References
- Ruzicka K, Veitl M, Thalhammer-Scherrer R, et al. The new hematology analyzer Sysmex XE-2100: performance evaluation of a novel white blood cell differential technology. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2001;125:391–396.
- Fernandes B, Hamaguchi Y. Performance characteristics of the Sysmex XT-2000i hematology analyzer. Lab Hematol. 2003;9:189–197.
- Seo JY, Lee ST, Kim SH. Performance evaluation of the new hematology analyzer Sysmex XN-series. Int J Lab Hematol. 2015;37:155–164.
- Luo Y, Lin J, Chen H, et al. Utility of neut-X, neut-Y and neut-Z parameters for rapidly assessing sepsis in tumor patients. Clin Chim Acta. 2013;422:5–9.
- Tabe Y, Yamamoto T, Maenou I, et al. Performance evaluation of the digital cell imaging analyzer DI-60 integrated into the fully automated Sysmex XN hematology analyzer system. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015;53:281–289.
- Barnes PW, McFadden SL, Machin SJ, international consensus group for hematology, et al. The international consensus group for hematology review: suggested criteria for action following automated CBC and WBC differential analysis. Lab Hematol. 2005;11:83–90.
- Cannesson M, Tanabe M, Suffoletto MS, et al. A novel two-dimensional echocardiographic image analysis system using artificial intelligence-learned pattern recognition for rapid automated ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:217–226.
- Comaniciu D, Engel K, Georgescu B, et al. Shaping the future through innovations: from medical imaging to precision medicine. Med Image Anal. 2016;33:19–26.
- Kratz A, Bengtsson H-I, Casey JE, et al. Performance Evaluation of the CellaVision DM96 System: WBC differentials by automated digital image analysis supported by an artificial neural network. Am J Clin Pathol. 2005;124:770–781.