References
- Lam JS, Cooper KL, Greene TD, Gupta M. Impact of hydronephrosis and renal function on treatment outcome: antegrade versus retrograde endopyelotomy. Urology 2003; 61: 1107–11
- Gupta M, Tuncay OL, Smith AD. Open surgical exploration after failed endopyelotomy: a 12-year perspective. J Urol 1997; 157: 1613–8
- Shalhav AL, Giusti G, Elbahnasy AM, Hoenig DM, McDougall EM, Smith DS, et al. Adult endopyelotomy: impact of etiology and antegrade versus retrograde approach on outcome. J Urol 1998; 160: 685–9
- Tawfiek ER, Liu JB, Bagley DH. Ureteroscopic treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol 1998; 160: 1643–6
- Osther PJ, Geertsen U, Nielsen HV. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction and ureteral strictures treated by simple high-pressure balloon dilation. J Endourol 1998; 12: 429–31
- Tan BJ, Smith AD. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction repair: when, how, what?. Curr Opin Urol 2004; 14: 55–9
- Ost MC, Kaye JD, Guttman MJ, Lee BR, Smith AD. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus antegrade endopyelotomy: comparison in 100 patients and a new algorithm for the minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Urology 2005; 66: 47–51
- Minervini A, Davenport K, Keeley FX, Timoney AG. Antegrade versus retrograde endopyelotomy for pelvi-ureteric junction (PUJ) obstruction. Eur Urol 2006; 49: 536–42
- Meretyk I, Meretyk S, Clayman RV. Endopyelotomy: comparison of ureteroscopic retrograde and antegrade percutaneous techniques. J Urol 1992; 148: 775–82
- Eden CG. Minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a critical analysis of results. Eur Urol 2007; 52: 983–9
- Motola JA, Badlani GH, Smith AD. Results of 212 consecutive endopyelotomies: an 8-year followup. J Urol 1993; 149: 453–6
- Mendez-Torres FR, Urena R, Thomas R. Retrograde ureteroscopic endopyelotomy. Urol Clin North Am 2004; 31: 99–106
- Dimarco DS, Gettman MT, McGee SM, Chow GK, Leroy AJ, Slezak J, et al. Long-term success of antegrade endopyelotomy compared with pyeloplasty at a single institution. J Endourol 2006; 20: 707–12
- Brooks JD, Kavoussi LR, Preminger GM, Schuessler WW, Moore RG. Comparison of open and endourologic approaches to the obstructed ureteropelvic junction. Urology 1995; 46: 791–5
- Bernado N, Smith AD. Endopyelotomy review. Arch Esp Urol 1999; 52: 541–8
- Gettman MT, Lotan Y, Roerhborn CG, Cadeddu JA, Pearle MS. Cost-effective treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a decision tree analysis. J Urol 2003; 169: 228–32
- Matin SF, Yost A, Streem SB. Ureteroscopic laser endopyelotomy: a single-center experience. J Endourol 2003; 17: 401–4
- Gerber GS, Kim JC. Ureteroscopic endopyelotomy in the treatment of patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Urology 2000; 55: 198–202
- Danuser H, Ackermann DK, Bohlen D, Studer UE. Endopyelotomy for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction: risk factors determine the success rate. J Urol 1998; 159: 56–61
- Olsen LH, Rawashdeh YF, Jørgensen TM. Pediatric robot assisted retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty: a 5-year experience. J Urol 2007; 178: 2137–41
- Van Cangh PJ, Nesa S, Galeon M, Tombal B, Wese FX, Dardenne AN, et al. Vessels around the ureteropelvic junction: significance and imaging by conventional radiology. J Endourol 1996; 10: 111–9
- Combe M, Gelet A, Abdelrahim AF, Lopez JG, Dawahra M, Martin X, et al. Ureteropelvic invagination procedure for endopyelotomy (Gelet technique): review of 51 consecutive cases. J Endourol 1996; 10: 153–7
- Conlin MJ, Bagley DH. Ureteroscopic endopyelotomy at a single setting. J Urol 1998; 159: 727–31
- Doo CK, Hong B, Park T, Park HK. Long-term outcome of endopyelotomy for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: how long should patients be followed up?. J Endourol 2007; 21: 158–61