Constructivism, Democracy and Symbolic Representation: A Formal/Stylistic Perspective

References

• Abizadeh, A. (2007). On the philosophy/rhetoric binaries: Or, is Habermasian discourse motivationally impotent? Philosophy and Social Criticism, 33(4), 445–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453707077017
   Google Scholar
• Ankersmit, F. R. (1996). Aesthetic politics: Political philosophy beyond fact and value. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ankersmit, F. R. (2002). Political representation. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arato, A. (2013). Political theology and populism. Social Research, 80(1), 143–172. https://doi.org/10.1353/sor.2013.0020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arditi, B. (2010). Review essay: Populism is hegemony is politics? On Ernesto Laclau’s on populist reason. Constellations (Oxford, England), 17(3), 488–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8675.2010.00587.x
   Google Scholar
• Ballacci, G. (2019). Representing judgment–judging representation: Rhetoric, judgment and ethos in democratic representation. Contemporary Political Theory, 18(4), 519–540. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-018-0276-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brito Vieira, M. (2017a). Introduction. In M. Brito Vieira (Ed.), Reclaiming representation: Contemporary advances in the theory of political representation (pp. 1–21). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brito Vieira, M. (2017b). Performative imaginaries. Pitkin versus Hobbes on political representation. In M. Brito Vieira (Ed.), Reclaiming representation: Contemporary advances in the theory of political representation (pp. 25–49). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, K. (1969). A rhetoric of motives. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castiglione, D. (2012). Giving Piktin her due: What the ‘representative claim’ gets right, and what it risks missing. Contemporary Political Theory, 11(1), 118–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castiglione, D., & Pollak, J. (2019). Introduction. In D. Castiglione & J. Pollak (Eds.), Creating political presence: The new politics of democratic representation (pp. 1–15). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, S. (2009). Rhetoric and the public sphere: Has deliberative democracy abandoned mass democracy? Political Theory, 37(3), 323–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591709332336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, M. (2006). Re-presenting the good society. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Disch, L. (2011). Toward a mobilization conception of democratic representation. American Political Science Review, 105(01), 100–114. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055410000602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Disch, L. (2012). Democratic representation and the constituency paradox. Perspectives on Politics, 10(3), 599–616. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592712001636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Disch, L. (2015). The “constructivist turn” in democratic representation: A normative dead-end? Constellations (Oxford, England), 22(4), 487–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Disch, L., van de Sande, L., & Urbinati, N. (2019). The constructivist turn in political representation. Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Disch, L. J. 2021. Making constituencies: Representation as mobilization in mass democracy. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fossen, T. (2019). Constructivism and the logic of political representation. American Political Science Review, 113(3), 824–837. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garsten, B. (2006). Saving persuasion: A defense of rhetoric and judgment. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garsten, B. (2011). The rhetoric revival in political theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 14(1), 159–180. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.040108.104834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geenens, R. (2019). Political representation: The view from France. In L. Disch, M. van de Sande, & N. Urbinati (Eds.), The constructivist turn in political representation (pp. 109–126). Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Göhler, G. (2014, February). Political representation – reconsidered. In P. Diehl & A. Escudier (Eds.), La “Représentation” du politique: histoire, concepts, symboles (Vol. 57, pp. 15−26). Cahier du CEVIPOF.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, R. (2021). Words on fire: Eloquence and its conditions. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, H. (2007). Rappresentanza – Rappresentazione. Parola e concetto dall’antichità all’Ottocento (C. Tommasi, Trans.). Milan: Giuffrè.
   Google Scholar
• Kelsen, H. (2004). Hans Kelsen’s reply to Eric Voegelin’s “new science of politics.” A contribution to the critique of ideology (A. Eckhart, Ed.). Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kitus, A. (2020). The theory of hegemony: Laclau’s path not taken. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 46(10), 1225–1243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453719889987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuyper, J. W. (2016). Systemic representation: Democracy, deliberation, and nonelectoral representatives. American Political Science Review, 110(2), 308–324. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. (1996a). Emancipation(s). Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. (1996b). Deconstruction, pragmatism, hegemony. In C. Mouffe (Ed.), Deconstruction and pragmatism (pp. 49–70). Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. (2000). Identity and hegemony. In J. Butler, E. Laclau, & S. Žižek (Eds.), Contingency, hegemony, universality: Contemporary dialogues on the left (pp. 44–89). Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. (2004). Glimpsing the future. In S. Critchley & O. Marchart (Eds.), Laclau: A critical reader (pp. 279–328). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. (2014). The rhetorical foundations of society. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1987). Post-Marxism without apologies. New Left Review, 166, 79–106.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (2001). Hegemony and socialist strategy (2nd ed.). Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Lefort, C. (1986). The political forms of modern society: Bureaucracy, democracy, totalitarianism (J. B. Thompson, Ed.). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lefort, C. (1988). Democracy and political theory (D. Macey, Trans.). Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J. (2003). Rethinking representation. American Political Science Review, 97(4), 515–528. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055403000856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGurie, S. (2011). Voegelin and Schelling on freedom and the beyond. In L. Trepanier & S. McGuire (Eds.), Eric Voegelin and the continental tradition: Explorations in modern political thought (pp. 64–84). University of Missouri Press.
   Google Scholar
• Montanaro, L. (2012). The democratic legitimacy of self-appointed representatives. Journal of Politics, 74(4), 1094–1107. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381612000515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulieri, A. (2016). Hasso Hofmann and the polysemy of representation. Redescriptions: Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory, 19(2), 127–145. https://doi.org/10.7227/R.19.2.2
   Google Scholar
• Mulieri, A. (2019). Exploring the semantics of constructivist representation. In L. Disch, M. van de Sande, & N. Urbinati (Eds.), The constructivist turn in political representation (pp. 245–268). Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Näsström, S. (2006). Representative democracy as tautology: Ankersmit and Lefort on representation. European Journal of Political Theory, 5(3), 321–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885106064664
   Google Scholar
• Näsström, S. (2015). Democratic representation beyond election. Constellations (Oxford, England), 22(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norval, A. J. (2004). Hegemony after deconstruction: The consequences of undecidability. Journal of Political Ideologies, 9(2), 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310410001691187
   Google Scholar
• Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1988). Traité de l’argumentation. La nouvelle rhétorique. Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.
   Google Scholar
• Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The concept of representation. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pitkin, H. F. (2004). Representation and democracy: Uneasy alliance. Scandinavian Political Studies, 27(3), 335–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2004.00109.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saward, M. (2010). The representative claim. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saward, M. (2016). Fragments of equality in representative politics. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 19(3), 245–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2016.1144853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saward, M. (2019). Liminal representation. In D. Castiglione & J. Pollak (Eds.), Creating political presence: The new politics of democratic representation (pp. 276–297). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saward, M. (2020). Making representations: Claim, counterclaim and the politics of acting for others. ECPR Press/Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Sintomer, Y. (2013). The meanings of political representation: Uses and misuses of a notion. Raisons politiques, 50(2), 13–34. https://doi.org/10.3917/rai.050.0013
   Google Scholar
• Thomassen, L. (2019). Representing the people: Laclau as a theorist of representation. New Political Science, 41(2), 329–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2019.1596687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbinati, N. (2006). Representative democracy: Principles and genealogy. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Urbinati, N. 2019. Me the people: How populism transforms democracy. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vatter, M. (2020). Divine democracy: Political theology after Carl Schmitt. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vergara, C. (2020). Populism as plebeian politics: Inequality, domination, and popular empowerment. Journal of Political Philosophy, 28(2), 222–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voegelin, E. (1952). The new science of politics: An introduction. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Voegelin, E. (1957). Plato and Aristotle. Louisiana State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Voegelin, E. (1987). In search of order. Louisiana State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Voegelin, E. (1990a). The beginning and the beyond (1977). In T. A. Hollweck & P. Caringella (Eds.), What is history? And other late unpublished writings (pp. 173–232). Louisiana State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Voegelin, E. (1990b). Equivalences of experience and symbolization in history. In E. Sandoz (Ed.), Published essays, 1966–1985 (pp. 115–133). Louisiana State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Voegelin, E. (2000). The ecumenic age (M. Franz, Ed.). University of Missouri Press.
   Google Scholar
• Voegelin, E. (2002). Anamnesis: On the theory of history and politics (D. Welsh, Ed.). University of Missouri Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yack, B. (2006). Rhetoric and public reasoning: An Aristotelian understanding of political deliberation. Political Theory, 34(4), 417–438. doi:10.1177/0090591706288232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar