REFERENCES
- Applegate, J., & Shapiro, J. (2005). Neurobiology for clinical social work: Theory and practice. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
- Basham, K., & Miehls, D. (2004). Transforming the legacy: Couple therapy with survivors of childhood trauma. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
- Bennett, S., & Holtz Deal, K. (2012). Supervision training: What we know and what we need to know. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 82(2/3), 195–215.
- Binder, J. (1999). Issues in teaching and learning time-limited psychodynamic psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology Review, 19(6), 705–719.
- Chapman, L. (2014). Neurobiologically informed trauma therapy with children and adolescents: Understanding mechanisms of change. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
- Cozolino, L. (2010). The neuroscience of psychotherapy: Healing the social brain (2nd ed.). New York: W.W. Norton.
- Decety, J., & Chaminade, T. (2003). When the self represents the other: A new cognitive neuroscience view on psychological identification. Consciousness and Cognition, 12, 577–596.
- DeKoven Fishbane, M. (2013). Loving with the brain in mind: Neurobiology & couple therapy. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
- Divino, C., & Moore, M. (2010). Integrating neurobiological findings into psychodynamic psychotherapy training and practice. Psychoanalytic Dialogues: The International Journal of Relational Perspectives, 20(3), 337–355.
- Frawley-O’Dea, M. G. (1997). Who’s doing what to whom? Supervision and sexual abuse. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 33(1), 5–18.
- Frawley-O’Dea, M. G. (2003). Supervision is a relationship too: A contemporary approach to psychoanalytic supervision. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 13(3), 355–366.
- Gallese, V. (2007). Before and below theory of mind: Embodied simulation and the neural correlates of social cognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Biological Sciences, 362, 659–669.
- Ganzer, C., & Ornstein, E. (2004). Regression, self-disclosure, and the teach or treat dilemma: Implications of a relational approach for social work supervision. Clinical Social Work Journal, 32(4), 431–449.
- Hahn, W. (2001). The experience of shame in psychotherapy supervision. Psychotherapy, 38(3), 272–282.
- Lindy, J. (2012). Dynamics of the educational triad. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 82(2/3), 173–194.
- Lyons-Ruth, K. (1998). Implicit relational knowing: Its role in development and psychoanalytic treatment. Infant Mental Health Journal, 19, 282–289.
- Miehls, D. (2010). Contemporary trends in supervision theory: A shift from parallel process to relational and trauma theory. Clinical Social Work Journal, 38, 370–378.
- Miehls, D. (2014). Neurobiology and clinical social work. In J. Brandell ( Ed.), Essentials of clinical social work ( pp. 84–102). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Montgomery, A. (2013). Neurobiology essentials for clinicians: What every therapist needs to know. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
- Sarnat, J. (2012). Supervising psychoanalytic psychotherapy: Present knowledge, pressing needs, future possibilities. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 42, 151–160.
- Schamess, G. (2006a). Therapeutic processes in clinical supervision (Part II). Clinical Social Work Journal, 34(4), 427–445.
- Schamess, G. (2006b). Transference enactments in clinical supervision. Clinical Social Work Journal, 34(4), 407–425.
- Schamess, G. (2012). Mutual influence in psychodynamic supervision. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 82(2/3), 142–160.
- Schore, A. N. (2012). The science of the art of psychotherapy. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
- Schore, J. R., & Schore, A. N. (2008). Modern attachment theory: The central role of affect-regulation in development and treatment. Clinical Social Work Journal, 36, 9–20.
- Wilkinson, M. (2010). Changing minds in therapy: Emotion, attachment, trauma & neurobiology. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.