Sex Differences and Gender-Role Differences in Children's Drawings

References

• Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997–1013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anastasi, A., & Foley, J. P. (1936). An analysis of spontaneous drawings by children in different cultures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 20, 689–726.
   Google Scholar
• Bem, S. L. (1977). On the utility of alternative procedures for assessing psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 196–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boldizar, J. P. (1991). Assessing sex typing and androgyny in children: The children's sex role inventory. Developmental Psychology, 27, 505–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinburg, S. G. (1979a). Conceptual content and spatial characteristics in boys' and girls' drawings of fighting and helping. Studies in Art Education, 18, 63–72.
   Google Scholar
• Feinburg, S. G. (1979b). The significance of what boys and girls choose to draw: Explorations of fighting and helping. In J. Loeb (Ed.). Feminist collage: Educating women in the visual arts (pp. 185–195). New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flannery, K. A., & Watson, M. W. (1991). Perceived competence in drawing during the middle childhood years. Visual Arts Research, 17, 66–71.
   Google Scholar
• Flannery, K. A., & Watson, M. W. (in press). Are individual differences in fantasy play as they are related to peer acceptance levels? Journal of Genetic Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, K. (1989). Dilemmas of equity in art education: Ideologies of individualism and cultural capital. In W. Secada (Ed.), Equity in Education (pp. 103–177). New York: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garber, E. (1992). Feminism, aesthetics, and art education. Studies in Art Education, 33, 210–225.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (1980). Artful scribbles: The significance of children's drawings. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J. A., & Halberstadt, A. G. (1980). Masculinity and femininity in children: Development of the Children's Personal Attributes Questionnaire. Developmental Psychology, 16, 270–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, D. B. (1963). Children's drawings as a measure of intellectual maturity. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World.
   Google Scholar
• Maccoby, E. & Jacklin, C. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Majewski, M. M. (1979). Female art characteristics: Do they really exist? In J. Loeb (Ed.), Feminist collage: Educating women in the visual arts (pp. 197–201). New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNiff, K. (1982). Sex differences in children's art. Journal of Education, 164, 271–289.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, J. B., & Boyette, N. (1983). What does children's art work tell us about gender? Qualitative Sociology, 6, 322–333.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, A. (1984). Sex differences and research relevant to art education. In G. Collins & R. Sandell (Eds.), Women, art, and education (pp. 143–161). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Signorella, M. L., & Jamison, W. (1986). Masculinity, femininity, androgyny, and cognitive performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 207–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvern, L. E., & Katz, P. A. (1986). Gender roles and adjustment in elementary school children: A multidimensional approach. Sex Roles, 14, 181–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Stapp, J. (1975). Ratings of self and peers on sex role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 29–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willsdon, J. A. (1977). A discussion of some sex differences in a study of human figure drawings by children aged four-and-a-half to seven-and-a-half years. In G. Butterworth (Ed.). The child's representation of the world (pp. 61–70). New York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar