Opportune Romance: How College Campuses Shape Students’ Hookups, Dates, and Relationships

References

• Adkins, Timothy, Paula England, Barbara J. Risman, and Jessie Ford. 2015. “Student Bodies: Does the Sex Ratio Matter for Hooking up and Having Sex at College?” Social Currents 2:144–62. doi: 10.1177/2329496515579763.
   Google Scholar
• Allison, Rachel, and Barbara J. Risman. 2014. ““It Goes Hand in Hand with the Parties”: Race, Class, and Residence in College Students’ Negotiations of Hooking Up.” Sociological Perspectives 57:102–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, Elizabeth A., Paula England, and Alison C. K. Fogarty. 2012. “Accounting for Women’s Orgasm and Sexual Enjoyment in College Hookups and Relationships.” American Sociological Review 77:435–62. doi: 10.1177/0003122412445802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arum, Richard and Josipa Roksa. 2014. Aspiring Adults Adrift: Tentative Transitions of College Graduates. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arum, Richard, Josipa Roksa, and Michelle J. Budig. 2008. “The Romance of College Attendance: Higher Education Stratification and Mate Selection.” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 26:107–21. doi: 10.1016/j.rssm.2008.02.003.
   Google Scholar
• Balistreri, Kelly Stamper, Kara Joyner, and Grace Kao. 2015. “Relationship Involvement among Young Adults: Are Asian American Men an Exceptional Case?” Population Research and Policy Review 34:1–24. doi: 10.1007/s11113-015-9361-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bearak, Jonathan Marc. 2014. “Casual Contraception in Casual Sex: Life-Cycle Change in Undergraduates’ Sexual Behavior in Hookups.” Social Forces 93:483–513. doi: 10.1093/sf/sou091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berntson, Marit Ann, Kristi L. Hoffman, and Tracy L. Luff. 2014. “College as Context: Influences on Interpersonal Sexual Scripts.” Sexuality & Culture 18:149–65. doi: 10.1007/s12119-013-9180-7.
   Google Scholar
• Blackwell, Debra L. and Daniel T Lichter. 2004. “Homogamy among Dating, Cohabiting, and Married Couples.” The Sociological Quarterly 45:719–37. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2004.tb02311.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau, Peter M. 1977. “A Macrosociological Theory of Social Structure.” American Journal of Sociology 83:26–54. doi: 10.1086/226505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau, Peter M. 1994. Structural Contexts of Opportunities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blossfeld, Hans-Peter and Andreas Timm, editors. 2003. Who Marries Whom? Educational Systems as Marriage Markets in Modern Societies. Boston: Klewer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bogle, Kathleen A. 2007. “The Shift from Dating to Hooking up in College: What Scholars Have Missed.” Sociology Compass 1/2:775–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2007.00031.x.
   Google Scholar
• Bogle, Kathleen A. 2008. Hooking Up: Sex, Dating, and Relationships on Campus. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, Nicholas A. 2012. “Structural Diversity and Close Interracial Relationships in College.” Educational Researcher 41:133–35. doi: 10.3102/0013189X12439934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, Kate H. and Maura Tienda. 2017. “Marriage-Market Constraints and Mate-Selection Behavior: Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Differences in Intermarriage.” Journal of Marriage & Family 79:301–17. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feld, Scott L. 1981. “The Focused Organization of Social Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 86:1015–35. doi: 10.1086/227352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feld, Scott L. 1982. “Social Structural Determinants of Similarity among Associates.” American Sociological Review 47:797–801. doi: 10.2307/2095216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feliciano, Cynthia, Rennie Lee, and Belinda Robnett. 2011. “Racial Boundaries among Latinos: Evidence from Internet Daters’ Racial Preferences.” Social Problems 58:189–212. doi: 10.1525/sp.2011.58.2.189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielder, Robyn L., Kate B Carey, and Michael P. Carey. 2013. “Are Hookups Replacing Romantic Relationships? A Longitudinal Study of First-Year Female College Students.” Journal of Adolescent Health 52:657–59. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.09.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heldman, Caroline and Lisa Wade. 2010. “Hook-Up Culture: Setting a New Research Agenda.” Sexuality Research and Social Policy 7:323–33. doi: 10.1007/s13178-010-0024-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalmijn, Matthijs. 1998. “Intermarriage and Homogamy: Causes, Patterns, Trends.” Annual Review of Sociology 24:395–421. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalminj, Matthijs and Henk Flap. 2001. “Assortative Meeting and Mating: Unintended Consequences of Organized Settings for Partner Choices.” Social Forces 79:1289–312. doi: 10.1353/sof.2001.0044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keels, Micere and Keshia Harris. 2014. “Intercultural Dating at Predominantly White Universities in the United States: The Maintenance and Crossing of Group Borders.” Societies 4:363–79. doi: 10.3390/soc4030363.
   Google Scholar
• Kuperberg, Arielle and Joseph E Padgett. 2015. “Dating and Hooking up in College: Meeting Contexts, Sex, and Variation by Gender, Partner’s Gender, and Class Standing.” Journal of Sex Research 52:517–31. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2014.901284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperberg, Arielle and Joseph E Padgett. 2016. “The Role of Culture in Explaining Students’ Selection into Hookups, Dates, and Long-Term Romantic Relationships.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 33:1070–96. doi: 10.1177/0265407515616876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, Susan K. and Valerie K Oppenheimer. 2000. “Educational Assortative Mating across Marriage Markets: Non-Hispanic Whites in the United States.” Demography 37:29–40. doi: 10.2307/2648094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichter, Daniel T., Robert N Anderson, and Mark D Hayward. 1995. “Marriage Markets and Marital Choice.” Journal of Family Issues 16:412–31. doi: 10.1177/019251395016004001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Ken-Hou and Jennifer Lundquist. 2013. “Mate Selection in Cyberspace: The Intersection of Race, Gender, and Education.” American Journal of Sociology 119:183–215. doi: 10.1086/673129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorincz, Laszlo. 2006. “Rules of Attraction: How Do People Select Partners?” Review of Sociology 12:71–84. doi: 10.1556/RevSoc.12.2006.1.6.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, Wendy D., Monica A. Longmore, and Peggy C. Giordano. 2005. “Adolescents’ Involvement in Non-Romantic Sexual Activity.” Social Science Research 34:384–407. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2004.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClintock, Elizabeth Aura. 2010. “When Does Race Matter? Race, Sex, and Dating at an Elite University.” Journal of Marriage and Family 72:45–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00683.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLendon, David, Janet Chen-Lan Kuo, and R. Kelly Raley. 2014. “Opportunities to Meet: Occupational Education and Marriage Formation in Young Adulthood.” Demography 51:1319–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, Miller, Lynn Smith-Lovin, and James M Cook. 2001. “Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks.” Annual Review of Sociology 27:415–44. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mollenhorst, Gerald, Beate Volker, and Henk Flap. 2008. “Social Contexts and Personal Relationships: The Effect of Meeting Opportunities on Similarity for Relationships of Different Strength.” Social Networks 30:60–68. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2007.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muro, Jazmín A. and Lisa M. Martinez. 2016. “Constrained Desires: The Romantic Partner Preferences of College-Educated Latinas.” Latino Studies 14:171–91. doi: 10.1057/lst.2016.3.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, Jesse J., Galena K. Rhoades, Scott M. Stanley, and Frank D. Fincham. 2008. ““Hooking Up” among College Students: Demographic and Pyschosocial Correlates.” Archives of Sexual Behavior 39:653–63. doi: 10.1007/s10508-008-9414-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paik, Anthony. 2010. “Hookups, Dating, and Relationship Quality: Does the Type of Sexual Involvement Matter?” Social Science Research 39:739–53. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.03.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, Elizabeth L. and Allison Hayes. 2002. “The Casualties of “Casual” Sex: A Qualitative Exploration of the Phenomenology of College Students’ Hookups.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 19:639–61. doi: 10.1177/0265407502195006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, Ingmar, Thomas Klein, Sebastian Fronk, and Johannes Stauder. 2015. “Partner Market Opportunities and Relationship Stability.” Comparative Population Studies 40:229–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, Julie A., Gretchen R. Webber, and Sinikka Elliot. 2015. ““It’s like Being in Church and Being on a Field Trip”: The Date versus Party Situation in College Students’ Accounts of Hooking Up.” Symbolic Interaction 38:175–94. doi: 10.1002/symb.153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spell, Sarah A. 2017. “Not Just Black and White: How Race/Ethnicity and Gender Intersect in Hookup Culture.” Sociology of Race and Ethnicity 3:172–87. doi: 10.1177/2332649216658296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stauder, Johannes. 2014. “Friendship Networks and the Social Structure of Opportunities for Contact and Interaction.” Social Science Research 48:234–50. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.06.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strully, Kate. 2014. “Racially and Ethnically Diverse Schools and Adolescent Romantic Relationships.” American Journal of Sociology 120:750–79. doi: 10.1086/679190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uecker, Jeremy E. 2015. “Social Context and Sexual Intercourse among First-Year Students at Selective Colleges and Universities in the United States.” Social Science Research 52:59–71. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.01.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uecker, Jeremy E. and Mark D Regenerus. 2010. “Bare Market: Campus Sex Ratios, Romantic Relationships, and Sexual Behavior.” The Sociological Quarterly 51:408–35. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2010.01177.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasquez, Jessica M. 2015. “Disciplined Preferences: Explaining the (Re)Production of Latino Endogamy.” Social Problems 62:455–75. doi: 10.1093/socpro/spv011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, Tara D., Wendy D Manning, Peggy C Giordano, and Monica A Longmore. 2011. “Relationship Formation and Stability in Emerging Adulthood: Do Sex Ratios Matter?” Social Forces 90:269–95. doi: 10.1093/sf/90.1.269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willoughby, Brian J., Jason S Carroll, William J Marshall, and Caitlin Clark. 2009. “The Decline of in Loco Parentis and the Shift to Coed Housing on College Campuses.” Journal of Adolescent Research 24:21–36. doi: 10.1177/0743558408326914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yancey, George. 2009. “Crossracial Differences in the Racial Preferences of Potential Dating Partners: A Test of the Alienation of African Americans and Social Dominance Orientation.” The Sociological Quarterly 50:121–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2008.01135.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar