Combined endoscopic mucosal resection and full-thickness resection for large colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis

References

• Zwager LW, Mueller J, Stritzke B, et al. Adverse events of endoscopic full-thickness resection: results from the German and Dutch nationwide colorectal FTRD registry. Gastrointest Endosc. 2023;97(4):780–789.e4. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2022.11.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt A, Beyna T, Schumacher B, et al. Colonoscopic full-thickness resection using an over-the-scope device: a prospective multicentre study in various indications. Gut. 2018;67(7):1280–1289. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt A, Damm M, Caca K. Endoscopic full-thickness resection using a novel over-the-scope device. Gastroenterology. 2014;147(4):740–742.e2. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2014.07.045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pimentel-Nunes P, Libânio D, Bastiaansen BAJ, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial gastrointestinal lesions: European society of gastrointestinal endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2022. Endoscopy. 2022;54(6):591–622. doi:10.1055/a-1811-7025.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Andrisani G, Hassan C, Pizzicannella M, et al. Endoscopic full-thickness resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for challenging colorectal lesions: a randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2023;98(6):987–997.e1. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2023.06.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier B, Elsayed I, Seitz N, et al. Efficacy and safety of combined EMR and endoscopic full-thickness resection (hybrid EFTR) for large nonlifting colorectal adenomas. Gastrointest Endosc. 2023;98(3):405–411. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2023.03.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Convie L, McBrearty A, Allen P, et al. Hybrid technique with endoscopic full thickness resection for the management of complex colorectal lesions. Colorectal Dis. 2022;24:94–95.
   Google Scholar
• Chua JS, Dang H, Zwager LW, et al. Hybrid endoscopic mucosal resection and full-thickness resection for large colonic polyps harboring a small focus of invasive cancer: a case series. Endosc Int Open. 2021;9(11):E1686–e1691. doi:10.1055/a-1529-1447.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yuen W, Mahadev S, Sofia Yuen PY, et al. Hybrid technique using endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic full-thickness resection for large colorectal lesions: initial North American experience. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;91(6):AB246–AB247. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2020.03.1818.
   Google Scholar
• Vareedayah AA, Yuen PYS, Skinner M, et al. Initial North American experience with endoscopic full-thickness resection of colorectal lesions: a multi-center retrospective cohort study. Gastroenterology. 2019;156(6):S-940. doi:10.1016/S0016-5085(19)39312-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munn Z, Barker TH, Moola S, et al. Methodological quality of case series studies: an introduction to the JBI critical appraisal tool. JBI Evidence Synthesis. 2020;18(10):2127–2133.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rücker G, Schwarzer G, Carpenter J, et al. Why add anything to nothing? The arcsine difference as a measure of treatment effect in meta-analysis with zero cells. Stat Med. 2009;28(5):721–738. doi:10.1002/sim.3511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7(3):177–188. doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sutton AJ, Abrams KR, Jones DR, et al. Methods for meta-analysis in medical research. Vol. 348. New Jersey, USA: Wiley; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1294–1302. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.03.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easterbrook PJ, Berlin JA, Gopalan R, et al. Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet. 1991;337(8746):867–872. doi:10.1016/0140-6736(91)90201-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boger P, Rahman I, Castro Silva A, et al. PTH-026 endoscopic full thickness resection of large scarred colonic polyps. Gut. 2017;66(Suppl 2):A218.
   Google Scholar
• Mahadev S, Vareedayah AA, Yuen S, et al. Outcomes of a hybrid technique using EMR and endoscopic full-thickness resection for polyps not amenable to standard techniques (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2021;94(2):358–367.e1. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2021.02.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauermeister M, Mende M, Hornoff S, et al. Hybrid resection of large colorectal adenomas combining EMR and FTRD. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2021;56(8):978–983. doi:10.1080/00365521.2021.1933583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sofia Yuen PY, Vareedayah AA, Skup M, et al. A novel hybrid technique using endoscopic mucosal resection (emr)and endoscopic full-thickness resection (eftr)for large colorectal neoplasms unresectable by emr alone. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;89(6):AB643–AB644. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2019.03.1130.
   Google Scholar
• Meier B, Caca K, Schmidt A. Hybrid endoscopic mucosal resection and full-thickness resection: a new approach for resection of large non-lifting colorectal adenomas (with video). Surg Endosc. 2017;31(10):4268–4274. doi:10.1007/s00464-017-5461-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan RD, Bazarbashi AN, McCarty TR, et al. Endoscopic full-thickness resection of colorectal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2022;95(2):216–224.e18. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2021.09.039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ichkhanian Y, Barawi M, Seoud T, et al. Endoscopic full-thickness resection of polyps involving the appendiceal orifice: a multicenter international experience. Endoscopy. 2022;54(1):16–24.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fuccio L, Hassan C, Ponchon T, et al. Clinical outcomes after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;86(1):74–86.e17. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2017.02.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar