Introduction to the Special Issue ‘Beyond ‘Direct Democracy’: Popular Vote Processes in Democratic Systems’

References

• AFP. (2019). Front de refus contre la proposition des députés LFI sur le RIC en commission. L’Obs, February 13. Retrieved from https://www.nouvelobs.com/politique/20190213.AFP1741/front-de-refus-contre-la-proposition-des-deputes-lfi-sur-le-ric-en-commission.html
   Google Scholar
• Altman, D. (2019). Citizenship and contemporary direct democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boehmke, F. J. (2005). The indirect effect of direct legislation: How institutions shape interest group systems. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowler, S., & Donovan, T. (2019). Perceptions of referendums and democracy: The referendum disappointment gap. Politics and Governance, 7(2), 227–41. doi: 10.17645/pag.v7i2.1874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budge, I. (2006). Direct and representative democracy: Are they necessarily opposed? Representation, 42(1), 1–12. doi: 10.1080/00344890600583685
   Google Scholar
• Cheneval, F., & el-Wakil, A. (2018). The institutional design of referendums: Bottom-up and binding. Swiss Political Science Review, 24(3), 294–304. doi: 10.1111/spsr.12319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A. (1989). Democracy and its critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• el-Wakil, A. (2020). Government with the people: The value of facultative referendums in democratic systems. Dissertation, Zurich: University of Zurich. doi:10.5167/uzh-183498.
   Google Scholar
• el-Wakil, A., & McKay, S. (2019). Disentangling referendums and direct democracy: A defence of the systemic approach to popular vote processes. Representation, 1–18. doi: 10.1080/00344893.2019.1652203
   Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J. S. (1995). The voice of the people: Public opinion and democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fishman, N. (1998). Editorial comment: Post-jenkins reflections. Representation, 35(4), 187–90. doi: 10.1080/00344899808523039
   Google Scholar
• Gady, F.-S. (2016). Brexit: The american founding fathers had it right: Direct democracy is a dead duck. The Diplomat, June 25. Retrieved from https://thediplomat.com/2016/06/brexit-the-american-founding-fathers-had-it-right-direct-democracy-is-a-dead-duck/.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, E. R. (1999). The populist paradox: Interest group influence and the promise of direct legislation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gillan, D. C. (2019). Updating guidelines to ensure fair referendums in council of Europe member states. Document no. 14791. Committee on Political Affairs and Democracy, Council of Europe. Strasbourg. Retrieved from http://semantic-pace.net/tools/pdf.aspx?doc=aHR0cDovL2Fzc2VtYmx5LmNvZS5pbnQvbncveG1sL1hSZWYvWDJILURXLWV4dHIuYXNwP2ZpbGVpZD0yNTIzMSZsYW5nPUVO&xsl=aHR0cDovL3NlbWFudGljcGFjZS5uZXQvWHNsdC9QZGYvWFJlZi1XRC1BVC1YTUwyUERGLnhzbA==&xsltparams=ZmlsZWlkPTI1MjMx.
   Google Scholar
• Guasti, P., & Geissel, B. (2019). Saward’s concept of the representative claim revisited: An empirical perspective. Politics and Governance, 7(3), 98–111. doi: 10.17645/pag.v7i3.2103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollander, S. (2019). The politics of referendum use in European democracies. Cham: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jacquet, V., & van der Does, R. (2020). The consequences of deliberative minipublics: Systematic overview, conceptual gaps, and new directions. Representation, 1–11. doi: 10.1080/00344893.2020.1778513
   Google Scholar
• Jäske, M., & Setälä, M. (2019). A functionalist approach to democratic innovations. Representation, 1–17. doi: 10.1080/00344893.2019.1691639
   Google Scholar
• Kousser, T., & Mccubbins, M. (2005). Social choice, crypto-initiatives, and policymaking by direct democracy. Southern California Law Review, 78, 949–984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H. (2005). Direct democratic choice: The Swiss experience. Lanham: Lexington.
   Google Scholar
• Leemann, L. (2015). Political conflict and direct democracy: Explaining initiative Use 1920–2011. Swiss Political Science Review, 21(4), 596–616. doi: 10.1111/spsr.12190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López, J., & Sanjaume-Calvet, M. (2020). The political Use of de facto referendums of independence the case of Catalonia. Representation, 1–19. doi: 10.1080/00344893.2020.1720790
   Google Scholar
• Lutz, G. (2006). The interaction between direct and representative democracy in Switzerland. Representation, 42(1), 45–57. doi: 10.1080/00344890600583776
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J., Bohman, J., Chambers, S., Christiano, T., Fung, A., Parkinson, J., … Warren, M. E. (2012). A systemic approach to deliberative democracy. In J. Parkinson & J. Mansbridge (Eds.), Deliberative systems: Deliberative democracy at the large scale (pp. 1–26). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKay, S. (2019). A democratic theory of ballot measures. Dissertation, Vancouver: University of British Columbia. doi:10.14288/1.0383358.
   Google Scholar
• Mendelsohn, M., & Parkin, A. (2001). Referendum democracy: Citizens, elites and deliberation in referendum campaigns. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, J.-W. (2016). What is populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. doi:10.9783/9780812293784.
   Google Scholar
• Nadau, L. (2019). Face au RIC, Macron brandit le Brexit. Marianne, January 16. Retrieved from https://www.marianne.net/politique/face-au-ric-macron-brandit-le-brexit.
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, J. (2020). The Roles of Referendums in Deliberative Systems. Representation, February, 1–16. doi:10.1080/00344893.2020.1718195.
   Google Scholar
• Reidy, T., & Suiter, J. (2015a). Do rules matter? Categorizing the regulation of referendum campaigns. Electoral Studies, 38(June), 159–69. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2015.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reidy, T., & Suiter, J. (2015b). New directions in referendums, politics and campaigns. Electoral Studies, 38(June), 137–38. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2015.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renwick, A., Palese, M., & Sargeant, J. (2019). Information in referendum campaigns: How Can It Be Improved? Representation, 1–17. doi: 10.1080/00344893.2019.1661872
   Google Scholar
• Saward, M. (2003). Enacting democracy. Political Studies, 51(1), 161–79. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.00418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarrow, S. E. (2001). Direct democracy and institutional change: A comparative investigation. Comparative Political Studies, 34(6), 651–65. doi: 10.1177/0010414001034006003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuck, A. R. T., & de Vreese, C. H. (2015). Public support for referendums in Europe: A cross-national comparison in 21 countries. Electoral Studies, 38(June), 149–58. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2015.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyd, B. (1998). Regulating the referendum. Representation, 35(4), 191–99. doi: 10.1080/00344899808523040
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, I. (2002). Problems, methods, and theories in the study of politics, or what’s wrong with political science and what to Do about It. Political Theory, 30(4), 596–619. doi: 10.1177/0090591702030004008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suiter, J., & Reidy, T. (2019). Does deliberation help deliver informed electorates: Evidence from Irish referendum votes. Representation, December, 1–19. doi:10.1080/00344893.2019.1704848.
   Google Scholar
• Swift, A., & White, S. (2008). Political theory, social science, and real politics. In D. Leopold, & M. Stears (Eds.), Political theory: Methods and approaches (pp. 49–69). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tombs, R. (2019). A very british constitutional crisis. The New York Times, September 5. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/05/opinion/britain-brexit-johnson-constitution.html.
   Google Scholar
• Urbinati, N. (2006). Representative democracy: Principles and genealogy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Biezen, I., & Saward, M. (2008). Democratic theorists and party scholars: Why they don’t talk to each other, and why they should. Perspectives on Politics, 6(1), 21–35. doi: 10.1017/S1537592708080043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Crombrugge, R. (2020). Are referendums necessarily populist? Countering the populist interpretation of referendums through institutional design. Representation, January, 1–22. doi:10.1080/00344893.2020.1720789.
   Google Scholar
• Vatter, A., Rousselot, B., & Milic, T. (2019). The input and output effects of direct democracy: A New research agenda. Policy & Politics, 47(1), 169–86. doi: 10.1332/030557318X15200933925423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, M. E. (2017). A problem-based approach to democratic theory. American Political Science Review, 111(1), 39–53. doi: 10.1017/S0003055416000605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar