References
- O'Hara CM. Manual and automated instrumentation for identification of Enterobacteriaceae and other aerobic Gram-negative bacilli. Clin Microbiol Rev 2005; 18: 147–62
- Stager CE, Davis JR. Automated systems for identification of microorganisms. Clin Microbiol Rev 1992; 5: 302–27
- York MK. Interpretation and rapid identification of bacterial growth on primary culture media. In: Isenberg HD. Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook. 2nd edn. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 2004. 3.3.2.4.
- Winn WC, Jr, Allen S, Janda W, Koneman E, Procop G, Schreckenberger P, et al. Koneman'ns Color Atlas and Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology. 6th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD 2006; 27
- Jenkins SG, Sewell DL. Quality control. In: Isenberg HD. Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook. 2nd edn. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 2004. 14.2.10.
- Abbott SL, Seli LS, Catino M, Jr, Hartley MA, Janda JM. Misidentification of unusual Aeromonas species as members of the genus Vibrio: a continuing problem. J Clin Microbiol 1998; 36: 1103–4
- Park TS, Oh SH, Lee EY, Lee TK, Park KH, Figueras MJ, et al. Misidentification of Aeromonas veronii biovar sobria as Vibrio alginolyticus by the VITEK system. Lett Appl Microbiol 2003; 37: 349–53
- Garcia-Garrote F, Cercenado E, Bouza E. Evaluation of a new system, VITEK 2, for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of enterococci. J Clin Microbiol 2000; 38: 2108–11
- Claeys G, De Baere T, Wauters G, Vandecandelaere P, Verschraegen G, Muylaert A, et al. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producing Enterobacter aerogenes phenotypically misidentified as Klebsiella pneumoniae or K. terrigena. BMC Microbiol 2004; 4: 49
- Ben-Ami R, Navon-Venezia S, Schwartz D, Schlezinger Y, Mekuzas Y, Carmeli Y. Erroneous reporting of coagulase-negative staphylococci as Kocuria spp. by the VITEK 2 System. J Clin Microbiol 2005; 43: 1448–50
- Funke G, Funke-Kissling P. Performance of the new VITEK 2 GP card for identification of medically relevant Gram-positive cocci in a routine clinical laboratory. J Clin Microbiol 2005; 43: 84–8
- Rantakokko-Jalava K, Elo-Lehtonen E, Meurman O. Comparison of workflow and accuracy of identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and enterococci by Vitek 2 and routine methods. APMIS 2006; 114: 43–9
- Graf B, Adam T, Zill E, Gobel UB. Evaluation of the VITEK 2 system for rapid identification of yeasts and yeast-like organisms. J Clin Microbiol 2000; 38: 1782–5
- Massonet C, van Eldere J, Vaneechoutte M, De Baere T, Verhaegen J, Lagrou K. Comparison of VITEK 2 with ITS2-fragment length polymorphism analysis for identification of yeast species. J Clin Microbiol 2004; 42: 2209–11
- Meurman O, Koskensalo A, Rantakokko-Jalava K. Evaluation of VITEK 2 for identification of yeasts in the clinical laboratory. Clin Microbiol Infect 2006; 12: 591–3
- Lowe P, Haswell H, Lewis K. Use of various common isolation media to evaluate the new VITEK 2 colorimetric GN card for identification of Burkholderia pseudomallei. J Clin Microbiol 2006; 44: 854–6