How Interdependence in Team Task Structure Impacts Evaluations of Members’ Work Contributions: Examining Resource versus Process Interdependence

References

• Aiken, Michael, and Jerald Hage. 1968. “Organizational Interdependence and Intra-Organizational Structure.” American Sociological Review 33(6):912–30. doi:10.2307/2092683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, Belinda C., Leisa D. Sargent, and Lisa M. Bradley. 2003. “Differential Effects of Task and Reward Interdependence on Perceived Helping Behavior, Effort, and Group Performance.” Small Group Research 34(6):716–40. doi:10.1177/1046496403257615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, Cameron, Michael W. Kraus, Adam D. Galinsky, and Dacher Keltner. 2012. “The Local-Ladder Effect: Social Status and Subjective Well-Being.” Psychological Science 23(7):764–71. doi:10.1177/0956797611434537
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bales, Robert F. 1950. “A Set of Categories for the Analysis of Small Group Interaction.” American Sociological Review 15(2):257–63. doi:10.2307/2086790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, Albert. 2000. “Exercise of Human Agency through Collective Efficacy.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 9(3):75–78. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendersky, Corinne, and Nicholas A. Hays. 2012. “Status Conflict in Groups.” Organization Science 23(2):323–40. doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, Joseph, Bernard P. Cohen, and Morris Zelditch Jr. 1972. “Status Characteristics and Social Interaction.” American Sociological Review 37(3):241–55. doi:10.2307/2093465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, Joseph, and Thomas L. Conner. 1969. “Performance Expectations and Behavior in Small Groups.” Acta Sociologica 12(4):186–98. doi:10.1177/000169936901200403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, Joseph, Thomas L. Conner, and M. Hamit Fisek. 1974. Expectation States Theory: A Theoretical Research Program. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, Joseph, M., Hamit Fisek, and Robert Zane Norman. 1977. Status Characteristics and Social Interaction: An Expectation-States Approach. New York: Elsevier Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Blau, Peter M. 1968. “The Hierarchy of Authority in Organizations.” American Journal of Sociology 73(4):453–67. doi:10.1086/224506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunderson, J.Stuart. 2003. “Recognizing and Utilizing Expertise in Work Groups: A Status Characteristics Perspective.” Administrative Science Quarterly 48(4):557–91. doi:10.2307/3556637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, Elizabeth G. 1994. “Restructuring the Classroom: Conditions for Productive Small Groups.” Review of Educational Research 64(1):1–35. doi:10.3102/00346543064001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, Elizabeth G., Rachel Lotan, and Lisa Catanzarite. 1988. ““Treating Status Problems in the Cooperative Classroom.” Pp. 27–54 in Status Generalization: New Theory and Research, edited by M. Webster Jr. and M. Foschi. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Elizabeth G., and Rachel A. Lotan. 1995. “Producing Equal-Status Interaction in the Heterogeneous Classroom.” American Educational Research Journal 32(1):99–120. doi:10.3102/00028312032001099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, Elizabeth G., and Rachel A. Lotan, eds. 1997. Working for Equity in Heterogenous Classrooms: Sociological Theory in Practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Elizabeth G., and Susan S. Roper. 1972. “Modification of Interracial Interaction Disability: An Application of Status Characteristic Theory.” American Sociological Review 37(6):643–57. doi:10.2307/2093576
   Google Scholar
• Courtright, Stephen H., Gary R. Thurgood, Greg L. Stewart, and Abigail J. Pierotti. 2015. “Structural Interdependence in Teams: An Integrative Framework and Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Applied Psychology 100(6):1825–46. doi:10.1037/apl0000027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Dreu, Carsten K.W., and Laurie R. Weingart. 2003. “Task versus Relationship Conflict, Team Performance, and Team Member Satisfaction: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Applied Psychology 88(4):741–49. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.741
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dessein, Wouter, and Tano Santos. 2006. “Adaptive Organizations.” Journal of Political Economy 114(5):956–95. doi:10.1086/508031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durkheim, Emile. [1893] 1997. The Division of Labor in Society. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, Richard M. 1972. “Exchange Theory, Part I: A Psychological Basis for Social Exchange.” Sociological Theories in Progress 2:38–57.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, Richard M. 1976. “Social Exchange Theory.” Annual Review of Sociology 2:335–62. doi:10.1146/annurev.so.02.080176.002003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, Elliott T., and Deborah H. Gruenfeld. 1998. “When Needs Outweigh Desires: The Effects of Resource Interdependence and Reward Interdependence on Group Problem Solving.” Basic and Applied Social Psychology 20(1):45–56. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2001_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feather, N.T., and J.G. Simon. 1971. “Attribution of Responsibility and Valence of Outcome in Relation to Initial Confidence and Success and Failure of Self and Other.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 18(2):173–88. doi:10.1037/h0030845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foddy, Margaret, and Martha Foschi. 1988. ““Standards, Performances, and the Formation of Self-Other Expectations.” Pp. 248–60 in Status Generalization: New Theory and Research, edited by M. Webster Jr. and M. Foschi. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foddy, Margaret, and Michael Smithson. 1996. “Relative Ability, Paths of Relevance, and Influence in Task-Oriented Groups.” Social Psychology Quarterly 59(2):140–53. doi:10.2307/2787048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gluszek, Agata, and John F. Dovidio. 2010. “The Way They Speak: A Social Psychological Perspective on the Stigma of Nonnative Accents in Communication.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 14(2):214–37. doi:10.1177/1088868309359288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goar, Carla, and Jane Sell. 2005. “Using Task Definition to Modify Racial Inequality within Task Groups.” Sociological Quarterly 46(3):525–43. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2005.00025.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkness, Sarah. 2014. “The Consequences of Interpersonal Rewards: Consequences of Interpersonal Rewards.” Sociology Compass 8(2):219–31. doi:10.1111/soc4.12124
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, D.A., K.H. Price, and M.P. Bell. 1998. “Beyond Relational Demography: Time and the Effects of Surface- and Deep-Level Diversity on Work Group Cohesion.” Academy of Management Journal 41(1):96–107. doi:10.2307/256901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirst, Mark K. 1988. “Intrinsic Motivation as Influenced by Task Interdependence and Goal Setting.” Journal of Applied Psychology 73(1):96–101. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.73.1.96
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hysom, Stuart J. 2009. “Status Valued Goal Objects and Performance Expectations.” Social Forces 87(3):1623–48. doi:10.1353/sof.0.0160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hysom, Stuart J., Murray Webster, and Lisa Slattery Walker. 2015. “Expectations, Status Value, and Group Structure.” Sociological Perspectives 58(4):554–69. doi:10.1177/0731121415571134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jehn, Karen A. 1997. “A Qualitative Analysis of Conflict Types and Dimensions in Organizational Groups.” Administrative Science Quarterly 42(3):530–57. doi:10.2307/2393737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jehn, Karen A., and Corinne Bendersky. 2003. “Intragroup Conflict in Organizations: A Contingency Perspective on the Conflict-Outcome Relationship.” Research in Organizational Behavior 25:187–242. doi:10.1016/S0191-3085(03)25005-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, Cathryn. 1993. “Gender and Formal Authority.” Social Psychology Quarterly 56(3):193–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz-Navon, Tal Y., and Miriam Erez. 2005. “When Collective- and Self-Efficacy Affect Team Performance the Role of Task Interdependence.” Small Group Research 36(4):437–65. doi:10.1177/1046496405275233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiggundu, Moses N. 1981. “Task Interdependence and the Theory of Job Design.” Academy of Management Review 6(3):499–508.
   Google Scholar
• Kiggundu, Moses N. 1983. “Task Interdependence and Job Design: Test of a Theory.” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 31(2):145–72. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(83)90118-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuwabara, Ko. 2011. “Cohesion, Cooperation, and the Value of Doing Things Together: How Economic Exchange Creates Relational Bonds.” American Sociological Review 76(4):560–80. doi:10.1177/0003122411414825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawler, Edward J. 2001. “An Affect Theory of Social Exchange.” American Journal of Sociology 107(2):321–52. doi:10.1086/324071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawler, Edward J., Shane R. Thye, and Jeongkoo Yoon. 2000. “Emotion and Group Cohesion in Productive Exchange.” American Journal of Sociology 106(3):616–57. doi:10.1086/318965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawler, Edward J., Shane R. Thye, and Jeongkoo Yoon. 2008. “Social Exchange and Micro Social Order.” American Journal of Sociology 73(4):519–42. doi:10.1177/000312240807300401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawler, Edward J., Shane R. Thye, and Jeongkoo Yoon. 2009. Social Commitments in a Depersonalized World. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Lawler, Edward J., and Jeongkoo Yoon. 1993. “Power and the Emergence of Commitment Behavior in Negotiated Exchange.” American Sociological Review 58(4):465–81. doi:10.2307/2096071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawler, Edward J., and Jeongkoo Yoon. 1996. “Commitment in Exchange Relations: Test of a Theory of Relational Cohesion.” American Sociological Review 61(1):89–108. doi:10.2307/2096408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawler, Edward J., and Jeongkoo Yoon. 1998. “Network Structure and Emotion in Exchange Relations.” American Sociological Review 63(6):871–94. doi:10.2307/2657506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, Jeffrey W., and Michael J. Lovaglia. 1998. “Leadership Status, Gender, Group Size, and Emotion in Face-to-Face Groups.” Sociological Perspectives 41(3):617–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannix, Elizabeth A., and Stephen J. Sauer. 2006. “Status and Power in Organizational Group Researc: Acknowledging the Pervasiveness of Hierarchy.” Advances in Group Processes: Theory and Research 23:149–82.
   Google Scholar
• Markovsky, Barry, F. Smith Le Roy, and Joseph Berger. 1984. “Do Status Interventions Persist?” American Sociological Review 49(3):373–382. doi:10.2307/2095281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Dale T., and Michael Ross. 1975. “Self-Serving Biases in the Attribution of Causality: Fact or Fiction?” Psychological Bulletin 82(2):213–25. doi:10.1037/h0076486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moch, Michael K. 1976. “Structure and Organizational Resource Allocation.” Administrative Science Quarterly 21(4):661–74. doi:10.2307/2391722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molm, L.D., D. Melamed, and M.M. Whitham. 2013. “Behavioral Consequences of Embeddedness: Effects of the Underlying Forms of Exchange.” Social Psychology Quarterly 76(1):73–97. doi:10.1177/0190272512468284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molm, Linda D. 1994. “Dependence and Risk: Transforming the Structure of Social Exchange.” Social Psychology Quarterly 57(3):163–76. doi:10.2307/2786874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molm, Linda D., Jessica L. Collett, and David R. Schaefer. 2006. “Conflict and Fairness in Social Exchange.” Social Forces 84(4):2331–52. doi:10.1353/sof.2006.0100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molm, Linda D., Jessica L. Collett, and David R. Schaefer. 2007. “Building Solidarity through Generalized Exchange: A Theory of Reciprocity.” American Journal of Sociology 113(1):205–42. doi:10.1086/517900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molm, Linda D., and Karen S. Cook. 1995. “Social Exchange and Exchange Networks.” Sociological Perspectives on Social Psychology 2:209–35.
   Google Scholar
• Molm, Linda D., Gretchen Peterson, and Nobuyuki Takahashi. 2003. “In the Eye of the Beholder: Procedural Justice in Social Exchange.” American Sociological Review 68(1):128–52. doi:10.2307/3088905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molm, Linda D., David R. Schaefer, and Jessica L. Collett. 2009. “Fragile and Resilient Trust: Risk and Uncertainty in Negotiated and Reciprocal Exchange.” Sociological Theory 27(1):1–32. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9558.2009.00336.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouchi, William G. 1977. “The Relationship between Organizational Structure and Organizational Control.” Administrative Science Quarterly 22(1):95–113. doi:10.2307/2391748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paskevich, David M., Lawrence R. Brawley, Kim D. Dorsch, and W. Neil Widmeyer. 1999. “Relationship between Collective Efficacy and Team Cohesion: Conceptual and Measurement Issues.” Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 3(3):210–22. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.3.3.210
   Google Scholar
• Pennings, Johannes M. 1975. “Interdependence and Complementarity: The Case of a Brokerage Office.” Human Relations 28(9):825–40. doi:10.1177/001872677502800904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugh, M.D., and Ralph Wahrman. 1983. “Neutralizing Sexism in Mixed-Sex Groups: Do Women Have to Be Better than Men?” American Journal of Sociology 88(4):746–62. doi:10.1086/227731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riches, Phoebe, and Margaret Foddy. 1989. “Ethnic Accent as a Status Cue.” Social Psychology Quarterly 52(3):197–206. doi:10.2307/2786714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridgeway, Cecilia. 1991. “The Social Construction of Status Value: Gender and Other Nominal Characteristics.” Social Forces 70(2):367–86. doi:10.1093/sf/70.2.367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridgeway, Cecilia L., Elizabeth Heger Boyle, Kathy J. Kuipers, and Dawn T. Robinson. 1998. “How Do Status Beliefs Develop? The Role of Resources and Interactional Experience.” American Sociological Review 63(3):331–50. doi:10.2307/2657553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelly, Robert K., and Lisa Troyer. 2001. “Emergence and Completion of Structure in Initially Undefined and Partially Defined Groups.” Social Psychology Quarterly 64(4):318–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelly, Robert K., and Murray Webster Jr. 1997. “How Formal Status, Liking, and Ability Status Structure Interaction: Three Theoretical Principles and a Test.” Sociological Perspectives 40(1):81–107. doi:10.2307/1389494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stasser, Garold, Dennis D. Stewart, and Gwen M. Wittenbaum. 1995. “Expert Roles and Information Exchange during Discussion: The Importance of Knowing Who Knows What.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 31(3):244–65. doi:10.1006/jesp.1995.1012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stasser, Garold, Sandra I. Vaughan, and Dennis D. Stewart. 2000. “Pooling Unshared Information: The Benefits of Knowing How Access to Information Is Distributed among Group Members.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 82(1):102–16. doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, Dennis D., and Garold Stasser. 1995. “Expert Role Assignment and Information Sampling during Collective Recall and Decision Making.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69(4):619–28. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.619
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streufert, Siegfried, and Susan C. Streufert. 1969. “Effects of Conceptual Structure, Failure, and Success on Attribution of Causality and Interpersonal Attitudes.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 11(2):138–47. doi:10.1037/h0027047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, James D. 1967. Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, Victor A. 1961. “Hierarchy, Specialization, and Organizational Conflict.” Administrative Science Quarterly 5(4):485–521. doi:10.2307/2390618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thye, S.R., E.J. Lawler, and J. Yoon. 2011. “The Emergence of Embedded Relations and Group Formation in Networks of Competition.” Social Psychology Quarterly 74(4):387–413. doi:10.1177/0190272511415553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Vegt, Gerben S, and Evert Van de Vliert. 2005. “Effects of Perceived Skill Dissimilarity and Task Interdependence on Helping in Work Teams.” Journal of Management 31(1):73–89. doi:10.1177/0149206304271382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Vegt, Gerben, Ben Emans, and Evert Van De Vliert. 1998. “Motivating Effects of Task and Outcome Interdependence in Work Teams.” Group and Organization Management 23(2):124–43. doi:10.1177/1059601198232003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Vegt, Gerben, and Evert Van de Vliert. 2002. “Intragroup Interdependence and Effectiveness: Review and Proposed Directions for Theory and Practice.” Journal of Managerial Psychology 17(1):50–67. doi:10.1108/02683940210415924
   Google Scholar
• Victor, Bart, and Richard S. Blackburn. 1987. “Interdependence: An Alterntative Conceptionalization.” Journal Academy of Management Review 12:486–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wageman, Ruth. 1995. “Interdependence and Group Effectiveness.” Administrative Science Quarterly 40(1):145–80. doi:10.2307/2393703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wageman, Ruth. 2001. “The Meaning of Interdependence.” Pp. 197-218 in Groups at Work: Theory and Research, edited by M.E. Turner. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Wageman, Ruth, and George Baker. 1997. “Incentives and Cooperation: The Joint Effects of Task and Reward Interdependence on Group Performance.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 18(2):139–58. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, David G., and Joseph Berger. 2002. “Expectation States Theory: An Evolving Research Program.” Pp. 41–76 in New Directions in Contemporary Sociological Theory, edited by Joseph Berger and Morris Zelditch Jr. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, Lisa Slattery, Sharon C. Doerer, and Murray Webster. 2014. “Status, Participation, and Influence in Task Groups.” Sociological Perspectives 57(3):364–81. doi:10.1177/0731121414524928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, Max. [1947] 1967. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, Murray Jr., and James E. Driskell Jr. 1978. “Status Generalization: A Review and Some New Data.” American Sociological Review 43(2):220–36. doi:10.2307/2094700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weingart, Laurie R., and Elizabeth Weldon. 1991. “Processes that Mediate the Relationship between a Group Goal and Group Member Performance.” Human Performance 4(1):33–54. doi:10.1207/s15327043hup0401_2
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Kipling D. 2010. “Dyads Can Be Groups (and Often Are).” Small Group Research 41(2):268–74. doi:10.1177/1046496409358619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolosin, Robert J., Steven J. Sherman, and Amnon Till. 1973. “Effects of Cooperation and Competition on Responsibility Attribution after Success and Failure.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 9:220–35. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(73)90011-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. 2003. “Cluster-Sample Methods in Applied Econometrics.” American Economic Review 93(2):133–38. doi:10.1257/000282803321946930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaccaro, Stephen J., Virginia Blair, Christopher Peterson, and Michelle Zazanis. 1995. “Collective Efficacy.” Pp. 305–28 in Self-Efficacy, Adaptation, and Adjustment:Theory, research, and application. The Plenum Series in Social/Clinical Psychology, edited by J. E. Maddux. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, Miron. 1979. “Attribution of Success and Failure Revisited, Or: The Motivational Bias Is Alive and Well in Attribution Theory.” Journal of Personality 47(2):245–87. doi:10.1111/jopy.1979.47.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar