Colonoscopy performance monitoring: do we need to adjust for case mix?

References

• Boroff ES, Disbrow M, Crowell MD, et al. Adenoma and polyp detection rates in colonoscopy according to indication. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2017;2017:7207595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaukat A, Oancea C, Bond JH, et al. Variation in detection of adenomas and polyps by colonoscopy and change over time with a performance improvement program. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7(12):1335–1340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen SC, Rex DK. Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102(4):856–861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoff G, Holme Ø, Bretthauer M, et al. Cecum intubation rate as quality indicator in clinical versus screening colonoscopy. Endosc Int Open. 2017;5(6):E489–E495.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rex DK, Ponugoti PL. Calculating the adenoma detection rate in screening colonoscopies only: is it necessary? Can it be gamed? Endoscopy. 2017;49(11):1069–1074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees CJ, Thomas Gibson S, Rutter MD, et al. UK key performance indicators and quality assurance standards for colonoscopy. Gut. 2016;65(12):1923–1929.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams EJ, Holub LJ, Faigel OD. Polypectomy rate is a valid quality measure for colonoscopy: results from a national endoscopy database. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75(3):576–582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel NC, Islam RS, Wu Q, et al. Measurement of polypectomy rate by using administrative claims data with validation against the adenoma detection rate. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77(3):390–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110(1):72–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heydtmann M. The statistics of targets. Gut. 2006;55(11):1672–1673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Do A, Weinberg J, Kakkar A, et al. Reliability of adenoma detection rate is based on procedural volume. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77(3):376–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen L. Aspects of quality in colonoscopy [PhD thesis]. Aalborg: Aalborg University Press; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Njor SH, Friis-Hansen L, Andersen B, et al. Three years of colorectal cancer screening in Denmark. Cancer Epidemiol. 2018;57:39–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen L, Torp-Pedersen C, Gerds TA. Colonoscopy database; R program; R markdown and output examples for ‘The reliability of overall cecum intubation rate and overall polyp detection rate’. Available from OneDrive folder: https://1drv.ms/u/s!Ags8FOYbGaczgvFmf3-u9HVEdb5Jtg?e=xiJuOV
   Google Scholar
• Valori R, Rey J-F, Atkin WS, et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. Endoscopy. 2012;44:SE88–SE105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020. Available from: https://www.r-project.org
   Google Scholar
• Allaire J, Xie Y, McPherson J, et al. rmarkdown: Dynamic Documents for R; 2020. Available from: https://github.com/rstudio/rmarkdown
   Google Scholar
• Gupta M, Holub JL, Eisen G. Do indication and demographics for colonoscopy affect completion? A large national database evaluation. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;22(5):620–627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris JK, Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, et al. Factors associated with the technical performance of colonoscopy: an EPAGE study. Dig Liver Dis. 2007;39(7):678–689.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Park HJ, Hong JH, Kim HS, et al. Predictive factors affecting cecal intubation failure in colonoscopy trainees. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13:5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81(1):31–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekstrøm CT, Gerds TA, Jensen AK. Sequential rank agreement methods for comparison of ranked lists. Biostatistics. 2019;20(4):582–598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinmouth J, Patel J, Hilsden RJ, et al. Audit and feedback interventions to improve endoscopist performance: principles and effectiveness. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2016;30(3):473–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kastenberg D, Bertiger G, Brogadir S. Bowel preparation quality scales for colonoscopy. World J Gastroenterol. 2018;24(26):2833–2843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clancy C, Burke JP, Chang KH, et al. The effect of hysterectomy on colonoscopy completion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57(11):1317–1323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashiwagi K, Inoue N, Yoshida T, et al. The impact of visceral adipose tissue as best predictor for difficult colonoscopy and the clinical utility of a long small-caliber scope as rescue. PLOS One. 2017;12(12):e0189817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varadarajulu S, Petruff C, Ramsey WH. Patient preferences for gender of endoscopists. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56(2):170–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murchie B, Tandon K, Zackria S, et al. Can polyp detection rate be used prospectively as a marker of adenoma detection rate? Surg Endosc. 2018;32(3):1141–1148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund M, Erichsen R, Valori R, et al. Data quality and colonoscopy performance indicators in the prevalent round of a FIT-based colorectal cancer screening program. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2019;54(4):471–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan C, Repici A, Rex DK. FITting ADR to colonoscopy indication. United European Gastroenterol J. 2017;5(2):149–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cubiella J, Castells A, Andreu M, et al. Correlation between adenoma detection rate in colonoscopy- and fecal immunochemical testing-based colorectal cancer screening programs. United European Gastroenterol J. 2017;5(2):255–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar