Generic Social Processes: Reimagining a Conceptual Schema for Grounded Theory in the Contemporary Era

References

• Adler, Patricia and Peter Adler. 2008. “Of Rhetoric and Representation: The Four Faces of Ethnography.” The Sociological Quarterly 49(1):1–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2007.00104.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, J.I., (Hans). 1999. “Wilhelm Dilthey: Classical Sociological Theorist.” Quarterly Journal of Ideology 22(1–2):43–82.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, Howard S. 1998. Tricks of the Trade: How to Think about Your Research while You’re Doing It. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, Michael. 2017. “Present Tense: Everyday Animism and Politics of Possession.” Pp. 117–27 in Microsociological Perspectives for Environmental Sociology, edited by B. Brewster and A. Puddephatt. UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Best, Joel. 2006. “What, We Worry? the Pleasures and Costs of Defective Memory for Qualitative Sociologists.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 35:466–78. doi: 10.1177/0891241606286988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigus, O., S. Hadden, and B. Glaser. 1982. “Basic Social Processes.” Pp. 251–72 in Qualitative Methods, Vol. 2: Handbook of Social Science Methods, edited by R.B. Smith and P. Manning. Cambridge: Ballinger.
   Google Scholar
• Blumer, Herbert. 1931. “Science without Concepts.” American Journal of Sociology 36:515–33. doi: 10.1086/215473.
   Google Scholar
• Blumer, Herbert. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blumer, Herbert. 1990. Industrialization as an Agent of Social Change. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Bonham, Megan. 2017. “Micro-Interactions of Cosmic Proportions: Mediating Human-Cosmos Relationships in the Planetarium.” Pp. 17–31 in Microsociological Perspectives for Environmental Sociology, edited by B. Brewster and A. Puddephatt. UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brewster, Bradley and Antony Puddephatt. 2016. “G.H. Mead as a Socio-Environmental Thinker.” Pp. 144–64 in The Timeliness of George Herbert Mead, edited by H. Joas and D. Huebner. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, Anthony and Kathy Charmaz. 2007. “Grounded Theory Research: Methods and Practices.” Pp. 1–28 in The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory, edited by A. Bryant and K. Charmaz. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Catton, William and Riley Dunlap. 1980. “A New Ecological Paradigm for A Post-Exuberant Sociology.” American Behavioral Scientist 24(1):15–47. doi: 10.1177/000276428002400103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, Kathy. 2014. Constructing Grounded Theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, Adele. 2005. Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory after the Postmodern Turn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, Juliet and Anselm Strauss. 1990. “Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons, and Evaluative Criteria.” Qualitative Sociology 13:3–21. doi: 10.1007/BF00988593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couch, Carl. 1984. “Symbolic Interaction and Generic Sociological Principles.” Symbolic Interaction 7:1–14. doi: 10.1525/si.1984.7.1.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, Lorne and Robert Prus. 1993. “Interactionist Ethnography and Postmodern Discourse: Affinities and Disjunctures in Studying Human Lived Experiences.” Studies in Symbolic Interaction 15:147–77.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, Lorne and Robert Prus. 1995. “Postmodernism and Linguistic Reality versus Symbolic Interaction and Obdurate Reality.” Studies in Symbolic Interaction 17:105–24.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, Norman. 1997. “Review of Subcultural Mosaics and Intersubjective Realities.” Contemporary Sociology 26(5):634–35. doi: 10.2307/2655666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, Ralph. 1987. “Four Ways to Improve the Craft of Fieldwork.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 16:69–89. doi: 10.1177/0891241687161005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franks, David. 2010. Neurosociology: The Nexus between Neuroscience and Social Psychology. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, Barney. 1992. Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis. Mill Valley, CA: The Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, Barney. 2002. “Constructivist Grounded Theory?” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 3 (3):12.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, Barney and Anselm Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, Neil. 2009. “A Pragmatist Theory of Social Mechanisms.” American Sociological Review 74(3):358–79. doi: 10.1177/000312240907400302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, Peter and Bradley Wing. 2000. “Review of beyond the Power Mystique.” Symbolic Interaction 23(3):317–20. doi: 10.1525/si.2000.23.3.317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammersley, Martin. 1992. What’s Wrong with Ethnography? Methodological Explorations. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Irvine, Leslie. 2004. “A Model of Animal Selfhood: Expanding Interactionist Possibilities.” Symbolic Interaction 27(1):3–21. doi: 10.1525/si.2004.27.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irvine, Leslie. 2017. “Wild Selves: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective on Species, Minds, and Nature.” Pp. 128–42 in Microsociological Theory for Environmental Sociology, edited by B. Brewster and A. Puddephatt. UK: Ashgate Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jerolmack, Colin and Iddo Tavory. 2014. “Molds and Totems: Nonhumans and the Constitution of the Social Self.” Sociological Theory 32(1):64–77. doi: 10.1177/0735275114523604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimerson, Jason and Jason Rosow. 2004. “Review of the Deviant Mystique: Involvements, Realities, and Regulation.” Contemporary Sociology 33(3):373–74. doi: 10.1177/009430610403300370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joas, Hans. 1996. The Creativity of Action. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinknecht, Steven. 2007. “An Interview with Robert Prus: His Career, Contributions, and Legacy as an Interactionist Ethnographer and Social Theorist.” Qualitative Sociology Review 3 (2):221–88.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Thomas. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 1992. “Where are the Missing Masses? the Sociology of a Few Mundane Artefacts.” Pp. 309–26 in Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, edited by Weibe Bijker and John Law. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 2005. Re-Assembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindesmith, Alfred. 1981. “Symbolic Interaction and Causality.” Symbolic Interaction 4:87–96. doi: 10.1525/si.1981.4.1.87.
   Google Scholar
• Lofland, John. 1970. “Interactionist Imagery and Analytic Interruptus.” Pp. 35–45 in Human Nature and Collective Behavior: Papers in Honor of Herbert Blumer, edited by T. Shibutani. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Lofland, John. 1976. Doing Social Life: The Qualitative Study of Human Interaction in Natural Settings. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Low, Jacqueline. 2008. “Structure, Agency, and Social Reality in Blumerian Symbolic Interactionism: The Influence of Georg Simmel.” Symbolic Interaction 31(3):325–43. doi: 10.1525/si.2008.31.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLuhan, Arthur, Dorothy Pawluch, William Shaffir, and Jack Haas. 2014. “The Cloak of Incompetence: A Neglected Concept in the Sociology of Everyday Life.” The American Sociologist 45:361–87. doi: 10.1007/s12108-014-9240-y.
   Google Scholar
• McVeigh, Ryan. 2015. “Basic-Level Categories, Mirror Neurons, and Joint-Attention Schemes: Three Points of Intersection between G.H. Mead and Cognitive Science.” Symbolic Interaction 39(1):45–65. doi: 10.1002/symb.200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mead, George Herbert. 1934. Mind, Self and Society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mead, George Herbert. 1938. Philosophy of the Act. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C. Wright. 1959. The Sociological Imagination. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miyamato, Frank. 1959. “The Social Act: Re-Examination of a Concept.” Pacific Sociological Review 2:51–55. doi: 10.2307/1388368.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, Raymond. 1995. “Sociology as if Nature Does Not Matter: An Ecological Critique.” British Journal of Sociology 46(4):688–707. doi: 10.2307/591578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadeson, Majia. 2003. “Review of beyond the Power Mystique.” Contemporary Sociology 32(6):777–79. doi: 10.2307/1556697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niewohner, Jorg and Thomas Scheffer. 2010. “Producing Comparability Ethnographically, Reply to Robert Prus.” Comparative Sociology 9:528–36.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, Andrew. 1995. The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pinker, Steven. 2002. The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature. New York, NY: Viking.
   Google Scholar
• Prus, Robert. 1987. “Generic Social Processes: Maximizing Conceptual Development in Ethnographic Research.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 16:250–91. doi: 10.1177/0891241687163002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prus, Robert. 1990. “The Interpretive Challenge: The Impending Crisis in Sociology.” Canadian Journal of Sociology 15(3):355–63. doi: 10.2307/3340924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prus, Robert. 1996. Symbolic Interaction and Ethnographic Research. New York, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prus, Robert. 1997. Subcultural Mosaics and Intersubjective Realities. New York, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prus, Robert. 1999. Beyond the Power Mystique. New York, NY: SUNY.
   Google Scholar
• Prus, Robert. 2007. “Human Memory, Social Process, and the Pragmatist Metamorphosis: Ethnological Foundations, Ethnographic Contributions and Conceptual Challenges.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 36(4):378–437. doi: 10.1177/0891241606299029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prus, Robert. 2008. “Authenticity, Activity, and Conceptuality: Generating a Pluralist, Humanist, and Enduring Social Science.” Studies in Symbolic Interaction 32:19–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prus, Robert. 2010. “Ethnographic Comparisons, Complexities and Conceptualities: Generic Social Processes and the Pragmatic Accomplishment of Group Life.” Comparative Sociology 9:496–527. doi: 10.1163/156913210X12555713197178.
   Google Scholar
• Puddephatt, Antony. 2005. “Mead Has Never Been Modern: Using Meadian Theory to Extend the Constructionist Study of Technology.” Social Epistemology 19(4):357–80. doi: 10.1080/02691720500145571.
   Google Scholar
• Puddephatt, Antony. 2006. “Special: An Interview with Kathy Charmaz: On Constructing Grounded Theory.” Qualitative Sociological Review 2 (3):6–20.
   Google Scholar
• Puddephatt, Antony. 2008. “Incorporating Ritual into Greedy Institution Theory: The Case of Devotion in Amateur Chess.” The Sociological Quarterly 49(1):155–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2007.00110.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puddephatt, Antony. 2009. “The Search for Meaning: Revisiting Herbert Blumer’s Interpretation of George Herbert Mead.” The American Sociologist 40(1):89–105. doi: 10.1007/s12108-009-9067-0.
   Google Scholar
• Puddephatt, Antony and Robert Prus. 2007. “Causality, Agency, and Reality: Plato and Aristotle Meet George Herbert Mead and Herbert Blumer.” Sociological Focus 40(3):265–86. doi: 10.1080/00380237.2007.10571310.
   Google Scholar
• Puddephatt, Antony, William Shaffir, and Steven Kleinknecht, eds. 2009. Ethnographies Revisited: Constructing Theory in the Field. UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, Larry. 1993. Symbolic Interactionism: Exposition and Critique. Lanham, MA: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, Clint. 2007. “Actions Speak Louder than Words: Close Relationships between Human and Nonhuman Animals.” Symbolic Interaction 26(3):405–26. doi: 10.1525/si.2003.26.3.405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwalbe, Michael, Sandra Godwin, Daphne Holden, Douglas Schrock, Shealy Thompson, and Michelle Wolkomir. 2000. “Generic Processes in the Reproduction of Inequality: An Interactionist Analysis.” Social Forces 79(2):419–52. doi: 10.1093/sf/79.2.419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmel, Georg. 1950. The Sociology of Georg Simmel. Translated and edited by Kurt H. Wolf. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D. A., C. Morrill, and L. Anderson. 2003. “Elaborating Analytic Ethnography: Linking Fieldwork and Theory.” Ethnography 4:181–200. doi: 10.1177/14661381030042002.
   Google Scholar
• Stebbins, Robert. 2006. “Concatenated Exploration: Aiding Theoretic Memory by Planning Well for the Future.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 35:483–94. doi: 10.1177/0891241606286989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, Anselm. 1978. Negotiations: Varieties, Processes, Contexts, and Social Order. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, Anselm and Juliet Corbin. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tavory, Iddo and Stefan Timmermans. 2014. “A Pragmatist Approach to Causality in Ethnography.” American Journal of Sociology 119(3):682–714. doi: 10.1086/675891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmermans, Stefan and Iddo Tavory. 2012. “Theory Construction in Qualitative Research: From Grounded Theory to Abductive Analysis.” Sociological Theory 30(3):167–86. doi: 10.1177/0735275112457914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, Jonathon H. 2000. On the Origins of Human Emotions: A Sociological Inquiry into the Evolution of Human Affect. Stanford, MA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Den Scott, Lisa Jo, Carrie Sanders, and Antony Puddephatt. 2017. “Reconceptualizing Users through Enriching Ethnography.” Pp. 501–28 in Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 4thed., edited by U. Felt, R. Fouché, C. Miller, and L. Smith-Doerr. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vannini, Phillip. 2017. “How to Climb Mount Fuji (At Your Earliest Convenience): A Non-Representational Approach.” Pp. 48–60 in Microsociological Perspectives for Environmental Sociology, edited by B. Brewster and A. Puddephatt. UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, Max. [1904] 1949. The Methodology of the Social Sciences. Edited and translated by Edward A. Shils and Henry A. Finch. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Weigert, Andrew. 1991. “Transverse Interaction: A Pragmatic Perspective on Environment as Other.” Symbolic Interaction 14(3):353–63. doi: 10.1525/si.1991.14.3.353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zerubavel, Eviatar. 2006. The Elephant in the Room: Silence and Denial in Everyday Life. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar