Participant Observation, Ethnography, and Their Use in Educational Evaluation: A Review of Selected Works

References

• Adler, J. E. Artists in offices: An ethnography of an academic art scene. (Doctoral dissertation, Brandeis University, 1977). Dissertation Abstracts International, 1977, 37, 7994. (University Microfilms No. DB77–13362)
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, R. R. ‘Mr. Jewel as a model’—An educational criticism of a high school art history class. Studies in Art Education, 1980, 21(3), 20–30. (a)
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, R. R. The cultural climate of the arts in schools: Beyond the color wheel and the bust of Beethoven using ethnographic techniques. Austin: The University of Texas at Austin, 1980. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 184 957). (b)
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, R. R. The evaluation of naturalistic, contextualist, constructivist, qualitative inquiry in art education. Review of Research in Visual Arts Education, 1981, 13, 34–43.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, R. R. Fantasy through puppetry. Canadian Review of Art Education Research, 1982, 9, 12–20.
   Google Scholar
• Bersson, R. D. The use of participant observation in the evaluation of art programs. Studies in Art Education, 1978, 19(2), 61–67.
   Google Scholar
• Blatcher, E. Emotion in the classroom. New York: Praeger, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, S. K. Batik making as creative problem solving: Description and theory development using ethnographic and process tracing methods. (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Cincinnati, 1980). Dissertation Abstracts International, 1981, 41, 2889–A. (University Microfilms No. 80–29653)
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, P. P. An arts in education program for the Birmingham Public School System: A case study of the Lakeview Elementary School. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Alabama, 1977). Dissertation Abstracts International, 1978, 39, 2004. (University Microfilms No. DDK78–19167)
   Google Scholar
• Dean, J. P., & Whyte, W. F. How do you know if the informant is telling the truth? Human Organization, 1958, 17(2), 34–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degge, R. M. A case study and theoretical analysis of the teaching practices in one junior high art class. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, 1975). Dissertation Abstracts International, 1976, 36, 5750. (University Microfilms No. DAH 76–05157)
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, J. D. Investigative social research. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Edmonston, P. A methodology for inquiry into one own's studio processes. (Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, 1961). Dissertation Abstracts International, 1961, 22, 2353. (University Microfilms No. 61–05080)
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. W. The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs. New York: Macmillan, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Gans, H. J. The participant-observer as a human being: Observations on the personal aspect of field work. In H. S. Becker (Ed.), Institutions and the person. Chicago: Aldine, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Gold, R. L. Roles in sociological field observations. Social Forces, 1958, 36, 217–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold, B. A., & Miles, M. B. Whose school is it, anyway? New York: Praeger, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G. Toward a methodology of naturalistic inquiry in educational evaluation. Los Angeles: UCLA Center for Study of Evaluation, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. Effective evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Hawke, D. The life-world of a beginning teacher of art. Unpublished dissertation, The University of Alberta, Edmonton, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, N. R. Aesthetic socialization during school tours in an art museum. Studies in Art Education, 1981, 23(1), 55–64.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, J. E. A descriptive study of elderly art students and implications for art education. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, 1976). Dissertation Abstracts International, 1976, 36, 1352. (University Microfilms No. DAH 76–19386)
   Google Scholar
• Knapp, M. S. Ethnographic contributions to evaluation research. In T. D. Cook & C. S. Reichardt (Eds.), Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Laing, R. H. An application of a world hypotheses inquiry method to describe the quality of the verbal art critique. (Doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, 1976). Dissertation Abstracts International, 1977, 37, 6904. (University Microfilms No. DBJ 77–09564)
   Google Scholar
• McCall, G. J., & Simmons, J. L. (Eds.). Issues in participant observation. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Magoon, A. J. Constructivist approaches in educational research. Review of Educational Research, 1977, 47(4), 651–693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, S. M. The participant observer and “over-rapport” American Sociological Review, 1952, 17, 97–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oru, S. O. The use of an observational system for instructional analysis (O.S.I.A.) and some ethnographic methods for the description of an “artists-in-schools” program model. (Doctoral Dissertation, Ohio State University, 1978). Dissertation Abstracts International, 1979, 39, 4664. (University Microfilms No. DEL 79–02200)
   Google Scholar
• Praiser, D. Linear lessons in a centrifugal environment: An ethnographic sketch of an art teaching experience. Review of Research in Visual Arts Education, 1981, 9, 81–90.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. Qualitative evaluation methods. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Pelto, P. J., & Pelto, G. H. Anthropological research: The structure of inquiry (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Perlink, A. A. A descriptive study of preactive and interactive teaching strategies employed by two selected art education teachers (Doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, 1978). Dissertation Abstracts International, 1979, 39, 618. (University Microfilms NO. DDK 78–12071)
   Google Scholar
• Pohland, P. A. Participant observation as a research methodology. Studies in Art Education, 1972, 13,(3), 4–15.
   Google Scholar
• Popkewitz, T. S., & Tabanchnick, R. B. The study of schooling: Field based methodologies in educational research and evaluation. New York: Praeger, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Rist, R. C. On the relations among educational research paradigms: From disdain to detente. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 1977, 8, 42–49.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, B. R. M. The utilization of naturalistic evaluation for art program evaluation: A case study. (Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, 1981). Dissertation Abstracts International, 1982, 42, 3394A. (University Microfilms No. 8200863)
   Google Scholar
• Sevigny, M. J., Jr. A descriptive study of instructional interaction and performance appraisal in a university studio art setting: A multiple perspective. (Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, 1977). Dissertation Abstracts International, 1978, 38, 6477. (University Microfilms No. DDK 78–06199)
   Google Scholar
• Silver, A., & Newsome, B. The art museum as educator. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. M. An evolving logic of participant observation, educational ethnography, and other case studies. In L. Shulman (Ed.), Review of Research in Education (Vol. 6). Itasca, Illinois: Peacock, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. M., & Geoffrey, W. The complexities of an urban classroom. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. M., & Schumacher, S. Extended pilot trials of an aesthetic education program: A qualitative description, analysis and evaluation. St. Louis: CEMREL, Inc., 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Spindler, G. (Ed.) Doing ethnography of schools: Educational anthropology in action. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Spradley, J. P. The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Spradley, J. P. Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. The countenance of educational evaluation. Teachers College Record, 1967, 40, 181–212.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. Evaluating the arts in education. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L. The art school and its students: A study and an interpretation. In A. Barnett & M. Griff (Eds.), The sociology of art and literature: A reader. New York: Praeger, 1955.
   Google Scholar
• Ulbricht, J. Functions of art and aesthetic activity in a small Midwestern town. Texas Trends in Art Education, 1978, 2(3), 24–26.
   Google Scholar
• Vena, H. D. A study of art programs in alternative high schools through participant observation. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, 1975). Dissertation Abstracts International, 1977, 37, 7481–82. (University Microfilms No. 77–13, 145)
   Google Scholar
• Willis, G. (Ed.). Qualitative evaluation: Concepts and cases in curriculum criticism. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing Co., 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. The superherocs of J. C. Holtz; plus an outline of a theory of child art. Art Education, 1974, 27(8), 2–9.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. The use of ethnographic techniques in educational research. Review of Educational Research, 1977, 47(1), 245–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar