References
- Lanier, Vincent, “Conclusions and Recommendations,” Final Report of the Uses of Newer Media in Art Education Project, Washington, D.C.: National Art Education Association, 1966, p. 81.
- McFee, June K., Preparation for Art, San Francisco: Wadsworth Publishing Company, Incorporated, 1961, p. 7.
- Keel, John S., “Art Education, 1940–1964, Art Education: Sixty-fourth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1965, p. 44.
- Eisner, Elliott W., “American Education and the Future of Art Education,” Art Education: The Sixty-fourth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II., op, cit., p. 309.
- Karel, Leon C, and Schwartz, Ira P. “A Curriculum in the Related Arts,” Art Education: Journal of the NAEA, 21 January, 1968, p. 24; Eisner, E. W., “Curriculum Making for the Wee Folk: Stanford University's Kettering Project,” Studies in Art Education, 9, Spring, 1968, p. 47; and Anderson, W. H., Art Learning Situations for Elementary Education, Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing Company, Incorporated, 1965, p. 4.
- Benz, John et al., “The Essentials of a Quality School Art Program: A Position Statement by the NAEA,” Art Education: Journal of the NAEA, 21, January, 1968, p. 29.
- Wilson, Brent, “A Proposal for Systematic Curriculum Evaluation in Art Education,” Studies in Art Education, 9, Spring, 1968, p. 60.
- Scriven, Michael, “The Methodology of Evaluation,” Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation, Chicago: Rand McNally and Company, 1967, as cited in Brent Wilson, op. cit., p. 59.
- Woodruff, Asahel D., and Clark, Cecil, “Preconference Education Research Training Program in Art Education,” New York: National Art Education Association Conference, March, 1969, passim. (Reproduced by means similar to mimeograph; publication pending.)
- Woodruff, Asahel D., and Clark, Cecil, “Closing Remarks to Participants of the Preconference Research Training Institute,” New York: National Art Education Association Conference, March 25, 1969.
- Allen, William H., “Audio-Visual Communication,” Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Third Edition, New York: The Macmillan Company, 1960, p. 125.
- Leith, G. O. M., “Teaching by Machinery: A Review of Research,” Educational Research, 5, June, 1963, pp. 1–22.
- Eigen, Lewis D., “High School Student Reactions to Programmed Instruction,” Phi Delta Kappan, 44, March, 1963, pp. 282–5.
- Noble, Grant, “A Study of Children's Perceptions of Intrinsic Teaching Machines and Programmed Instruction,” Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 5, April, 1968, p. 142.
- Fellows, B. J., and Apter, M. J., “An Experimental Study of Three Variables in the Presentation of Audio-Visual Teaching Programs,” Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 4, February, 1967, passim.
- Allen, loc, cit.
- Smith, Daniel M., and Bolyard, A. Joyce, “Interaction of Words and Non-Wordal Stimuli in Programmed Sequences of Concept-Formation Tasks,” A V Communication Review, 14, Winter, 1966, p. 514.
- Mickish, Verle L., “The Relationship of Art Viewing Skills and Artistic Visual Perception,” Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe, 1970, passim.
- Kensler, Gordon L., “The Effects of Perceptual Training and Modes of Perceiving upon Individual Differences in Ability to Learn Perspective Drawing,” Studies in Art Education, 7, Autumn, 1965, p. 41.
- Salome, Richard A., “The Effects of Perceptual Training Upon the Two-Dimensional Drawings of Children,” Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, 1964, p. 101.
- Wilson, Brent G., “An Experimental Study Designed to Alter Fifth and Sixth Grade Students' Perception of Paintings,” Studies in Art Education, 8, Autumn, 1966, p. 41.
- Allen, loc. cit.