Computed tomography colonography: Current issues

References

• Available at: www.-dep.iarc.fr/eucan/eucan.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh JM, Terdiman JP. Colorectal cancer screening: scientific review. J Am Med Assoc 2003; 289: 1288–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coebergh JW. Colorectal cancer screening in Europe: first things first. Eur J Cancer 2004; 40: 638–42
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D, Bond J, Burt R, Ferrucci J, et al. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale: update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology 2003; 124: 544–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo L, Corti G, Magri F, Marocchi A, Brambilla P, Crespi C, et al. Results of a pilot study of endoscopic screening of first degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients in Italy. J Epidemiol Community Health 1997; 51: 453–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pariente A, Milan C, Lafon J, Faivre J. Colonoscopic screening in first-degree relatives of patients with ‘sporadic’ colorectal cancer: a case-control study. L'Association Nationale des Gastroenterologues des Hospitaux et Registre Bourguignon des Cancers Digestifs (INSERM CRI 9505). Gastroenterology 1998; 115: 7–12
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eckhardt VF, Fuchs M, Kanzler G, Remmele W, Stienen U. Follow-up of patients with colonic polyps containing severe atypia and invasive carcinoma. Compliance, recurrence, and survival. Cancer 1988; 61: 2552–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Knopf KB, Warren JL, Feuer EJ, Brown ML. Bowel surveillance patterns after a diagnosis of colorectal cancer in Medicare beneficiaries. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 563–71
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cooper GS, Yuan Z, Chak A, Rimm AA. Patterns of endoscopic follow-up after surgery for nonmetastatic colorectal cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 52: 33–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hacklesberger A, Fruhmorgen P, Weiler H, Heller T, Seeliger H, Junghanns K. Endoscopic polypectomy and management of colorectal adenomas with invasive carcinoma. Endoscopy 1995; 27: 153–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harewood GC, Wiersema MJ, Melton LJ. A prospective, controlled assessment of factors influencing acceptance of screening colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 3186–94
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dominitz JA, Eisen GM, Baron TH, Goldstein JL, Hirota WK, Jacobson BC, et al. Complications of colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 57: 441–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O'Brien MJ, Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Gottlieb LS, Sternberg SS, Diaz B, et al. The National Polyp Study. Patient and polyp characteristics associated with high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas. Gastroenterology 1990; 98: 371–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond JH. Colon polyps and cancer. Endoscopy 2001; 33: 46–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pescatore P, Glucker T, Delarive J, Meuli R, Pantoflickova D, Duvoisin B, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement of CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy). Gut 2000; 47: 126–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rex DK, Vining D, Kopecky KK. An initial experience with screening for colon polyps using spiral CT with and without CT colography (virtual colonoscopy). Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 50: 309–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yee J, Akerkar GA, Hung RK, Steinauer-Gebauer AM, Wall SD, McQuaid KR. Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients. Radiology 2001; 219: 685–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenlon HM, Nunes DP, Schroy PC, Barish MA, Clarke PD, Ferrucci JT. A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 1496–503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pineau BC, Paskett ED, Chen GJ, Espeland MA, Phillips K, Han JP, et al. Virtual colonoscopy using oral contrast compared with colonoscopy for the detection of patients with colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 2003; 125: 304–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson CD, Toledano AY, Herman BA, Dachman AH, McFarland EG, Barish MA, et al. Computerized tomographic colonography: performance evaluation in a retrospective multicenter setting. Gastroenterology 2003; 125: 688–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson MH, Svensson E, Lasson A, Hellstrom M. Patient acceptance of CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy: prospective comparative study in patients with or suspected of having colorectal disease. Radiology 2002; 222: 337–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomeer M, Bielen D, Vanbeckevoort D, Dymarkowski S, Gevers A, Rutgeers P, et al. Patient acceptance for CT colonography: what is the real issue?. Eur J Radiol 2002; 12: 1410–15
   Google Scholar
• Akerkar GA, Yee J, Hung R, McQuaid K. Patient experience and preferences toward colon cancer screening: a comparison of virtual colonoscopy and conventional colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 310–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbes GM, Mendelson RM. Patient acceptance of virtual colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2000; 32: 274–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ristvedt SL, McFarland EG, Weinstock LB, Thyssen EP. Patient preferences for CT colonography, conventional colonoscopy, and bowel preparation. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98: 578–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gluecker TM, Johnson CD, Harmsen WS, Offord KP, Harris AM, Wilson LA, et al. Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography, colonoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema examination: prospective assessment of patient perceptions and preferences. Radiology 2003; 227: 378–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Gelder RE, Nio CY, Florie J, Bartelsman JF, Snel P, de Jager SW, et al. Computed tomographic colonography compared with colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2004; 127: 41–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vos FM, van Gelder RE, Serlie IW, Florie J, Nio CY, Glas AS, et al. Three-dimensional display modes for CT colonography: conventional 3D virtual colonoscopy versus unfolded cube projection. Radiology 2003; 228: 878–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickhardt PJ, Choi R, Hwang I, Butler JA, Puckett ML, Hildebrandt HA, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 2191–200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson CD, Harmsen WS, Wilson LA, McCarty RL, Welch TJ, Ilstrup DM, et al. Prospective blinded evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for screen detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 2003; 125: 311–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotton PB, Durkalski VL, Pineau BC, Palesch YY, Mauldin PD, Hoffman B, et al. J Am Med Assoc 2004; 291: 1713–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gelder RE, Florie J, Stoker J. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance with CT colonography: current controversies and obstacles. Abdom Imaging 2004 (Nov), first published on-line.
   Google Scholar
• Pickhardt PJ, Nugent PA, Choi JR, Schindler WR. Flat colorectal lesions in asymptomatic adults: implications for screening with CT virtual colonoscopy. Am J Roentgenol 2004; 183: 1343–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rex DX, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, Rahmani EY, Clark DW, Helper DJ, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 1997; 112: 24–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hixson LJ, Fennerty MB, Sampliner RE, McGee D, Garewal H. Prospective study of the frequency and size distribution of polyps missed by colonoscopy. J Natl Cancer Inst 1990; 82: 1769–72
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Loeve F, van Ballegooijen M, Kuipers EJ, Habbema JDF. Colorectal cancer risk in adenoma patients: a nation-wide study. Int J Cancer 2004; 111: 147–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Gelder RE, Birnie E, Florie J, Schutter MP, Bartelsman JF, Snel P, et al. A comparison of patient preference of CT colonography and colonoscopy: a five-week follow-up study. Radiology 2004; 233: 328–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berrington de González A, Darby S. Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries. Lancet 2004; 363: 345–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Gelder RE, Venema HW, Serlie IWO, Nio CY, Determann RM, Tipker CA. CT colonography at different radiation dose levels: feasibility of dose reduction. Radiology 2002; 224: 25–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Gelder RE, Venema HW, Florie J, Nio CY, Serlie IWO, Schutter MP. CT colonography: feasibility of substantial dose reduction – comparison of medium to very low doses in identical patients. Radiology 2004; 232: 611–20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Macari M, Bini EJ, Xue X, Milano A, Katz SS, Resnick D, et al. Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection. Radiology 2002; 224: 383–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C, Brink JA, Mangiapane F, Trenna S, et al. Detection of colorectal lesions: lower-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy. Radiology 2003; 229: 775–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogt C, Cohnen M, Beck A, vom Dahl S, Aurich V, Modder U. Detection of colorectal polyps by multislice CT colonography ultra-low-dose technique: comparison with high-resolution videocolonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60: 201–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beaulieu CF, Jeffrey RB, Jr, Karadi C, Paik DS, Napel S. Display modes for CT colonography. Part II. Blinded comparison of axial CT and virtual endoscopic and panoramic endoscopic volume-rendered studies. Radiology 1999; 212: 203–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macari M, Milano A, Lavelle M, Berman P, Megibow AJ. Comparison of time-efficient CT colonography with two- and three-dimensional colonic evaluation for detecting colorectal polyps. Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174: 1543–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar