196
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Endoscopic ultrasound with combined fine needle aspiration plus biopsy improves diagnostic yield in solid pancreatic masses

, , , ORCID Icon, , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 610-617 | Received 28 Sep 2021, Accepted 24 Dec 2021, Published online: 06 Jan 2022

References

  • Sheehan M, Latona C, Aranha G, et al. The increasing problem of unusual pancreatic tumors. Arch Surg. 2000;135(6):644–650.
  • Frampas E, Morla O, Regenet N, et al. A solid pancreatic mass: tumour or inflammation? 2013. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2013;94(7–8):741–755.
  • Erickson RA, Sayage-Rabie L, Beissner RS. Factors predicting the number of EUS-guided fine-needle passes for diagnosis of pancreatic malignancies. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;51(2):184–190.
  • Eloubeidi MA, Jhala D, Chhieng DC, et al. Yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy in patients with suspected pancreatic carcinoma. Cancer. 2003;99(5):285–292.
  • Yoshinaga S, Suzuki H, Oda I, et al. Role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses. Dig Endosc. 2011; 23 Suppl 1:29–33.
  • Levy MJ, Wiersema MJ. EUS-guided trucut biopsy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62(3):417–426.
  • Jenssen C, Dietrich CF. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy and trucut biopsy in gastroenterology - an overview. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;23(5):743–759.
  • Bang JY, Hebert-Magee S, Trevino J, et al. Randomized trial comparing the 22-guage aspiration and 22-guage biopsy needles for EUS-guided sampling f solid pancreatic mass lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76(2):321–327.
  • Bhutani MS, Gress FG, Giovannini M, et al. The No Endosonographic Detection of Tumor (NEST) study: a case series of pancreatic cancers missed on endoscopic ultrasonography. Endoscopy. 2004;36(05):385–389.
  • Varadarajulu S, Tamhane A, Eloubeidi MA. Yield of EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic masses in the presence or the absence of chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62(5):728–736.
  • Alsohaibani F, Girgis S, Sandha GS. Does onsiet cytotechnology evaluation improve the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy? Can J Gastroenterol. 2009;23(1):26–30.
  • Hebert-Magee S, Bae S, Varadarajulu S, et al. The prsence of a cytopathologist increases the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis. Cytopathology. 2013;24(3):159–171.
  • Iglesias-Garcia J, Dominguez-Munoz JE, Abdulkader I, et al. Influence of on-site cytopathology evaluation on the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of solid pancreatic masses. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106(9):1705–1710.
  • Klapman JB, Logrono R, Dye CE, et al. Clinical impact of on-site cytopathology interpretation on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98(6):1289–1294.
  • Wani S, Mullady D, Early DS, et al. Clinical impact of immediate on-site cytopathology evaluation during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic mass: interim analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77(2):1429–1439.
  • Strand DS, Jeffus SK, Sauer BG, et al. EUS-guided 22-gauge fine-needle aspiration versus core biopsy needle in the evaluation of solid pancreatic neoplasms. Diagn Cytopathol. 2014;42(9):751–758.
  • Tian L, Tang AL, Zhang L, et al. Evaluation of 22G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine-needle biopsy (FNB) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: a prospective comparison study. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(8):3533–3539.
  • Alatawi A, Beuvon F, Grabar S, et al. Comparison of 22G reverse-beveled versus standard needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic lesions. United Eur Gastroenterol J. 2015; 3(4):343–352.
  • Lee YN, Moon JH, Kim HK, et al. Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study. Endoscopy. 2014;46(12):1056–1062.
  • Aadam AA, Wani S, Amick A, et al. A randomized controlled cross-over trial and cost analysis comparing endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration and fine needle biopsy. Endosc Int Open. 2016;4(5):E497–E505.
  • Cheng B, Zhang Y, Chen Q, et al. Analysis of fine-needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration in diagnosis of pancreatic and abdominal masses: a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;16(8):1314–1321.
  • Weston BR, Bhutani MS. Optimizing diagnostic yield for EUS-guided sampling of solid pancreatic lesions: a technical review. Gastroenterol Hepatol (NY). 2013;9(6):352–363.
  • Park SW, Chung MJ, Lee SH, et al. Prospective study for comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition using 25- and 22-gauge core biopsy needles in solid pancreatic masses. PLoS One. 2016; 11(5):e0154401.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.