Democratic Stress and Political Institutions: Drives of Reforms of Bicameralism in Times of Crisis

References

• Acemoğlu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2008). Persistence of power, elites, and institutions. American Economic Review, 98(1), 267–293. doi: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.1.267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apahideanu, I. (2014). Unicameralism versus bicameralism revisited. The case of Romania. Romanian Political Science Review, 14(1), 47–88.
   Google Scholar
• Avram, C., & Radu, R. (2009). The transition from bicameral to unicameral parliament: Learning from the experience of Western democracies. Revista de Ştiinţe Politice, 23, 11–17.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, S. (2014). Principles or practicalities? Salvaging House of Lords reform. Renewal, 22(1–2), 118–128.
   Google Scholar
• Bedock, C. (2017). Reforming democracy. Institutional engineering in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, A., & Checkel, J. T. (Eds.). (2014). Process tracing: From metaphor to analytic tool. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi, D. G. (2017). ‘I missed a penalty’: The constitutional referendum and Matteo Renzi’s mistakes. Modern Italy, 22(3), 315–329. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/mit.2017.35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder, S. A. (2003). Stalemate: Causes and consequences of legislative Gridlock. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blokker, P. (2017). The Grande Riforma of the Italian constitution: Majoritarian versus participatory democracy? Contemporary Italian Politics, 9(2), 124–141. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/23248823.2017.1338446
   Google Scholar
• Burkhart, S. (2008). Reforming federalism in Germany: Incremental changes instead of the big deal. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 39(2), 341–365. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjn035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceccarini, L., & Bordignon, F. (2017). Referendum on Renzi: The 2016 vote on the Italian constitutional Revision. South European Society and Politics, 22(3), 281–302. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2017.1354421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiaramonte, A. (2015). The unfinished story of electoral reforms in Italy. Contemporary Italian Politics, 7(1), 10–26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/23248823.2014.1002244
   Google Scholar
• Chiaramonte, A., & Emanuele, V. (2017). Party system volatility, regeneration and de-institutionalization in Western Europe (1945–2015). Party Politics, 23(4), 376–388. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068815601330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiva, C. (2015). Strong investiture rules and minority governments in Romania. In B. E. Rasch, S. Martin, & J. A. Cheibub (Eds.), Parliaments and government formation. Unpacking investiture rules (pp. 197–216). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conti, N., Hutter, S., & Nanou, K. (2018). Party competition and political representation in crisis: An introductory note. Party Politics, 24(1), 3–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068817740758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutrone, M., & McCarty, N. (2006). Does bicameralism matter? In B. R. Weingast & D. A. Wittman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political economy (pp. 180–195). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. J. (2004). Democratic challenges, democratic choices: The erosion of political support in advanced industrial democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Döring, H., & Manow, P. (2018). Parliaments and governments database (ParlGov): Information on parties, elections and cabinets in modern democracies. Development version.
   Google Scholar
• Draege, J. B., & Dennison, J. (2018). Making sense of Italy’s constitutional referendum. Mediterranean Politics, 23(3), 403–409. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2017.1302224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elgie, R. (Ed.). (2001). Divided government in comparative perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goossens, J. (2017). Electoral reforms in Belgium's sixth state reform: Historic split of electoral constituency BHV, reform of the senate, and coincident elections. Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, 16(2), 316–324. doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2016.0420
   Google Scholar
• Goossens, J., & Cannoot, P. (2015). Belgian federalism after the sixth state reform. Perspectives on Federalism, 7(2), 29–55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/pof-2015-0009
   Google Scholar
• Harguindéguy, J.-B., Coller, X., & Cole, A. (2017). Why is the Spanish upper chamber so difficult to reform? Parliamentary Affairs, 70(3), 530–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinz, D. (2010). Federal reform II in Germany. Perspectives on Federalism, 2(2), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, W. B. (1997). Bicameralism and budget deficits: The effect of parliamentary structure on government Spending. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 22(4), 485–516. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/440340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, M. (2012). The political crisis in Belgium (2007–2011): A federal system without federal loyalty. Representation, 48(1), 131–138. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2012.653250
   Google Scholar
• Huntington, S. P. (1968). Political order in changing societies. New Have: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutter, S., Kriesi, H., & Vidal, G. (2018). Old versus new politics: The political spaces in Southern Europe in times of crises. Party Politics, 24(1), 10–22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068817694503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, K. (2011). The power or the people? Direct democratic and electoral reforms in Austria, Belgium and the Netherlands (PhD dissertation). Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen.
   Google Scholar
• Koß, M. (2018). Parliaments in time. The evolution of parliamentary democracy in Western Europe, 1866–2015. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. (2012). Patterns of democracy. Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries (2nd ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacCarthaigh, M., & Martin, S. (2015). Bicameralism in the Republic of Ireland: The Seanad abolition referendum. Irish Political Studies, 30(1), 121–131. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07907184.2014.981534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (2010). A theory of gradual institutional change. In J. Mahoney & K. Thelen (Eds.), Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency and power (pp. 1–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, P. (2013). Ruling the void. The hollowing of Western democracy. London: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Musella, F. (2010). La Germania dall’intreccio costituzionale alla riforma. Un ritorno di stato duale? Quaderni di Scienza Politica, 17(3), 575–598.
   Google Scholar
• Muthoo, A., & Shepsle, K. A. (2008). The constitutional choice of bicameralism. In E. Helpman (Ed.), Institutions and economic performance (pp. 249–291). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, P. (2007). Adding value? The role of second chambers. Asia Pacific Law Review, 15(1), 3–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10192557.2007.11788164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedrazzani, A. (2017). Fare le leggi nella Seconda Repubblica. Come cambia il Parlamento. Milano: Egea.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. The American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251–267. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2586011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilet, J.-B. (2008). The future is imagination, the present is reality: Why do big ruling parties oppose majority systems? A Belgian case study. Representation, 44(1), 41–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00344890701869108
   Google Scholar
• Plescia, C., & Eberl, J.-M. (2019). “Not my government!” The role of norms and populist attitudes on voter preferences for government formation after the election. Party Politics, OnlineFirst, doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068819827513
   Google Scholar
• Przeworski, A., & Teune, H. (1970). The logic of comparative social inquiry. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry. Fuzzy sets and beyond. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Renwick, A. (2010). The politics of electoral reform: Changing the rules of democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reuchamps, M. (2013). The current challenges on the Belgian federalism and the Sixth reform of the State. In A. López-Basaguren & L. E. San Epifanio (Eds.), The Ways of federalism in Western countries and the Horizons of territorial autonomy in Spain (Vol. 1, 375–392). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, A. (2006). What kind of democracy is emerging in Eastern Europe? Post-Soviet Affairs, 22(1), 37–64. doi: https://doi.org/10.2747/1060-586X.22.1.37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, J. R. (2001). An informational rationale for congruent bicameralism. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 13(2), 123–151. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692801013002001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, M. (2012). Elected second chambers and their powers: An international survey. The Political Quarterly, 83(1), 117–129. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2012.02275.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, M. (2013a). Rethinking bicameral strength: A three-dimensional approach. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 19(3), 370–391. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2013.773639
   Google Scholar
• Russell, M. (2013b). The contemporary House of Lords. Westminster bicameralism revived. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, M., & Sandford, M. (2002). Why are second chambers so difficult to reform? The Journal of Legislative Studies, 8(3), 79–89. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/714003926
   Google Scholar
• Seha, E., & Müller-Rommel, F. (2016). Case study analysis. In H. Keman & J. J. Woldendorp (Eds.), Handbook of research methods and applications in political science (pp. 419–429). Northampton: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Shugart, M. S. (2003). Extreme electoral systems and the appeal of the mixed-member alternative. In M. S. Shugart & M. P. Wattenberg (Eds.), Mixed-member electoral systems: The best of both worlds? (pp. 25–53). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, G. (2002). Veto players. How political institutions work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, G., & Money, J. (1997). Bicameralism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Varela Suanzes-Carpegna, J. (2006). La reforma constitucional del Senado. Teoría y Realidad Constitucional, 17, 143–168. doi: https://doi.org/10.5944/trc.17.2006.7061
   Google Scholar
• Vatter, A. (2005). Bicameralism and policy performance: The effects of Cameral structure in comparative Perspective. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 11(2), 194–215. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13572330500158607
   Google Scholar
• Vercesi, M. (2017). What kind of veto player is the Italian Senate? A comparative analysis of European second chambers. Journal of Modern Italian Studies, 22(5), 604–623. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1354571X.2017.1389523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vírgala Foruria, E. (2013). The participation of autonomous communities in the central bodies of state. In A. López-Basaguren & L. E. San Epifanio (Eds.), The ways of federalism in Western countries and the horizons of territorial autonomy in Spain (Vol. 2, pp. 63–81). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ware, A. (2002). The American direct primary: Party institutionalization and transformation in the north. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woelk, J. (1999). Segnali di crisi nel federalismo tedesco a 50 anni dal Grundgesetz: verso un modello più competitivo? Le Regioni, 27(2), 217–243.
   Google Scholar