Social Studies Teachers as Instructional Gatekeepers for Issues of Race and Justice

References

• Beck, T. A. (2005). Tools of deliberation: Exploring the complexity of learning to lead elementary civics discussions. Theory & Research in Social Education, 33(1), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2005.10473273
   Google Scholar
• Busey, C. L., & Waters, S. (2016). Who are we? The demographic and professional identity of social studies teacher educators. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 40(1), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2015.07.001
   Google Scholar
• Byford, J., Lennon, S., & Russell, W. B. (2009). Teaching controversial issues in the social studies: A research study of high school teachers. The Clearing House, 82(4), 165–170. https://doi.org/10.3200/TCHS.82.4.165-170
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. E. (2008). Voice in the Classroom: How an open classroom climate fosters engagement among adolescents. Political Behavior, 30(4), 437–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-008-9063-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crocco, M. S., Segall, A., Halvorsen, A., & Jacobsen, R. (2018). Deliberating public policy issues with adolescents. Democracy & Education, 26(1), 3. Article
   Google Scholar
• Doppen, F., Misco, T., & Patterson, N. (2008). The state of K-12 social studies instruction in Ohio. Social Studies Research and Practice, 3(3), 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Feinberg, J., Doppen, F., & Hollstein, M. (2014). Equal protection. Immigration, and Education: Plyler v. doe. Social Education, 78(4), 183–188.
   Google Scholar
• Fitchett, P. G., & Heafner, T. L. (2010). A National Perspective on the Effects of High-Stakes Testing and Standardization on Elementary Social Studies Marginalization. Theory & Research in Social Education, 38(1), 114–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2010.10473418
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, B. J. (1986). Classroom environment. Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Herder and Herder.
   Google Scholar
• Gonyea, J. G., & Hudson, R. B. (2020). In an era of deepening partisan divide, what is the meaning of age or generational differences in political values? Public Policy & Aging Report, 30(2), 52–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppar/praa003
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, M., Levesque, E., Valant, J., & Quintero, D. (2018). The 2018 Brown Center report on American education: How well are American students learning. The Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, D. (2009). Controversy in the classroom: The democratic power of discussion. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, D., & Gatti, L. (2010). Putting politics where it belongs: In the classroom. New Directions for Higher Education, 2010(152), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.408
   Google Scholar
• Holstein, M. (2016). Black lives matter in the social studies. Ohio Social Studies Review, 53(1), 964.
   Google Scholar
• Hung, Y. H. (2018). Exploration of teacher life stories: Taiwanese history teachers’ curricular gatekeeping of controversial public issues. Teaching and Teacher Education, 70, 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Journell, W. (2011). Teachers’ controversial issue decisions related to race, gender, and religion during the 2008 presidential election. Theory & Research in Social Education, 39(3), 348–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2011.10473459
   Google Scholar
• Journell, W. (2018). Should marriage equality be taught as controversial post-Obergefell v. Hodges? Teachers College Record, 120(8), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811812000805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaka, S. (2021). OCSS state of the social studies annual survey findings. Ohio Social Studies Review, 57(2), 42–44.
   Google Scholar
• Kaka, S. J., Littenberg-Tobias, J., Kessner, T., Francis, A. T., Kennett, K., Marvez, G., & Reich, J. (2021). Digital simulations as approximations of practice: Preparing preservice teachers to facilitate whole-class discussions of controversial issues. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 29(1), 67–90.
   Google Scholar
• Kaka, S., & Patterson, N. (2019). 2018-2019 Ohio Council for the social studies annual survey results. Ohio Social Studies Review, 55(2), 4–5.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. (1943). Psychological ecology. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Field theory in social science. Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Love, B. L. (2019). We want to do more than survive: Abolitionist teaching and the pursuit of educational freedom. Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maguth, B., & Moore, C. (2013). The campaign to save world history in Ohio’s schools. The Ohio Social Studies Review, 50(1), 31–39.
   Google Scholar
• McAvoy, P., & Hess, D. (2013). Classroom deliberation in an era of political polarization. Curriculum Inquiry, 43(1), 14–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/curi.12000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaren, P. (2002). Critical pedagogy: A look at the major concepts. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2019). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Misco, T., & Patterson, N. C. (2007). A study of pre-service teachers’ conceptualizations of academic freedom and controversial issues. Theory & Research in Social Education, 35(4), 520–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2007.10473349
   Google Scholar
• National Council for the Social Studies (2001). Creating effective citizens. https://www.socialstudies.org/sites/default/files/publications/se/6505/650511.html#:∼:text=National%20Council%20for%20the%20Social%20Studies%20believes%20that%20a%20primary,citizen%E2%80%9D%20in%20our%20democratic%20republic
   Google Scholar
• National Council for the Social Studies. (2010). Academic freedom and the social studies teacher. Social Education, 74(6), 334–335.
   Google Scholar
• National Council for the Social Studies. (2013). Social studies for the next generation: Purposes, practices, and implications of the College, Career, and Civic Life (C3) framework for social studies state standards. National Council for the Social Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Pace, J. L. (2019). Contained risk-taking: Preparing preservice teachers to teach controversial issues in three countries. Theory & Research in Social Education, 47(2), 228–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2019.1595240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pace, J. L. (2021). Hard questions: Learning to teach controversial issues. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Passe, J., & Fitchett, P. G. (Eds.). (2013). The status of social studies: Views from the field. Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Passe, J., & Patterson, N. C. (2013). The evolution of a national survey of social studies teachers. In Passe   & Fitchett   (Eds.), The status of social studies: Views from the field (pp. 3–17). Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. (2017). Using controversy as a teaching tool: An interview with Diana Hess. Phi Delta Kappan, 99(4), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721717745542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, J., Franke, M., Yun, J.-E E., Ishimoto, M., Diera, C., Geller, R. C., Berryman, A., Brenes, T. (2017). Teaching and learning in the age of Trump: Increasing stress and hostility in America’s high schools. UCLA Institute for Ideas, Democracy, Education, and Access. https://idea.gseis.ucla.edu/publications/teaching-and-learning-in-age-of-trump
   Google Scholar
• Sawchuk, S. (2021). What is critical race theory, and why is it under attack? Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/leadership/what-is-critical-race-theory-and-why-is-it-under-attack/2021/05
   Google Scholar
• Shaver, J. P., Davis, O. L., Jr., & Helburn, S. W. (1978). An interpretive report on the status of precollege social studies education based on three NSF-funded studies. National Council for the Social Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Shoemaker, P. J., & Vos, T. P. (2009). Gatekeeping theory. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stout, C., Wilburn, T. (2022, February 1). Efforts to restrict teaching about racism and bias have multiplied across the U.S. Chalkbeat. https://www.chalkbeat.org/22525983/map-critical-race-theory-legislation-teaching-racism
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, S. J. (1989, March 27). Aspiration and practice: Teacher as curricular-instructional gatekeeper in social studies [Paper session]. American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, California, United States. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED315347
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, S. J. (1991). Teacher as curricular-instructional gatekeeper in social studies. In J. S. Shaver (Ed.), Handbook of research on social studies teaching and learning. (pp. 237–248). Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, S. J. (2005). Teaching social studies that matters: Curriculum for active learning. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Washington, E. Y., & Humphries, E. K. (2011). A social studies teacher’s sense making of controversial issues discussions of race in a predominately white, rural high school classroom. Theory & Research in Social Education, 39(1), 92–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2011.10473448
   Google Scholar
• Welbers, K., & Opgenhaffen, M. (2018). Social media gatekeeping: An analysis of the gatekeeping influence of newspapers’ public Facebook pages. New Media & Society, 20(12), 4728–4747. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818784302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westheimer, J., & Kahne, J. (2004). What kind of citizen? The politics of educating for democracy. American Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 237–269. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312041002237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, D. M. (1950). The “gate keeper”: A case study in the selection of news. Journalism Quarterly, 27(4), 383–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769905002700403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, J., & Robertson, E. (2017). The case for contention. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar