Do Governments Always Take Unpopular Decisions Knowingly? How Perceptual Inaccuracy Affects Policy Decisions

References

• Ashcroft, M., & Culwick, K. (2015). Pay me forty Quid and I’ll tell you. Biteback Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Baekgaard, M., Christensen, J., Dahlmann, C. M., Mathiasen, A., & Petersen, N. B. G. (2019). The role of evidence in politics: Motivated reasoning and persuasion among politicians. British Journal of Political Science, 49. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balls, E. (2016). Speaking out. Arrow Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bardi, L., Bartolini, S., & Trechsel, A. H. (2014). Responsive and responsible? The role of parties in twenty-first century politics. West European Politics, 37(2), https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2014.887871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belchior, A. M. (2014). Explaining MPs’ perceptions of voters’ positions in a party-mediated representation system: Evidence from the Portuguese case. Party Politics, 20(3), 403–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068811436046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergman, M. (2014). 7 Quality of inferences in mixed methods research: Calling for an integrative framework. In Advances in mixed methods research. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857024329.d10
   Google Scholar
• Brady, H. E., Collier, D., & Seawright, J. (2004). Refocusing the discussion of methodology. In H. Brady & D. Collier (Eds.), Rethinking social inquiry: Diverse tools, shared standards (pp. 3–21). Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Broockman, D. E., & Skovron, C. (2018). Bias in perceptions of public opinion among political elites. American Political Science Review, 112(3). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055418000011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burstein, P. (2014). American public opinion, advocacy, and policy in congress: What the public wants and what it gets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, C. (2021). When are governing parties more likely to respond to public opinion? The strange case of the Liberal Democrats and tuition fees. British Politics, 16(3), 336–354. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-020-00139-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, D. M., & Dynes, A. M. (2016). How politicians discount the opinions of constituents with whom they disagree. American Journal of Political Science, 60(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canes-Wrone, B., & Shotts, K. W. (2004). The Conditional Nature of Presidential Responsiveness to Public Opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 48(4), 690–706. https://doi.org/10.2307/1519928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, S., & Geddes, A. (2010). Less is more: Immigration and European integration at the 2010 general election. Parliamentary Affairs, 63(4). https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsq021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, J., & Moynihan, D. (2020). Motivated reasoning and policy information: Politicians are more resistant to debiasing interventions than the general public. Behavioural Public Policy, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2020.50
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, H. D., Kellner, P., Stewart, M. C., Twyman, J., & Whiteley, P. (2016). Austerity and political choice in Britain. In Austerity and political choice in Britain, https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137524935
   Google Scholar
• Clausen, A. R., Holmberg, S., & deHaven-Smith, L. (1983). Contextual factors in the accuracy of leader perceptions of constituents’ views. The Journal of Politics, 45(2), 449–472. https://doi.org/10.2307/2130134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clegg, N. (2016). Politics: Between the extremes. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Consterdine, E. (2017). Labour’s immigration policy: The making of the migration state. In Labour’s immigration policy: The making of the migration state. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64692-3
   Google Scholar
• Converse, P. E., & Pierce, R. (1986). Political representation in France. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cutts, D., Fieldhouse, E., & Russell, A. (2010). The campaign that changed everything and still did not matter? The Liberal Democrat campaign and performance. Parliamentary Affairs, 63(4), https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsq025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekker, P., & Ester, P. (1989). Elite perceptions of mass preferences in The Netherlands; biases in cognitive responsiveness. European Journal of Political Research, 17(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1989.tb00210.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, P. (1995). Policy disasters: Explaining the UK’s record. Public Policy and Administration, https://doi.org/10.1177/095207679501000205
   Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, P., & Ward, H. (1981). Exogenous voter preferences and parties with state power: Some internal problems of economic theories of party competition. British Journal of Political Science, 11(3), 351–380. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400002684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmelund-Præstekær, C., & Emmenegger, P. (2013). Strategic re-framing as a vote winner: Why vote-seeking governments pursue unpopular reforms. Scandinavian Political Studies, 36(1), https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2012.00295.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, G., & Chzhen, K. (2013). Explaining voters’ defection from labour over the 2005-10 electoral cycle: Leadership, economics and the rising importance of immigration. Political Studies, 61(SUPPL.1)), https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fieldhouse, E., Cutts, D., & Russell, A. (2006). Neither north nor south: The liberal democrat performance in the 2005 general election. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties, 16(1), https://doi.org/10.1080/13689880500505306
   Google Scholar
• Ford, R., Jennings, W., & Somerville, W. (2015). Public opinion, responsiveness and constraint: Britain’s three immigration policy regimes. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41(9), https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2015.1021585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould, P. (2011). The unfinished revolution: How new labour changed British politics for ever. Abacus.
   Google Scholar
• Green, J. & Jennings, W. (2017) The politics of competence: Parties, public opinion and voters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, E. (2017). Election 2017: Will the Liberal Democrats win over young voters? BBC News. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2017-39952676
   Google Scholar
• Herbst, S. (1998). Reading public opinion. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hertel-Fernandez, A., Mildenberger, M., & Stokes, L. C. (2019). Legislative staff and representation in congress. American Political Science Review, 113(1). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055418000606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmberg, S. (1999). Wishful thinking among European Parliamentarians. In Political representation and legitimacy in the European Union. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198296614.003.0011
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, L.R. & Shapiro, R.Y. (2000) Politicans don't pander. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jarman, H., & Greer, S. L. (2015). The big bang: Health and social care reform under the coalition. In The conservative-liberal coalition: Examining the Cameron-Clegg Government. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137461377_4
   Google Scholar
• John, P., Bertelli, A., Jennings, W., & Bevan, S. (2013). Policy agendas in British politics. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, B. D. (2001). Politics and the architecture of choice. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2005). The politics of attention: How government prioritizes problems. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185. ISSN 0012-9682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karremans, J., & Lefkofridi, Z. (2020). Responsive versus responsible? Party democracy in times of crisis. In Party politics (Vol. 26, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068818761199.
   Google Scholar
• Kavanagh, D., & Cowley, P. (2010). The British General Election of 2010. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. W. (1989). Congressmen’s voting decisions: Third Edition. University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knecht, T. M., & Weatherford, S. (2006). Public opinion and foreign policy: The stages of presidential decision making. International Studies Quarterly, 50(3), 705–727. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2006.00421.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lansley, A. (2005). Speech to the NHS Confederation: The future of health and public service regulation. https://conservative-speeches.sayit.mysociety.org/speech/600287
   Google Scholar
• Laws, D. (2016). Coalition: The inside story of the conservative-liberal democrat coalition. Biteback Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, J. S. (2008). Case studies: Types, designs, and logics of inference. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 25(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388940701860318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindstädt, R., & Vander Wielen, R. J. (2011). Timely shirking: Time-dependent monitoring and its effects on legislative behavior in the U.S. Senate. Public Choice, 148(1–2), 119–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-010-9649-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mair, P. (2009) Representative versus responsible government, MPIfG Working Paper, No. 09/8, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne.
   Google Scholar
• Mattinson, D. (2010). Talking to a brick wall: How new labour stopped listening to the voter and why we need a new politics. Biteback Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P., & Lovenduski, J. (2004). Why parties fail to learn: Electoral defeat, selective perception and British Party Politics. Party Politics, 10(1), 85–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068804039122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ONS (2018) Dataset: Long-term International Migration 1.01, components and adjustments, UK. Retrieved October 5, 2019, from https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/internationalmigration/datasets/longterminternationamigrationcomponentlsandadjustmentstable101.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, E. (2010). Reactive, defensive and weak. Prospect Magazine, 15–16.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, M. M. (2021). Understanding and reducing biases in elite beliefs about the electorate. American Political Science Review, https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305542100037X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petry, F. (2007). How policy makers view public opinion. In Policy analysis in Canada: The state of the art. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442685529-017
   Google Scholar
• Plescia, C., & Staniek, M. (2017). In the eye of the beholder: Voters’ perceptions of party policy shifts. West European Politics, 40(6), 1288–1309. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2017.1309623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, B. (2012). A brief history of the pasty Tax, The Guardian, 29 May. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2012/may/29/pasty-tax-brief-history
   Google Scholar
• Salmon, P. (1993). Unpopular policies and the theory of representative democracy. In A. Breton, G. Galeotti, P. Salmon, & R. Wintrobe (Eds.), Preferences and democracy. International studies in economics and econometrics (Vol. 28). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2188-0_2
   Google Scholar
• Seldon, A., & Snowdon, P. (2016). Cameron at 10: The Verdict. William Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Sevenans, J., Walgrave, S., Jansen, A., Soontjens, K., Brack, N., & Bailer, S. (2023). Projection in politicians’ perceptions of public opinion. Political Psychology, https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, P. (1991). Lessons from the British poll tax disaster. National Tax Journal, 44(4), 421–436. https://doi.org/10.1086/NTJ41788932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soontjens, K. (2020). The awareness paradox: (Why) politicians overestimate citizens’ awareness of parliamentary questions and party initiatives. Representation, https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2020.1785538
   Google Scholar
• Soontjens, K. (2022). Inside the party’s mind: Why and how parties are strategically unresponsive to their voters’ preferences. Acta Politica, 22, 731–752. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-021-00220-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straw, J. (2012). Last man standing. Pan Books.
   Google Scholar
• Strøm, K. (1990). A behavioral theory of competitive political parties. American Journal of Political Science, 34(2), 565–598. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Conservative Party. (2007). NHS autonomy and accountability: Proposals for legislation. http://www.nhshistory.net/NHSautonomyandaccountability.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tiggle, N. (2010) GPs ‘uncertain if NHS shake-up will benefit patients’. BBC News, 7th October. https://www.bbc.com/news/health-11488780
   Google Scholar
• Timmins, N. (2012). Never Again? The story of the Health and Social Care Act. Institue for the Government, The King’s Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Vargas-Silva, C. (2011). Lessons from the EU eastern enlargement: Chances and challenges for policy makers. CESifo DICE Report, 9(4), 9–13.
   Google Scholar
• Varone, F., & Helfer, L. (2022). Understanding MPs’ perceptions of party voters’ opinion in Western democracies. West European Politics, 45(5), 1033–1056. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2021.1940647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vis, B. (2019). Heuristics and political elites’ judgment and decision-making. Political Studies Review, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929917750311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vis, B., & Van Kersbergen, K. (2007). Why and how do political actors pursue risky reforms? Journal of Theoretical Politics, 19(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/0951629807074268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walgrave, S., Jansen, A., Sevenans, J., Soontjens, K., Pilet, J. B., Brack, N., Varone, F., Helfer, L., Vliegenthart, R., van der Meer, T., Breunig, C., Bailer, S., Sheffer, L., & Loewen, P. J. (2023). Inaccurate politicians: Elected representatives’ estimations of public opinion in four countries. The Journal of Politics, 85(1), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1086/722042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittman, D. (1983 March). Candidate motivation: A synthesis of alternative theories. American Political Science Review, 77(1), 142–157. (1989). Why democracies produce efficient results. Journal of Political Economy, 97. 6 (December), 1395–1424. https://doi.org/10.2307/1956016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YouGov. (2015). Best Party on Issues Tracker. YouGov. https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/9drub35(7f/YG-Archives-Pol-Trackers-Issues(1)-Best-Party-on-Issue-270415.pdf.
   Google Scholar