Myocardial first pass perfusion assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance and coronary microvascular dysfunction in women with angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease

References

• Jespersen L, Hvelplund A, Abildstrøm SZ, et al. Stable angina pectoris with no obstructive coronary artery disease is associated with increased risks of major adverse cardiovascular events. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:734–744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pepine CJ, Anderson RD, Sharaf BL, et al. Coronary microvascular reactivity to adenosine predicts adverse outcome in women evaluated for suspected ischemia. Results from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute WISE (Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation) Study. J Am Coll Cardiol Elsevier Inc. 2010;55:2825–2832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murthy VL, Naya M, Foster CR, et al. Improved cardiac risk assessment with noninvasive measures of coronary flow reserve. Circulation. 2011;124:2215–2224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sicari R, Rigo F, Cortigiani L, et al. Additive prognostic value of coronary flow reserve in patients with chest pain syndrome and normal or near-normal coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol. 2009;103:626–631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meimoun P, Tribouilloy C. Non-invasive assessment of coronary flow and coronary flow reserve by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography: a magic tool for the real world. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2008;9:449–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fakhri G. El, Sitek A, Gue B, et al. Quantitative dynamic cardiac 82Rb PET using generalized factor and compartment analyses. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1264–1271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graf S, Khorsand A, Gwechenberger M, et al. Typical chest pain and normal coronary angiogram: cardiac risk factor analysis versus PET for detection of microvascular disease. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:175–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelsen MM, Mygind ND, Pena A, et al. Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography compared with positron emission tomography for assessment of coronary microvascular dysfunction: The iPOWER study. Int J Cardiol. 2017;228:435–443,
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerosch-Herold M, Seethamraju RT, Swingen CM, et al. Analysis of myocardial perfusion MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;19:758–770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwitter J, Wacker CM, Wilke N, MR-IMPACT Investigators, et al. MR-IMPACT II: Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion Assessment in Coronary artery disease Trial: perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance vs. single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparative. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:775–781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood JP, Maredia N, Younger JF, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial. Lancet. 2012;379:453–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gargiulo P, Dellegrottaglie S, Bruzzese D, et al. The prognostic value of normal stress cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6:574–582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerakis S, McLean DS, Anadiotis AV, et al. Prognostic value of adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with low-risk chest pain. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2009;11:37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mygind ND, Michelsen MM, Pena A, et al. Coronary microvascular function and myocardial fibrosis in women with angina pectoris and no obstructive coronary artery disease: the iPOWER study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:76. doi:10.1186/s12968-016-0295-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mygind ND, Michelsen MM, Pena A, et al. Coronary microvascular function and cardiovascular risk factors in women with angina pectoris and no obstructive coronary artery disease: the iPOWER Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5:e003064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prescott E, Abildstrøm SZ, Aziz A, et al. Improving diagnosis and treatment of women with angina pectoris and microvascular disease: the iPOWER study design and rationale. Am Heart J. 2014;167:452–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Scholten BJ, Hasbak P, Christensen TE, et al. Cardiac (82)Rb PET/CT for fast and non-invasive assessment of microvascular function and structure in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2016;59:371–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekemp RA, Declerck J, Klein R, et al. Multisoftware reproducibility study of stress and rest myocardial blood flow assessed with 3D dynamic PET/CT and a 1-tissue-compartment model of 82Rb kinetics. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:571–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz-Menger J, Bluemke DA, Bremerich J, et al. Standardized image interpretation and post processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) board of trustees task force on standardized post processing. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013;15:35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle M, Weinberg N, Pohost GM, et al. Prognostic value of global MR myocardial perfusion imaging in women with suspected myocardial ischemia and no obstructive coronary disease: results from the NHLBI-sponsored WISE (Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation) study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3:1030–1036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panting JR, Gatehouse PD, Yang G-Z, et al. Abnormal subendocardial perfusion in cardiac syndrome X detected by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1948–1953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shufelt CL, Thomson LEJ, Goykhman P, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging myocardial perfusion reserve index assessment in women with microvascular coronary dysfunction and reference controls. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2013;3:153–160.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thomson LEJ, Wei J, Agarwal M, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion reserve index is reduced in women with coronary microvascular dysfunction. A National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-sponsored study from the Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:e002481–e002481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim T, Nekolla SG, Schreiber K, et al. Assessment of coronary flow reserve: comparison between contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:864–870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu A, Wijesurendra RS, Liu JM, et al. Diagnosis of microvascular angina using cardiac magnetic resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018. 71:969–979. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.12.046.
   Google Scholar
• Qayyum AA, Kastrup J. Measuring myocardial perfusion: the role of PET, MRI and CT. Clin Radiol. 2015;70:576–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim HE, Shim WJ, Rhee H, et al. Assessment of coronary flow reserve with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography: comparison among adenosine, standard-dose dipyridamole, and high-dose dipyridamole. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2000;13:264–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston DL, Daley JR, Hodge DO, et al. Hemodynamic responses and adverse effects associated with adenosine and dipyridamole pharmacologic stress testing: a comparison in 2000 patients. Mayo Clin Proc. 1995;70:331–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manisty C, Ripley DP, Herrey AS, et al. Splenic switch-off: a tool to assess stress adequacy in adenosine perfusion cardiac MR imaging. Radiology. 2015;276:732–740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mygind ND, Michelsen MM, Pena A, et al. steering committee of the iPower study. Coronary microvascular function and myocardial fibrosis in women with angina pectoris and no obstructive coronary artery disease: the iPOWER study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu A, Wijesurendra RS, Liu JM, et al. Gadolinium-free cardiac MR stress T1-mapping to distinguish epicardial from microvascular coronary disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71:957–968. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picano E. Stress Echocardiography. 5th ed. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Sicari R, Nihoyannopoulos P, Evangelista A, European Association of Echocardiography, et al. Stress echocardiography expert consensus statement: European Association of Echocardiography (EAE) (a registered branch of the ESC). Eur J Echocardiogr. 2008;9:415–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar