Diagnosing dysplasia in Barrett’s oesophagus still requires Seattle protocol biopsy in the era of modern video endoscopy: results from a tertiary centre Barrett’s dysplasia database

References

• Thrift A. The epidemic of oesophageal carcinoma: where are we now? Cancer Epidemiol. 2016;41:88–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cancer Research UK. Oesophageal Cancer Statistics [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2018 May 16]. Available from: http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/statistics-by-cancer-type/oesophageal-cancer#heading-Two
   Google Scholar
• Sharma P. Clinical practice. Barrett’s esophagus. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:2548–2556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai TK, Krishnan K, Samala N, et al. The incidence of oesophageal adenocarcinoma in non-dysplastic Barrett’s oesophagus: a meta-analysis. Gut. 2012;61:970–976.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anaparthy R, Gaddam S, Kanakadandi V, et al. Association between length of Barrett's esophagus and risk of high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma in patients without dysplasia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11:1430–1436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandrasekar VT, Hamade N, Desai M, et al. Significantly lower annual rates of neoplastic progression in short- compared to long-segment non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2019;51:665–672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameeteman W, Tytgat GN, Houthoff HJ, et al. Barrett’s esophagus: development of dysplasia and adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterology. 1989;96:1249–1256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duits LC, Phoa KN, Curvers WL, et al. Barrett’s oesophagus patients with low-grade dysplasia can be accurately risk-stratified after histological review by an expert pathology panel. Gut. 2015;64:700–706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald RC, di Pietro M, Ragunath K, et al. British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the diagnosis and management of Barrett’s oesophagus. Gut. 2014;63:7–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Codipilly DC, Chandar AK, Singh S, et al. The effect of endoscopic surveillance in patients with Barrett’s esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology [Internet]. 2018;154:2068–2086.e5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spechler SJ, Sharma P, Souza RF, et al. American gastroenterological association technical review on the management of Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2011;140:e18–e52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaheen NJ, Falk GW, Iyer PG, et al. ACG Clinical Guideline: diagnosis and management of Barrett’s esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111:30–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weusten B, Bisschops R, Coron E, et al. Endoscopic management of Barrett’s esophagus: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement. Endoscopy. 2017;49:191–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beg S, Ragunath K, Wyman A, et al. Quality standards in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a position statement of the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (AUGIS). Gut. 2017;66:1886–1889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogt JS, Larsen AC, Sommer T, et al. Quality of endoscopic surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018 ;53:256–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerveld D, Khullar V, Mramba L, et al. Adherence to quality indicators and surveillance guidelines in the management of Barrett’s esophagus: a retrospective analysis. Endosc Int Open. 2018;6:E300–E307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrams JA, Kapel RC, Lindberg GM, et al. Adherence to biopsy guidelines for Barrett’s esophagus surveillance in the community setting in the United States. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:736–742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laine L, Kaltenbach T, Barkun A, et al. SCENIC international consensus statement on surveillance and management of dysplasia in inflammatory bowel disease. YMGE. 2015;81:489–501.e26.
   Google Scholar
• Sami SS, Subramanian V, Butt WM, et al. High definition versus standard definition white light endoscopy for detecting dysplasia in patients with Barrett’s esophagus. Dis Esophagus. 2015;28:742–749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturm MB, Wang TD. Emerging optical methods for surveillance of Barrett’s oesophagus. Gut. 2015;64:1816–1823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beg S, Wilson A, Ragunath K. The use of optical imaging techniques in the gastrointestinal tract. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2016;7:207–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thosani N, Abu Dayyeh BK, Sharma P, et al. ASGE Technology Committee systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ASGE Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations thresholds for adopting real-time imaging–assisted endoscopic targeted biopsy during endoscopic surveillance. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83:684–698.e7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• di Pietro M, Boerwinkel DF, Shariff MK, et al. The combination of autofluorescence endoscopy and molecular biomarkers is a novel diagnostic tool for dysplasia in Barrett’s oesophagus. Gut. 2015;64:49–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moussata D, Allez M, Cazals-Hatem D; the GETAID, et al. Are random biopsies still useful for the detection of neoplasia in patients with IBD undergoing surveillance colonoscopy with chromoendoscopy? Gut. 2018;67:616–624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chedgy F, Kandiah K, Barr H, et al. Development and validation of a training module on the use of acetic acid for the detection of Barrett’s neoplasia. Endoscopy. 2017;49:121–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ooi J, Wilson P, Walker G, et al. Dedicated Barrett’s surveillance sessions managed by trained endoscopists improve dysplasia detection rate. Endoscopy. 2017;49:524–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald RC, Saeed IT, Khoo D, et al. Rigorous surveillance protocol increases detection of curable cancers associated with Barrett’s esophagus. Dig Dis Sci. 2001;46:1892–1898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar