Determinants of optimal bowel function in ileal pouch-anal anastomosis – physiological differences contributing to pouch function

References

• Parks A, Nicholls RJ. Proctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis. Br Med J. 1978;2:85–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carne PWG, Pemberton JH. Technical aspects of ileoanal pouch surgery. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2004;17:35–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heuschen UA, Hinz U, Allemeyer EH, et al. Risk factors for ileoanal J pouch-related septic complications in ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Ann Surg. 2002;235:207–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hueting WE, Buskens E, van der Tweel I, et al. Results and complications after ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a meta-analysis of 43 observational studies comprising 9,317 patients. Dig Surg. 2005;22:69–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Zeeuw S, Ali UA, Donders RART, et al. Update of complications and functional outcome of the ileo-pouch anal anastomosis: overview of evidence and meta-analysis of 96 observational studies. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012;27:843–853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meagher AP, Farouk R, Dozois RR, et al. J ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis: complications and long-term outcome in 1310 patients. Br J Surg. 1998;85:800–803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tekkis PP, Lovegrove RE, Tilney HS, et al. Long-term failure and function after restorative proctocolectomy – a multi-centre study of patients from the UK National Ileal Pouch Registry. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12:433–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulchinsky H, Hawley PR, Nicholls J. Long-term failure after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis. Ann Surg. 2003;238:229–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazio VW, Kiran RP, Remzi FH, et al. Ileal pouch anal anastomosis: analysis of outcome and quality of life in 3707 patients. Ann Surg. 2013;257:679–685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Øresland T, Fasth S, Nordgren S, et al. Pouch size: the important functional determinant after restorative proctocolecotmy. Br J Surg. 1990;77:165–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annibali R, Øresland T, Hultén L. Does the level of stapled ileoanal anastomosis influence physiologic and functional outcome? Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37:321–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovegrove RE, Constantinides VA, Heriot AG, et al. A comparison of hand-sewn versus stapled ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) following proctocolectomy: a meta-analysis of 4183 patients. Ann Surg. 2006;244:18–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunde ML, Øresland T, Faerden AE. Restorative proctocolectomy with two different pouch designs: few complications with good function. Colorectal Dis. 2016;19:363–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berndtsson I, Lindholm E, Øresland T, et al. Long-term outcome after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: function and health-related quality of life. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50:1545–1552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunde ML, Øresland T, Engebreth Faerden A. Correlation between pouch function and sexual function in patients with IPAA. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2015;51:295–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Øresland T, Fasth S, Nordgren S, et al. The clinical and functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy. A prospective study in 100 patients. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1989;4:50–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahnloser D, Pemberton JH, Wolff BG, et al. The effect of ageing on function and quality of life in ileal pouch patients: a single cohort experience of 409 patients with chronic ulcerative colitis. Ann Surg. 2004;240:615–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandborn WJ, Tremaine WJ, Batts KP, et al. Pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a Pouchitis Disease Activity Index. Mayo Clin Proc. 1994;69:409–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utsunomiya J, Iwama T, Imajo M, et al. Total colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and ileoanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 1980;23:459–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kock NG. Intra-abdominal “Reservoir” in patients with permanent ileostomy. Arch Surg. 1969;99:223–231.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hallgren T, Fasth S, Nordgren S, et al. Manovolumetric characteristics and functional results in three different pelvic pouch designs. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1989;4:156–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallgren T, Fasth S, Nordgren S, et al. The stapled ileal pouch–anal anastomosis. A randomized study comparing two different pouch designs. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1990;25:1161–1168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Øresland T, Fasth S, Nordgren S, et al. A Prospective randomized comparison of two different pelvic pouch designs. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1990;25:986–996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rink AD, Kneist W, Radinski I, et al. Differences in ano-neorectal physiology of ileoanal and coloanal reconstructions for restorative proctectomy. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12:342–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt MD, Kamm MA, Groom J, et al. Ileoanal pouch compliance and motor function. Br J Surg. 1992;79:126–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg PA, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ, et al. Contribution of gastrointestinal transit and pouch characteristics in determining pouch function. Gut. 1997;40:790–793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farouk R, Dozois R, Pemberton JH, et al. Incidence and subsequent impact of pelvic abscess after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41:1239–1243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiely JM, Fazio VW, Remzi FH, et al. Pelvic sepsis after IPAA adversely affects function of the pouch and quality of life. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55:387–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keighley MRB, Winslet MC, Flinn R, et al. Multivariate analysis of factors influencing the results of restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg. 1989;76:740–744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oresland T, Bemelman WA, Sampietro GM, et al. European evidence based consensus on surgery for ulcerative colitis. J Crohns Colitis. 2015;9:4–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelassi F, Lee J, Rubin M, et al. Long-term functional results after ileal pouch anal restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: a prospective observational study. Ann Surg. 2003;238:433–441. discussion 442–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholls RJ, Belliveau P, Neill M, et al. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir: a pathophysiological assessment. Gut. 1981;22:462–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keighley MRB, Yoshioka K, Kmiot W, et al. Physiological parameters influencing function in restorative proctocolectomy and ileo-pouch-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg. 1988;75:997–1002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stryker SJ, Kelly KA, Phillips SF, et al. Anal and neorectal function after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Ann Surg. 1986;203:55–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halvorsen AL, Hull TL, Remzi FH, et al. Perioperative resting pressure predicts long-term postoperative function after ileal pouch–anal anastomosis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2002;6:316–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuckson WB, McNamara MJ, Fazio VW, et al. Impact of anal manipulation and pouch design on ileal pouch function. J Natl Med Assoc. 1991;83:1089–1092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block M, Borjesson L, Lindholm E, et al. Pouch design and long-term functional outcome after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg. 2009;96:527–532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach S, Mortensen NJ. Revolution and evolution: 30 years of ileoanal pouch surgery. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2006;12:131–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar