Psychometric validation of the Stoma-QOL questionnaire in a Canadian cross-sectional sample of colostomy and ileostomy patients

References

• Gooszen AW, Geelkerken RH, Hermans J, et al. Quality of life with a temporary stoma: ileostomy vs. colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:650–655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahjoubi B, Kiani Goodarzi K, Mohammad-Sadeghi H. Quality of life in stoma patients: Appropriate and inappropriate stoma sites. World J Surg. 2010;34:147–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85:365–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt CE, Bestmann B, Kuchler T, et al. Impact of age on quality of life in patients with rectal cancer. World J Surg. 2005;29:190–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter NN, Novotny PJ, Jacobson T, et al. A stoma quality of life scale. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49:205–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Versteegh MM, Leunis A, Uyl-De Groot CA, et al. Condition-specific preference-based measures: Benefit or burden?. Value Health. 2012;15:504–513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olbrisch ME. Development and validation of the Ostomy Adjustment Scale. Rehabil Psychol. 1983;28:3–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquis P, Marrel A, Jambon B. Quality of life in patients with stomas: the Montreux Study. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2003;49:48–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prieto L, Thorsen H, Juul K. Development and validation of a quality of life questionnaire for patients with colostomy or ileostomy. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005;3:62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wong EL, Coulter A, Cheung AW, et al. Item generation in the development of an inpatient experience questionnaire: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crocker L, Algina J. Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Introd to Class Mod Test Theory. New York (NY): Holt, Rinehart, and Winston; 1986. p. 527.
   Google Scholar
• Canova C, Giorato E, Roveron G, et al. Validation of a stoma-specific quality of life questionnaire in a sample of patients with colostomy or ileostomy. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15:e692-e698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kald A, Juul KN, Hjortsvang H, et al. Quality of life is impaired in patients with peristomal bulging of a sigmoid colostomy. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2008;43:627–633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Oliveira AL, Loures Mendes L, Pereira Netto M, et al. Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Stoma Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With a Colostomy or Ileostomy in Brazil: A Cross-sectional Study. Ostomy Wound Manag 2017;63:34–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czupi A. Quality of life study in patients with a Stoma. Presented at the ECET meeting. Salzburg, Austria; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Serinanell D, Vinals MAMP, et al. Quality of life study through validated questionnaire for ostomist. Presented at the ECET meeting. Salzburg, Austria; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Dol L, Van Keizerswaard PSS. Validation of a Dutch version of Stoma-QoL. Presented at the WCET meeting. Ljubljana, Slovenia;2008.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland JM, Crump RT, Chan A, et al. Health of patients on the waiting list: Opportunity to improve health in Canada? Health Policy (New York). 2016;120:749–757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent K, Sutherland JM. A review of methods for deriving an index for socioeconomic status in the province of British Columbia. Prepared for the British Columbia Ministry of Health. Victoria, British Columbia; 2013. p. 53. Available from: http://healthcarefunding.ca/files/2013/04/Review-of-Methods-for-SES-Index-for-BC.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally J, Bernstein I. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Falvey P, Holbrook JDC. Assessing students. Vol. 14, Development. Hong Kong: Longman; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Cappelleri JC, Jason Lundy J, Hays RD. Overview of classical test theory and item response theory for the quantitative assessment of items in developing patient-reported outcomes measures. Clin Ther. 2014;36:648–662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu CH, Popp SO, Digangi S, et al. Assessing unidimensionality: a comparison of rasch modeling, parallel analysis, and TETRAD. Pract Assessment, Res Eval 2007;12:1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Prieto L, Alonso J, Lamarca R. Classical Test Theory versus Rasch analysis for quality of life questionnaire reduction. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Andrich D. A rating scale formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika 1978;43:561–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model A Multidiscip J. 1999;6:1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pituch KA, Stevens JP. Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. New York (NY): Routledge; 2016. p. 794.
   Google Scholar
• Bond TG, Fox CM. Applying the Rasch model: fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Int J Testing 2015;1:319–326.
   Google Scholar
• Smith RM, Schumacker RE, Bush MJ. Using item mean squares to evaluate fit to the Rasch model. J Outcome Meas. 1998;2:66–78.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stelmack J, Szlyk JP, Stelmack T, et al. Use of Rasch person-item map in exploratory data analysis: a clinical perspective. Jrrd. 2004;41:233–242.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Christensen KB, Makransky G, Horton M. Critical values for Yen’s Q3: identification of local dependence in the rasch model using residual correlations. Appl Psychol Meas. 2016;41:178–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sier MF, Oostenbroek RJ, Dijkgraaf MGW, Veldink GJ, Bemelman WA, Pronk A, etet al. Home visits as part of a new care pathway (iAID) to improve quality of care and quality of life in ‘ostomy patients: a cluster-randomised stepped-wedge trial. Color Dis. 2017;95:739–749.
   Google Scholar
• Erwin-Toth P, Thompson SJ, Davis JS. Factors impacting the quality of life of people with an ostomy in North America: results from the Dialogue Study. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2012;39:417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayarajah U, Samarasekera DN. A cross-sectional study of quality of life in a cohort of enteral ostomy patients presenting to a tertiary care hospital in a developing country in South Asia. BMC Res Notes. 2017;10:75.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nguyan TH, Han H-R, Kim MT, et al. An introduction to item response theory for patient-reported outcome measurement. Patient [Internet] 2014;7:23–35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brems C, Johnson ME, Warner T, et al. Survey return rates as a function of priority versus first-class mailing. Psychol Rep. 2016;99:496–501.
   Google Scholar
• Smith AB, Rush R, Fallowfield LJ, et al. Rasch fit statistics and sample size considerations for polytomous data. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linacre JM. Investigating rating scale category utility. J Outcome Meas. 1999;3:103–122.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar