879
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Visual gaze patterns in trainee endoscopists – a novel assessment tool

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , & ORCID Icon
Pages 1138-1146 | Received 10 Jan 2022, Accepted 06 Apr 2022, Published online: 21 Apr 2022

References

  • Atkins L, Hunkeler EM, Jensen CD, et al. Factors influencing variation in physician adenoma detection rates: a theory-based approach for performance improvement. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83(3):617–626.
  • Van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J, et al. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101(2):343–350.
  • Pickhardt PJ, Nugent PA, Mysliwiec PA, et al. Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141(5):352–359.
  • Rees CJ, Gibson ST, Rutter MD, et al. UK key performance indicators and quality assurance standards for colonoscopy. Gut. 2016;65(12):1923–1929.
  • Anderson JC, Butterly LF. Colonoscopy: quality indicators. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2015;6(2):e77.
  • Millan MS, Gross P, Manilich E, et al. Adenoma detection rate: the real indicator of quality in colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51(8):1217–1220.
  • Kaminski MF, Wieszczy P, Rupinski M, et al. Increased rate of adenoma detection associates with reduced risk of colorectal cancer and death. Gastroenterology. 2017;153(1):98–105.
  • Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(19):1795–1803.
  • Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, et al. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(14):1298–1306.
  • Adler A, Wegscheider K, Lieberman D, et al. Factors determining the quality of screening colonoscopy: a prospective study on adenoma detection rates, from 12 134 examinations (Berlin colonoscopy project 3, BECOP-3. Gut. 2013;62(2):236–241.
  • Lee RH, Tang RS, Muthusamy VR, et al. Quality of colonoscopy withdrawal technique and variability in adenoma detection rates (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74(1):128–134.
  • van Doorn SC, Klanderman RB, Hazewinkel Y, et al. Adenoma detection rate varies greatly during colonoscopy training. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;82(1):122–129.
  • Vassiliou MC, Kaneva PA, Poulose BK, et al. Global assessment of gastrointestinal endoscopic skills (GAGES): a valid measurement tool for technical skills in flexible endoscopy. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(8):1834–1841.
  • Mehta T, Dowler K, McKaig BC, et al. Development and roll out of the JETS e-portfolio: a web based electronic portfolio for endoscopists. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2011;2(1):35–42.
  • Patel K, Faiz O, Rutter M, et al. The impact of the introduction of formalised polypectomy assessment on training in the UK. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2017;8(2):104–109.
  • Ward ST, Mohammed MA, Walt R, et al. An analysis of the learning curve to achieve competency at colonoscopy using the JETS database. Gut. 2014;63(11):1746–1754.
  • Sedlack RE. The Mayo colonoscopy skills assessment tool: validation of a unique instrument to assess colonoscopy skills in trainees. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72(6):1125–1133.
  • Wilson M, McGrath J, Vine S, et al. Psychomotor control in a virtual laparoscopic surgery training environment: gaze control parameters differentiate novices from experts. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(10):2458–2464.
  • Sodergren MH, Orihuela-Espina F, Clark J, et al. A hidden markov model-based analysis framework using eye-tracking data to characterise re-orientation strategies in minimally invasive surgery. Cogn Process. 2010;11(3):275–283.
  • Sodergren MH, Orihuela-Espina F, Clark J, et al. Evaluation of orientation strategies in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 2010;252(6):1027–1036.
  • Sodergren MH, Orihuela‐Espina F, Froghi F, et al. Value of orientation training in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2011;98(10):1437–1445.
  • Tien T, Pucher PH, Sodergren MH, et al. Differences in gaze behaviour of expert and junior surgeons performing open inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(2):405–413.
  • Kogkas AA, Sodergren MH, Darzi A, et al. Macro- and micro-scale 3D gaze tracking in the operating theatre. Framework 2016;8(6.85):20–87.
  • Erridge S, Ashraf H, Dilley J, et al. Eye tracking research: seen through the patient's eyes. BMJ Stel. 2016;2(3):101–102.
  • Erridge S, Ashraf H, Purkayastha S, et al. Comparison of gaze behaviour of trainee and experienced surgeons during laparoscopic gastric bypass. Br J Surg. 2018;105(3):287–294.
  • Khan RS, Tien G, Atkins MS, et al. Analysis of eye gaze: Do novice surgeons look at the same location as expert surgeons during a laparoscopic operation? Surg Endosc. 2012;26(12):3536–3540.
  • Dik VK, Hooge IT, van Oijen MG, et al. Measuring gaze patterns during colonoscopy: a useful tool to evaluate Colon inspection? Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;28(12):1400–1406.
  • Edmondson MJ, Pucher PH, Sriskandarajah K, et al. Looking towards objective quality evaluation in colonoscopy: analysis of visual gaze patterns. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;31(3):604–609.
  • Lami M, Singh H, Dilley JH, et al. Gaze patterns hold key to unlocking successful search strategies and increasing polyp detection rate in colonoscopy. Endoscopy. 2018;50(07):701–707.
  • Gaschler R, Frensch PA. Is information reduction an item‐specific or an item‐general process? Int J Psychol. 2007;42(4):218–228.
  • Gaschler R, Marewski JN, Frensch PA. Once and for all-how people change strategy to ignore irrelevant information in visual tasks. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(3):543–567.
  • Lee SH, Park YK, Lee DJ, et al. Colonoscopy procedural skills and training for new beginners. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(45):16984–16995.
  • Waye JD, Thomas-Gibson S. How I do colonoscopy. Endoscopy. 2018;50(3):259–262.
  • Mackenzie AK, Harris JM. Eye movements and hazard perception in active and passive driving. Vis Cogn. 2015;23(6):736–757.
  • Arya V, Singh S, Agarwal S, et al. Position change during colonoscopy improves caecal intubation rate, mucosal visibility, and adenoma detection in patients with suboptimal caecal preparation. Prz Gastroenterol. 2017;12(4):296–302.
  • Hess EH, Polt JM. Pupil size in relation to mental activity during simple problem-solving. Science. 1964;143(3611):1190–1192.
  • Marshall SP. The index of cognitive activity: measuring cognitive workload. Proceedings of the IEEE 7th conference on Human Factors and Power Plants; 2002 Sep 19; IEEE. p. 7.
  • Pomplun M, Sunkara S. Pupil dilation as an indicator of cognitive workload in human-computer interaction. Proceedings of the International Conference on HCI; 2003 Jun 22.
  • Palinko O, Kun AL, Shyrokov A, et al. Estimating cognitive load using remote eye tracking in a driving simulator. Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye-tracking Research & Applications ACM; 2010. p. 141–144.
  • Nielsen AB, Nielsen OH, Hendel J. Impact of feedback and monitoring on colonoscopy withdrawal times and polyp detection rates. BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2017;4(1):e000142.
  • Jang HJ. Training in endoscopy: colonoscopy. Clin Endosc. 2017;50(4):322–327.
  • Shahidi N, Ou G, Telford J, et al. Establishing the learning curve for achieving competency in performing colonoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80(3):410–416.
  • Mahadev S, Jin Z, Lebwohl B, et al. Trainee colonoscopy quality is influenced by the independent and unobserved performance characteristics of supervising physicians. Endosc Int Open. 2019;7(1):E74–82.
  • Chetwood AS, Kwok KW, Sun LW, et al. Collaborative eye tracking: a potential training tool in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(7):2003–2009.
  • Vine SJ, Masters RS, McGrath JS, et al. Cheating experience: guiding novices to adopt the gaze strategies of experts expedites the learning of technical laparoscopic skills. Surgery. 2012;152(1):32–40.