Attribute substitution, earlier-generation economic approaches and behavioural economics

References

• Akerlof, G. (2002). Behavioural macroeconomics and macroeconomic behaviour. American Economic Review, 92(3), 411–433. https://doi.org/10.1257/00028280260136192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akerlof, G. A., & Shiller, R. J. (2009). Animal spirits: How human psychology drives the economy, and why it matters for global capitalism. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41(3), 258. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055756
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee, A. (1992). A simple model of herd behaviour. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(3), 797–817. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulding, K. E. (1956). The image: Knowledge in life and society (Vol. 47). University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butos, W. N. (2010). The social science of Hayek’s ‘The sensory order’. Emerald Group.
   Google Scholar
• Butos, W. N., & Koppl, R. (1993). Hayekian expectations: Theory and empirical applications. Constitutional Political Economy, 4(3), 303–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393266
   Google Scholar
• Butos, W. N., & Koppl, R. (1997). The varieties of subjectivism: Keynes and Hayek on expectations. History of Political Economy, 29(2), 327–359. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-29-2-327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, R. M., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2020). If and or: Real and counterfactual possibilities in their truth and probability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46(4), 760–780. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000756
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, W. K., & Sedikides, C. (1999). Self-threat magnifies the self-serving bias: A meta-analytic integration. Review of General Psychology, 3(1), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.3.1.23
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, S. (2002). Conspiracy theories and conspiracy theorizing. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 32(2), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/004931032002001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Sciences Quarterly, 17(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, J. R., & Griggs, R. A. (1982). The effects of experience on performance in Watson’s selection task. Memory and Cognition, 10(5), 496–502. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197653
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crocker, J., Luhtanen, R., Broadnax, S., & Blaine, B. E. (1999). Belief in US government conspiracies against blacks among black and white college students: Powerlessness or system blame? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(8), 941–953. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672992511003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Amico, D. J., & Boettke, P. J. (2010). Making sense out of the sensory order. In W. Butos (Ed.), The social science of Hayek’s ‘The sensory order’ (pp. 357–381). Emerald Group.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. (2018). Extending behavioural economics’ methodological critique of rational choice theory. Journal of Behavioural Economics for Policy, 2(2), 5–9.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J., & Koutsobinas, T. (2021). Counterfactual thinking and attribute substitution in economic behavior. Review of Behavioral Economics, 8(1), 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dow, A., & Dow, S. C. (2011). Animal spirits revisited. Capitalism and Society, 6(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.2202/1932-0213.1087
   Google Scholar
• Earl, P. (2020). Principles of behavioural economics: Bringing together old, new and evolutionary approaches (Chapters 1–8, as of 18 May 2020). Manuscript in progress. https://shredecon.files.wordpress.com/2020/02/principles-of-behavioral-economics-chs1to8.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Earl, P. E. (1992). On the complementarity of economic applications of cognitive dissonance theory and personal construct psychology. In S. E. G. Lea, P. Webley, & B. M. Young (Eds.), New directions in economic psychology (pp. 49–65). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Earl, P. E. (2005). Economics and psychology in the twenty-first century. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 29(6), 909–926. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bei077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earl, P. E. (2013). Satisficing and cognition: Complementarities between Simon and Hayek. In R. Frantz & R. Leeson (Eds.), Hayek and behavioural economics (pp. 278–300). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Earl, P., & Littleboy, B. (2014). GLS Shackle. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Frederick, S., & Kahneman, D. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 49–81). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, M. (2006). Developments in behavioural finance and experimental economics and post Keynesian finance theory. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 29(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.2753/PKE0160-3477290102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62(1), 451–482. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., & Selten, R. (2001). Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, D. T. (2002). Inferential correction. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 167–184). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, D. T., Krull, D. S., & Pelham, B. W. (1988a). Of thoughts unspoken: Social inference and the self-regulation of behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(5), 685–694. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.5.685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, D. T., Pelham, B. W., & Krull, D. S. (1988b). On cognitive busyness: When person perceivers meet persons perceived. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5), 733–740. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gintis, H. (2009). The bounds of reason: Game theory and the unification of the behavioural sciences. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gurevich, G., Kliger, D., & Weiner, B. (2012). The role of attribution of causality in economic decision making. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 41(4), 439–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2011.07.005
   Google Scholar
• Gutman, J. (1982). A means-end chain model based on consumer categorization processes. Journal of Marketing, 46(2), 60–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298204600207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. A. (1952). The sensory order: An inquiry into the foundations of theoretical psychology. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heider, F. (1944). Social perception and phenomenal causality. Psychological Review, 51(6), 358–374. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055425
   Google Scholar
• Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Heiner, R. A. (1983). The οrigin of predictable behaviour. American Economic Review, 73(4), 560–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4896(83)90055-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, H., & Johnston, A. (2007). The hollow-face illusion: Object-specific knowledge, general assumptions or properties of the stimulus? Perception, 36(2), 199–223. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson, G. M. (1988). Economics and institutions: A manifesto for a modern institutional economics. Polity Press and University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, G. M. (1997). The ubiquity of habits and rules. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 21(6), 663–684. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a013692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson, G. M. (2003). The hidden persuaders: Institutions and individuals in economic theory. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27(2), 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/27.2.159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommes, C., Massaro, D., & Weber, M. (2019). Monetary policy under behavioural expectations: Theory and experiment. European Economic Review, 118, 193–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2019.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, H. E. (1987). The theory of human nature. Journal of Economic Issues, 21(3), 1039–1073. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1987.11504696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. M. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 219–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60107-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, E. E., & Harris, V. A. (1967). The attribution of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(67)90034-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, E. E., & Nisbett, R. E. (1987). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behaviour. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behaviour (pp. 79–94). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2002). Maps of bounded rationality: A perspective on intuitive judgment and choice. Nobel Prize Lecture, 8, 351–401.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioural economics. American Economic Review, 93(5), 1449–1475. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803322655392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80(4), 237. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 192–240). University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, H. H. (1972). Causal schemata and the attribution process. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behaviour (pp. 151–174). General Learning Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, H. H. (1973). The process of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 78(2), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034225
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Kelman, H. (1958). Compliance, identification, and internalization: Three processes of attitude change. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1(1), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200275800200106
   Google Scholar
• Keynes, J. M. (1921). A treatise on probability, as reprinted in Collected writings of J. M. Keynes, Vol. VIII, by D. E. Moggridge (Ed.). Macmillan, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of employment, Interest and money. Harcourt and Brace and World, as reprinted in The collected writings of J. M. Keynes, Vol. VII, by D. E. Moggridge (Ed.). Macmillan, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Koppl, R., & Luther, W. J. (2012). Hayek, Keynes, and modern macroeconomics. The Review of Austrian Economics, 25(3), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-011-0161-5
   Google Scholar
• Koutsobinas, T. (2008). The formation of conventional expectations under strong uncertainty: A reply. International Journal of Social Economics, 35(1), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1108/03068290810843882
   Google Scholar
• Koutsobinas, T. T. (2014). Keynes as the first behavioural economist: The case of the attribute substitution heuristic. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 37(2), 337–355. https://doi.org/10.2753/PKE0160-3477370207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koutsobinas, T. T. (2019). Structural dualism, socio-evolutionary reproduction and the transformation of orthodoxy and heterodoxy in economics. Journal of Economic Methodology, 26(4), 327–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2019.1596294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruglanski, A. W., & Gigerenzer, G. (2011). Intuitive and deliberative judgements are based on common principles. Psychological Review, 118(1), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020762
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancaster, K. (1971). Consumer demand: A new approach. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman, M. D. (2007). Social cognitive neuroscience: A review of core processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 58(1), 59–89. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085654
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman, M. D., Gaunt, R., Gilbert, D. T., & Trope, Y. (2002). Reflection and reflexion: A social cognitive neuroscience approach to attributional inference. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 199–249). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malle, B. F. (2006). How the mind explains behavior: Folk explanations, meaning, and social interaction. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malle, B. F. (2011a). Attribution theories: How people make sense of behavior. In D. Chadee (Ed.), Theories in social psychology (pp. 72–95). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Malle, B. F. (2011b). Time to give up the dogmas of attribution: An alternative theory of behaviour explanation. In M. Zanna & J. Olson (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 44, pp. 297–352). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNally, B., & Bradley, G. L. (2014). Driving construals: Personal construct theory in a reckless driving context. Transportation Research. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 24, 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Nisbett, R. E., Krantz, D. H., Jepson, C., & Kunda, Z. (1983). The use of statistical heuristics in everyday inductive reasoning. Psychological Review, 90(4), 339–363. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.90.4.339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quattrone, G. A. (1982). Overattribution and unit formation: When behaviour engulfs the person. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(4), 593–607. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.42.4.593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 173–220). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford, M. (1988). Learning and decision-making in economics and psychology: A methodological perspective. In P. E. Earl (Ed.), Psychological economics. Recent economic thought series (Vol. 13), pp. 35–54. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7775-7_3
   Google Scholar
• Sent, E. M. (2004). Behavioral economics: How psychology made its (limited) way back into economics. History of Political Economy, 36(4), 735–760. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-36-4-735
   Google Scholar
• Shackle, G. L. S. (1949). Expectation in economics. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shackle, G. L. S. (1961). Decision, order, and time in human affairs (Vol. 2). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. (1980). Cognitive science: The newest science of the artificial. Cognitive Science, 4(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0401_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. (1990). Invariants of human behaviour. Annual Review of Psychology, 41(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.000245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, V. L. (2003). Constructivist and ecological rationality in economics. American Economic Review, 93(3), 465–508. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803322156954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (2009). Distinguishing the reflective, algorithmic, and autonomous minds: Is it time for a tri-process theory. In J. S. B. Evans & K. E. Frankish (Eds.), Two minds: Dual processes and beyond (pp. 55–88). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2015). The duality of everyday life: Dual-process and dual system models in social psychology. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 891–927).
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. (2005). Moral heuristics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(4), 531–541. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X05000099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trope, Y. (1986). Identification and inferential processes in dispositional attribution. Psychological Review, 93(3), 239–257. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(1), 207–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983). Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological Review, 90(4), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.90.4.293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Boven, L., White, K., Kamada, A., & Gilovich, T. (2003). Intuitions about situational correction in self and others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 249. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar