When Mini-Publics and Maxi-Publics Coincide: Ireland’s National Debate on Abortion

References

• Brown, M. (2006). Survey article: Citizen panels and the concept of representation. Journal of Political Philosophy, 14, 203–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2006.00245.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M. (2018). Deliberation and representation. In A. Bächtiger, J. Dryzek, & J. Mansbridge (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of deliberative democracy (pp. 171–186). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, H., & von Schoultz, Å. (2018). Ideology and deliberation: An analysis of public support for deliberative practices in Finland. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 31, 178–194. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edx022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler, F., Johnston, R., Carty, R. K., Blais, A., & Fournier, P. (2008). Deliberation information, and Trust: The British Columbian Citizens’ Assembly. In M. Warren & H. Pearse (Eds.), Designing deliberative democracy: The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly (pp. 166–191). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A. (1989). Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Darcy, R., & Laver, M. (1990). Referendum dynamics and the Irish divorce amendment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 54, 1–20. doi: 10.1086/269180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. (2001). Legitimacy and Economy in deliberative democracy. Political Theory, 29, 651–69. doi: 10.1177/0090591701029005003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkink, J., Farrell, D., Marien, S., Reidy, T., & Suiter, J. (2020). The death of conservative Ireland? The 2018 abortion referendum. Electoral Studies, (published online first).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkink, J., Farrell, D., Reidy, T., & Suiter, J. (2017). Understanding the 2015 marriage equality referendum in Ireland: Context, campaign and conservative Ireland. Irish Political Studies, 32, 361–81. doi: 10.1080/07907184.2016.1197209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elstub, S. (2010). The third generation of deliberative democracy. Political Studies Review, 8, 291–307. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-9302.2010.00216.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elstub, S. (2014). Deliberative pragmatic equilibrium review: A framework for comparing institutional devices and their enactment of deliberative democracy in the UK. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 16, 386–409. doi: 10.1111/1467-856X.12000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrar, C., Green, D., Green, J., Nikerson, D., & Shewfelt, S. (2009). Does discussion group composition affect policy preferences? Results from three randomized experiments. Political Psychology, 30, 615–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00717.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, D., Curato, N., Dryzek, J. S., Geißel, B., Grönlund, K., Marien, S., … Setälä, M. (2019). Deliberative Mini-Publics: Core Design Features. Centre for Deliberative Democracy and Global Governance working paper 2019/5. Canberra, Australia: Centre for Deliberative Democracy and Global Governance.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, D., & Stone, P. (2020). Sortition and mini-publics: A different kind of representation? In R. Rohrschneider & J. Thomassen (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of political representation in liberal Democracies (pp. 228–246). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, D., Suiter, J., & Harris, C. (2019). ‘Systematizing’ constitutional deliberation: The 2016-18 citizens’ assembly in Ireland. Irish Political Studies, 34, 113–23. doi: 10.1080/07907184.2018.1534832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, D., Suiter, J., Harris, C., & Cunningham, K. (Forthcoming). Ireland’s deliberative mini-publics. In D. Farrell, & N. Hardiman (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Irish Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Field, L. (2018). The abortion referendum of 2018 and a timeline of abortion politics in Ireland to date. Irish Political Studies, 33, 608–28. doi: 10.1080/07907184.2018.1500461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J. S. (1991). Democracy and deliberation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J. S. (2009). When the people speak: Deliberative democracy and public consultation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J. S. (2018). Democracy when The people Are Thinking: Revitalizing Our Politics through public deliberation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fournier, P., Van der Kolk, H., Carty, R. K., Blais, A., & Rose, J. (2011). When citizens decide: Lessons from citizen assemblies on electoral reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, M. (Forthcoming). The politics of referendums. In D. Farrell, & N. Hardiman (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Irish Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gastil, J., Bacci, C., & Dollinger, M. (2010). Is deliberation neutral? Patterns of attitude change during ‘the deliberative polls’. Journal of Public Deliberation, 6(2), Article 3.
   Google Scholar
• Goodin, R., & Dryzek, J. (2006). Deliberative impacts: The macro-political uptake of mini-publics. Politics and Society, 34, 219–44. doi: 10.1177/0032329206288152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grönlund, K., Herne, K., & Setälä, M. (2015). Does enclave deliberation polarize opinions? Political Behavior, 37, 995–1020. doi: 10.1007/s11109-015-9304-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, C. (2019). Mini-publics: Design Choices and Legitimacy. In S. Elstub & O. Escobar (Eds.), The Handbook of democratic Innovation and Governance (pp. 45–59). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. Northampton, MA USA.
   Google Scholar
• Herne, K., Christensen, H. S., & Grönlund, K. (2019). The influence of political knowledge on opinion polarization in citizen deliberation. Political Research Exchange, 1(1), 1–23. doi: 10.1080/2474736X.2019.1702887
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, H., Pan, Z., & Sun, Y. (2008). Influence of hostile media perception on willingness to engage in discursive activities: An examination of mediating role of media indignation. Media Psychology, 11, 76–97. doi: 10.1080/15213260701813454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, L. R., Cook, F. L., & Carpini, M. X. (2009). Talking together: Public deliberation and political participation in America. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• James, M. R. (2008). Descriptive representation in the British Columbian Citizens’ Assembly. In M. Warren & H. Pearse (Eds.), Designing deliberative democracy: The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly (pp. 106–126). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karjalainen, M., & Rapeli, L. (2015). Who will not deliberate? Attrition in a multi-stage citizen deliberation experiment. Quality and Quantity, 49, 407–22. doi: 10.1007/s11135-014-9993-y
   Google Scholar
• Kuran, T. (1998). Insincere deliberation and democratic Failure. Critical Review, 12, 529–44. doi: 10.1080/08913819808443515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuyper, J. (2016). Systemic representation: Democracy, deliberation and nonelected representatives. American Political Science Review, 110, 308–324. doi: 10.1017/S0003055416000095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafont, C. (2020). Democracy without Shortcuts: A Participatory Conception of deliberative democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luskin, R. C., Fishkin, J. S., & Jowell, R. (2002). Considered opinions: Deliberative polling in Britain. British Journal of Political Science, 32, 455–87. doi: 10.1017/S0007123402000194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGraw, S. (2015). How parties win: Shaping the Irish political arena. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGraw, S. (2018). Multi-dimensional party competition: Abortion politics in Ireland. Government and Opposition, 53, 682–706. doi: 10.1017/gov.2017.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendelberg, T. (2006). Small group deliberation [Paper presented]. The Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Noelle-Neumann, E. (1984). The spiral of silence: Public opinion, our social skin. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Park, A., Jowell, R., & McPherson, S. (1998). The future of the national Health Service: Results from a deliberative poll. London: Social and Community Planning Research.
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, J. (2006). Deliberating in the real world: Problems of legitimacy in deliberative democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paulis, E., Pilet, J.-B., Panel, S., Vittori, D., & Close, C. (2020). The POLITICIZE dataset: An inventory of deliberative mini-publics (DMPs) in Europe. European Political Science, (online first).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearse, H. (2008). Institutional design and citizen deliberation. In M. Warren & H. Pearse (Eds.), Designing deliberative democracy: The British Columbia citizens’ assembly (pp. 70–84). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A., & Eveland, W. P. (2001). Perceptions of ‘public opinion’ and ‘public’ opinion expression. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 13, 25–44. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/13.1.25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setälä, M., Grönlund, K., & Herne, K. (2010). Citizen deliberation on Nuclear Power: A Comparison of Two decision-making Methods. Political Studies, 58, 688–714. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00822.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, G. (2009). Democratic innovations: Designing institutions for citizen participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, J. (Forthcoming). Representation and deliberation. In M. Cotta, & D. Russo (Eds.), The Handbook of political representation. Cheltenham UK & Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Strandberg, K., Himmelroos, S., & Grönlund, K. (2019). Do discussions in like-minded groups necessarily lead to more extreme positions? Deliberative democracy and group polarization. International Political Science Review, 40, 41–57. doi: 10.1177/0192512117692136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suiter, J., Farrell, D., & Harris, C. (2016). The Irish constitutional Convention: A case of ‘high legitimacy’? In M. Reuchamps & J. Suiter (Eds.), Constitutional deliberative democracy in Europe (pp. 33–52). Colchester, Essex: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suiter, J., Farrell, D., & Harris, C. (2018). Ireland’s evolving constitution. In P. Blokker (Ed.), Constitutional Acceleration within the European Union and Beyond (pp. 142–154). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Suiter, J., Farrell, D., & O’Malley, E. (2016). When do deliberative citizens change their opinions? Evidence from the Irish citizens’ assembly. International Political Science Review, 37, 198–212. doi: 10.1177/0192512114544068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suiter, J., & Reidy, T. (2020). Does deliberation help deliver informed electorates: Evidence from Irish referendum votes. Representation. (Online first).
   Google Scholar
• Suiter, J., & Reuchamps, M. (2016). A constitutional turn for deliberative democracy in Europe. In M. Reuchamps & J. Suiter (Eds.), Constitutional deliberative democracy in Europe (pp. 1–14). Colchester, Essex: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. (2002). The law of group polarization. Journal of Political Philosophy, 10, 175–95. doi: 10.1111/1467-9760.00148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbanati, N., & Warren, M. E. (2008). The concept of representation in contemporary democratic theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 387–412. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053006.190533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, M. E. (2008). Citizen representatives. In M. Warren & H. Pearse (Eds.), Designing deliberative democracy: The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly (pp. 50–69). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, K. (2019). Encountering Dissimilar views in deliberation: Political knowledge, attitude strength, and opinion change. Political Psychology, Online Early View.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar