The Conservative Party Leadership Transition from Theresa May to Boris Johnson: Party Popularity and Leadership Satisfaction

References

• Adam, R. (2020). Brexit: Causes and consequences. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Alderman, K. (1996). The Conservative Party Leadership Election of 1995. Parliamentary Affairs, 49(2), 316–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderman, K. (1998). The Conservative Party Leadership Election of 1997. Parliamentary Affairs, 51(1), 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderman, K. (1999). Revision of leadership election procedures in the Conservative party. Parliamentary Affairs, 52(2), 260–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderman, K., & Carter, N. (1991). A very Tory Coup: The ousting of Mrs Thatcher. Parliamentary Affairs, 44(2), 125–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderman, K., & Carter, N. (2002). The Conservative Party Leadership Election of 2001. Parliamentary Affairs, 55(4), 569–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, N., Bara, J., & Bartle, J. (2013). Rules, strategies and words: The content of the 2010 Prime ministerial debates. Political Studies, 61(1), 92–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, N., Bara, J., & Bartle, J. (2017). ‘Finding a niche? Challenger parties and issue emphasis in the 2015 televised leaders’ debates’. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 19(4), 807–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, J., & Jackman, R. (2008). ‘If winning isn’t everything, why do they keep score? Consequence of electoral performance for party leaders’. British Journal of Political Science, 38(4), 657–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, J. (2018). ‘Candidate Brand personality and the 2017 New Zealand General Election’. In J. Lees-Marshment (Ed.), Political Marketing and Management in the 2017 New Zealand General Election (pp. 67–84). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Bittner, A. (2012). Platform or personality? The role of party leaders in elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. A. (1992). The major effect: Changes in party leadership and party popularity. Parliamentary Affairs, 45(4), 545–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bynander, F., & ‘t Hart, P. (2007). The politics of leader survival and succession, Australia in comparative perspective. Australian Journal of Political Science, 42(1), 47–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bynander, F., & ‘t Hart, P. (2008). The art of handing over: (Mis)managing party leadership successions. Government and Opposition, 43(3), 385–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, H., Goodwin, M., & Whiteley, P. (2017). Brexit: Why Britain voted to leave the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, H., Ho, S., & Stewart, M. (2000). ‘Major’s lesser (not minor) effects: Prime ministerial approval and governing party support in Britain since 1979’. Electoral Studies, 19(2-3), 255–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, H., Kellner, P., Stewart, M., Twyman, J., & Whiteley, P. (2016). Austerity and political choice in Britain. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, H., Sanders, D., Stewart, M., & Whiteley, P. (2004). Political choice in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, H., Sanders, D., Stewart, M., & Whiteley, P. (2009). Performance politics and the British voter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, H., & Stewart, M. (1995). Economic evaluations, prime ministerial approval and governing party support: Rival models reconsidered. British Journal of Political Science, 25(2), 145–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa-Lobo, M., & Curtice, J. (2015). Personality politics? The role of leader evaluations in democratic elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cowley, P., & Bailey, M. (2000). ‘Peasants’ uprising or religious war: Re-examining the 1975 conservative leadership contest’. British Journal of Political Science, 30(4), 599–629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowley, P., & Garry, J. (1998). The British Conservative Party and Europe: The choosing of John Major. British Journal of Political Science, 28(3), 473–99.
   Google Scholar
• Cowley, P., & Kavanagh, D. (2018). The British General Election of 2017. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Crines, A., Jeffery, D., & Heppell, T. (2018). ‘The British Labour Party and leadership election mandate(s) of Jeremy Corbyn: Patterns of opinion and opposition within the parliamentary Labour Party’. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 28(3), 361–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, W., & Blais, A. (2010)., ‘Who selects the party leader? ’ Party Politics, 18(2), 127–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, W., & Blais, A. (2012). Politics at the centre: The selection and removal of party leaders in the Anglo parliamentary democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cutts, D., Goodwin, M., Heath, O., & Milazzo, C. (2019). Resurgent remain and a rebooted revolt on the right: Exploring the 2019 European Parliament elections in the United Kingdom. Political Quarterly, 90(3), 496–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutts, D., Goodwin, M., Heath, O., & Surridge, P. (2020). ‘Brexit, the 2019 general election and the realignment of British politics’. Political Quarterly, 91(1), 7–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denham, A., & Dorey, P. (2006). A tale of two speeches: The conservative leadership election. Political Quarterly, 78(1), 35–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denham, A., Dorey, P., & Roe-Crines, A. (2020). Choosing party leaders: Britain’s conservatives and labour compared. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denham, A., & O’Hara, K. (2008). Democratising conservative leadership selection: From grey suits to grass roots. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denver, D. (2005). Valence politics: How Britain votes now. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 7(2), 292–9.
   Google Scholar
• Denver, D., & Garnett, M. (2012). The popularity of British Prime Ministers. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 14(1), 57–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorey, P., & Denham, A. (2016). The longest suicide vote in History: The Labour Party leadership election of 2015. British Politics, 11(3), 259–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ennser-Jedenastik, L., & Schumacher, G. (2020). What parties want from their leader: How office achievement trumps electoral performance as a driver of party leader survival. European Journal of Political Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Vasquez, P., & Somer-Topcu, Z. (2019). The informational role of party leader changes on voter perceptions of party positions. British Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 977–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M., & Milazzo, C. (2015). UKIP: Inside the campaign to redraw the map of British politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heppell, T. (2008a). The degenerative tendencies of long serving governments … .1963 … 1996 … 2008? Parliamentary Affairs, 61(4), 578–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heppell, T. (2008b). Choosing the tory leader: Conservative party leadership elections from Heath to Cameron. London: I. B. Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Heppell, T. (2010). Choosing the labour leader: Labour Party leadership elections from Wilson to Brown. London: I. B. Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Heppell, T., & Hill, M. (2008). The conservative party leadership election of 1997: An analysis of the voting motivations of conservative parliamentarians. British Politics, 3(1), 63–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heppell, T., & Hill, M. (2009). Transcending Thatcherism? Ideology and the conservative party leadership mandate of David Cameron. Political Quarterly, 80(3), 388–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heppell, T., & Hill, M. (2010). The voting Motivations of conservative parliamentarians in the conservative party leadership election of 2001. Politics, 30(1), 36–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heppell, T., & McMeeking, T. (2020). ‘The election and re-election of Jeremy Corbyn as leader of the Labour Party’. In A. Crines (Ed.), The Labour Party under Jeremy Corbyn (pp. 18–29). Newcastle: Agenda.
   Google Scholar
• Horiuchi, Y., Laing, M., & t’Hart, P. (2015). Hard acts to follow: Predecessor effects on party leader survival. Party Politics, 21(3), 357–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ipsos-Mori. (2020a). ‘Voting Intentions Great Britain, 1997–2002’. https://www.ipsos.com/ipsos-mori/en-uk/voting-intentions-great-britain-1997-2002
   Google Scholar
• Ipsos-Mori. (2020b). ‘Voting Intentions Great Britain, 2002-2020’. https://www.ipsos.com/ipsos-mori/en-uk/voting-intention-great-britain-recent-trends
   Google Scholar
• Ipsos-Mori. (2020c). ‘Satisfaction Ratings 1997 to present’. https://www.ipsos.com/ipsos-mori/en-uk/political-monitor-satisfaction-ratings-1997-present
   Google Scholar
• Jeffery, D., Heppell, T., Hayton, R., & Crines, A. (2018). The conservative party leadership election of 2016: An analysis of the voting motivations of conservative parliamentarians. Parliamentary Affairs, 71(2), 263–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenig, O. (2009a). ‘Classifying party leaders’ selection methods in parliamentary democracies. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 19(4), 433–47.
   Google Scholar
• Kenig, O. (2009b). Democratization of party leadership selection: Do wider selectorates produce more competitive contests? Electoral Studies, 28(2), 240–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A. (2002). Leaders’ personalities and the outcomes of Democratic elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• King, A., & Wybrow, R. (2001). British political opinion 1937–2000: The gallup polls. London: Politicos.
   Google Scholar
• Langer, A. (2011). The personalisation of politics in the UK: Mediated leadership from Attlee to Cameron. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• LeDuc, L. (2001). Democratizing party leadership selection. Party Politics, 7(3), 323–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAnulla, S. (2010). Forced exits: Accounting for the removal of contemporary party leaders. Political Quarterly, 81(4), 593–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McSweeney, D. (1999). Changing the rules changed the game: Selecting conservative leaders. Party Politics, 5(4), 471–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murr, A. (2015). The party leadership model: An early forecast of the 2015 British General Election. Research and Politics, April-June, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Opinium. (2020). Political Polling, 15th January. See https://www.opinium.co.uk/political-polling-15th-january-2020/
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, H., & Schumacher, G. (2015). ‘Do leadership changes improve electoral performance?’. In W. Cross & J.-B. Pilet (Eds.), The politics of party leadership: A cross-national perspective (pp. 149–164). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pilet, J. B., & Cross, W. (2014). The selection of political party leaders in contemporary parliamentary democracies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Punnett, R. (1992). Selecting the party leader: Britain in comparative perspective. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, T. (2005). Leasehold or Freehold? Leader-Eviction rules in the British Conservative and Labour parties. Political Studies, 53(4), 793–815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, T. (2010). Membership ballots in party leadership elections in Britain. Representation, 46(1), 101–117.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, T. (2012). Electing and ejecting party leaders in Britain. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, T. (2016). The British Labour Leadership Election of 2015’. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 18(4), 759–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, T. (2019). The Conservative Party's Leadership Election of 2016: Choosing a leader in government. British Politics, 14(1), 63–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridge-Newman, A. (2019). ‘Weak and Wobbly to Get Brexit Done: 2019 and the conservative campaign’. In D. Jackson, E. Thorsen, D. Lilleker, & N. Weidhase (Eds.), UK election analysis 2019: Media, voters and the campaign (pp. 48–49). Poole: Centre for Comparative Politics and Media Research.
   Google Scholar
• Seldon, A., & Newell, R. (2019). May at Ten. London: Biteback.
   Google Scholar
• Sjoblom, G. (1968). Party Strategies in a Multiparty System. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Somer-Topcu, Z. (2017). ‘Agree or disagree: How do party leader changes affect the distribution of voters’ perceptions’. Party Politics, 23(1), 66–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark, L. (1996). Choosing a leader: Party leadership contests in Britain from Macmillan to Blair. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, D., Karp, J., & Hodgson, R. (2011). ‘Party leaders as movers and shakers in British campaigns? Results from the 2010 Election’. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 21(2), 125–45.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, M., & Clarke, H. (1992). The (un)importance of party leaders: Leader images and party choice in the 1987 British election. Journal of Politics, 54(2), 447–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ‘t Hart, P., & Uhr, J. (2011). How power changes hands: Transition and succession in government. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Weller, P. (2012). Fight, flee or fulminate: Prime ministerial challengers, strategic choices and rites of succession. Political Quarterly, 83(1), 152–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteley, P., Clarke, H., Sanders, D., & Stewart, M. (2013). Affluence, austerity and electoral change in Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Worthy, B. (2016). ‘Ending in failure? The performance of ‘takeover’ Prime Ministers 1916–2016. Political Quarterly, 87(4), 509–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar