Metacritical Inquiry in Arts Education

References

• Barkan, M. Curriculum problems in art education. In a seminar in art education for research and curriculum development (Cooperative Research Project No. V-002). University Park, Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Barkan, M., Chapman, L. H., & Kern, E. J. Guidelines: Curriculum development for aesthetic education. St. Anne, Missouri: Central Midwestern Regional Educational Laboratory, Inc., 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Beardsley, M. Aesthetics: Problems in the philosophy of criticism. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World, 1958.
   Google Scholar
• Broudy, H. S. The preparation of teachers for aesthetic education. Art Education, 1967, 20(3), 29–32.
   Google Scholar
• Ecker, D. Justifying aesthetic judgments. Art Education, 1967, 20(5), 5–8.
   Google Scholar
• Ecker, D. Analyzing children's talk about art. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 1973, (1), 58–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ennis, R. H. Logic in teaching. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. W. Curriculum ideas in time of crisis. The Ohio Art Education Newsletter, 1965, 3, 5–12.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. W. Teaching art to the young; A curriculum development project in art education. Stanford, California, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, E. B. Art as image and idea. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc., 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, E. B. Becoming human through art. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, E. B. The teacher as model critic. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 1973, 7(1), 50–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garner, R. T. & Rosen, B., Moral philosophy, New York: The Macmillan Company, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, C. K. Pragmatic implication. Philosophy, 1958, 33, (127), 303–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ice, J. L. Criticism in art education: Its role and relevance. Art Education, 1969, 22(9), 12–16.
   Google Scholar
• Johanson, P. An art appreciation model for visual aesthetic education. Studies in Art Education, 1979, 20(3), 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Kaelin, E. F. Method and methodology in literary criticism. School Review, 1964, 72(3), 289–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaelin, E. F. An existential-phenomenological account of aesthetic education. Penn State papers in art education, 1968, (Whole No. 4).
   Google Scholar
• Komisar, P. B. & McClellan, J. E. The logic of educational slogans. In B. O. Smith & Robert H. Ennis (Eds.), Language and Concepts in Education. Chicago: Rand-McNally, 1961.
   Google Scholar
• MacGregor, N. P. The use of selected concepts of art criticism in the preparation of pre-service art teachers (doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, 1971) Dissertation Abstracts International, 1971, 32 1961A. (University Microfilms No. 71-27, 514.)
   Google Scholar
• Mittler, G. Efforts to secure congruent and incongruent modifications of attitudes toward works of art. Studies in Art Education, 1972, 13(2), 58–70.
   Google Scholar
• Scheffler, I. The language of education. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas, 1958.
   Google Scholar
• Scheffler, I. Conditions of knowledge, Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman, and Co., 1965.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. The assent to aesthetic education. Art Education, 1967, 20(2), 8–12.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. Aesthetic criticism: The method of aesthetic education. Studies in Art Education, 1968, 7(3), 12–31.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. Teaching aesthetic criticism in the schools, Journal of Aesthetic Education, 1973, 7(1), 38–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stumbo, H. Changes in meaning that follow phenomenological analysis. Studies in Art Education, 1970, 12(1), 50–60.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. Relationships among art teachers, art critics, and historians, and non-art trained individuals statements about Guernica. Studies in Art Education, 1970, 12(1), 31–39.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. The relationship between years of art training and the use of aesthetic judgmental criteria among high school students. Studies in Art Education, 1972, 13(2), 34–43.
   Google Scholar