Establishing biological variation for plasma D-dimer from 25 healthy individuals

References

• Fraser CG. Biological Variation: From Principles to Practice. Washington (DC): AACC Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser CG, Sandberg S. Biological variation. In: Rifai N, Horvath AR, Wittwer CT, editors. Tietz textbook of clinical chemistry and molecular diagnostics. Missouri: Elseiver; 2018. p. 157–169.
   Google Scholar
• Ricós C, Alvarez V, Cava F, et al. Current databases on biological variation: pros, cons and progress. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1999;59(7):491–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biologic Variation Database, the 2014 Update. Wisconsin: Westgard QC; [cited 2020 Oct 11]. Available from: http://www.westgard.com/biodatabase-2014-update.htm
   Google Scholar
• The Aarsand AK, Fernandez-Calle P, Webster C, et al. The EFLM biological variation database. 2020. [cited 2020 Oct 11]. Available from: https://biologicalvariation.eu/
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett WA, Braga F, Carobene A, et al.; Biological Variation Working Group, European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM). A checklist for critical appraisal of studies of biological variation. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015;53(6):879–885.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aarsand AK, Røraas T, Fernandez-Calle P, et al.; European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Working Group on Biological Variation and Task and Finish Group for the Biological Variation Database. The biological variation data critical appraisal checklist: A standard for evaluating studies on biological variation. Clin Chem. 2018;64(3):501–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Favresse J, Lippi G, Roy PM, et al. D-dimer: preanalytical, analytical, postanalytical variables, and clinical applications. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2018;55(8):548–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitz JI, Fredenburgh JC, Eikelboom JW. A test in context: D-Dimer. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(19):2411–2420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippi G, Cervellin G, Casagranda I, et al. D-dimer testing for suspected venous thromboembolism in the emergency department. Consensus document of AcEMC, CISMEL, SIBioC, and SIMeL. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2014;52(5):621–628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simundic AM, Bölenius K, Cadamuro J, et al.; Working Group for Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE), of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and Latin American Working Group for Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE-LATAM) of the Latin America Confederation of Clinical Biochemistry (COLABIOCLI). Joint EFLM-COLABIOCLI Recommendation for venous blood sampling. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018;56(12):2015–2038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodhams B, Girardot O, Blanco MJ, et al. Stability of coagulation proteins in frozen plasma. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2001;12(4):229–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran WG. The distribution of the largest of a set of estimated variances as a fraction of their total. Ann Eugen. 1941;11(1):47–52.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon WJ. Processing data for outliers. Biometrics. 1953;9(1):74–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Agostino RB, Belanger A, D'Agostino RB. Jr A suggestion for using powerful and informative tests of normality. Am Stat. 1990;44:316–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro SS, Wilk MB. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika. 1965;52(3-4):591–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carobene A, Aarsand AK, Guerra E, European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Working Group on Biological Variation, et al. European Biological Variation Study (EuBIVAS): Within- and between-subject biological variation data for 15 frequently measured proteins. Clin Chem. 2019;65(8):1031–1041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burdick RK, Graybill FA. Confidence intervals on variance components. New York (NY): Marcell Dekker, Inc; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser CG, Hyltoft Petersen P, Libeer JC, et al. Proposals for setting generally applicable quality goals solely based on biology. Ann Clin Biochem. 1997;34(1):8–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris EK. Effects of intra- and interindividual variation on the appropriate use of normal ranges. Clin Chem. 1974;20(12):1535–1542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Røraas T, Petersen PH, Sandberg S. Confidence intervals and power calculations for within-person biological variation: effect of analytical imprecision, number of replicates, number of samples, and number of individuals. Clin Chem. 2012;58(9):1306–1313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristoffersen AH, Petersen PH, Sandberg S. A model for calculating the within-subject biological variation and likelihood ratios for analytes with a time-dependent change in concentrations; exemplified with the use of D-dimer in suspected venous thromboembolism in healthy pregnant women. Ann Clin Biochem. 2012;49(Pt 6):561–569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen ND, Ghaddar H, Stinson V, et al. ARIC hemostasis study–IV. Intraindividual variability and reliability of hemostatic factors. The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC). Thromb Haemost. 1995;73:256–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelberger RP, Limacher A, Kucher N, et al. Biological variation of established and novel biomarkers for atherosclerosis: Results from a prospective, parallel-group cohort study. Clin Chim Acta. 2015;447:16–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny D, Fraser CG, Peterson PH, et al. Consensus agreement. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1999;59:585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandberg S, Fraser CG, Horvath AR, et al. Defining analytical performance specifications: Consensus Statement from the 1st Strategic Conference of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015;53(6):833–835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser CG. Reference change values. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011;50(5):807–812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricós C, Perich C, Minchinela J, et al. Application of biological variation - a review. Biochem Med. 2009;19:250–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aarsand AK, Díaz-Garzón J, Fernandez-Calle P, et al. The EuBIVAS: Within- and between-subject biological variation data for electrolytes, lipids, urea, uric acid, total protein, total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, and glucose. Clin Chem. 2018;64(9):1380–1393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coşkun A, Carobene A, Kilercik M, European Biological Variation Study of the EFLM Working Group on Biological Variation, et al. Within-subject and between-subject biological variation estimates of 21 hematological parameters in 30 healthy subjects. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018;56(8):1309–1318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley RS, Gilbert AR, Dalton JB, et al. Widely used types and clinical applications of D-Dimer assay. Lab Med. 2016;47(2):90–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar