Publication Cover
Science Activities
Projects and Curriculum Ideas in STEM Classrooms
Volume 60, 2023 - Issue 3
155
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Lazy lizards in a drought: Science modeling and English learners

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Ainsworth, S., V. Prain, and R. Tytler. 2011. Drawing to learn in science. Science (New York, N.Y.) 333 (6046):1096–7. doi: 10.1126/science.1204153.
  • Ardasheva, Y., and T. R. Tretter. 2017. Developing science-specific, technical vocabulary of high school newcomer English learners. Int. J. Bilingual Educ. Bilingual. 20 (3):252–71. doi: 10.1080/13670050.2015.1042356.
  • August, D. 2018. Educating English language learners: A review of the latest research. Amer. Educator 42 (3):4.
  • August, D., L. Branum-Martin, E. Cardenas-Hagan, and D. J. Francis. 2009. The impact of an instructional intervention on the science and language learning of middle-grade English language learners. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness 2 (4):345–76. doi: 10.1080/19345740903217623.
  • Bravo, M. A., and G. N. Cervetti. 2014. Attending to the language and literacy needs of English learners in science. Equity & Excellence in Education 47 (2):230–45. doi: 10.1080/10665684.2014.900418.
  • Britsch, S. 2020. “Nosotras no Empezamos a Hacer Eso”: A social semiotic view of a sheltered science investigation. TESOL Quarterly 54 (2):310–47. doi: 10.1002/tesq.546.
  • Bybee, R. W., J. A. Taylor, A. Gardner, P. Van Scotter, J. C. Powell, A. Westbrook, and N. Landes. 2006. The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness, 88–98. Colorado Springs, CO: BSCS 5.
  • Charamba, E. 2022. Pushing linguistic boundaries: Translanguaging in a bilingual science and technology classroom. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 43 (10):951–65. doi: 10.1080/01434632.2020.1783544.
  • Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO). 2022. Common core state standards for mathematics. CCSSO, Washington, DC. https://learning.ccsso.org/common-core-state-standards-initiative
  • Demirhan, E., and F. Şahin. 2021. The effects of different kinds of hands-on modeling activities on the academic achievement, problem-solving skills, and scientific creativity of prospective science teachers. Res. Sci. Educ. 51 (S2):1015–33. doi: 10.1007/s11165-019-09874-0.
  • Estrella, G., J. Au, S. M. Jaeggi, and P. Collins. 2018. Is inquiry science instruction effective for English language learners? A meta-analytic review. AERA Open 4 (2):233285841876740. doi: 10.1177/2332858418767402.
  • Garzón-Díaz, E. 2021. Translanguaging in science lessons: Exploring the language of science in L2 low achievers in a public school setting in Colombia. In International perspectives on CLIL, ed. C. Hemmi and D. L. Banegas, 85–106. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Garza, T., M. Huerta, T. G. Spies, R. Lara-Alecio, B. J. Irby, and F. Tong. 2018. Science classroom interactions and academic language use with English learners. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 16 (8):1499–519. doi: 10.1007/s10763-017-9855-x.
  • Gee, J. P. 2004. An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. New York: Routledge.
  • Gibbons, B. 2008. Elementary preservice teachers’ utilization of English language development instructional strategies in the teaching of science to English learners. Multicultural Education 15 (3):50.
  • Giere, R. N. 2004. How models are used to represent reality. Philosophy of Science 71 (5):742–52. doi: 10.1086/425063.
  • Gilbert, J. K., and D. F. Treagust. 2009. Towards a coherent model for macro, submicro and symbolic representations in chemical education. In Multiple representations in chemical education, ed. J. K. Gilbert and D. Treagust, 333–50. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Godfrey-Smith, P. 2006. The strategy of model-based science. Biology & Philosophy 21 (5):725–40. doi: 10.1007/s10539-006-9054-6.
  • González-Howard, M., and K. L. McNeill. 2016. Learning in a community of practice: Factors impacting English-learning students’ engagement in scientific argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 53 (4):527–53. doi: 10.1002/tea.21310.
  • Grapin, S. E., L. Llosa, A. Haas, and O. Lee. 2022. Affordances of computational models for English learners in science instruction: Conceptual foundation and initial inquiry. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 31 (1):52–67. doi: 10.1007/s10956-021-09930-3.
  • Gross, L., S. Fitts, V. Quadrini, and B. M. Ramirez. 2018. Gravity is a pull! Exploring forces and motion with English learners. Science Activities: Classroom Projects and Curriculum Ideas 55 (1–2):1–19. doi: 10.1080/00368121.2017.1400942.
  • Haynes, J., and D. Zacarian. 2010. Teaching English language learners across the content areas. virgina: ASCD.
  • Hemphill, F. C., and A. Vanneman. 2011. Achievement gaps: How Hispanic and White students in public schools perform in mathematics and reading on the national assessment of educational progress. Statistical Analysis Report. NCES 2011-459. National Center for Education Statistics, Washington, DC.
  • Hoffman, L., and A. Zollman. 2016. What STEM teachers need to know and do for English language learners (ELLs): Using literacy to learn. Journal of STEM Teacher Education 51 (1):9. doi: 10.30707/JSTE51.1Hoffman.
  • Huerta, M., and J. Jackson. 2010. Connecting literacy and science to increase achievement for English language learners. Early Childhood Education Journal 38 (3):205–11. doi: 10.1007/s10643-010-0402-4.
  • Karabassova, L. 2021. English-medium education reform in Kazakhstan: Comparative study of educational change across two contexts in one country. Current Issues in Language Planning 22 (5):553–73. doi: 10.1080/14664208.2021.1884436.
  • Karlsson, A., P. Nygård Larsson, and A. Jakobsson. 2019. Multilingual students’ use of translanguaging in science classrooms. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 41 (15):2049–69. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2018.1477261.
  • Lee, O., J. Maerten-Rivera, R. D. Penfield, K. LeRoy, and W. G. Secada. 2008. Science achievement of English language learners in urban elementary schools: Results of a first-year professional development intervention. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 45 (1):31–52. doi: 10.1002/tea.20209.
  • Lee, O., H. Quinn, and G. Valdés. 2013. Science and language for English language learners in relation to Next Generation Science Standards and with implications for Common Core State Standards for English language arts and mathematics. Educational Researcher 42 (4):223–33. doi: 10.3102/0013189X13480524.
  • Lo, Y. Y., A. M. Lin, and T. C. Cheung. 2018. Supporting English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) learners’ science literacy development in CLIL: A genre-based approach. In Global developments in literacy research for science education, 79–95. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-69197-8.
  • Lynch, S., J. Kuipers, C. Pyke, and M. Szesze. 2005. Examining the effects of a highly rated science curriculum unit on diverse students: Results from a planning grant. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 42 (8):912–46. doi: 10.1002/tea.20080.
  • Malone, K. L., and Ö. Yılmaz. 2023. Turkish and American science teachers’ perceptions about science models and modelling. Euras. J. Sci. Environ. Educ. 3 (1):33–42. doi: 10.30935/ejsee/13065.
  • Malone, K. L., A. M. Schuchardt, and Z. Sabree. 2019. Models and modeling in evolution. In Evolution education re-considered: nderstanding what works, eds. Ute Harms and Michael J Reiss, 207–26. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-14698-6.
  • Ministry of Education in Taiwan. 2018. Curriculum standards for grades 1–12. Taipei: Ministry of Education.
  • McFarland, J., B. Hussar, C. De Brey, T. Snyder, X. Wang, S. Wilkinson-Flicker, S. Gebrekristos, et al. 2017. The Condition of Education 2017. NCES 2017-144. Jessup, MD: National Center for Education Statistics.
  • National Research Council. 2013. Next generation science standards: For states, by states, Washington, DC.
  • Ohio Department of Education (ODE). 2017. English language proficiency standards. https://education.ohio.gov/
  • Pappas, C. C., M. Varelas, S. K. Patton, L. Ye, and I. Ortiz. 2012. Dialogic strategies in read-alouds of English-language information books in a second-grade bilingual classroom. Theory into Practice 51 (4):263–72. doi: 10.1080/00405841.2012.726054.
  • Pearce, E., M. Stewart, U. Malkoc, R. Ivy, and M. Weinburgh. 2020. Utilizing a dynamic model of food chains to enhance English learners’ science knowledge and language construction. Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ. 18 (5):887–901. doi: 10.1007/s10763-019-10004-5.
  • Pierson, A. E., and S. E. Grapin. 2021. A disciplinary perspective on translanguaging. Bilingual Research Journal 44 (3):318–34. doi: 10.1080/15235882.2021.1970657.
  • Pun, J. K., and K. W. Tai. 2021. Doing science through translanguaging: A study of translanguaging practices in secondary English as a medium of instruction science laboratory sessions. International Journal of Science Education 43 (7):1112–39. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2021.1902015.
  • Rillero, P., M. Thibault, J. Merritt, and M. Jimenez-Silva. 2018. Bears in a boat: Science content and language development through a problem-based learning experience. Science Activities: Classroom Projects and Curriculum Ideas 55 (1–2):1–6. doi: 10.1080/00368121.2017.1406323.
  • Shabani, K., M. Khatib, and S. Ebadi. 2010. Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development: Instructional implications and teachers’ professional development. English Language Teaching 3 (4):237–48. doi: 10.5539/elt.v3n4p237.
  • Shaw, J. M., E. G. Lyon, T. Stoddart, E. Mosqueda, and P. Menon. 2014. Improving science and literacy learning for English language learners: Evidence from a pre-service teacher preparation intervention. Journal of Science Teacher Education 25 (5):621–43. doi: 10.1007/s10972-013-9376-6.
  • Song, Y., T. Higgins, and J. Harding-DeKam. 2014. Sweet science for ALL! Supporting inquiry-based learning through M&Ms investigation for English language learners. Science Activities: Classroom Projects and Curriculum Ideas 51 (2):52–65. doi: 10.1080/00368121.2014.891563.
  • Suárez, E. 2020. Estoy Explorando Science": Emergent bilingual students problematizing electrical phenomena through translanguaging. Science Education 104 (5):791–826. doi: 10.1002/sce.21588.
  • Walqui, A. 2006. Scaffolding instruction for English language learners: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 9 (2):159–80. doi: 10.1080/13670050608668639.
  • Wassell, B. A., S. N. Martin, and K. Scantlebury. 2013. Using cogenerative dialogues to foster community and support English language learner students’ learning. TESOL Journal 4 (4):759–71. doi: 10.1002/tesj.109.
  • Won, M., H. Yoon, and D. F. Treagust. 2014. Students’ learning strategies with multiple representations: Explanations of the human breathing mechanism. Science Education 98 (5):840–66. doi: 10.1002/sce.21128.
  • Wu, Z., and S. An. 2016. Addressing challenges in urban teaching, learning and math using model-strategy-application with reasoning approach in linguistically and culturally diverse classrooms. Journal of Urban Learning, Teaching, and Research 12:47–60.
  • Wu, S. C., A. Silveus, S. Vasquez, D. Biffi, C. Silva, and M. Weinburgh. 2019. Supporting ELLs’ use of hybrid language and argumentation during science instruction. Journal of Science Teacher Education 30 (1):24–43. doi: 10.1080/1046560X.2018.1529520.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.