Agency theory and social interactions at work

References

• Akerlof, G. (1982) “Labor Contracts as Partial Gift Exchange,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 97(4): 543–569.10.2307/1885099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alchian, A. and Demsetz, H. (1972) “Production, Information Costs and Economic Organization,” American Economic Review LXII(2): 777–795.
   Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M. and Willmont, H. (1992) Critical Management Studies, London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, H. (1958) The Human Condition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, G., Gibbons, R., and Murphy, K. (2002) “Relational Contracts and the Theory of the Firm,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 117(1): 39–84.10.1162/003355302753399445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnard, C. (1938) The Functions of the Executive, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, J. and Kreps, D. (2012) “Employment as an Economic and a Social Relationship,” in R. Gibbons and J. Roberts (eds) The Handbook of Organizational Economics, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 315–341.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, N. and Gigerenzer, G. (2010) “As-If Behavioral Economics: Neoclassical Economics in Disguise?,” History of Economic Ideas 18(1): 133–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruni, L. (2008) “Back to Aristotle? Happiness, Eudaimonia, and Relational Goods,” in L. Bruni, F. Comim and P. Pugno (eds) Capabilities and Happiness, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 114–138.
   Google Scholar
• Bruni, L., Panebianco, Fabrizio, and Smerilli, A. (2014) “Beyond Carrots and Sticks: How Cooperation and Its Rewards Evolve Together,” Review of Social Economy 72(1): 55–82.10.1080/00346764.2014.884388
   Google Scholar
• Charness, G. and Kuhn, P. (2011) “Lab Labor: What Can Labor Economists Learn from the Lab?,” in O. Ashenfelter and D. Card (eds) Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 4, Part A, pp. 229–330.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, R. (1985) “Agency Costs versus Fiduciary Duties,” in J. Pratt and R. Zeckhauser (eds) Principals and Agents, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, pp. 55–80.
   Google Scholar
• Cushen, J. and Thompson, P. (2012) “Doing the Right Thing? HRM and the Angry Knowledge Worker,” New Technology, Work and Employment 27(2): 79–92.10.1111/ntwe.2012.27.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. and Ryan, R. (2000) “The ‘What’ and ‘Why’ of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior,” Psychological Inquiry 11: 227–268.10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowell, Richard, Goldfarb, Robert, and Griffith, William (1998) “Economic Man as a Moral Individual,” Economic Inquiry XXXVI: 645–653.
   Google Scholar
• Dur, R., Non, A., and Roefsma, H. (2010) “Reciprocity and Incentive Pay in the Workplace,” IZA Discussion Paper nº 4782.
   Google Scholar
• Duska, R. (1992) “Why Be a Loyal Agent? A Systemic Ethical Analysis,” in E. Freeman and N. Bowie (eds) Ethics and Agency Theory, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 149–170.
   Google Scholar
• Favereau, O. (2008) “The Unconventional, but Conventionalist, Legacy of Lewis’s ‘Convention’,” Topoi 27(1–2): 115–126.10.1007/s11245-008-9038-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagné, M. and Deci, E. (2005) “Self-Determination Theory and Work Motivation,” Journal of Organizational Behavior 26: 331–362.10.1002/job.v26:4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghoshal, S. (2005) “Bad Management Theories Are Destroying Good Management Practices,” Academy of Management Learning & Education 4(1): 75–91.10.5465/AMLE.2005.16132558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gindis, D. (2013) “A Timely Rhetoric and a Rallying Label,” In Communication to the 15th Annual AHE Conference, unpublished.
   Google Scholar
• Gui, B. (2000) “Beyond Transactions: On the Interpersonal Dimension of Economic Reality,” Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 71(2): 139–169.10.1111/apce.2000.71.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves Heap, S. (2013) “What is the Meaning of Behavioural Economics?,” Cambridge Journal of Economics 37(5): 985–1000.10.1093/cje/bes090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, G. (1989) “Concepts of Individual, Self, and Person in Description and Analysis,” American Anthropologist 91: 599–612.10.1525/aa.1989.91.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, O. (2002) “Norms and the Theory of the Firm,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 149: 1701–1715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmstrom, B. (1999) “The Firm as a Subeconomy,” Journal of Law Economics and Organization 15(1): 74–102.10.1093/jleo/15.1.74
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmstrom, B. and Tirole, J. (1989) “The Theory of the Firm,” in R. Schmalensee and R. Willig (eds) Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. 1, Amsterdam: North-Holland/Elsevier, pp. 61–133.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. (1995) The Struggle for Recognition – The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts, Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. and Meckling, W. (1976) “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure,” Journal of Financial Economics 3(4): 305–360.10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandori, M. (1992) “Social Norms and Community Enforcement,” The Review of Economic Studies 59(1): 63–80.10.2307/2297925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, E. Han, Morse, A., and Zingales, L. (2006) “What Has Mattered to Economics since 1970,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 20(4): 189–202.10.1257/jep.20.4.189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkin, I., Pierce, L., and Gino, F. (2012) “The Psychological Costs of Pay-for-Performance: Implications for the Strategic Compensation of Employees,” Strategic Management Journal 33: 1194–1214.10.1002/smj.v33.10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Gall, J.-M. (2011) L’entreprise Irréprochable [The irreproachable firm], Paris: Desclée de Brower.
   Google Scholar
• Lopes, H. (2011) “Why Do People Work? Individual Wants versus Common Goods,” Journal of Economic Issues 45(1): 57–74.10.2753/JEI0021-3624450104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes, H., Lagoa, S., and Calapez, T. (2014) “Work Autonomy, Work Pressure, and Job Satisfaction: An Analysis of European Union Countries,” The Economic and Labour Relations Review 25(2): 306–326.10.1177/1035304614533868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, G., Gomez-Mejia, L., and Wiseman, R. (2013) “Executive Stock Options as Mixed Gambles: Revisiting the Behavioral Agency Model,” Academy of Management Journal 56(2): 451–472.10.5465/amj.2010.0967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitnick, B. (1992) “The Theory of Agency and Organizational Analysis,” in N. Bowie and R. Freeman (eds) Ethics and Agency Theory, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 75–227.
   Google Scholar
• Netterstrom, B., Conrad, N., Bech, P., Fink, P., Olsen, O., Rugulies, R., and Stansfeld, S. (2008) “The Relation between Work-Related Psychosocial Factors and the Development of Depression,” Epidemiologic Reviews 30: 118–132.10.1093/epirev/mxn004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Non, A. (2012) “Gift-Exchange, Incentives and Heterogeneous Workers,” Games and Economic Behavior 75(1): 319–336.10.1016/j.geb.2011.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pepper, A. and Gore, J. (2015) “Behavioral Agency Theory: New Foundations for Theorizing about Executive Compensation,” Journal of Management 41(4): 1045–1068.10.1177/0149206312461054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebitzer, J. and Taylor, T. (2011) “Extrinsic Rewards and Intrinsic Motives: Standard and Behavioural Approaches to Agency and Labor Markets,” in O. Ashenfelter and D. Card (eds) Handbook of Labor Economics, North Holland: Elsevier, pp. 701–772.
   Google Scholar
• Rob, R. and Zemsky, P. (2002) “Social Capital, Corporate Culture, and Incentive Intensity,” The RAND Journal of Economics 33(2): 243–257.10.2307/3087432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. (2005) “Agency Theory, Ethics and Corporate Governance,” in C. Lehman (ed) Advances in Public Interest Accounting, Vol. 11, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 249–269.
   Google Scholar
• Roger, B. (Ed) (2012) L’entreprise, Formes De Propriété Et Responsabilités Sociales [The firm, ownership forms and social responsibilities], Paris: Éditions Lethilieux.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, B., Garza, A., Conlon, D., and Kim, Y. (2014) “Why Do Managers Act Fairly in the First Place? A Daily Investigation of ‘Hot’ and ‘Cold’ Motives and Discretion,” Academy of Management Journal 57(6): 1571–1591.10.5465/amj.2012.0644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (2002) Rationality and Freedom, Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, S. (2005) “Agency Theory,” Annual Review of Sociology 31: 263–284.10.1146/annurev.soc.31.041304.122159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheldon, K., Ryan, R., Deci, E., and Kasser, T. (2004) “The Independent Effects of Goal Contents and Motives on Well-Being: It’s Both What You Pursue and Why You Pursue It,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 30(4): 475–486.10.1177/0146167203261883
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, J. (2006) “Work, Health and Welfare: New Challenges,” International Journal of Social Welfare 15(Suppl. 1): S5–S12.10.1111/ijsw.2006.15.issue-s1
   Google Scholar
• Sliwka, D. (2007) “Trust as a Signal of a Social Norm and the Hidden Costs of Incentive Schemes,” American Economic Review 97(3): 999–1012.10.1257/aer.97.3.999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugden, R. (2005) “Fellow-Feeling,” in B. Gui and R. Sugden (eds) Economics and Social Interactions – Accounting for Interpersonal Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 52–75.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. (1985) “The Person,” in M. Carrithers, et al. (eds) The Category of the Person, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 257–281.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. (1989) Sources of the Self, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. (2013) “Financialization and the Workplace: Extending and Applying the Disconnected Capitalism Thesis,” Work, Employment and Society 27(3): 472–488.10.1177/0950017013479827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhlaner, C. (1989) “‘Relational Goods’ and Participation: Incorporating Sociability into a Theory of Rational Action,” Public Choice 62: 253–285.10.1007/BF02337745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajac, E. and Westphal, J. (2004) “The Social Construction of Market Value: Institutionalization and Learning Perspectives on Stock Market Reactions,” American Sociological Review 69: 433–457.10.1177/000312240406900306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar