childs, S., & Curtin, J. (2016). Specialised parliamentary bodies and the quality of women’s substantive representation: A comparative analysis of Belgium, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Parliamentary Affairs, 69(4), 812–829. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsw007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Childs, S. (2013). In the absence of electoral sex quotas: Regulating political parties for women’s representation. Representation, 49(4), 401–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2013.850320
   Google Scholar
• Childs, S., & Kittilson, M. C. (2016). Feminizing political parties: Women’s party member organizations within European parliamentary parties. Party Politics, 22(5), 598–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068816654320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, C. (2019). Gaining voice: Causes and consequences of black representation in the American States. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coronil, F. (1994). Listening to the subaltern: The poetics of neocolonial states. Poetics Today, 15(4), 643–658. https://doi.org/10.2307/1773104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dittmar, K., Sanbonmatsu, K., & Carroll, S. J. (2018). A Seat at the Table: Congresswomen’s Perspectives on Why their presence matters. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elazar, D. J. (1994). The American mosaic: The impact of space, time, and culture on American politics. Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, J. H. (2006). Connecting the Congress: A study of cosponsorship networks. Political Analysis, 14(4), 456–487. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpl002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, no. 25/26: 56–80. https://doi.org/10.2307/466240
   Google Scholar
• Gertzog, I. N. (2004). Women and power on capitol hill: Reconstructing the congressional women’s caucus. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Grumbach, J. M. (2018). From backwaters to major policymakers: Policy polarization in the states, 1970–2014. Perspectives on Politics, 16(2), 416–435. https://doi.org/10.1017/S153759271700425X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere. (T. Burger, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/structural-transformation-public-sphere
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, S. W. (1998). Congressional caucuses in National policymaking. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hawaii Senate Majority Office. (2017). Children’s Health and Safety, Access to Healthcare and Violence against Women Focus of Women’s Legislative Caucus in 2017. https://www.hawaiisenatemajority.com/single-post/2017/01/26/Womens-Legislative-Caucus-2017
   Google Scholar
• Holman, M. R. (2017). Women in local government: What we know and where we go from here. State and Local Government Review, 49(4), 285–296. doi: 10.1177/0160323X17732608
   Google Scholar
• Holman, M. R., & Mahoney, A. M. (2018). Stop, collaborate, and listen: Women’s collaboration in US state legislatures. Legislative Studies Quarterly, OnlineFirst (January). https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12199
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, N., & Josefsson, C. (2016). A new way of doing politics? Cross-party women’s caucuses as Critical Actors in Uganda and Uruguay. Parliamentary Affairs, 69(4), 845–859. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsw011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanthak, K., & Krause, G. A. (2010). Valuing diversity in political organizations: Gender and token minorities in the U.S. House of Representatives. American Journal of Political Science, 54(4), 839–854. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00467.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanthak, K., & Krause, G. A. (2012). The diversity paradox: Political parties, legislatures, and the organizational foundations of representation in America. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• King-Meadows, T., & Schaller, T. F. (2007). Devolution and black state legislators: Challenges and choices in the twenty-first century. SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkland, J. H. (2011). The relational determinants of legislative outcomes: Strong and weak ties between legislators. The Journal of Politics, 73(3), 887–898. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381611000533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koger, G. (2003). Position taking and cosponsorship in the U.S. House. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 28(2), 225–246. https://doi.org/10.3162/036298003X200872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, A. M. (2018). Women take their place in state legislatures the creation of women’s caucuses. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, A. M., & Clark, C. (2018). When and where do women’s legislative caucuses emerge? Politics and Gender, forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, D. Z., & Piscopo, J. M. (2018). Electing women to national legislatures. In C. A. Amy, I. B. Catherine, & J. Farida (Eds.), Measuring Women’s Political Empowerment across the Globe: Strategies, Challenges and Future Research. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, D., & Piscopo, J. M. (2019). The impact of women’s political presence. In F. Susan, L. K. Mona, & T. Netina (Eds.), Handbook of women’s political rights. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ondercin, H. L. (2017). Who is responsible for the gender gap? The dynamics of men’s and women’s democratic macropartisanship, 1950–2012. Political Research Quarterly, 70(4), 749–777. doi: 10.1177/1065912917716336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborn, T. (2012). How women represent women: Political parties, gender and representation in the state legislatures. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osborn, T. (2014). Women state legislators and representation the role of political parties and institutions. State and Local Government Review, 46(2), 146–155. doi: 10.1177/0160323X14542441
   Google Scholar
• Osborn, T., Winburn, J., Sullivan, J., & Wright, G. C. (2002). Minority caucuses and roll call voting in state legislatures. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Pinney, N., & Serra, G. (1999). The congressional black caucus and vote cohesion: Placing the caucus within house voting patterns. Political Research Quarterly, 52, 583–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainey, C. (2014). Arguing for a negligible effect. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 1083–1091. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reingold, B., & Schneider, P. (2001). Sex, gender, and the status of ‘Women’s Issue’ Legislation in the states. Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco.
   Google Scholar
• Ringe, N., & Victor, J. N. (2013). Bridging the information gap: Legislative member organizations as social networks in the United States and the european union. University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, A. (1981). Legislative life. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Sanbonmatsu, K. (2010). Where women run: Gender and party in the American States. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sawer, M., & Turner, A. (2016). Specialised parliamentary bodies: Their role and relevance to women’s movement repertoire. Parliamentary Affairs, 69(4), 763–777. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsw003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shor, B., & McCarty, N. (2011). The ideological mapping of American legislatures. American Political Science Review, 105(3), 530–551. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055411000153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squires, C. R. (2002). Rethinking the black public sphere: An alternative vocabulary for multiple public spheres. Communication Theory, 12(4), 446–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00278.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swers, M. L. (2002). The difference women make: The policy impact of women in congress. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tam Cho, W. K., & Fowler, J. H. (2010). Legislative success in a small world: Social network analysis and the dynamics of congressional legislation. The Journal of Politics, 72(1), 124–135. https://doi.org/10.1017/s002238160999051x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomsen, D. M. (2014). Ideological moderates won’t run: How party fit matters for partisan polarization in Congress. The Journal of Politics, 76(03), 786–797. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381614000243
   Google Scholar
• Thomsen, D. M. (2015). Why so few (Republican) women? Explaining the partisan imbalance of women in the U.S. Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 40(2), 295–323. doi: 10.1111/lsq.12075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss, D. S. (2005). Multicollinearity. In Encyclopedia of social measurement (pp. 759–770). New York: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Weldon, S. L. (2004). The dimensions and policy impact of feminist civil society democratic policymaking on violence against women in the fifty US states. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 6(1), 1–28. doi: 10.1080/1461674032000165914
   Google Scholar