Incumbency and patronage politics in Malaysia’s GE15

References

• Ansolabehere, S., Snyder, J. M., Jr., & Stewart, C., III. (2001). Candidate positioning in U.S. house elections. American Journal of Political Science, 45(1), 136–159. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aspinall, E., Weiss, M. L., Hicken, A., & Hutchcroft, P. D. (2022). Mobilizing for elections: Patronage and political machines in Southeast Asia. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bersih. (2023). Policy brief 1: “Fix the date: Raising turnout by early announcement of election dates.
   Google Scholar
• Bogaards, M. (2005). Dominant parties and democratic defects. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, 6(2), 29–35. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43134090
   Google Scholar
• Case, W. (2006). Manipulative skills: How do rulers control the electoral arena. In A. Schedler (Ed.), Electoral authoritarianism: The dynamics of unfree competition Boulder (pp. 95–112). Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Case, W. (2011). Electoral authoritarianism and backlash: Hardening Malaysia, oscillating Thailand. International Political Science Review, 32(4), 438–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512110385296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Case, W. (2020). Regime type and pandemic policy: Hybrid exceptionalism in Malaysia. Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 16(2), 31–55. http://www.taiwandemocracy.org.tw/export/sites/tfd/files/publication/journal/031-055-Regime-Type-and-Pandemic-Policy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Collier, R. B. (1992). The contradictory alliance: State-labor relations and regime change in Mexico [ Research Series No. 83]. Institute of International Studies, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Dettman, S., & Weiss, M. (2018). Has Patronage lost its punch in Malaysia? The Round Table, 107(6), 739–754. https://doi.org/10.1080/00358533.2018.1545936
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, L. (2002). Thinking about hybrid regimes. Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2002.0025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duch, R. M., & Stevenson, R. T. (2008). The economic vote: How political and economic institutions condition election results. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Government of Malaysia and Pakatan Harapan. (2021, September 13). Memorandum of understanding (MOU) on transformation and political stability. Federal Government and Pakatan Harapan.
   Google Scholar
• Gandhi, J., & Lust-Okar, E. (2009). Elections under authoritarianism. Annual Review of Political Science, 12(1), 403–422. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060106.095434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geddes, B. (1999). What do we know about democratization after twenty years? Annual Review of Political Science, 2(1), 115–144. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez, E. T. (2012). Monetizing politics: Financing parties and elections in Malaysia. Modern Asian Studies, 46(5), 1370–1395. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X12000200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez, E. T., & Jomo, K. S. (1999). Malaysia’s political economy: Politics, patronage and profits. CUP Archive.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez, T., Fikri, F., Padmanabhan, T., & Juwairiah, T. (2018). Government in business: Diverse forms of intervention. Malaysia GLC monitor 2018. Institute for Democracy and Democratic Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, K. F. (2007). Why dominant parties lose: Mexico’s democratization in comparative perspective. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, K. F. (2008). Dominant party strategy and democratization. American Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 16–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00296.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, K. F. (2010). The political economy of authoritarian single-party dominance. Comparative Political Studies, 43(7), 807–834. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414009332462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicken, A. (2011). Clientelism. Annual Review of Political Science, 14(1), 289–310. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.031908.220508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IDEAS. (2022). Pantau Kuasa. www.pantaukuasa.com
   Google Scholar
• Iman Research. (2023, January). Election sentiments analysis of Malaysia’s 15th general election.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, G. C. (2015). It’s nothing personal: The decline of the incumbency advantage in US house elections. The Journal of Politics, 77(3), 861–873. https://doi.org/10.1086/681670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G., & Gelman, A. (1991). Systemic consequences of incumbency advantage in US house elections. American Journal of Political Science, 35(1), 110–138. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitsky, S., & Way, L. (2002). The rise of competitive authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2002.0026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitsky, S., & Way, L. (2012). Beyond patronage: Violent struggle, ruling party cohesion, and authoritarian durability. Perspectives on Politics, 10(4), 869–889. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592712002861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loh, F. K. W. (2009). Old politics vs new politics in Malaysia: State and society in transition. Strategic Information and Research Development Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Magaloni, B. (2006). Voting for autocracy: Hegemonic party survival and its demise in Mexico. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Magaloni, B. (2008). Credible power-sharing and the longevity of authoritarian rule. Comparative Political Studies, 41(4–5), 715–741. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414007313124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malaysiakini. (2018, December 28). PTPTN’s ‘generosity’ up north raises eyebrows. https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/458035
   Google Scholar
• Malaysiakini. (2020, July 30). Zahid: Umno will not join PN coalition but be still part of govt. https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/536749
   Google Scholar
• Malaysian Administrative Modernisation and Management Planning Unit. (2023). Portal Data Terbuka Malaysia: Ringkasan Anggaran Mengurus dan Pembangunan Mengikut Maksud. https://www.data.gov.my/data/dataset/b389eb4b-db17-4c21-b200-d83bbf6cfc09/resource/48fae2ee-4972-4e7b-ae90-cc20d494e78d/download/2.-ringkasan-anggaran-mengurus-dan-pembangunan-mengikut-maksud.csv
   Google Scholar
• Martin, L. W., & Stevenson, R. T. (2010). The conditional impact of incumbency on government formation. American Political Science Review, 104(3), 503–518. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055410000213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merdeka Center for Opinion Research. (2020, September 2). Majority of Malaysians satisfied with PM.
   Google Scholar
• Merdeka Center for Opinion Research. (2022, October 28). Malaysia’s upcoming elections: The state of play.
   Google Scholar
• Merdeka Center for Opinion Research. (2023). Perceptions towards economy, leadership and current issues. 26th December 2022 – 15th January 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Meriläinen, J., & Tukiainen, J. (2022). The advantage of incumbents in coalitional bargaining. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 47(4), 921–957. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohd Husni, M. N. (2022, November 18). PN bayar sehingga RM50,000 dapatkan pempengaruh TikTok. Utusan Malaysia. https://www.utusan.com.my/nasional/2022/11/pn-bayar-sehingga-rm50000-dapatkan-pempengaruh-tiktok/
   Google Scholar
• Nadirah, H. R. (2022, December 5). $185b scandal: Serious procedural breaches during Muhyiddin administration, says PM Anwar. The Straits Times.
   Google Scholar
• Ooi, K. H. (2022, December 22). How political parties used TikTok in the 2022 Malaysian general election. S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Nanyang Technological University. https://www.rsis.edu.sg/rsis-publication/rsis/how-political-parties-used-tiktok-in-the-2022-malaysian-general-election/#.ZABZdOxBw-Q
   Google Scholar
• Palansamy, Y., Noorshahrizam, S. A., & Soo, W. J. (2022, November 13). A week into campaigning, Umno-led BN that forced GE15 lacks enthusiasm. The Malay Mail. https://www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2022/11/13/a-week-into-campaigning-umno-led-bn-that-forced-ge15-lacks-enthusiasm/39336
   Google Scholar
• Perak Insights. (2021, February 5). Bukan 5 tapi 6 MP UMNO disekat peruntukan, jadi berapa tinggal majoriti Muhyiddin sekarang? https://perakinsights.com/2021/02/05/bukan-5-tapi-6-mp-umno-disekat-peruntukan-jadi-berapa-tinggal-majoriti-muhyiddin-sekarang/
   Google Scholar
• Randall, V., & Svåsand, L. (2002). Party institutionalization in new democracies. Party Politics, 8(1), 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068802008001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saifuddin, A. (2022). Manifesto PRU15 & Biodata.
   Google Scholar
• Saravanamuttu, J., & Mohamad, M. (2020). The monetisation of consent and its limits: Explaining political dominance and decline in Malaysia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 50(1), 56–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2019.1569710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schedler, A. (2013). The politics of uncertainty: Sustaining and subverting electoral authoritarianism. OUP Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Scheiner, E. (2006). Democracy without competition in Japan: Opposition failure in a one-party dominant state. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schleiter, P., & Bucur, C. (2023). Assembly dissolution powers and incumbency advantages in coalition formation. West European Politics, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2023.2165356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, D. (2003). Iron cage in an iron fist: Authoritarian institutions and the personalization of power in Malaysia. Comparative Politics, 36(1), 81–101. https://doi.org/10.2307/4150161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, T. E. H. (2018). Incumbency advantage of UK members of parliament, 1959–2010 [ PhD. diss]. The University of Nottingham.
   Google Scholar
• Sri Murniati, Y., Lee, J. R. J., Danial, A., Armand, A., & Law, J. (2021). Removal or reform: Charting the way forward for Malaysia’s constituency development funds (Peruntukan Ahli Parlimen dan ADUN). Bersih 2.0 and IDEAS.
   Google Scholar
• Sri Murniati, Y., Rode, A., & Low, Z. T. (2023). Pantau Laksana: Assessing Malaysia’s transparency and accountability initiatives in implementing emergency fiscal responses [Policy Ideas. No. 77]. The Institute for Democracy and Economic Affairs (IDEAS).
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, S.C. (2007). Political clientelism. In R. Goodin (Ed.), The Oxford of Political Science (pp. 648–672). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199604456.013.0031
   Google Scholar
• Svolik, M. (2009). Power sharing and leadership dynamics in authoritarian regimes. American Journal of Political Science, 53(2), 477–494. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00382.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Templeman, K. (2012). The origins and decline of dominant party systems: Taiwan’s transition in comparative perspective [ PhD diss]. The University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Washida, H. (2023). Voting Behaviour after the Collapse of a Dominant Party Regime in Malaysia: Ethno-religious Backlash or Economic Grievances? The Round Table. https://doi.org/10.1080/00358533.2023.2219524
   Google Scholar
• Welsh, B. (2020). The unsung role of state governments in battling Covid. Malaysiakini. https://www.malaysiakini.com/columns/532836
   Google Scholar
• Welsh, B. (2023). Umno’s GE15 collapse. Malaysiakini. https://m.malaysiakini.com/columns/651163
   Google Scholar
• Wong, C. H. (2020). Parliament as Prime Minister’s electoral college: The defection game in Malaysia’s democratic backsliding. The Round Table, 109(5), 586–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/00358533.2020.1819631
   Google Scholar
• Wong, C. H., Chin, J., & Othman, N. (2010). Malaysia–towards a topology of an electoral one-party state. Democratization, 17(5), 920–949. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2010.501179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeoh, T. (2020). Trends No. 12/2020: Federal-state relations under the Pakatan Harapan government. ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Yeoh, T. (2022). Opposition subnational strongholds in dominant party authoritarian regimes (DPARs): The Pakatan coalition in Selangor and Penang from 2008 to 2018 [PhD diss.]. The University of Nottingham.
   Google Scholar