Right-Wing Ideologies and Ideological Diversity in the Tea Party

References

• Abanes, Richard. 1996. American Militias: Rebellion, Racism and Religion. Downers Grove, IL: Intervarsity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aho, James. 1990. The Politics of Righteousness. Seattle, WA: The University of Washington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Althusser, Louis. 1971. Lenin and Other Essays. New York: Monthly Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, Hannah. 1952. “Ideology and Terror.” The Review of Politics 15(3):303–27. doi: 10.1017/S0034670500001510.
   Google Scholar
• Babington, Charles. 2010. “Tea Party Shaping Republican Party, Fall Faceoffs”. ABC News, June 11.
   Google Scholar
• Berlet, Chip. 2004. “Mapping the Political Right.” Pp. 19–49 in Home-Grown Hate, edited by A. Ferber. New York: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Berlet, Chip. 2012a. “Reframing Populist Resentments in the Tea Party Movement.” Pp. 47–66 in Steep: The Precipitous Rise of the Tea Party, edited by L. Rosenthal and C. Trost. Berkeley: University of California Press
   Google Scholar
• Berlet, Chip. 2012b. “Collectivists, Communists, Labor Bosses, and Treason: The Tea Parties as Right-Wing Populist Counter-Subversion Panic.” Critical Sociology 38(4):565–87. doi: 10.1177/0896920511434750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlet, Chip and Matthew Nemiroff Lyons. 2000. Right-Wing Populism in America: Too Close for Comfort. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blee, Kathleen. 2002. Inside Organized Racism; Women in the Hate Movement. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blee, Kathleen. 2008. Women of the Klan. 2nd ed. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blee, Kathleen and Kimberly Creasap. 2010. “Conservative and Right-Wing Movements.” Annual Review of Sociology 36:269–86. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burghart, Devin. 2012. “View from the Top.” Pp. 67–97 in Steep: The Precipitous Rise of the Tea Party, edited by Lawrence Rosenthal and Christine Trost. Berkeley: The University of California Press
   Google Scholar
• Burke, Meghan. 2015. Race, Gender, and Class in the Tea Party. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Canovan, Margaret. 1981. Populism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• CNBC.com. 2009. “Rick Santelli’s Shout Heart ‘Round the World’.” CNBC February 22. Retrieved January 26, 2013 (http://www.cnbc.com/id/29283701/Rick_Santelli039s_Shout_Heard_039Round_the_World).
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Suzanne. 2008. The Hunger Games. New York: Scholastic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coppings, McKay. 2017. “The Republican Identity Crisis”. The Atlantic. April 1. Retrieved October 20, 2017. (https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/04/the-gops-ideological-identity-crisis/521316/).
   Google Scholar
• Craighill, Peyton. 2012. “The Many Faces of the Republican Party”. The Washington Post. August 20. Retrieved October 19, 2017. (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2012/08/20/the-many-faces-of-the-republican-party/?utm_term=.994aa6a94ad7).
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, Donatella. 2005. “Multiple Belongings, Tolerant Identities, and the Construction of ‘Another Politics’: Between the European Social Forum and the Local Social Fora.” in Transnational Protest and Global Activism, edited by Donatella Della Porta and Sidney Tarrow. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, Donatella and Lorenzo Mosca. 2005. “Global-Net for Global Movements? A Network of Networks for A Movement or Movements.” Journal of Public Policy 25(1):165–90. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X05000255.
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta Donatella, and Mario Diani. 2006. Social Movements: An Introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Demographics Pro. 2016. “More than One-Third of Trump Supporters Follow White Nationalists on Trwitter”. Retrieved October 12, 2017. (http://www.demographicspro.com/insights/trump-supporters-follow-white-nationalists-on-twitter).
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, Sara. 1995. Roads to Dominion. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Disch, Lisa. 2012. “The Tea Party: A ‘White Citizenship’ Movement?” Pp. 133–51 in Steep: The Precipitous Rise of the Tea Party, edited by Lawrence Rosenthal and Christine Trost. Berkeley: The University of California Press
   Google Scholar
• Ezekiel, Raphael. 1995. The Racist Mind: Portraits of American Neo-Nazis and Klansmen. New York: Penguin Books USA.
   Google Scholar
• Ferber, Abby and Kimmel, Michael. 2004. “’White Men are this Nation’: Right-Wing Militias and the Restoration of Rural American Masculinity” in Home Grown Hate edited by Abby Ferber. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, David and Stephen Hester. 2004. An Invitation to Ethnomethodology: Language, Society and Interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• George, John and Laird Wilcox. 1996. American Extremists: Militias, Supremacists, Klansmen, Communists, and Others. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, Antonio. 1926[2005]. The Southern Question. Translated by Pasquale Verdicchio. Toronto: Guernica.
   Google Scholar
• Gusfield, Joseph. 1962. “Mass Society and Extremist Politics”. American Sociological Review. 27(1): 19–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, Stuart. 1997. Representation: Cultural Representation and Signifying Practices. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hara, Noriko and Bi-Yun Huang. “Online Social Movements.” Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. 45(1): 489–522.
   Google Scholar
• Hardisty, Jean. 1999. Mobilizing Resentment: Conservative Resurgence from the John Birch Society to the Promise Keepers. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hochschild, Arlie. 2016. Strangers in Their Own Land. New York: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstadter, Richard. 1965. The Paranoid Style in American Politics, and Other Essays. New York: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Holstein, James and Jaber Gubrium. 2005. “Interpretive Practice.” Pp. 483–506 in The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Iserby, Charlotte. 1999. The Deliberate Dumbing down of America. Ravenna, OH: Conscience Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jonsson, Patrik. 2010. “Amid Harsh Criticisms, ‘Tea Party’ Slips Into Mainstream”. The Christian Science Monitor, April 3.
   Google Scholar
• Kanazawa, Satoshi. 2010. “Why Liberals and Athiests Are More Intellegent.” Social Psychology Quarterly. 73(1): 33–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, Leslie and Kate Zernike. 2012. “Activists Fight Green Projects, Seeing U.N. Plot”. New York Times. February 3rd. Retrieved February 21, 2013 (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/04/us/activists-fight-green-projects-seeing-un-plot.html?pagewanted=all).
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, Gavin and Gary Wickham. 2003. Using Foucault’s Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kersten, Katherine. 2008. “Teacher Questions Muslim Practices at Charter School” Star Tribune, May 19. Retrieved May 30, 2014 (http://www.startribune.com/featuredColumns/17406054.html).
   Google Scholar
• Knobel, Dale T. 1996. “America for the Americans”: The Nativist Movement in the United States. Woodbridge, CT: Twayne Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kraychik, Robert. 2007. “CNN's Brinkley: '10-15%' of Trump's Supporters are KKK, Whit eNationalists, Alt-Right“. The Daily Wire. August 13. Retrieved August 13, 2018. (https://www.dailywire.com/news/19663/cnns-brinkley-10-15-percent-trumps-supporters-are-robert-kraychik)
   Google Scholar
• Lipset, Seymour and Earl Raab. 1978. The Politics of Unreason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lundskow, George. 2012. “Authoritarianism and Destructiveness in the Tea Party Movement.” Critical Sociology 38(4):529–47. doi: 10.1177/0896920511434218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCright, Aaron and Dunlap, Riley. 2000. “Challenging global warming as a Social Problem” Social Problems. 47(4): 499–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McVeigh, Rory. 1999. Structural incentives for Conservative Mobilization. Social Forces. 77(4):1461–1496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meckler, Mark and Jenny Beth Martin. 2012. Tea Party Patriots: The Second American Revolution. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, Sara. 2003. Foucault. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mulloy, D.J. 2008. American Extremism: History, Politics and the Militia Movement. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, Pamela E and Hank Johnson. 2000. “What a Good Idea! Ideologies and Frames in Social Movement Research.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly 5:37–54.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, Christopher and Matt Barreto. 2013. Change They Can’t Believe In: The Tea Party and Reactionary Politics in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, Christopher and Christopher Towler. 2010. “Tea Party Preliminary Content Analysis.” 2010 Multi-State Survey on Race and Politics Content Analysis. Seattle: University of Washington Institute for the Study of Ethnicity, Race and Sexuality. Retrieved February 1, 2014 (http://depts.washington.edu/uwiser/tp_content_analysis.htm).
   Google Scholar
• Perrin, Andrew, Steven Tepper, Neal Caren, and Sally Morris. 2014. “Political and Cultural Dimensions of Tea Party Support, 2009–2012.” The Sociological Quarterly 55(4):625–52. doi: 10.1111/tsq.12069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. 2014. “Beyond Red Vs. Blue.” June 26. Retrieved October 12, 2017. (http://www.people-press.org/2014/06/26/the-political-typology-beyond-red-vs-blue/).
   Google Scholar
• Pitcavage, M. 2001. “Camouflage and Conspiracy: The Militia Movement from Ruby Ridge to Y2K.” American Behavioral Scientist 44:957–81. doi: 10.1177/00027640121956610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saad, Lydia. 2010. “Tea Partiers are Fairly Mainstream in Their Demographics”. Gallup, April 5.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, David. 1985. Qualitative Methodology and Sociology. Aldershot, UK: Gower.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, David. 2004. Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, Robert. 1999. The Militia Threat: Terrorists among Us. New York: Plenum Trade.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, Kenneth Saul. 1996. A Force Upon the Plain. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, Sidney. 1994. Power in Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skocpol, Theda and Vanessa Williams. 2012. The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tea Party. 2011. “Gateway Grassroots Mission Statement and Core Values.” Retrieved January 6, 2011 (https://docs.google.com/View?id=dhsxmzm7_19fcdzskg5&pli=1).
   Google Scholar
• UN Environment Programme. 1992. “Agenda 21”. Retrieved February 21, 2013 (http://www.unep.org/Documents.Multilingual/Default.asp?documentid=52).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Commerce. 2013. “Per Capita Personal Income by State.” Albuquerque, NM: Bureau of Economic Analysis and The University of New Mexico. Retrieved May 30, 2014 (http://bber.unm.edu/econ/us-pci.htm).
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Juan. 2010. “Tea Party Anger Reflects Mainstream Concerns”. The Wall Street Journal, April 2.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, Colin. 2010. “’Tea Party’-Backed Platform Sails through Maine GOP Convention”. Christian Science Monitor, May 10.
   Google Scholar
• Zernike, Kate. 2010. Boiling Mad: Inside Tea Party America. New York: Times Books.
   Google Scholar
• Zeskind, Leonard. 2012. “A Nation Dispossessed: The Tea Party Movement and Race.” Critical Sociology 38(4):495–509. doi: 10.1177/0896920511431852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zizek, Slavoj. 1989. The Sublime Object of Ideology. New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar