References
- CLSI. Autoverification of Clinical Laboratory test results; Approved Guideline. CLSI document AUTO10-A. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2006.
- Krasowski M, Davis S, Drees D, Morris C, Kulhavy J, Crone C, Bebber T, Clark I, Nelson D, Teul S, Voss D, Aman D, Fahnle J, Blau J. Autoverification in a core clinical chemistry laboratory at an academic medical center. J Pathol Inform 2014;5:13.
- Torke N, Boral L, Nguyen T, Perri A, Chakrin A. Process improvement and operational efficiency through test result autoverification. Clin Chem 2005;51:2406–8.
- ISLH. Consensus guidelines: preface. Available at: http://www.islh.org/web/consensus_rules.php [last accessed 2014].
- Zhao Y, Yang L, Zheng G, Yingmu CA. Building and evaluating the autoverification of coagulation items in the laboratory information system. Clin Lab 2014;60:143–50.
- Froom P, Saffuri-Elias E, Brak M. Autovalidation rates in an outpatient coagulation laboratory. Int J Lab Hematol 2015;37:680–5.
- Whitehurst P, Di Dilvo T, Boyadjian G. Evaluation of discrepancies in patients’ results-an aspect of computer-assisted quality control. Clin Chem 1975;21:87–92.
- Sheiner L, Wheeler L, Moore J. The performance of delta check methods. Clin Chem 1979;25:2034–7.
- Park S, Kim S-Y, Lee W, Chun S, Min W-K. New decision criteria for selecting delta check methods based on the ratio of the delta difference to the width of the reference range can be generally applicable for each clinical chemistry test item. Ann Lab Med 2012;32:345–54.
- Hoaglin D, Iglewicz B. Fine tuning some resistant rules for outlier labeling. J Am Stat Assoc 1987;82:1147–9.