Critical test result management at Danish hospital laboratories: a national survey

References

• Lundberg G. When to panic over abnormal values. Med Lab Observer. 1972;4:47–54.
   Google Scholar
• Lundberg GD. Critical (panic) value notification: an established laboratory practice policy (parameter). Jama. 1990;263(5):709. doi:10.1001/jama.1990.03440050103044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sciacovelli L, Plebani M. The IFCC working group on laboratory errors and patient safety. Clin Chim Acta. 2009;404(1):79–85. doi:10.1016/j.cca.2009.03.025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO. Medical laboratories – requirements for quality and competence. 4th ed. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organisation for Standardization; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Hanna D, Griswold P, Leape LL, et al. Communicating critical test results: safe practice recommendations. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2005;31(2):68–80. doi:10.1016/s1553-7250(05)31011-7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Campbell C, Caldwell G, Coates P, et al. Consensus statement for the management and communication of high risk laboratory results. Clin Biochem Rev. 2015;36(3):97–105.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Croal B. The communication of critical and unexpected pathology results. London, UK: The Royal College of Pathologists; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• CLSI. Management of critical- and significant-risk results. 1st ed. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell CA, Horvath AR. Harmonization of critical result management in laboratory medicine. Clin Chim Acta. 2014;432:135–147. doi:10.1016/j.cca.2013.11.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenicek Krleza J, Honovic L, Vlasic Tanaskovic J, et al. Post-analytical laboratory work: national recommendations from the working group for post-analytics on behalf of the croatian society of medical biochemistry and laboratory medicine. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2019;29(2):020502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piva E, Sciacovelli L, Pelloso M, et al. Performance specifications of critical results management. Clin Biochem. 2017;50(10–11):617–621. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.05.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippi G, Mattiuzzi C. Critical laboratory values communication: summary recommendations from available guidelines. Ann Transl Med. 2016;4(20):400–400. doi:10.21037/atm.2016.09.36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell C, Horvath A. Towards harmonisation of critical laboratory result management - review of the literature and survey of australasian practices. Clin Biochem Rev. 2012;33(4):149–160.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kost GJ, Hale KN. Global trends in critical values practices and their harmonization. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011;49(2):167–176. doi:10.1515/CCLM.2011.033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate JR, Johnson R, Barth J, et al. Harmonization of laboratory testing – Current achievements and future strategies. Clin Chim Acta. 2014;432:4–7. doi:10.1016/j.cca.2013.08.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llovet MI, Biosca C, Martínez-Iribarren A, et al. Reaching consensus on communication of critical laboratory results using a collective intelligence method. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018;56(3):403–412. doi:10.1515/cclm-2017-0374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh H, Vij MS. Eight recommendations for policies for communicating abnormal test results. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2010;36(5):226–232. doi:10.1016/s1553-7250(10)36037-5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kopcinovic LM, Trifunović J, Pavosevic T, et al. Croatian survey on critical results reporting. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2015;25(2):193–202. doi:10.11613/BM.2015.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fei Y, Zhao H, Wang W, et al. National survey on current situation of critical value reporting in 973 laboratories in China. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2017;27(3):030707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosallam R, Ibrahim SZ. Critical value reporting at egyptian laboratories. J Patient Saf. 2019;15(3):205–211. doi:10.1097/PTS.0000000000000217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuljanić D, Pereira M, Santos S, et al. Critical results reporting in Portuguese hospital laboratories: state-of-the-Art. Ejifcc. 2020;31(2):145–156.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aakre KM, Hov GG, Skadberg O, et al. Notification of highly abnormal laboratory results to doctors outside hospitals. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2013;133(21):E1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Dighe AS, Rao A, Coakley AB, et al. Analysis of laboratory critical value reporting at a large academic medical center. Am J Clin Pathol. 2006;125(5):758–764. doi:10.1309/R53XVC2U5CH6TNG8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clavijo A, Fallaw D, Coule P, et al. Communication of critical laboratory values: optimization of the process through secure messaging. Lab Med. 2020;51(1):e6–e11. doi:10.1093/labmed/lmz047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn TJ, Olson JE. Improving critical value notification through secure text messaging. J Pathol Inform. 2020;11(1):21. doi:10.4103/jpi.jpi_19_20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Randell EW, Yenice S. Delta checks in the clinical laboratory. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2019;56(2):75–97. doi:10.1080/10408363.2018.1540536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monaghan SA, Li JL, Liu YC, et al. A machine learning approach to the classification of acute leukemias and distinction From nonneoplastic cytopenias using flow cytometry data. Am J Clin Pathol. 2022;157(4):546–553. doi:10.1093/ajcp/aqab148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis MA, Rao B, Cedeno PA, et al. Machine learning and improved quality metrics in acute intracranial hemorrhage by noncontrast computed tomography. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2022;51(4):556–561. doi:10.1067/j.cpradiol.2020.10.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callen J, Georgiou A, Li J, et al. The safety implications of missed test results for hospitalised patients: a systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20(2):194–199. doi:10.1136/bmjqs.2010.044339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laguna J, Macias-Muñoz L, Bedini JL, et al. Notification of biochemistry critical results and its clinical impact on outpatient care: experience in a spanish tertiary hospital. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2021;59(11):1777–1783. doi:10.1515/cclm-2021-0495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. The research priority setting working group of the world alliance for patient safety. Summary of the evidence on patient safety: implications for research. Geneva, Switzerland: world Health Organization; 2008.
   Google Scholar