Neuroscience and literacy: an integrative view

REFERENCES

• Abadzi, H. 2006. Efficient Learning for the Poor: Insights from the Frontier of Cognitive Neuroscience. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Abadzi, H. 2008. Efficient learning for the poor: new insights into literacy acquisition for children. International Review of Education 54: 581–604.
   Google Scholar
• Abadzi, H. 2017. Turning a Molehill into a Mountain? How Reading Curricula are Failing the Poor Worldwide. Unesco, IBE Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Abadzi, Helen. 2006. Efficient Learning for the Poor : Insights from the Frontier of Cognitive Neuroscience. Washington, DC: World Bank. © World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/7023 License: CC BY 3.0 IGO
   Google Scholar
• Adams, M.J. 2001. Alphabetic anxiety and explicit systemic phonics instruction: a cognitive science perspective. In Neuman, S.B. & Dickinson, D.K. (Eds.) Handbook of Early Literacy Research. New York, Guilford. pp. 66–80.
   Google Scholar
• Agee, james (1988) Let us Now Praise Famous Men (Houghton Mifflin): 289–307
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, N. & Bloch, C. 2010. Creating literate communities – the challenge of early literacy. In Krüger-Potratz, M., Neumann, U. & Reich, H. (Eds.) Bei Vielfalt Chancengleichheit. New York, Münster. pp. 197–212.
   Google Scholar
• Alitto, H.J. & Usrey, W.M. 2003. Corticothalamic feedback and sensory processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 13: 440–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altwerger, B, Jordan, N. & Shelton, N.R. 2007. Rereading Fluency. Process, Practice and Policy. Portsmouth, NH, Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Amodei, D., et al. 2016. Deep speech 2: End-to-end speech recognition in English and Mandarin. International conference on machine learning. pp. 173–182.
   Google Scholar
• Ardington, C., Wills, G., et al. 2020. Technical Report: Benchmarking Early Grade Reading Skills in Nguni Languages. Stellenbosch, ReSEP, Stellenbosch University.
   Google Scholar
• Arizpe, E. & Styles, M. 2016. Children Reading Picturebooks. London and New York, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Au, K.H. 1980. Participation structures in a reading lesson with Hawaiian children: analysis of a culturally appropriate instructional event. Anthropology & Education Quarterly 11: 91–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bar, M., Kassam, K.S., et al. 2006. Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences 103 (2): 449–454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, D., Hamilton, M. & Ivanic, R. (Eds.). 2000. Situated Literacies: Reading and Writing in Context. London and New York, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, N. 1991. Gestalt imagery: a critical factor in language comprehension. Annals of Dyslexia 41: 246–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berent, I. 2020. Talk is cheap. Inference 5 (3). https://inference-review.com/article/talk-is-cheap
   Google Scholar
• Bergeron, B. & Bradbury-Wolff, M. (2010). ‘If it’s not fixed, the staples are out!’ Documenting young children’s perceptions of strategic reading processes. Reading Horizons 50: 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Bever, T.G. 2009. All language understanding is a psycholinguistic guessing game: explaining the still small voice. In Anders P. (Ed.) Issues in the Present and Future of Reading. London, Routledge. pp. 249–281.
   Google Scholar
• Bever, T.G. 2013. The biolinguistics of language universals: The next years. In Sanz, M., et al. (Eds.) Language Down the Garden Path: The Cognitive and Biological Basis for Linguistic Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bever, T.G. 2017. The unity of consciousness and the consciousness of unity. In de Almeida, R.G. & Gleitman, L. (Eds.) Minds on Language and Thought. Oxford, Oxford University Press. pp. 87–112.
   Google Scholar
• Bever, T.G. & Poeppel, D. 2010. Analysis by synthesis: a (re-)emerging program of research for language and vision. Biolinguistics 4: 174–200.
   Google Scholar
• Bialystok, E., Luk, G. & Kwan, E. 2005. Bilingualism, biliteracy, and learning to read: interactions among languages and writing systems. Scientific Studies of Reading 9: 43–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0901_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biber, D., Conrad, S. & Reppen, R. 1998. Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, C.M. 1995. Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bissex, G.L. 1980. Gnys at Wrk: A Child Learns to Write and Read. Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, C. 1997. Chloe’s Story. First Steps to Literacy. Cape Town, Juta and Co. https://www.praesa.org.za/training/.
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, C. 1999. Literacy in the early years: teaching and learning in multilingual early childhood classrooms. International Journal of Early Years Education 7: 39–59.
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, C. 2000. Don’t expect a story: young children’s literacy learning in South Africa. Early Years: An International Journal of Research and Development. TACTYC 20: 57–67.
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, C. 2002. A case study of Xhosa and English biliteracy in the foundation phase versus English as a medium of destruction. In Heugh, K. (Ed.). Perspectives in Education. Special Issue: Many Languages in Education 20: 65–78.
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, C. 2015. Nal’ibali and libraries: activating reading together. library.ifla.org/1282/1/076-bloch-en.pdf. https://www.praesa.org.za/articles/.
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, C. 2018. Story by story: nurturing multilingual reading and writing in South Africa. In Daly, N, Limbrick, L & Dix, P. (Eds.) Children’s Literature in a Multiliterate World. London, UCL Institute of Education Press. pp. 161–181
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, C. & Alexander, N. 2003. Aluta continua: the relevance of the continua of biliteracy to South African multilingual schools. In Hornberger, N. (Ed.) Continua of Biliteracy: An Ecological Framework for Educational Policy, Research, and Practice in Multilingual Settings. Clevedon, Multilingual Matters Ltd. pp. 91–121.
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, C. & Mbolekwa, S. 2021. Apprenticeships in meaning: transforming opportunities for oral and written language learning in the early years. In Erling et al. (Eds.) Multilingual Learning in Schools in Sub-Saharan Africa: Critical Insights and Practical Applications. London, Routledge, forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, B. 2018. The evolution of stories: from mimesis to language, from fact to fiction. WIREs Cogn Sci 9: e1444. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, F. & Usrey, W.M. 2008. Emerging views of corticothalamic function. Curr Opin Neurobiol 18: 403–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce, T. 1991. Time to Play in Early Childhood Education. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
   Google Scholar
• Bruce, T. 2015. Early Childhood Education, 5th ed. London: Hodder Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, P.E., MacLean, M., Bradley, L.L. & Crossland, J. 1990. Rhyme and alliteration, phoneme detection, and learning to read. Developmental Psychology 26: 429–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bua-lit Language and Literacy Collective. 2018. How are we failing our children? Reconceptualising language and literacy education, viewed 28 April 2020. https://bua-lit.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/bua-lit-language-literacy-education.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham, J. & Castles. A. 2019. Why do some children learn to read without explicit teaching? Nomanis 7: 18–20.
   Google Scholar
• Buckner, C. & Garson, J. 2019. Connectionism. In Zalta, E.N. (Ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall). URL= https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/connectionism/.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, J. & McClelland, J.L. 2005. Alternatives to the combinatorial paradigm of linguistic theory based on domain general principles of human cognition. The Linguistic Review 22: 381–410. doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2005.22.2-4.381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cambourne, B. 1995. Toward an educationally relevant theory of literacy learning: twenty years of inquiry. The Reading Teacher 49 (3): 182–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cambourne, B. 2000. Conditions for literacy learning. Reading Teacher 54: 414–417.
   Google Scholar
• Cambourne, B. 2017. Reclaiming or reframing? Getting the right conceptual metaphor for thinking about early literacy learning. In Reclaiming early childhood literacies: Narratives of hope, power, and vision, pp. 17–29.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell S. 2020. Teaching phonics without teaching phonics: early childhood teachers’ reported beliefs and practices. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy 20 (4): 783–814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cambourne, B. & Kilarr, G. 2020. Helping teachers reframe reading as meaning making. In Whitmore, K.F. & Meyer, R.J. (Eds.) Reclaiming Literacies as Meaning Making: Manifestations of Values, Identities, Relationships, and Knowledge. Routledge New York. pp. 114–125.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, E., Hill, F., Devine, A. & Szücs, D. 2017. The modified abbreviated math anxiety scale: a valid and reliable instrument for use with children. Frontiers in Psychology 8: 11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, G.A. & Grossberg, S. (Eds.). 1991. Pattern Recognition by Self-Organizing Neural Networks. Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, J.M., Holliman, A.J, Weir, F. & Baroody, A.E. 2019. Literacy interest, home literacy environment and emergent literacy skills in preschoolers. Journal of Research in Reading 42: 150–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castles, A., Rastle, K. & Nation, K. 2018. Ending the reading wars: reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 19: 5–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattinelli, I., Borghese, N.A., Gallucci, M. & Paulesu, E. 2013. Reading the reading brain: a new meta-analysis of functional imaging data on reading. Journal of Neurolinguistics 26: 214–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervetti, G.N., Pearson, D., et al. 2020. How the reading for understanding initiative’s research complicates the simple view of reading invoked in the science of reading. Reading Research Quarterly 55: S161–S172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chall, J.S. 1967. Learning to Read: The Great Debate. New York, McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. 1975. Reflections on Language. New York, Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Chukovsky, K. 1968. From Two to Five. (M. Morton, Trans.). Berkeley, University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Churchland, P.S. & Sejnowski, T.J. 1999. The Computational Brain. Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, A. 2013. Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36: 181–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A. 2016. Surfing Uncertainty: Prediction, Action, and the Embodied Mind. New York, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, M. 1976. Young Fluent Readers. What Can They Teach Us? London, Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, M. 2020. Independent research into the impact of the systematic synthetic phonics government policy on literacy courses at institutions in England delivering initial teacher education. Education Journal 411: 18–23.
   Google Scholar
• Clay, M.M. 1991. Becoming Literate: The Construction of Inner Control. Portsmouth, NH, Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M. 2000. Dual routes from print to speech and dual routes from print to meaning: some theoretical issues. In Kennedy et al. (Eds.) Reading as a Perceptual Process, Oxford, UK, Elsevier. pp. 475–490.
   Google Scholar
• Compton-Lilly, C.F., Mitra, A., Guay, M. & Spence, L.K. 2020. A confluence of complexity: intersections among reading theory, neuroscience, and observations of young readers. Reading Research Quarterly 55: S185–S195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constant, A., Clark, A., Kirchhoff, M. & Friston, K.J. 2019. Extended active inference: constructing predictive cognition beyond skulls. In Mind and Language, Wiley. p. 4.
   Google Scholar
• Conte, E., Ornaghi, V., et al. 2019. Emotion knowledge, theory of mind, and language in young children: testing a comprehensive conceptual model. Frontiers in Psychology 10: 2144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, P. 2009. The Classrooms All Young Children Need. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cremin, T. 2020. Teachers as readers and writers. In Debates in Primary Education. Routledge. pp. 243–253.
   Google Scholar
• Cremin, T., Bearne, E., Mottram, M. & Goodwin, P. 2008. Primary teachers as readers. English in Education 42: 8–23.
   Google Scholar
• Damasio, A. 1999. The Feeling of What Happens: Body, Emotion and the Making of Consciousness. London, Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Damasio, A. 2000. Descarte’s Error. New York, Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Danelli, L., Marelli, M., Berlingeri, M., Tettamanti, M., Sberna, M., Paulesu, E. & Luzzatti, C. 2015. Framing effects reveal discrete lexical-semantic and sublexical procedures in reading: an fMRI study. Frontiers in psychology 6: 1328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, K.L. & Montag, C. 2019. Selected principles of Pankseppian affective neuroscience. Frontiers in neuroscience 12: 1025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deacon, T.W. 1998. The Symbolic Species: The Co-evolution of Language and the Brain. London, Penguin Books, London.
   Google Scholar
• Deacon, T.W. 2003. Universal grammar and semiotic constraints. In Christiansen, M.H. & Kirby, S. (Eds.) Language Evolution. Oxford, Oxford University Press. pp. 111–139.
   Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S. 2010. Reading in the Brain: The New Science of How We Read. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education (DoE). 2008. National Reading Strategy. South Africa, Department of Education. Online. https://www.education.gov.za/Portals/0/DoE%20Branches/GET/GET%20Schools/National_Reading. pdf?ver=2009-09-09-110716-507
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education (DoE). 2011. Action Plan to 2014: Towards the Realisation of Schooling 2025. Pretoria, Department of Basic Education.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education (DoE). 2015. The South African National Curriculum Framework for children from Birth to Four. Pretoria: Department of Basic Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ding, N., Melloni, L., Zhang, H., Tian, X. & Poeppel, D. 2016. Cortical tracking of hierarchical linguistic structures in connected speech. Nature Neuroscience 19: 158–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donald, M. 2001. A Mind So Rare: The Evolution of Human Consciousness. New York, Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Dooley, C.M. & Matthews, M.W. 2009. Emergent comprehension: understanding comprehension development among young literacy learners. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy 9 (3): 269–294.
   Google Scholar
• Dowd, A.J. & Bartlett, L. 2019. The need for speed: interrogating the dominance of oral reading fluency in international reading efforts. Comparative Education Review 63: 189–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunbar, R. 1998. Theory of mind and the evolution of language. In Hurford, J. R., Hurford, J. R., Studdert-Kennedy, M., & Knight, C. (Eds.). Approaches to the evolution of language: Social and Cognitive Bases. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 92–110.
   Google Scholar
• Dunbar, R.I. 1993. Coevolution of neocortical size, group size and language in humans. Behavioral and brain sciences 16: 681–694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman, G.M. 1987. Neural Darwinism: The Theory of Neuronal Group Selection. New York, Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Egan, K. 1989. Teaching as Storytelling. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elkind, D. 2007. The Power of Play: Learning What Comes Naturally. Da Capo Lifelong Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, G. 2016. How Can Physics Underlie the Mind? Top-Down Causation in the Human Context. Heidelberg, Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, G. 2018. Top-down effects in the brain. Physics of life reviews 31: 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, G. & Solms M. 2017. Beyond Evolutionary Psychology: How and Why Neuropsychological Modules Arise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, G. & Toronchuk, J.A. 2005. Neural development affective and immune system influences. In Ellis, R.D. & Newton, N. (Eds.) Consciousness and Emotion: Agency, Conscious Choice, and Selective Perception. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins. pp. 81–119.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, G. & Toronchuk, J.A. 2013. Affective neuronal selection: the nature of the primordial emotion systems. Frontiers in psychology 3: 589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esteban-Guitart, M. & Moll, L.C. 2013. Funds of identity: a new concept based on the funds of knowledge approach. Culture & Psychology 20: 31–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, V. 2014. The Language Myth: Why Language is Not an Instinct. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, V. 2015. The Crucible of Language: How Language and Mind Create Meaning. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, V. 2020. The Evidence there is no language instinct. Aeon. https://aeon.co/essays/the-evidence-is-in-there-is-no-language-instinct.
   Google Scholar
• Fabry, R.E. 2017. Transcending the evidentiary boundary: prediction error minimization, embodied interaction, and explanatory pluralism. Philosophical Psychology. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2016.1272674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer, T.A., Brown, M. & Tanenhaus, M.K. 2013. Prediction, .explanation, and the role of generative models in language processing. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36: 211–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedorenko, E., et al. 2016. Neural correlate of the construction of sentence meaning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113: E6256–E6262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, J.A. 2008. From Molecule to Metaphor: A Neural Theory of Language. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreiro, E. & Teberosky, A. 1982. Literacy Before Schooling. Ports mouth, NH: Heinemann Educational Books.
   Google Scholar
• Findlay, J.M. & Gilchrist, I.D. 2003. Active Vision: The Psychology of Looking and Seeing. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fitch, W.T. 2005. The evolution of language: a comparative review. Biology and philosophy 20: 193–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleisch, B. & Dixon, K. (2019). Identifying mechanisms of change in the early grade reading study in South Africa. South African Journal of Education 39 (3): 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flurkey, A.D., Paulson E.J. & Goodman, K.S. 2008. Scientific Realism in Studies of Reading. New York, Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Flurkey, A.D. & Xu J. 2003. On the Revolution of Reading: The Selected Writings of Kenneth S. Goodman. Portsmouth, New Hampshire, Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, D.J., Kulesz, P.A. & Benoit J.S. (2018). Extending the simple view of reading to account for variation within readers and across texts: The complete view of reading. (CVRi). Remedial and Special Education 39: 274–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankel, K.K., Becker, B.L., Rowe, M.W. & Pearson, P.D. 2016. From ‘what is reading?’ to ‘what is literacy’? Journal of Education 196: 7–17.
   Google Scholar
• Frankl, V.E. 1985. Man’s Search for Meaning. New York, Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, W.J. 2004. How and why brains create meaning from sensory information. International journal of bifurcation and chaos 14: 515–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friederici, A.D. 2017. Language in Our Brain: The Origins of a Uniquely Human Capacity. Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friston, K. 2003. Learning and inference in the brain. Neural Networks 16: 1325–1352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friston, K. 2010. The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience 11: 127–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friston, K. 2012. The history of the future of the Bayesian brain. NeuroImage 62: 1230–1233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friston, K., FitzGerald, T., Rigoli, F., Schwartenbeck, P. & Pezzulo, G. 2017. Active inference: a process theory. Neural computation 29: 1–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friston, K. & Frith C. 2015. A duet for one. Consciousness and cognition 36: 390–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friston, K.J., Parr, T., et al. 2020. Generative models, linguistic communication and active inference. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 118: 42–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friston, K.J., Rosch, R., Parr, T., Price, C. & Bowman, H. 2017a. Deep temporal models and active inference. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 77: 388–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith, C. 2007. Making Up the Mind: How the Brain Creates Our Mental World. Malden, Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• García, O. & Wei, L. 2014. Language, bilingualism and education. In Translanguaging: Language, Bilingualism and Education. London, Palgrave Pivot. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137385765_4
   Google Scholar
• Gombrich, E.H. 1961. Art and Illusion. New York, Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, K.S. 1967. Reading: a psycholinguistic guessing game. Journal of the Reading Specialist 6: 126–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, K.S. 1982. Language and Literacy. Boston, Mass, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, K.S. 2006. The Truth about Dibels: What it is, What it Does. Portsmouth, NH, Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, K.S. & Burke, C. 1973. Theoretically Based Studies of Patterns of Miscues in Oral Reading Performance. Washington, DC, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, K.S., Fries, P., Strauss, S. & Paulson, E. 2016. Reading: The Grand Illusion. How and Why Readers Make Sense of Print. New York, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, K.S. & Goodman, Y.M. 2013. Learning to read ls natural. Theory and Practice of Early Reading 1: 137.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, Y.M. 1992. The roots of literacy. Journal for the Study of Education and Development 15: 29–42, doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.1992.10822331
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, A.P. & Jiménez, R.T. 2020. Special issue executive summary: the science of reading. Reading Research Quarterly 55: 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Goswami, U. 2008. Learning to read across languages: the role of phonics and synthetic phonics. In Kathy Goouch & Andrew Lambirth (Eds.) Understanding Phonics and the Teaching of Reading: Critical Perspectives. Maidenhead, Berkshire, Open University Press. pp. 124–143.
   Google Scholar
• Gottschall, J. 2012. The Story-Telling Animal: How Stories Make us Human. Boston, New York, Mariner books.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, P.B. & Hillinger, M.L. 1980. Learning to read: an unnatural act. Bulletin of the Orton Society 30: 179–196.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, P.B. & Tunmer, W.E. 1986. Decoding, reading and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education 7: 6–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104
   Google Scholar
• Gray, P. 2011. Psychology. New York, Worth Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, P. 2013. The reading wars: why natural learning fails in classrooms. https://www.psychologytoday.com/za/blog/freedom-learn/201311/the-reading-wars-why-natural-learning-fails-in-classrooms
   Google Scholar
• Gray, P. 2017. What exactly is play, and why is it such a powerful vehicle for learning? Topics in Language Disorders 37: 217–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenspan, S. & Shanker, S. 2004. The First Idea: How Symbols, Language, and Intelligence Evolved from Our Primate Ancestors to Modern Humans. Cambridge, Mass, Da Capo Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, R.L. 1978. Eye and Brain: The Psychology of Seeing (World University Library). New York, McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, R. & Cavanagh, P. 2011. The blind spot. Scholarpedia (accessed 13 October 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Gunn, B.K., Simmons, D.C. & Kameenui, E.J. 1995. Emergent Literacy: Synthesis of the Research. Eugene, Oregon, National Center to Improve the Tools of Educators, College of Education, University of Oregon.
   Google Scholar
• Gussin Paley, V. 1990. The Boy Who Would be a Helicopter. The Uses of Storytelling in the Classroom. Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M.A.K. 1977. Text as semantic choice in social contexts. In van Dijk T.A. & Petöfi, J. (Eds.) Grammars and Descriptions. pp. 176–225.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M.A.K. 1993. Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education 5: 93–116.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M.A.K. 2003. On the “architecture” of human language. In Webster, J.J. (Ed.). Language and linguistics 3: 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Harari, Y. 2011. Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind. London, Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, G.D. 2020. A snapshot of early childhood care and education in South Africa: institutional offerings, challenges and recommendations. South African Journal of Childhood Education 10: a797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harste, J.C., Woodward, V.A. & Burke, C.L. 1984. Language Stories and Literacy Lessons. Portsmouth, NH, Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, J. 2005. On Intelligence. Times Books, Henry Holt and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, S.B. 1983. Ways with Words: Language, Life and Work in Communities and Classrooms. New York, CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Heyes, C.M. & Frith, C.D. 2014. The cultural evolution of mind reading. Science 344: 1243091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickman, R. 2018. Creating a nation of readers. https://www.shineliteracy.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Creating-a-nation-of-readersa-survey-of-evidence-ePDF.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hoey, M. 2005. Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. Abingdon, Oxon, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, J.V., Hikida, M. & Sailors, M. 2020. Contesting science that silences: amplifying equity, agency, and design research in literacy teacher preparation. Reading Research Quarterly 55: S255–S266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, J. 2012. Why EGRA – a clone of DIBELS – will fail to improve literacy in Africa. Research in the Teaching of English 46: 340–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoff, E. (2006). How social contexts support and shape language development. Developmental Review 26, 55–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohwy, J. 2013. The Predictive Mind. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holdaway, D. 1979. The Foundations of Literacy. Sydney, Ashton Scholastic.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz-Kraus, T. & Hutton, J.S. 2015. From emergent literacy to reading: how learning to read changes a child’s brain. Acta Paediatrica 104: 648–656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horowitz-Kraus, T., Schmitz, R., Hutton, J.S. & Schumacher, J. 2017. How to create a successful reader? Milestones in reading development from birth to adolescence. Acta Paediatrica: Nurturing the Child, January 106: 534–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howie, S., Combrinck, C., Roux, K., Tshele, M., Mokoena, G. & Palane, N.M. 2017. PIRLS Literacy 2016: South African Children’s Reading Literacy Achievement. Pretoria, Centre for Evaluation and Assessment. (CEA), Faculty of Education, University of Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• Hruby, G.G. & Goswami, U. 2019. Educational neuroscience for reading educators. In Alvermann, D.E., Unrau, N.J. & Sailors, M. (Eds.) Theoretical Models and Process of Reading. Routledge, New York, pp. 558–588.
   Google Scholar
• Huey, E.B. 1908. The Psychology and Pedagogy of Reading. New York, Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Huron, D. 2008. Sweet Anticipation: Music and the Psychology of Expectation. Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutton, J.S., et al., C-MIND Authorship Consortium. 2015. Home reading environment and brain activation in preschool children listening to stories. Pediatrics 136: 466–478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutton, J.S., et al. 2017. Story time turbocharger? Child engagement during shared reading and cerebellar activation and connectivity in preschool-age children listening to stories. PLOS One, May, 12 (5): e0177398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutton, J.S., Dudley, J., et al. 2020. Associations between home literacy environment, brain white matter integrity and cognitive abilities in preschool-age children. Acta Paediatrica 109: 1376–1386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huybregts, M.A.C., Berwick, R.C. & Bolhuis, J.J. 2016. The language within. Science 352: 1286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Immordino-Yang, M.H., Darling-Hammond, L. & Krone, C.R. 2019. Nurturing nature: how brain development is inherently social and emotional, and what this means for education. Educational Psychologist 54: 185–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaac, A.M. & Ward, D. 2019. Introduction: gestalt phenomenology and embodied cognitive science. Synthese. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02391-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jukes, M., Pretorius, E., Schaefer, M., Tjasink, K., Roper, M., Bisgard, J. & Mabhena, N. 2020. Setting Reading Benchmarks in South Africa. Khulisa Management Services Ltd: USAID and Department of Basic Education. https://www.khulisa.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/PA00X1NZ.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Juliebö, M., Malicky, G.V. & Norman, C. 1998. Metacognition of young readers in an early intervention programme. Journal of Research in Reading 21: 24–35.
   Google Scholar
• Kandel, E.R. 2012. The Age of Insight: The Quest to Understand the Unconscious in Art, Mind, and Brain from Vienna 1900 to the Present. New York, Penguin Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Kandel, E.R. 2016. Reductionism in Art and Brain Science. New York, Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kearns, D.M., Hancock, R., Hoeft, F., Pugh, K.R. & Frost, S.J. 2019. The neurobiology of dyslexia. Teaching Exceptional Children 51: 175–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keitel, A., Gross, J. & Kayser, C. 2018. Perceptually relevant speech tracking in auditory and motor cortex reflects distinct linguistic features. PLoS biology 16: e2004473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J.S. 2008. Research and the reading wars. Phi Delta Kappan 89: 372–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klaas, A. & Trudell, B. 2011. Effective literacy programmes and independent reading in African contexts. Language Matters 42: 22–38, doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10228195.2011.569739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krashen, S. 1989. We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: additional evidence for the input hypothesis. The Modern Language Journal 73: 440–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krashen, S. 2017. The case for comprehensible input. Language Magazine. https://www.sdkrashen.com/content/articles/case_for_comprehensible_input.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Krashen, S. & Mason, B. 2020. The optimal input hypothesis: not all comprehensible input is of equal value. CATESOL Newsletter, May, pp. 1–2. http://beniko-mason.net/content/articles/2020-the-optimal-input-hypothesis.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhl, P. 2010. Brain mechanisms in early language acquisition. Neuron 67: 713–727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kveraga, K., Ghuman, A. & Bar, M. 2007. Top-down predictions in the cognitive brain. Brain Cogn 65: 145–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. 1980. The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system. Cognitive science 4: 195–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laszlo, S. & Plaut, D.C. 2012. A neurally plausible parallel distributed processing model of event-related potential word reading data. Brain and language 120: 271–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J. & Wenger, E. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. & Elman, J.L. 2001. Learnability and the statistical structure of language: Poverty of stimulus arguments revisited. Proc 26th annual Boston University conference on language development. Vol. 1. Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Longres, J.F. 1990. Human Behaviours in the Social Environment. Itasca, IL, F E Peacock.
   Google Scholar
• Makalela L. 2014. Teaching indigenous African languages to speakers of other African languages: The effects of translanguaging for multilingual development. In L Hibbert & C.W. Van der Walt (Eds.) Multilingual Universities in South Africa: Reflecting Society in Higher Education. Buffalo, Multilingual Matters. pp. 88–106.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, G.F. 2019. The Algebraic Mind: Integrating Connectionism and Cognitive Science. Cambridge, Mass, MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, L., Durisko, C., et al. 2019. The VWFA is the home of orthographic learning when houses are used as letters. Eneuro 6 (1)e0425-17.2019 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQuillan, J. 2019. We don’t need no stinkin’exercises: the impact of extended instruction and storybook reading on vocabulary acquisition. Language and Language Teaching 8: 25–37.
   Google Scholar
• Meek, M. 1988. How Texts Teach What Readers Learn. Stroud, Thimble Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, D.K. & Turner, J.C. 2006. Re-conceptualizing emotion and motivation to learn in classroom contexts. Educational Psychology Review 18: 377–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mkhize, D. & Balfour, R. 2017. Language rights in education in South Africa. South African Journal of Higher Education 31 (6): 133–150. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.28535/31-6-1633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miłkowski, M. et al. 2018. From wide cognition to mechanisms: A silent revolution. Frontiers in Psychology 9: 2393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, M. & Clark, A. 2018. Happily entangled: prediction, emotion, and the embodied mind. Synthese 195: 2559–2575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, S.B. 2020. Showdown on the kansas plains: the reading wars continue. Kansas English 101 (1): 19–23.
   Google Scholar
• Moll, L.C., Amanti, C., Neff, D. & Gonzalez, N. 1992. Funds of knowledge for teaching: using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice 31: 132–141.
   Google Scholar
• Monsalve, I.F., Pérez, A. & Molinaro, N. 2014. Item parameters dissociate between expectation formats: a regression analysis of time-frequency decomposed EEG data. Frontiers in psychology 5: 847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, M.V., Durisko, C., et al. 2014. Learning to read an alphabet of human faces produces left-lateralized training effects in the fusiform gyrus. J Cogn Neurosci 26: 896–913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullins, D.A., Whitehouse, H. & Atkinson, Q.D. 2013. The role of writing and recordkeeping in the cultural evolution of human cooperation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 90: S141–S151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Literacy Trust. 2019. Read on. Get on. London, National Literacy Trust.
   Google Scholar
• National Reading Panel. 2000. Teaching Children to Read: An Evidence-based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and Its Implications for Reading Instruction: Reports of the Subgroups.
   Google Scholar
• NEEDU. 2013. NEEDU National Report 2012: The state of literacy teaching and learning in the foundation phase. Pretoria, National education and evaluation development unit. Department of Basic Education.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, J.G., Martin, A.R., Wallace, B.G. & Fuchs, P.A. 2001. From Neuron to Brain. Sunderland, MA, Sinauer Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolopoulou, A., Cortina K.S., Ilgaz, H., Brockmeyer Cates, C., de Sá A.B. 2015. Using a narrative- and play-based activity to promote low-income preschoolers’ oral language, emergent literacy, and social competence. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 31: 147–162,
   Google Scholar
• Nutbrown, C. 2018. Early childhood educational research. SAGE Publications Ltd https://doi.org/https://www.doi.org/10.4135/9781526451811
   Google Scholar
• Olson L.A., Evans J.R. & Keckler, W.T. 2006. Precocious readers: past, present, and future. Journal for the Education of the Gifted 30: 205–235.
   Google Scholar
• Orbán, G., Fiser, J., Aslin, R.N. & Lengyel, M. 2008. Bayesian learning of visual chunks by human observers. Proc Nat Acad Sci 105: 2745–2750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otten, M., Seth, A.K. & Pinto, Y. 2017. A social Bayesian brain: how social knowledge can shape visual perception. Brain and cognition 112: 69–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panichello, M.F., Cheung, O.S. & Bar, M. 2013. Predictive feedback and conscious visual experience. Frontiers in Psychology 3: 620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panksepp, J. 1998. Affective Neuroscience: The Foundations of Human and Animal Emotions. London, UK, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Panksepp, J. & Biven, L. 2012. The Archaeology of Mind: Neuroevolutionary Origins of Human Emotion. New York, W. W. Norton and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Parr, T., Corcoran, A.W., Friston K.J. & Hohwy, J. 2019. Perceptual awareness and active inference. Neuroscience of consciousness 2019: niz012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parr, T., Rees, G. & Friston, K.J. 2018. “Computational neuropsychology and Bayesian inference” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 12: 61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patael, S.Z., Farris E.A., et al. 2018. Brain basis of cognitive resilience: prefrontal cortex predicts better reading comprehension in relation to decoding. PloS one 13: e0198791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, D. 2004. The reading wars: The politics of reading research and policy. Educational Policy 18: 216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C.A. 1992. The representation problem in reading acquisition. In Gough, P.B., Ehri, L.C. & Treiman, R. (Eds.) Reading Acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum. pp. 145–174.
   Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. 2003. The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language. London UK, Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Piper, B., Schroeder, L. & Trudell, B. 2016. Oral reading fluency and comprehension in Kenya: reading acquisition in a multilingual environment. UKLA Journal of Research in Reading 39: 133–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaut, D.C. 2005. Connectionist approaches to reading. In Snowling, M.J. & Hulme, C. (Eds.) The Science of Reading: A Handbook. London, Blackwell. pp. 24–38.
   Google Scholar
• Pugh, K.R., Mencl, W.E., et al. 2000. Functional neuroimaging studies of reading and reading disability (developmental dyslexia). Mental retardation and developmental disabilities research reviews 6: 207–213.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pullum G.K. & Scholz, B.C. 2002. Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments. The linguistic review 19: 9–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purves, D. 2010. Brains: How They Seem to Work. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, Ft Press.
   Google Scholar
• Purves, D., Cabeza R, et al. 2008. Cognitive Neuroscience. Sunderland, Sinauer Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Railton, P. 2017. At the core of our capacity to act for a reason: the affective system and evaluative model-based learning and control. Emotion Review 9: 335–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R. & Ziegler, J. 2001. Drc: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological review 108: 204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauss, K. & Pourtois, G. 2013. What is bottom-up and what is top-down in predictive coding? Frontiers in Psychology 4: 276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawlinson, G.E. 1976. The significance of letter position in word recognition. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Psychology Department, University of Nottingham, Nottingham UK. Summarised here: https://www.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/personal/matt.davis/Cmabrigde/rawlinson.html.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., White, S.J. & Liversedge, S.P. 2006. Raeding wrods with jubmled lettres: there is a cost. APS Psychological Science 17: 192–193. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9280.2006.01684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redhead, G. & Dunbar, R.I. 2013. The functions of language: An experimental study. Evolutionary Psychology 11 (4): 147470491301100409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves, C. 2017. The early grade reading study (EGRS). In Depth Case Studies of Home Language Literacy Practices in Four Grade 2 Classrooms in Treatment 1 and 2 Schools. Johannesburg, South Africa, EGRS.
   Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B. 1990. Apprenticeship in Thinking. New York, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B. 2003. The Cultural Nature of Human Development. New York, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B., Gutiérrez, K. & Erickson, F. 2016. The organization of informal learning. Review of Research in Education 40: 356–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolls, E.T. 2016. Cerebral Cortex: Principles of Operation. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, L.M. 1982. The literary transaction: evocation and response. Theory into Practice, Children’s Literature 21 (4): 268–277.
   Google Scholar
• Roskos, K.A. & Christie, J.F. 2011. Mindbrain and play–literacy connections. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy 11: 73–94.
   Google Scholar
• Roskos, K.A., Christie, J.F. & Richgels, D. 2003. The essential of early literacy instruction. Young Children 58: 62–60.
   Google Scholar
• Rumelhart, D.E. 1977. Toward an interactive model of reading. In S. Dornic (Ed.) Attention and Performance VI. Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum. pp. 573–606.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R.M. & Deci, E.L. 2009. Promoting self-determined school engagement: motivation, learning, and well-being. In Wentzel & Wigfield (Eds.) Handbook of Motivation in School. New York, Taylor Francis. pp. 171–196.
   Google Scholar
• Schnelle, H. 2010. Language in the Brain. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M.S. 2005. Connectionist models of word reading. Current Directions in Psychological Science 14: 238–242. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00372.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M.S. 2013. The science of reading and its educational implications. Language learning and development 9: 331–360.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seidenberg, M. 2017. Language at the Speed of Sight: How We READ, Why so Many Cannot, and What Can be Done about it. New York, Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M.S., Cooper Borkenhagen, M. & Kearns, D.M. 2020. Lost in translation? Challenges in connecting reading science and educational practice. Reading Research Quarterly 55: S119–S130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M.S. & McClelland, L. 1989. A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review 96 (4): 523–568. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.96.4.523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seth, A.K. 2013. Interoceptive inference, emotion, and the embodied self. Trends in cognitive sciences 17: 565–573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seth, A.K. 2014. The Cybernetic Bayesian Brain. Open MIND. Frankfurt am Main, MIND Group.
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T. 2020. What constitutes a science of reading instruction? Reading Research Quarterly 55: S235–S247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaywitz, B.A., Shaywitz, S.E., et al. 2002. Disruption of posterior brain systems for reading in children with developmental dyslexia. Biological psychiatry 52: 101–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaywitz, S. 2003. Overcoming Dyslexia. New York, Alfred Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Shaywitz, S. & Shaywitz, B.A. 2004. Reading disability and the brain: what research says about reading. Educational Leadership 61 (6): 6–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, S.M. & Guillery, R.W. 2006. Exploring the Thalamus and Its Role in Cortical Function. Cambridge, Mass, MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Sibanda, R. & Kajee, L. 2019. Home as a primary space: exploring out-of-school literacy practices in early childhood education in a township in South Africa. South African Journal of Childhood Education 9 (1): a686. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v9i1.686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, F. 1983. Reading like a writer. Language Arts 60: 558–567.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, F. 2012. Understanding Reading: A Psycholinguistic Analysis of Reading and Learning to Read. New York, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C.E. 2018. Simple and not-so-simple views of reading. Remedial and Special Education 39 (5): 313–316. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518770288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohoglu, E., Peelle, J.E., Carlyon, R.P. & Davis, M.H. 2012. Predictive top-down integration of prior knowledge during speech perception. The Journal of Neuroscience 32: 8443–8453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaull, N. & Pretorius, E. 2016. Exploring relationships between oral reading fluency and reading comprehension amongst English second language readers in South Africa. Reading and Writing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9645-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaull, N. & Pretorius, E. 2019. Still falling at the first hurdle: examining early grade reading in South Africa. In Spaull, N. & Jansen, J.D. (Eds.) South African Schooling: The Enigma of Inequality. Cham, Springer. pp. 147–168.
   Google Scholar
• Spaull, N., Pretorius, E. & Mohohlwane, N. 2020. Investigating the comprehension iceberg: developing empirical benchmarks for early-grade reading in agglutinating African languages. South African Journal of Childhood Education 10 (1): a773. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v10i1.773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spear-Swerling, L. 2019. Structured literacy and typical literacy practices: understanding differences to create instructional opportunities. Teaching Exceptional Children 51: 201–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00400-59917-750160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, S. 2012. Why Think? Philosophical Play from 3-11. London, Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, A. & Price, J. 2015. Evolutionary Psychiatry: A New Beginning. New York, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, S.J. & Burriss, K.G. 2016. A case for symbolic play: An important foundation for literacy development. The International Journal of Holistic Early Learning and Development 3: 59–72.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, S.L. 2004. The Linguistics, Neurology, and Politics of Phonics: Silent “E” Speaks Out. New York, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, S.L. & Altwerger, B. 2007. The logographic nature of English alphabetics and the fallacy of direct intensive phonics instruction. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy 7: 299–319.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, S.L., Goodman, K.S. & Paulson, E.J. 2009. Brain research and reading: How emerging concepts in neuroscience support a meaning construction view of the reading process. Educational Research and Review 4: 021–033.
   Google Scholar
• Street, B. 1984. Literacy in Theory and Practice. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Street, B. 2006. Autonomous and ideological models of literacy: approaches from new literacy studies. Media Anthropology Network 17: 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Sugiyama, M.S. 2017. Oral storytelling as evidence of pedagogy in forager societies. Frontiers of Psychology 8: 471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, D. 1983. Family Literacy: Young Children Learning to Read and Write. Portsmouth, NH, Heinemann Educational Books.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J.S.H., Rastle, K. & Davis, M.H. 2013. Can cognitive models explain brain activation during word and pseudoword reading? A meta-analysis of 36 neuroimaging studies. Psychological Bulletin 139: 766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, N. 1989. Falling at the First Hurdle: Initial Encounters with the Formal System of African Education in South Africa. Johannesburg, University of the Witwatersrand, Education Policy Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S., Cilliers, J., Prinsloo, C., Fleisch, B. & Reddy, V. 2019. Improving Early Grade Reading in South Africa, 3ie Grantee Final Report. New Delhi, International Initiative for Impact Evaluation. (3ie).
   Google Scholar
• Teale, W.H., Whittingham, C.E., Hoffman, E.B. 2020. Early literacy research, 2006–2015: A decade of measured progress. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy 20 (2): 169–222.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. 2000. The Cultural Origin of Human Cognition. Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. 2003. Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tovey, D.R. 1976. The psycholinguistic guessing game. Language Arts 53: 319–322.
   Google Scholar
• Trettenbrein, P.C., Papitto, G, Friederici, A.D. & Zaccarella, E. 2021. Functional neuroanatomy of language without speech: An ALE meta-analysis of sign language. Human Brain Mapping 42: 699–712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Berg, S., Spaull, N., Wills, G., Gustafsson, M. & Kotzé, J. 2016. Identifying the Binding Constraints in Education. Report commissioned by the South African Presidency Pro-Poor Policy Development. (PSPPD). Initiative.
   Google Scholar
• van Rooy, B. & Pretorius, E.J. 2013. Is reading in an agglutinating language different from an analytic language? An analysis of isiZulu and English reading based on eye movements. S A Linguistics & Applied Language Studies 31: 281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidal, Y., Viviani, E., Zoccolan, D. & Crepaldi, D. 2021. A general-purpose mechanism of visual feature association in visual word identification and beyond. Current Biology 31 (6): 1261–1267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, A.C., Petersen, S.E. & Schlaggar, B.L. 2012. The left occipitotemporal cortex does not show preferential activity for words. Cereb. Cortex 22: 2715–2732. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhr295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, A.C., Petersen, S.E. & Schlaggar, B.L. 2014. The VWFA: it’s not just for words anymore. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8: 88. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L.S. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wagemans, J., Elder, J.H., et al. 2012. A century of gestalt psychology in visual perception I. Perceptual grouping and figure-ground organization. Psychol Bull 138: 1172–1217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagemans, J., Elder, J.H., et al. 2012a. A century of gestalt psychology in visual perception II. Conceptual and theoretical foundations. Psychol Bull 138: 1218–1252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wandell, B.A., Rauschecker, A.M. & Yeatman, J.D. 2012. Learning to see words. Ann rev of psychology 63: 31–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitmore K.F., Martens P., Goodman Y.M. & Owocki, G. (2004). Critical lessons from the transactional perspective on early literacy research. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy 6 (2): 291–325.
   Google Scholar
• Whitmore, K.F. & Meyer, R.J. (Eds.). 2020. Reclaiming Literacies as Meaning Making: Manifestations of Values, Identities, Relationships and Knowledge. New York, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., Gladstone, J. & Turci, L. 2016. Beyond cognition: reading motivation and reading comprehension child development perspectives. The Society for Research in Child Development. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willingham, D.T. 2017. The Reading Mind: A Cognitive Approach to Understanding How the Mind Reads. San Francisco, John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, J. 2006. Research-Based Strategies To Ignite Student Learning. Alexandria, Virginia, ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, J. 2008. Teaching the Brain to Read: Strategies for Improving Fluency, Vocabulary and Comprehension. Virginia, USA, ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Willson, A.M. & Falcon, L.A. 2018. Seeking equilibrium: in what ways are teachers implementing a balanced literacy approach amidst the push for accountability? Texas journal of literacy education 6 (2): 73–93.
   Google Scholar
• Wissman, K.K. 2019. Reading radiantly: embracing the power of picturebooks to cultivate the social imagination. Bookbird 57: 14–25. IBBY.org.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, M. 2008. Proust and the Squid: The Story and Science of the Reading Brain. Thriplow, Cambridge, Icon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, M. 2018. The science and poetry in learning (and teaching) to read. Phi Delta Kappan 100: 13–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolpert, et al. 2002. Principles of Development. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yon, D. 2019. Now you see it. Aeon 4. July 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Zarcone, A., Van Schijndel, M., Vogels, J. & Demberg, V. 2016. Salience and attention in surprisal- based accounts of language processing. Frontiers in psychology 7: 844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar