Books that Matter. The Case of Tocqueville’s Democracy in America

References

• Abbott, J. 2007. “Whither Tocqueville in American Sociology?” American Sociologist 38:60–77. doi:10.1007/s12108-007-9004-z.
   Google Scholar
• Allyn, C. 1972. Sociology: An Introduction. New York: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Almquist, E.M. 1978. Sociology: Women, Men and Society. St Paul, MN: West Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, W. 1945. “Tocqueville, Alexis de. Democracy in America.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 242:182–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aron, R. 1965. Main Currents in Sociological Thought: Vol. I: Montesquieu, Comte, Marx, Tocqueville, The Sociologists and the Revolution of 1848. New York: Basic Books
   Google Scholar
• Aron, R. 1967. Main Currents in Sociological Thought: Vol. II: Durkheim, Pareto, Weber. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Aron, R. 1968–1969. Main Currents of Sociological Thought. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ashley, D. and D.M. Orenstein. 2005. Sociological Theory. 6th ed. Boston: Pearson Books.
   Google Scholar
• Babchuk, N. and B. Keith. 1995. “Introducing the Discipline.” Teaching Sociology 23:215–25. doi:10.2307/1319213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baert, P. and F.C. Silva. 2010. Social Theory in the Twentieth Century and Beyond. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bain, R. 1962. “The Most Important Sociologists?” American Sociological Review 27:746–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baltzell, E.D. 1962. American Business Aristocracy. New York: Collier Books.
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee, P., A. Nigam, and R. Pandey. 2018. “Thinking across Traditions. The Work of Theory.” Economic & Political Weekly 51:42–50.
   Google Scholar
• Baudrillard, J. 1981. For a Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign. St. Louis: Telos Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bellah, R., A. Swidler, R. Madsen, S.M. Tipton, and W.M. Sullivan. 1985. Habits of the Heart. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bendix, R. 1964. Nation-Building and Citizenship. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bensman, J. and B. Rosenberg. 1963. Mass, Class and Bureaucracy: The Evolution of Contemporary Society. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Binkley, W.E. 1945. “Review: America through French Eyes.” The Scientific Monthly 61:494–95.
   Google Scholar
• Boudon, R. 2006. Tocqueville for Today. Oxford: The Bardwell Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broom, L. and P. Selznick. 1958. Sociology: A Test with Adapted Readings, 2nd ed. Evanston, Ill.: Row, Peterson & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Burawoy, M. 2005. “The Return of the Repressed.” Annals AAPSS 600:68–85. doi:10.1177/0002716205277028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceaser, J. 1997. Reconstructing America. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chinoy, E. 1961. Society: An Introduction to Sociology. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Colwell, J.L. 1967. “‘The Calamities Which They Apprehend’.” Western Humanities Review 21:93–100.
   Google Scholar
• Commager, H.S. 1950. The American Mind. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Condren, C. 1985. The Status and Appraisal of Classic Texts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R.W. 1997. “Why Is Classical Theory Classical?” American Journal of Sociology 102:1511–57. doi:10.1086/231125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, T.I. 1945. “Democracy in America. By Alexis de Tocqueville.” The American Historical Review 51:131–33. doi:10.2307/1843106.
   Google Scholar
• de Saussure, F. 1983. Course in General Linguistics. London: Duckworth.
   Google Scholar
• de Tocqueville, A. 1980. On Democracy, Revolution, and Society. Edited by J. Torpey and S. Mennell. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Tocqueville, A. 1990. De la Démocratie en Amérique. Edited by E. Nolla. Paris: Vrin.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. 1976. On Grammatology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drescher, S. 1968. Tocqueville and Beaumont on Social Reform. Translated and edited by S. Drescher. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Drescher, S. 2001. “Book Review of Democracy in America.” The Journal of American History 88:612–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edles, L.D. and S. Appelrouth. 2005. Theory in the Contemporary Era. Newbury Park: Pine Forge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edward, D.B. 1964. The Protestant Establishment: Aristocracy and Caste in America. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Elster, J. 2009. Alexis de Tocqueville. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Escarpit, R. 1966. The Book Revolution. New York: Unesco Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, J. 1945. “Review of Democracy in America, Phillips Bradley.” Federal Bar Journal 6:455–66.
   Google Scholar
• Gennette, G. 1997. Paratexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldhammer, A. 2003. “Remarks on the Mansfield-Winthrop Translation?” French Politics, Culture and Society 21:110–119.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, G.A. and J.A. Scimecca. 2005. Classical Sociological Theory. Belmont: Thomson.
   Google Scholar
• Gouldner, A.W., and H.P. Gouldner. 1963. Modern Sociology: An Introduction to the Study of Human Interaction. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
   Google Scholar
• Green, A.W. 1960. Sociology: An Analysis of Life in Modern Society. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, L. 1945. “Review: Tocqueville on Democracy.” The American Journal of Economics and Sociology 4:556–58. doi:10.1111/j.1536-7150.1945.tb01484.x.
   Google Scholar
• Guillory, J. 1994. Cultural Capital: The Problem of Literary Canon Formation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, R.F. 2003. “American Sociology Rewrites Its History.” Sociological Theory 21:281–97. doi:10.1111/1467-9558.00189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henslin, J. 1999. Essentials of Sociology: A Down-to-Earth Approach. New York: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Herrick, R.L. 1980. “Nineteen Pictures of a Discipline.” Contemporary Sociology 9:617–21. doi:10.2307/2065474.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, B.B., E.W. Markson, and P.J. Stein. 1991. Sociology. New York: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kammen, M. 1998. Alexis de Tocqueville and Democracy in America. Washington, DC: Library of Congress.
   Google Scholar
• Kasinitz, P. 2006. “Missing Tocqueville?” Sociological Forum 21:693–94. doi:10.1007/s11206-006-9043-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall, D. 2011. Sociology in Our Times. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Kiniery, P. 1945. “Democracy in America.” The Catholic Historical Review 31:345–47.
   Google Scholar
• Kirk, R. 1953. The Conservative Mind. Chicago: Henry Regnery Company.
   Google Scholar
• Lance Bennett, W. and P. Whitten. 1973. The Study of Society. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Laski, H.J. 1945. “Foreword.” Pp. i–iii in Democracy in America, edited by P. Bradley. Based on the H. Reeve translation as revised by F. Bowen. 2 vols. New York: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Lawler, P. A. 1993. The Restless Mind. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Lemert, C. 2013. Social Theory. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Light, D. and Suzanne Keller. 1979. Sociology. New York: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Lipset, S.M., M. Trow, and J. Coleman. 1956. Union Democracy. New York: Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, D. 2005. “Science, Text, and Space.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 30:391–401. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2005.00179.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorde, A. 1981. “The Master’s Tools Will Never Dismantle the Master’s House.” Pp. 98–101 in This Bridge Called My Back, edited by C. Moraga and G. Anzaldua. New York: Kitchen Table Women of Color Press,
   Google Scholar
• Lowry, R. and R. Rankin. 1969. The Science of Society. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Maccionis, J.J. [1987] 2014. Sociology. New Jersey: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Mancini, M. 2006. Alexis de Tocqueville and American Intellectuals. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Mancini, M. 2008. “Too Many Tocquevilles.” Journal of the History of Ideas 69:245–68. doi:10.1353/jhi.2008.0010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mancini, M. 2011. “From Oblivion to Apotheosis.” Journal of American Studies 45:21–37. doi:10.1017/S0021875809991447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield, H.C. 1995. “Self-Interest Rightly Understood.” Political Theory 23:48–66. doi:10.1177/0090591795023001004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield, H.C. and D. Winthrop. 2000. “Introduction,” in Democracy in America. Translated and edited H.C. Mansfield and D. Winthrop. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Margree, V. and G. Bhambra. 2011. “Tocqueville, Beaumont and the Silences in Histories of the United States.” Journal of Historical Sociology 24:116–31. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6443.2011.01392.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, L. and S. Drescher. 1968. “American Historians and Tocqueville’s Democracy.” The Journal of American History 55:512–32. doi:10.2307/1891011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, L.L. (1967). “Review of Democracy in America, by Alexis de Tocqueville.” The Journal of American History 54: 378–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martindale, D. 1960. The Nature and Types of Sociological Theory. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Masugi, K., ed. 1991. Interpreting Tocqueville’s Democracy in America. Savage, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, J.P. 1939. Alexis de Tocqueville: Prophet of the Mass Age. London: J. M. Dent and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, J.P. 1959a. “Tocqueville Today.” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 13:313–19.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, J.P. 1959b. “Alexis de Tocqueville.” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 13:350–53.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, J.-P., and G. Rudler. 1951. “Oeuvres Complètes,” in Correspondance Anglaise, Vol. 6, Correspondance D’Alexis de Tocqueville avec Henry Reeve et John Stuart Mill. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• McCleery, A. 2002. “The Return of the Publisher to Book History.” Book History 5:161–85. doi:10.1353/bh.2002.0012.
   Google Scholar
• McKee, J.B. 1969. Introduction to Sociology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie, D.F. 1999. Bibliography and the Sociology of Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mead, G.H. 2002. The Philosophy of the Present. Amherst: Prometheus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mead, G.H. 2011. G.H. Mead. A Reader. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Meyers, M. 1957. The Jacksonian Persuasion. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M.J. 2017. “Textbooks and the Dilemmas of Teaching Political Theory.” Political Science & Politics. 50 (2):531–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, L. 1944. The Condition of Man. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Nisbet, R. 1966. The Sociological Tradition. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Nisbet, R. 1976–1977. “Many Tocquevilles.” The American Scholar 46:59–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, R.A. [1976] 2002. Sociology as an Art Form. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, C. 2010. “The Sacred Book.” Pp. 11–23. in The Oxford Companion to the Book, edited by M.F. Suarez and H.R. Woudhuysen, Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oromaner, M.J. 1968. “The Most Cited Sociologists.” The American Sociologist 3:124–26.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T., E. Shils, K. Naegele, and J. Pitts, eds. 1961. Theories of Society. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C.S. 1955. The Philosophical Writings of Peirce. New York: Dover.
   Google Scholar
• Perrucci, R. 1980. “Sociology and the Introductory Textbook.” The American Sociologist 15:39–49.
   Google Scholar
• Persell, C. 1990. Understanding Society: An Introduction to Sociology. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, G. W. 1938. Tocqueville and Beaumont in America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollock, S., B. A. Elman, and K. Chang. 2015. World Philology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pope, W. 1986. Tocqueville: His Social and Political Theory. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Popenoe, D. 1971. Sociology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. 1993. Making Democracy Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Resh, R.W. 1963. “Alexis de Tocqueville and the Negro.” The Journal of Negro History 48:251–59. doi:10.2307/2716328.
   Google Scholar
• Ritzer, G., K.C.W. Kammeyer, and N.R. Yetman. 1979. Sociology: Experiencing a Changing Society. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, I. 1977. Sociology. New York: Worth Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Rupke, N. 1999. “A Geography of Enlightenment.” Pp. 319–39 in Geography and Enlightenment., edited by D.N. Livingstone and C.W.J. Withers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salomon, A. 1935. “Tocqueville, Moralist and Sociologist.” Social Research 2:405–27.
   Google Scholar
• Salomon, A. 1959. “Tocqueville, 1959.” Social Research 36:449–70.
   Google Scholar
• Schaefer, R. T. 2001. Sociology: A Brief Introduction. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. 1990. A Matter of Record. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Secord, J. 2001. Victorian Sensation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seidman, S. 2012. Contested Knowledge. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Shepard, J. 1974. Basic Sociology: Structure, Interaction, and Change. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, F.C. and M.B. Vieira. 2019. The Politics of the Book. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skocpol, T. 1996. “Unraveling from above.” The American Prospect 25:20–25.
   Google Scholar
• Smelser, N.J. 1967. Sociology: An Introduction. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L.T. 1999. Decolonizing Methodologies. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, M. 1979. Foundations Of Modern Society. New York: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Swedberg, R. 2009. Tocqueville’s Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sydnor, C.S. 1945. “Democracy in America.” Political Science Quarterly 60:457–59. doi:10.2307/2144260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torpey, J. 2006. “Alexis de Tocqueville.” Sociological Forum 21:695–707. doi:10.1007/s11206-006-9042-2.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. 1998. The Structure of Sociological Theory. 6th ed. Belmont: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, J.W. 1966. “The Democratic Animal.” rev. of Democracy in America, by Alexis De Tocqueville, Book Week 1:10.
   Google Scholar
• Welch, C. 2001. De Tocqueville. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. 1960. American Society: A Sociological Interpretation. New York: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Winthrop, D. 1986. “Tocqueville’s American Women and ‘The True Conception of Democratic Progress’.” Political Theory 14:239–61. doi:10.1177/0090591786014002004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, B.F. 1946. “Of Democracy in America.” The American Political Science Review 40:52–61. doi:10.2307/1949945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar