References
- Adebiyi, A., P. Sorrentino, S. Bohlool, C. Zhang, M. Arditti, G. Goodrich, and J. D. Weiland. 2017. Assessment of feedback modalities for wearable visual aids in blind mobility. PLoS One 12 (2):e0170531. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170531.
- Alotaibi, H., H. S. Al-Khalifa, and D. AlSaeed. 2020. Teaching programming to students with vision impairment: Impact of tactile teaching strategies on student’s achievements and perceptions. Sustainability 12 (13):5320. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135320.
- Argon Dev. 2021. Proximity Sensor Counter, Google Play Store. Accessed March, 18 2021. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.argonremote.proximitysensorcounter&hl=tr&gl=US
- Argyropoulos, V., M. Nikolaraizi, T. Tsiakali, P. Kountrias, S. M. Koutsogiorgou, and A. Martos. 2014. Collaborative action research approach promoting professional development for teachers of students with visual impairment in assistive technology. Journal of International Special Needs Education 17 (1):33–43. doi: https://doi.org/10.9782/2159-4341-17.1.33.
- Argyropoulos, V., A. Paveli, and M. Nikolaraizi. 2019. The role of DAISY digital talking books in the education of individuals with blindness: A pilot study. Education and Information Technologies 24 (1):693–709. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9795-2.
- Asamoah, E., K. Ofori-Dua, E. Cudjoe, A. Abdullah, and J. A. Nyarko. 2018. Inclusive education: Perception of visually impaired students, students without disability, and teachers in Ghana. SAGE Open 8 (4):215824401880779. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018807791.
- Atika, I. N., E. Ediyanto, and N. Kawai. 2018. Improving deaf and hard of hearing students’ achievements using STS approach: A literature review. IJPTE: International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education 2:13–24. doi: https://doi.org/10.20961/ijpte.v2i0.19748.
- Bandyopadhyay, S., and B. B. Rathod. 2017. The sound and feel of titrations: A smartphone aid for color-blind and visually impaired students. Journal of Chemical Education 94 (7):946–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00027.
- Banf, M., R. Mikalay, B. Watzke, and V. Blanz. 2016. PictureSensation – A mobile application to help the blind explore the visual world through touch and sound. Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering 3:2055668316674582. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2055668316674582.
- Beal, C. R., and P. Rosenblum. 2018. Evaluation of the effectiveness of a tablet computer application (app) in helping students with visual impairments solve mathematics problems. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness 112 (1):5–19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1811200102.
- Bektasli, B., and G. Cakmakci. 2011. Consistency of students’ ideas about the concept of rate across different contexts. Education and Science 36 (162):273–87.
- Bouck, E. C., P.-L. Weng, and R. Satsangi. 2016. Digital versus traditional: Secondary students with visual impairments’ perceptions of a digital algebra textbook. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness 110 (1):41–52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1611000105.
- Bybee, R. W., J. A. Taylor, A. Gardner, P. Van Scotter, J. C. Powell, A. Westbrook, and N. Landes. 2006. The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. Colorado Springs, Co: BSCS.
- Common Core State Standards Initiative. 2010. Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and the Council of Chief State School Officers.
- Crogman, H., R. Peters, and M. Trebeau Crogman. 2018. Probing students misconceptions results from concept inventory and their understanding in science learning. European Journal of Physics Education 9 (1):23–44. doi: https://doi.org/10.20308/ejpe.v9i1.209.
- Duarte, C., S. Desart, D. Costa, and B. Dumas. 2017. Designing multimodal mobile interaction for a text messaging application for visually impaired users. Frontiers in ICT 4:26. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fict.2017.00026.
- Elmannai, W., and K. Elleithy. 2017. Sensor-based assistive devices for visually-impaired people: Current status, challenges, and future directions. Sensors 17 (3):565. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/s17030565.
- Gomes, V. V., S. C. F. Cavaco, C. P. Morgado, J. Aires-de-Sousa, and J. C. B. Fernandes. 2020. An Arduino-based talking calorimeter for inclusive lab activities. Journal of Chemical Education 97 (6):1677–81. doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00148.
- Haegele, J. H., and L. L. Lieberman. 2014. Summertime physical activity opportunities for youths with visual impairments and their families. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness 108 (4):347–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1410800411.
- Kalonde, G. 2019. Inclusive education in science education: Are science teachers using inclusive technologies in science classrooms?. In Handbook of Research on Innovative Digital Practices to Engage Learners, ed. P. Bull and P.H. Keengwe, 261–73. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-9438-3.ch013.
- Kamei-Hannan, C. 2008. Examining the accessibility of a computerized adapted test using assistive technology. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness 102 (5):261–71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X0810200502.
- Kapucu, S. 2019. Discovering quantities of circular motion of a lightemitting toy train using a smartphone light sensor. The Physics Teacher 57(7):480–2. doi:https://doi.org/10.1119/1.5126830.
- Kapucu, S., and M. Şimşek. 2021. Determination of the angular velocity of a simple propeller with a smartphone proximity sensor. Physics Education 56(3):033003. doi:https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/abe4ad.
- Koehler, K. E., and T. A. Wild. 2019. Students with visual impairments’ access and participation in the science curriculum: Views of teachers of students with visual impairments. Journal of Science Education for Students with Disabilities 22 (1):1–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.14448/jsesd.11.0003.
- Martiniello, N., W. Eisenbarth, C. Lehane, A. Johnson, and W. Wittich. 2022. Exploring the use of smartphones and tablets among people with visual impairments: Are mainstream devices replacing the use of traditional visual aids? Assistive Technology: The Official Journal of Resna 34 (1):34–45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2019.1682084.
- Mclaughlin, R., and C. Kamei-Hannan. 2018. Paper or digital text: Which reading medium is best for students with visual impairments? Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness 112 (4):337–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1811200401.
- Miyauchi, H. 2020. A systematic review on inclusive education of students with visual impairment. Education Sciences 10 (11):346. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10110346.
- Monteiro, M., C. Stari, C. Cabeza, and A. C. Martí. 2019. Physics experiments using simultaneously more than one smartphone sensors. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1287 (1):012058. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742.[Mismatch] 6596/1287/1/012058
- Morrice, E., A. P. Johnson, J.-A. Marinier, and W. Wittich. 2017. Assessment of the Apple iPad as a low-vision reading aid. Eye 31 (6):865–71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2016.309.
- Mulloy, A. M., C. Gevarter, M. Hopkins, K. S. Sutherland, and S. T. Ramdoss. 2014. Assistive technology for students with visual impairments and blindness. In Assistive technologies for people with diverse abilities. Autism and child psychopathology series, ed. G. Lancioni and N. Singh. New York, NY: Springer.
- NGSS Lead States. 2013. Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- Nikolopoulou, K., and M. Kousloglou. 2019. Mobile learning in science: A study in secondary education in Greece. Creative Education 10 (06):1271–84. doi: https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.106096.
- Nisbet, P. D. 2020. Assistive technologies to access print resources for students with visual impairment: Implications for accommodations in high stakes assessments. British Journal of Visual Impairment 38 (2):222–47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0264619619899678.
- Nuanmeesri, S. 2020. Mobile application development of managing elderly household accounts using speech recognition. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM) 14 (02):84–100. doi: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i02.11651.
- Ozioko, O., W. Navaraj, M. Hersh, and R. Dahiya. 2020. Tacsac: A wearable haptic device with capacitive touch-sensing capability for tactile display. Sensors 20 (17):4780. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/s20174780.
- Perfect, E., A. Jaiswal, and T. C. Davies. 2019. Systematic review: Investigating the effectiveness of assistive technology to enable internet access for individuals with deafblindness. Assistive Technology: The Official Journal of RESNA 31 (5):276–85. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2018.1445136.
- Qutieshat, A., R. Aouididi, and R. Arfaoui. 2019. Design and construction of a low-cost arduino-based pH sensor for the visually impaired using universal pH paper. Journal of Chemical Education 96 (10):2333–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00450.
- Sai Bharadwaj, Y. V., and V. N. Sastry. 2014. Analysis on sensors in a smart phone-survey. International Journal of Innovative Research in Advanced Engineering 1 (9):96–108.
- Scholes, L., and G. Stahl. 2020. I’m good at science but I don’t want to be a scientist’: Australian primary school student stereotypes of science and scientists. International Journal of Inclusive Education:1–16. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1751316.
- Senjam, S. S. 2019. Assistive technology for students with visual disability: Classification matters. Kerala Journal of Ophthalmology 31 (2):86–91. doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/kjo.kjo_36_19.
- Serway, R. A., and R. J. Beichner. 2000. Physics for scientists and engineers with modern physics. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders College Publishing.
- Siagian, P., and S. Hutauruk. 2018. Voice controller mobile android application. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 420: 012046. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/420/1/012046.
- Stone, B. W., D. Kay, and A. Reynolds. 2019. Teaching visually impaired college students in introductory. Statistics, Journal of Statistics Education 27 (3):225–37. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2019.1677199.
- van Garderen, D., M. Decker, R. Juergensen, and H. Abdelnab. 2020. Using the 5E instructional model in an online environment with pre-service special education teachers. The Journal of Science Education for Students with Disabilities 23 (1):1–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.14448/jsesd.12.0008.
- Vieyra, R., C. Vieyra, P. Jeanjacquot, A. Marti, and M. Monteiro. 2015. Turn your smartphone into a science laboratory. The Science Teacher 082 (09):32–40. doi: https://doi.org/10.2505/4/tst15_082_09_32.
- Watanabe, T., T. Yamaguchi, and K. Minatani. 2015. Advantages and drawbacks of smartphones and tablets for visually impaired people – Analysis of ICT user survey results. Institute of Electronics Transactions on Information and Systems (IEICE) E98.D (4):922–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1587/transinf.2014EDP7317.
- Wild, T., and K. Koehler. 2017. Science education. In Foundations of education volume II, ed. C. Holbrook, C. Kamei Hannan and T. McCarthy. 2nd ed. New York: AFB Press.
- Wong, M. E., and S. S. K. Tan. 2012. Teaching the benefits of smart phone technology to blind consumers: Exploring the potential of the iPhone. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness 106 (10):646–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1210601008.