The US labor share of income: what shocks matter?

References

• Alloza, D., Gonzalo, J., & Sanz, C. (2019). Dynamic effects of persistent shocks. Mimeo. Retrieved November 18, 2019 from https://drive.google.com/file/d/16GPYuS4k4qsSi2iHfih9Rh3DINL7mJ1z/view.
   Google Scholar
• Autor, D., Dorn, D., Katz, L., Patterson, C., & Van Reenen, J. (2017). The fall of the labor share and the rise of superstar firms (NBER Working Paper, No. 23396).
   Google Scholar
• Bacchiocchi, E., & Fanelli, L. (2015). Identification in structural vector autoregressive models with structural changes, with an application to US monetary policy. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 77(6), 761–779. https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.2015.77.issue-6 doi: 10.1111/obes.12092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbosa, N., & Taylor, L. (2006). Distributive and demand cycles in the US economy: A structuralist Goodwin model. Metroeconomica, 57(3), 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/meca.2006.57.issue-3 doi: 10.1111/j.1467-999X.2006.00250.x
   Google Scholar
• Barkai, S. (2017). Declining labor and capital shares. University of Chicago. Mimeo. Retrieved September 18, 2019 from https://drive.google.com/file/d/18-5POx2FQ-UZBq-KaDla5dwEBLttaJV9/view.
   Google Scholar
• Basu, D., & Gautham, L. (2019). What is the impact of an exogenous shock to the wage share? VAR results for the US economy, 1973–2018 (UMASS Amherst Economics Working Paper, No. 2019–08).
   Google Scholar
• Beqiraj, E., Fanti, L., & Zamparelli, L. (2019). Sectoral composition of output and the wage share: The role of the service sector. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 51, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2019.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchard, O., & Giavazzi, F. (2003). Macroeconomic effects of regulation and deregulation in goods and labor markets. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(3), 879–907. https://doi.org/10.1162/00335530360698450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blecker, R., & Setterfield, M. (2019). Heterodox macroeconomics: Models of demand, distribution and growth. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Brugnolini, L. (2018). About local projection impulse response function reliability (CEIS Working Paper, No. 440).
   Google Scholar
• Cantore, C., Ferroni, F., & León-Ledemsa, M. (2020). The missing link: Monetary policy and the labor share (Bank of England Staff Working Paper, No. 857).
   Google Scholar
• Checchi, D., & García-Peñalosa, C. (2010). Labour market institutions and the personal distribution of income in the OECD. Economica, 77(307), 413–450. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.2009.00776.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chirinko, R. S., & Mallick, D. (2017). The substitution elasticity, factor shares, and the low-frequency panel model. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 9(4), 225–253. https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.20140302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciminelli, G., Duval, R., & Furceri, D. (2018). Employment protection deregulation and labor shares in advanced economies (IMF Working Paper, No. 18/186).
   Google Scholar
• Dünhaupt, P. (2017). Determinants of labor's income share in the era of financialisation. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 41(1), 283–306. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bew023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, G., Rothenberg, T. J., & Stock, J. H. (1996). Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica, 64(4), 813–836. https://doi.org/10.2307/2171846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsby, M. W., Hobijn, B., & Şahin, A. (2013). The decline of the US labor share. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2013(2), 1–63. https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.2013.0016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertürk, K. A. (2019). Induced technology hypothesis. Acemoglu and Marx on deskilling (skill replacing) innovations. Review of Social Economy. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346764.2019.1650291
   Google Scholar
• Flaschel, P. (1993). Macrodynamics. Income distribution, effective demand and cyclical growth. Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Fogli, A., & Perri, F. (2006). The ‘Great Moderation’ and the US external imbalance (NBER Working Paper, No. 12708).
   Google Scholar
• Foroni, C., Furlanetto, F., & Lepetit, A. (2018). Labor supply factors and economic fluctuations. International Economic Review, 59(3), 1491–1510. https://doi.org/10.1111/iere.2018.59.issue-3 doi: 10.1111/iere.12311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giannoni, M., & Merterns, K. (2019). Outsourcing, markups and the labor share. Mimeo. Retrieved September 18, 2019 from https://karelmertenscom.files.wordpress.com/2019/03/mg_outsourcing_03_20_2019.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, R. M. (1967). A growth cycle. In C. H. Feinstein (Ed.), Socialism, capitalism and growth: Essays presented to Maurice Dobb (pp. 54–58). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hein, E. (2013). Finance-dominated capitalism and re-distribution of income: A Kaleckian perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 39(3), 907–934. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bet038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaumotte, F., & Osorio-Buitron, C. (2020). Inequality: traditional drivers and the role of union power. Oxford Economic Papers, 72(1), 25–58. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpz024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordà, Ò. (2005). Estimation and inference of impulse responses by local projections. American Economic Review, 95(1), 161–182. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828053828518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaldor, N. (1966). Causes of the slow growth in the United Kingdom. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karabarbounis, L., & Neiman, B. (2013). The global decline of the labor share. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(1), 61–103. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjt032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilian, L. (2009). Not all oil price shocks are alike: Disentangling demand and supply shocks in the crude oil market. American Economic Review, 99(3), 1053–1069. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.99.3.1053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P. C., Schmidt, P., & Shin, Y. (1992). Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? Journal of Econometrics, 54(1–3), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(92)90104-Y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendieta-Muñoz, I., Rada, C., & von Arnim, R. (2019). The decline of the U.S. labor share across sectors. (INET Working Paper, No. 105).
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, K., & Topel, R. (1985). Estimation and inference in two-step econometric models. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 3(4), 370–379. https://doi.org/10.1198/073500102753410417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, S., & Perron, P. (1995). Unit root tests in ARMA models with data-dependent methods for the selection of the truncation lag. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90(429), 268–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1995.10476510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagan, A. (1984). Econometric issues in the analysis of regressions with generated regressors. International Economic Review, 25(1), 221–247. https://doi.org/10.2307/2648877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pariboni, R., & Tridico, P. (2019). Labor share decline, financialisation and structural change. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 43(4), 1073–1102. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bez025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plagborg-Møller, M., & Wolf, C. K. (2019). Local projections and VARs estimate the same impulse responses. Mimeo. Retrieved September 18, 2019 from https://scholar.princeton.edu/sites/default/files/mikkelpm/files/lp_var.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Proaño, C., Flaschel, P., Ernst, E., & Semmler, W. (2006). Disequilibrium macroeconomic dynamics, income distribution and wage-price Phillips curves. Evidence from the US and the Euro area (IMK Working Paper, No. 4).
   Google Scholar
• Rada, C., & Kiefer, D. (2016). Distribution-utilization interactions: A race to the bottom among OECD countries. Metroeconomica, 67(2), 477–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/meca.12081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raval, D. (2017). What's wrong with capital in the twenty-first century's model? In H. Boushey, J. B. DeLong, & M. Steinbaum (Eds.), After Piketty: The agenda for economics and inequality (pp. 75–98). Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rubio-Ramírez, F., Waggoner, D., & Zha, T. (2010). Structural Vector Autogregressions: Theory of identification and algorithms for inference. Review of Economic Studies, 77(2), 665–696. https://doi.org/10.1111/roes.2010.77.issue-2 doi: 10.1111/j.1467-937X.2009.00578.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Said, S. E., & Dickey, D. A. (1984). Testing for unit roots in autoregressive-moving average models of unknown order. Biometrika, 71(3), 599–607. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/71.3.599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stock, J. H., & Watson, M. W. (2002). Has the business cycle changed and why? NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 17, 159–218. https://doi.org/10.1086/ma.17.3585284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavani, D., Flaschel, P., & Taylor, L. (2011). Estimated non-linearities and multiple equilibria in a model of distributive-demand cycles. International Review of Applied Economics, 25(5), 519–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/02692171.2010.534441
   Google Scholar
• Tavani, D., & Zamparelli, L. (2017). Endogenous technical change in alternative theories of growth and distribution. Journal of Economic Surveys, 31(5), 1272–1303. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.2017.31.issue-5 doi: 10.1111/joes.12220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, L., & Ömer, Ö. (2020). Where do profits and jobs come from? Employment and distribution in the US economy. Review of Social Economy, 78(1), 98–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346764.2019.1672883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, A. (1928). Increasing returns and economic progress. Economic Journal, 38(152), 527–542. https://doi.org/10.2307/2224097
   Google Scholar