Quality of Guidelines for the Laboratory Management of Diabetes Mellitus

References

• Institute of Medicine Committee to Advise the Public Health Service on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Clinical practice guideline: directions for a new program., M. J. Field, K. N Lohr. National Academy Press, Washington, DC 1990
   Google Scholar
• Oosterhuis W. P., Bruns D. E., Watine J., Sandberg S., Horvath A. R. Evidence‐based guidelines in laboratory medicine: principles and methods. Clin Chem 2004; 50((5))806–818, Downloadable at: http://www.clinchem.org
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shaneyfelt T. M., Mayo‐smith M. F., Rothwangl J. Are guidelines following guidelines? The methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines in the peer‐reviewed medical literature. JAMA 1999; 281((20))1900–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grilli R., Magrini N., Penna A., Mura G., Liberati A. Practice guidelines developed by specialty societies: the need for a critical appraisal. Lancet 2000; 355((9198))103–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Graham I. D., Beardall S., Carter A. O., Glennie J., Hebert P. C., Tetroe J. M., Mcalister F. A., Visentin S., Anderson G. M. What is the quality of drug therapy clinical practice guidelines in Canada?. CMAJ 2001; 165((2))157–63, Downloadable at: http://www.cmaj.ca/cgi/reprint/165/2/157.pdf
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mcalister F. A., Campbell N. R., Zarnke K., Levine M., Graham I. D. The management of hypertension in Canada: a review of current guidelines, their shortcomings and implications for the future. CMAJ 2001; 164((4))517–22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cranney A., Waldegger L., Graham I., Man‐son‐hing M., Byszewski A., Ooi D. Systematic assessment of the quality of osteoporosis guidelines. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2002; 3: 20, Downloadable at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1471‐2474‐3‐20.pdf
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mccormack J., Perry jr T., Rangno R., Van breemen C., Wright J. M., Baltzan M., Graham I. D., Beardal S. Assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines. CMAJ 2002; 166((2))168–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harpole L. H., Kelley M. J., Schreiber G., Toloza E. M., Kolimaga J., Mccrory D. C. Assessment of the scope and quality of clinical practice guidelines in lung cancer. Chest 2003; 123((1 Suppl))7S–20S
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burgers J. S., Fervers B., Haugh M., Brouwers M., Browman G., Philip T., Cluzeau F. A. International assessment of the quality of clinical practice guidelines in oncology using the Appraisal of Guidelines and Research and Evaluation Instrument. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22((10))2000–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van tulder M. W., Tuut M., Pennick V., Bombardier C., Assendelft W. J. Quality of primary care guidelines for acute low back pain. Spine 2004; 29((17))E357–62
   Google Scholar
• The AGREE Collaboration. Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation (AGREE) Instrument. Downloadable at: www.agreecollaboration.com
   Google Scholar
• Haynes R. B., Wilczynski N., Mckibbon K. A., Walker C. J., Sinclair J. C. Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound studies in MEDLINE. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1994; 1((6))447–58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvath A. R., Pewsner D. Systematic reviews in laboratory medicine: principles, processes and practical considerations. Clin Chim Acta 2004; 342((1–2))23–39
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WHO/NCD/NCS/99.2/ Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complication. Report of a WHO Consultation. Part 1: Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. WHO. Department of Noncommunicable Disease Surveillance. Geneva, Switzerland, 1999. pp 65
   Google Scholar
• Mcintosh A., Hutchinson A., Home P. D., Brown F., Bruce A., Damerell A., Davis R., Field R., Frost G., Marshall S., Roddick J., Tesfaye S., Withers H., Suckling R., Smith S., Griffin S., Kaltenthaler E., Peters J., Feder G. Clinical guidelines and evidence review for Type 2 diabetes: management of blood glucose. , et al. ScHARR, University of Sheffield, Sheffield 2001
   Google Scholar
• Sacks D. B., Bruns D. E., Goldstein D. E., Maclaren N. K., Mcdonald J. M., Parrott M. Guidelines and recommendations for laboratory analysis in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus. Clin Chem 2002; 48: 436–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Diabetes Care Standards of medical care for patients with diabetes mellitus. Diab Care 2003; 26((Suppl. 1))S33–50
   Google Scholar
• Vlayen J., Aertgeerts B., Hannes K., Sermeus W., Ramaekers D. A systematic review of appraisal tools for clinical practice guidelines: multiple similarities and one common deficit. Int J Qual Health Care 2005; 17((3))235–42
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• EIP/GPE/EQC/2003.1. Guidelines for WHO Guidelines. Global Programme on Evidence for Health Policy World Health Organization. Geneva, Switzerland, Version 10, March 2003. pp 24. Downloadable at: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2003/EIP_GPE_EQC_2003_1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• NHS NICE: Guideline Development Methods. Information for National Collaborating Centres and Guideline Developers. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. February 2004 (updated February 2005) Downloadable at: http://www.nice.org.uk/page.aspx?o=guidelinestechnicalmanual
   Google Scholar
• Burgers J. S., Bailey J. V., Klazinga N. S., Van der bij A. K., Grol R., Feder G. Inside guidelines. Comparative analysis of recommendations and evidence in diabetes guidelines from 13 countries. Diab Care 2002; 25((11))1933–1939
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vogel N., Burnand B., Vial Y., Ruiz J., Paccaud F., Hohlfeld P. Screening for gestational diabetes: variation in guidelines. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2000; 91: 29–36, Downloadable at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkins D., Best D., Briss P. A., Eccles M., Falck‐ytter Y., Flottorp S., Guyatt G. H., Harbour R. T., Haugh M. C., Henry D., Hill S., Jaeschke R., Leng G., Liberati A., Magrini N., Mason J., Middleton P., Mrukowicz J., O'connell D., Oxman A. D., Phillips B., Schunemann H. J., Edejer T. T., Varonen H., Vist G. E., Williams J. W Jr., Zaza S. GRADE Working Group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2004; 328((7454))1490
   PubMedGoogle Scholar